Abkhazian New Union Treaty referendum, 1991

On 17 March 1991 a referendum was organised in the Abkhazian ASSR, in which the population was asked to express its opinion over the New Union Treaty, through which the Soviet Union would have been reorganised into a less centralised state. The referendum was largely boycotted by the Georgian section of society, thereby following the example of the rest of the Georgian SSR where no referendum was organised. Vice versa, the non-Georgian population stayed home when about a month later a referendum was held concerning Georgian independence.

Results

166,544 people cast a vote, of which 98.61% were in favour of the new union treaty, as against 0.94% opposed, with 0.45% of the votes invalid. The 166,544 voters represented a turnout of 52.32% out of 318,317 officially registered voters.[1]

 Summary of the 17 March 1991 Abkhazian new union treaty referendum results
Answer Votes %
Yes 164,231 98.61
No 1,566 0.94
Invalid 747 0.45
Total amount of votes cast 166,544 100.00
Turnout 166,544 52.32
Number of voters who collected their ballot papers but did not participate in voting 332 0.10
Abstention 151,441 47.58
Total number of registered voters 318,317 100.00
Source: INFORMATION OF THE CENTRAL STATE COMMISSION OF THE ABKHAZ ASSR

Consequences

The Union Treaty was approved in the republics where referendums were held, but its coming into effect was prevented by the August 1991 coup attempt and the subsequent dissolution of the Soviet Union on 26 December.

The fact that voters in Abkhazia approved the new union treaty while the Georgian SSR declared its independence on 9 April has been advanced by Abkhazia as an argument that Georgia became de jure independent from the Soviet Union without Abkhazia, which was then free to choose its own future.[2] The argument is based on Soviet law which stated that if a union republic like Georgia should choose to secede, that its autonomous parts like Abkhazia then have the right to decide for themselves their political future. Georgian arguments against this line of reasoning include the claim that the relevant law was illegal as it infringed on the sovereign rights of the Georgian SSR, or that Georgian secession was not based on this law - which stipulated a lengthy exit procedure - but rather on the Georgian SSR's fundamental sovereignty.

References