Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel

Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel
A visualization of the future tunnel
Overview
Location Seattle, Washington, U.S.
Coordinates 47°36′37″N 122°20′41″W / 47.61028°N 122.34472°WCoordinates: 47°36′37″N 122°20′41″W / 47.61028°N 122.34472°W
Status Under construction
Route SR 99
Start 47°35′48″N 122°20′09″W / 47.596534°N 122.335699°W
End 47°37′14″N 122°20′41″W / 47.620520°N 122.344674°W
Operation
Work begun July 30, 2013[1]
Operator Washington State Department of Transportation
Traffic Automotive
Technical
Length 2 miles (3.2 km)[2]
Number of lanes 4
Route map

The Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel is a bored road tunnel that is under construction in the city of Seattle in the U.S. state of Washington. The project has been stalled since December 2013. No firm date for if/when the project will continue has been set.[3] The 2-mile (3.2 km) tunnel would carry State Route 99 under Downtown Seattle from the SoDo neighborhood to South Lake Union in the north.

Since 2001, the proposed replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct has been the source of much political consternation demonstrating the Seattle process. Options for the structure, which carries 110,000 vehicles per day, included either replacing it with a cut-and-cover tunnel, replacing it with another elevated highway, or eliminating it while improving other surface streets and public transportation. The current plan emerged in 2009 when government officials agreed to a deep-bore tunnel.

Planning history

Alaskan Way Viaduct issues

The Alaskan Way Viaduct
Main article: Alaskan Way Viaduct

The Alaskan Way Viaduct, completed on April 4, 1953, is a double-decked elevated section of State Route 99 (SR 99) that runs along the Elliott Bay waterfront in the Industrial District and Downtown of Seattle. It is the smaller of the two major north–south traffic corridors through Seattle (the other being Interstate 5), carrying up to 110,000 vehicles per day.[4] The viaduct runs above the surface street, Alaskan Way, from S. Nevada Street in the south to the entrance of Belltown's Battery Street Tunnel in the north, following previously existing railroad lines.

The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake destroyed the similarly designed Cypress Street Viaduct in Oakland, California with the loss of 42 lives.[5] The 2001 Nisqually earthquake damaged the viaduct and its supporting Alaskan Way Seawall and required the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to invest US$14.5 million in emergency repairs. Experts gave a 1-in-20 chance that the viaduct could be shut down by an earthquake within the following decade.[6] After the Nisqually earthquake, the viaduct has been closed semi-annually for WSDOT to conduct inspections of the structure. Those inspections have discovered continuing settlement damage. In 2005, a group of researchers and faculty from the University of Washington urged political officials to close the viaduct within a two-year timeframe.[7]

The Alaskan Way Viaduct seen from Elliott Bay
The view beneath the viaduct; opponents of a new viaduct argued that the enlarged replacement would put more of the waterfront in shadow.[8]

Options and politics

Several replacement proposals were developed. Many Seattle leaders, including then-Mayor Greg Nickels and state and city transportation officials, favored building a tunnel. Plans for a six-lane, "cut-and-cover" double-decker tunnel were developed.[9] The tunnel was envisioned to solve not only the viaduct's traffic limitations and safety problems, but also to allow better uses for the waterfront real estate, including parks, housing, and retail developments. While future development of the Alaskan Way real estate corridor may provide tax revenue for the city, many state lawmakers objected to the cost of the proposed six-lane tunnel. One criticism compared the plan to Boston's Big Dig project, which was said to illustrate the schedule and budget challenges of a large cut-and-cover tunnel. Proponents responded that the Seattle proposal was significantly smaller in scale than the Big Dig.[10]

Another proposal aimed to replace the current viaduct with another elevated structure with updated seismic standards. This new viaduct would be larger, 12-foot (3.7 m) wide lanes with new shoulders on both sides, compared to the structure it would replace, which had no shoulders and lanes as narrow as 10 feet (3.0 m) in places. The on and off ramps at the northern and southern portion of the viaduct would remain the same with an additional full intersection at South Atlantic Street and South Royal Brougham Way. The First Street off ramp would be removed. The plan included a complete replacement of the sea wall. It was estimated to cost $2.8 billion and take 10–12 years to construct.[11] Many prominent leaders and organizations opposed the elevated structure and believed this was a unique opportunity to remove the viaduct and connect downtown Seattle to the waterfront. Former Governors Dan Evans and Gary Locke, former U.S. Senator Slade Gorton, and the American Institute of Architects[12] recommended against rebuilding the viaduct.

