Tafseer-e-Kabeer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of the series on
Quranic exegesis


Most famous

Sunni:
Tanwir al-Miqbas (~800)
Tafsir al-Tabari (~922)
Tafsir al-Kabir (1149-1209).
Tafsir al-Qurtubi (~1273)
Tafsir ibn Kathir (~1370)
Tafsir al-Jalalayn (1460–1505)
Maariful Quran (1897–1976)

Shi'a:
Tafsir Imam al-Sadiq (~750)
Tafsir Ayyashi (~920)
Tafsir Qomi (~920)
Al-Tibbyan Fi Tafsir al-Quran (<1067)
Majma al-Bayan (~1150)
Makhzan al-Irfan (1877–1983)
Tafsir al-Mizan (1892–1981)

Sunni tafsir

Tafsir al-Baghawi
Tafsir al-Kabir
Dur al-Manthur
Tadabbur-i-Quran
Tafhim-ul-Quran

Shi'a tafsir

Tafsir Furat Kufi (~900)
Tafsir Safi (<1680)
Al-Burhan Fi Tafsir al-Quran
Holy Quran (puya)
Al-Bayan Fi Tafsir al-Quran

Mu'tazili tafsir

Al-Kashshaf

Ahmadi tafsir

Tafseer-e-Kabeer
Haqā'iq al-Furqān

Terms

Asbab al-nuzul

For other uses, see Tafsir al-Kabir.

Tafseer-e-Kabeer (Urdu: تفسير کبير, tafsīr-e-kabīr, "The Extensive Commentary") is a 10 volume exegesis of the Quran containing the lectures, writings and notes on Quranic verses by Mirza Mahmood Ahmad, the second Caliph of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, and took over 20 years to compile. It is often seen as his Magnum opus. A significant part of the text, especially that of the later volumes was dictated by Mahmood Ahmad.

Background

The first of the 10 volumes was published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, Qadian. Mirza Mahmood Ahmad was the second Head of the modern Islamic messianic movement known as the Ahmadiyya Muslim community. The author considered this commentary to be the next step ahead in Quranic studies. In the preface to the first volume, he writes that classical commentators like Ibn Kathir, Zamakhshari and Abu Hayyan did a great service for the Quran. Throughout the commentary he suggests the vital importance of the order in which chapters were arranged in the present form. The contextual relationship of the text of the entire Quran and of each sura to the preceding Sura i.e. the themes of the Qur'an are connected and all chapters, verses and words are perfectly arranged. The writer has given much importance to this aspect in his commentary, which was a novel approach at the time of its publication.

Contents of the Commentary

Although the work is very detailed, it does not contain all chapters of the Quran.

Features and Themes

The commentary is written in the style of an argument for Islam. Repeated references and comments are made on the works of famous orientalists like Theodor Nöldeke, William Muir and William Montgomery Watt. The author has frequently dismissed the views of these writers in favour of more linguistic approach towards understanding the meanings of the Quran. As compared to other classical texts, this commentary seems to rely less on "Asbab al-nuzul" or reasons of revelation of verses. This approach greatly reduces the impact and validity of negative remarks and allegations made on the Quran by non-Muslim theologians.

Each verse is explained separately in two sections. The first section gives different translations of the words in the verse according to major classical Arabic lexicons along with their different uses derived from classical Arabic prose and poetry. The second section contains detailed commentary.

A detailed bibliography of references and indices are provided at the end of each volume.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.