Wolff-Michael Roth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wolff-Michael Roth (Born June 28, 1953, Heidelberg) is a learning scientist at the University of Victoria conducting research on how people across the life span know and learn mathematics and science. He has contributed to numerous fields of research: learning science in learning communities, coteaching, authentic school science education, cultural-historical activity theory, social studies of science, gesture studies, qualitative research methods, embodied cognition, situated cognition, and the role of language in learning science and mathematics.

Career

Roth received a Masters degree of physics[1] from the University of Wuerzburg and completed a doctorate in the College of Science and Technology at the University of Southern Mississippi (Hattiesburg, Mississippi) with concentrations in cognition, statistics, and physical chemistry. He began to establish himself as a researcher while teaching at Appleby College (Oakville, Ontario). There, he did the research for what became one of the first research articles on the social construction of knowledge in science classrooms: "The social construction of scientific concepts or The concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science."[2] There he also conducted the work that would lead to Authentic School Science,[3] in which he provides evidence for how high school students learn science when provided with opportunities to frame their own research questions, which they then answer by designing and conducting experiments. They write up their results, which they have to be able to defend within their learning community. In 1992, he joined Simon Fraser University (Burnaby, British Columbia), where he was mainly responsible for teaching statistics in the Faculty of Education. In his research, he initially focused on learning in science classrooms, but soon expanded his work to learning mathematics and science among future teachers, research scientists, and designers of computer software. In 1997, he was appointed Lansdowne Professor of Applied Cognitive Science at the University of Victoria. There he further expanded his research on the learning of mathematics and science, for example, on the use of graphs in scientific research and in technical professions.[4]

Main Contributions

Although he worked within a neo-Piagetian (information processing oriented) paradigm during his doctoral research, using statistical methods, his subsequent work was initially based in school science classrooms and later extended to mathematics and science in fish hatcheries,[5] environmental activism,[6][7] field ecology,[8][9] scientific laboratories,[10] dental practice,[11] water technicians,[12] construction sites, and in local communities.[13][14]

Graphing as Social Practice

Psychologist tend to theorize graphing, as all other forms of representing activity, as a faculty of the mind. Based on his ethnographic studies of mathematics among scientists, Roth proposes to view graphing as a social practice that humans learn in relation with others; the relation is what we subsequently attribute to the mind. Because graphing is a social fact, it can be studied using anthropological methods, which is precisely what Roth proposes in Towards an Anthropology of Graphing[15] and in a comprehensive review of the literature.[16]

Gesture Studies

Gestures constitute an integral aspect of knowing and learning. Arising from his studies of learning in high school science laboratories and hands-on elementary school activities, Roth showed how students' scientific knowledge arises from what initially are simply manipulative movements and hand movements to explore and learn about the natural world. These movements later become symbolic movements, that is, gestures, which encode the earliest forms of knowing that can be observed prior to verbal forms.[17] In the main review journal of educational research he published a summary of the work in psychology, anthropology, and linguistics.[18]

Coteaching

Whereas in many professions, practitioner learn while working with others, teachers have to figure out much of their knowledge on their own. Using it initially as a form of staff development, Roth, subsequently working with Ken Tobin, developed coteaching as a form learning to teach while teaching. Together they published At the Elbow of Another,[19] in which they lay out the foundation of this approach. In this model, supervision and evaluation of teaching and research on teaching have to be conducted by teaching together with the resident teachers.

Cultural-Historical Activity Theory

Roth has contributed to this field especially by theorizing school-related processes in terms of a version of this theory that was popularized in the Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. He proposed a fourth generation of this theory, which takes into account emotion.[20] Together with Yew Jin Lee, he wrote a review of the literature on this "neglected legacy" of the work of Lev S. Vygotsky.[21]

Knowing in the Flesh

Most recently, Roth has been working on questions of embodied cognition, which is in fact a misnomer, for all cognition inherently is embodied.[22] Following the French philosophers Maine de Biran and Michel Henry he conceives of the emergence of signification from the auto-affection of the flesh. All perception, all knowing, all communication therefore arises from forms of movement. In a number of publications, he develops this way of understanding knowing with data from geometry in second-grade classrooms.[23]

Academic Honors and Service

Selected Publications

  • Roth, W.-M. (2010). Language, learning, context: Talking the talk. London: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2009). Dialogism: A Bakhtinian perspective on science and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (Eds.). (2008). Generalization in educational research. New York: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning science: A singular plural perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of methods. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2005). Talking science: Language and learning in science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2002). Being and becoming in the classroom. Westport, CT: Ablex/Greenwood.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Notes

  1. ↑ Bruner, K., Hink, W., & Roth, W.-M. (1980). Stopping power for H+ in Be (20-120 keV). Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 173, 357-362.
  2. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or The concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76, 531-557.
  3. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  4. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing: Semiotic and activity-theoretic perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  5. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 75-109.
  6. ↑ Boyer, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning and teaching as emergent features of informal settings: An ethnographic study in an environmental action group. Science Education, 90, 1028-1049.
  7. ↑ Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2001). How ditch and drain become a healthy creek: Representations, translations and agency during the re/design of a watershed. Social Studies of Science, 31, 315-356.
  8. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2005). Making classifications (at) work: Ordering practices in science. Social Studies of Science, 35, 581-621.
  9. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999). Digitizing lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29, 719-764.
  10. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2009). Radical uncertainty in scientific discovery work. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34, 313-336.
  11. ↑ Ardenghi, D., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). Responsibility in dental practice: An activity theoretical practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19, 240-255.
  12. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2007). Graphing Hagan Creek: A case of relations in sociomaterial practice. In E. Teubal, J. Dockrell, & L. Tolchinsky (Eds.), Notational knowledge: Historical and developmental perspectives (pp. 179-207). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense.
  13. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2008). Constructing community health and safety. Municipal Engineer, 161, 83-92.
  14. ↑ Roth, W.-M., Riecken, J., Pozzer, L. L., McMillan, R., Storr, B., Tait, D., Bradshaw, G. & Pauluth Penner, T. (2004). Those who get hurt aren't always being heard: Scientist-resident interactions over community water. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29 (2), 153-183.
  15. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing: Semiotic and activity-theoretic perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: a social practice approach to "representations." Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
  17. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & Lawless, D. (2002). Signs, deixis, and the emergence of scientific explanations. Semiotica, 138, 95-130.
  18. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2002). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365-392.
  19. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
  20. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2007). Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural historical activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14, 40-63.
  21. ↑ Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186-232.
  22. ↑ Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). The corporeal turn: An interdisciplinary reader. Exeter, England: Imprint Academic.
  23. ↑ Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York: Routledge.
  24. ↑ http://www.narst.org/

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.