WSDOT evaluated five proposals in 2003–2004 and decided that the six-lane cut-and-cover tunnel was the preferred alternative. Rebuilding the viaduct was retained as a backup plan.[13]

However, due to the costs and scope of the project, other options were still being discussed in the local media. A proposal to remove the viaduct and replace it with surface street and transit improvements was backed by former King County Executive Ron Sims,[14] the People's Waterfront Coalition,[15] and the Congress for the New Urbanism.[15] Proponents of this plan offered examples of successes in removing highways in other cities. They envisioned the waterfront becoming a pedestrian-friendly neighborhood with a mix of commercial, retail, and public park spaces. Traffic needs would be addressed through improvements to existing streets, I-5, and public transit; they argued that these improvements would be desirable in any event. Proponents further argued that this plan had the potential to improve the tourist economy, create jobs, and encourage a denser and more residential downtown through the offering of a generous waterfront park.[16] The total cost of removal of the viaduct, repairing the seawall, and improvements to I-5 and existing streets was unofficially estimated to be $1.6 billion. In 2006, Seattle City Council member Peter Steinbrueck noted, "While the mayor's first choice is the tunnel, he supports the City Council's resolution that designates a surface and transit alternative as a backup."[17]

In response to concerns about the cost of the originally proposed tunnel construction, the city council created a scaled-down, four-lane hybrid tunnel option. This would have combined the smaller tunnel with surface transit improvements to address traffic needs. The tunnel's 14-foot (4.3 m) shoulders would be used as an extra travel lane each way during periods of high demand. Transit service would be increased during peak commuter periods. Cars entering and exiting from Elliott and Western Avenues would each have a dedicated lane. Third Avenue would become a permanent transit corridor. The cost estimate for the four-lane tunnel was $3.4 billion. On February 13, 2007, Governor Christine Gregoire rejected the tunnel hybrid option, saying that a WSDOT review showed the tunnel proposal "does not meet state and federal safety standards." Of particular concern was that the use of shoulders as traffic lanes during peak traffic times would leave no additional lanes for emergency access.[18] However, several of the viaduct "stakeholders committee" brought on board to advise the city indicated that the tunnel option should remain on the table.[19]

State and city officials deadlocked in late 2006 over whether to build an elevated structure (the state's preference) or a hybrid tunnel (the city's preference). Governor Gregoire stated "no action" was not an option for the viaduct.[20] The state government called for an advisory ballot on March 13, 2007, for Seattle residents, which was supported by the city council. The advisory ballot allowed Seattleites to vote on whether they supported a surface-tunnel hybrid and whether they supported an elevated structure.[21] Voters rejected both options, with the surface-tunnel hybrid getting only 30% support and the elevated structure only 43%.[22]

Bored tunnel selection

Milepost 31, the SR 99–Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel information center in Pioneer Square
Front of a model of the tunnel boring machine at Milepost 31, the tunnel project information center
Two columns from the demolished portion of Alaskan Way Viaduct

In January 2008, as debate on its replacement continued, Governor Gregoire announced that the State of Washington would take down the viaduct in 2012.[23] On January 12, 2009, the state of Washington, King County, the city of Seattle, and the Port of Seattle revealed that they had agreed to replace the viaduct with a bored underground tunnel.[24] On March 4, 2009, the state senate passed a bill endorsing the tunnel option.[25] On May 12, 2009, Governor Gregoire signed Senate Bill 5768, authorizing $2.8 billion in state funds for a possible deep-bore tunnel. Controversy surrounds the tunnel project however, as it was never approved in any general election or referendum, is the subject of multiple lawsuits, was selected before legally required environmental impact studies on both the state and federal level were completed, and is designed in legislation to make Seattle-area taxpayers pay for any cost overruns,[26] which is not the norm for state-level projects, which generally have their costs distributed evenly among all state residents.

Disparate factions, ranging from some environmentalists to some industrialists, criticized the tunnel decision.[24][27] A business owner argued that the restrictions on hazardous cargo through the tunnel would restrict movement of freight through downtown,[27] though hazardous cargo is already prohibited from the Battery Street Tunnel and the viaduct at peak hours.[28] Similarly, another argued that surface traffic would increase, which would cause further problems to downtown freight transport.[24] A chairman of a local Sierra Club chapter argued that the large investment in automobile transport did not take into account global warming concerns.[24]

Design, construction, and funding

Freighter Fairpartner carrying the disassembled tunnel boring machine into the Port of Seattle

The approved design is a four-lane, 2-mile (3.2 km) long bored underground tunnel.[24] The tunnel will have a south portal in SoDo, near CenturyLink Field, and a north portal in South Lake Union, east of Seattle Center.[27] The route goes beneath Pioneer Square, the central business district of Downtown, and Belltown.

The project is estimated to cost US$4.25 billion, with $2.8 billion coming from the state and federal governments to cover the tunnel boring and a new interchange in SoDo.[27] The replacement project also includes the following projects and funding sources:

WSDOT began part of the larger project in 2008, while the replacement debate was still on-going, by repairing some of the viaduct columns.[3]

The $80 million tunnel boring machine (TBM) Bertha was created for this project by Hitachi Zosen Corporation near Osaka, Japan. The 326 ft (99 m), 6,700-short-ton (6,100 t) TBM was disassembled into 40 pieces and shipped to Seattle where it was reassembled in the launch pit near the south end of the future tunnel.[32] From there, the record-breaking 57.5-foot (17.5 m) diameter borer moves in 6.5 ft (2.0 m) increments toward the north end.[33][34]

WSDOT nicknamed the TBM "Bertha" after Seattle's first female mayor, Bertha Knight Landes. This name was chosen from names submitted by kindergarten through 12th grade students for a naming competition.[35]

The initial phase of demolition and removal of the viaduct began on October 21, 2011. Only a southern portion of the viaduct was removed at that time; the viaduct along the central waterfront will remain open for traffic until the tunnel is complete.[36][37]

Boring began on July 30, 2013, and at the time was expected to be completed in 14 months.[1] After three weeks of drilling, the project was estimated to be two weeks behind schedule; problems with fiberglass near the front of the drill and a labor dispute with a local longshoreman's union were blamed.[38] Boring was again delayed in December when Bertha struck a steel pipe, installed as a well casing for an exploratory well drilled as part of the planning phases of the project.[39] This delay has lasted for more than a year as the workers have had to dig a 120-foot (37 m) vertical shaft down to Bertha's cutting head to repair it. Settling was discovered in Pioneer Square that may be related to this additional excavation.[40]

If construction is completed, the 1950s Battery Street Tunnel will be filled in and sealed because it does not meet modern safety standards, is expensive to maintain, and will be made redundant by the Alaskan Way tunnel.[41] Dirt produced by tunnel construction will be sent to fill a CalPortland quarry in nearby Port Ludlow, Washington.[42] Rebuilding of the waterfront area is expected to last until 2019.[3]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Esser, Doug (July 31, 2013). "Bertha takes first bite of new Seattle tunnel". KOMO.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 "Tunneling toward a new SR 99; The SR 99 tunnel route (map)". Washington State Department of Transportation. Retrieved December 8, 2012.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Alaskan Way Viaduct - Schedule". WSDOT. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  4. ↑ "Is most of the traffic using the viaduct today going to downtown or through downtown?". WSDOT. Retrieved December 8, 2012.
  5. ↑ "Cypress Viaduct Freeway".
  6. ↑ Anderson, Ross (April 7, 2002). "Dutiful Servant, Brutal Barrier: The Viaduct at a Crossroads". Pacific Northwest. The Seattle Times.
  7. ↑ Miles, Scott; Montgomery, David R.; Beyers, Bill (March 2, 2006). "Shut down the viaduct". The Seattle Times.
  8. ↑ Barnett, Erica C. (February 22, 2007). "No and Hell No". The Stranger.
  9. ↑ "Alaskan Way Viaduct In-depth". Seattle Channel. Retrieved December 8, 2012. (See the "Background" tab in particular.)
  10. ↑ Howland, Jr, Greg (April 19, 2006). "Seattle's Little Dig". Seattle Weekly.
  11. ↑ "WSDOT Viaduct Alternatives Information". WSDOT. Archived from the original on October 26, 2006.
  12. ↑ Bennett, Sam. "Tunnel to replace Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle." Daily Journal of Commerce (Portland, OR) 14 Jan. 2009: Newspaper Source Plus. Web. 19 Dec. 2012.
  13. ↑ "Appendix B: Alternatives Description and Construction Methods". Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project: Final Environmental Impact Statement (PDF). WSDOT. July 2011.
  14. ↑ "Gregoire nixes surface option for viaduct". KOMONews.com. AP. February 19, 2007.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 "Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct". Congress for the New Urbanism. Retrieved December 8, 2012.
  16. ↑ Holden, Dominic (March 16, 2011). "Stop the Insanity". The Stranger. Retrieved August 1, 2013.
  17. ↑ Steinbrueck, Peter (October 10, 2006). "Climate's Right For Fresh Viaduct Plan". The Seattle Times.
  18. ↑ Garber, Andrew; Gilmore, Susan; Lindblom, Mike (February 14, 2007). "State says no tunnel; mayor still wants vote". The Seattle Times.
  19. ↑ Garber, Andrew; Lindblom, Mike; Heffter, Emily (January 12, 2009). "City, county, state agree on tunnel to replace viaduct". The Seattle Times.
  20. ↑ McGann, Chris; Santos, Melissa; Lange, Larry (January 17, 2007). "Tunnel option off table for viaduct replacement". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
  21. ↑ Young, Bob (March 7, 2007). "Viaduct vote set; state may ignore it". The Seattle Times.
  22. ↑ "King County Election Results (Mar. 13 special election)". King County. March 27, 2007.
  23. ↑ McGann, Chris (January 3, 2008). "Gregoire: 'Watch me' tear down the viaduct". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Garber, Andrew (January 13, 2009). "Tunnel in place of viaduct: A deal, but how to pay?". The Seattle Times.
  25. ↑ Garber, Andrew (March 4, 2009). "Senate passes bill to replace viaduct with tunnel". The Seattle Times.
  26. ↑ "House Floor Debate Wednesday April 22nd 2009, 6:30PM". TVW - Washington State Public Affairs Network. (Video.)
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6 Lindblom, Mike; Sara Jean Green (January 13, 2009). "Gregoire announces tunnel plans; car-tab taxes might help pay for it". The Seattle Times.
  28. ↑ http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/Contents/Item/Display/156
  29. ↑ "Alaskan Way Viaduct - Budget". WSDOT. Retrieved December 11, 2012.
  30. ↑ "Will tolling cause diversion?". WSDOT. Retrieved December 26, 2013.
  31. ↑ "Advisory Committee on Tolling and Traffic Management (2011 - present)". WSDOT. Retrieved December 26, 2013.
  32. ↑ Robinson, Patrick (September 7, 2012). Seattle Deep Bore Tunnel Tour Sept. 6, 2012. West Seattle Herald.
  33. ↑ Newcomb, Tim (August 30, 2012). "Digging an Enormous Tunnel Under Downtown Seattle". Popular Mechanics.
  34. ↑ Johnson, Kirk (December 4, 2012). "Engineering Projects Will Transform Seattle, All Along the Waterfront". The New York Times.
  35. ↑ "SR 99 tunneling machine tweets her name: Bertha". WSDOT. Retrieved December 10, 2012.
  36. ↑ Gutierrez, Scott (October 22, 2011). "Alaskan Way Viaduct closure, demolition begin". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
  37. ↑ "When will the viaduct be demolished?". WSDOT. Retrieved December 10, 2014.
  38. ↑ Lindblom, Mike (August 27, 2013). "Huge tunneling machine off to painfully slow start". The Seattle Times.
  39. ↑ Lindblom, Mike (January 3, 2014). "What’s blocking Bertha: a long steel pipe". The Seattle Times.
  40. ↑ Johnson, Kirk (December 9, 2014). "In Seattle, a Sinking Feeling About a Troubled Tunnel". The New York Times.
  41. ↑ "What will happen to the Battery Street Tunnel?". WSDOT. Retrieved December 26, 2013.
  42. ↑ "Where will the dirt from tunneling go?". WSDOT. Retrieved December 26, 2013.

Further reading

External links