Stylosanthes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stylosanthes
Stylosanthes hamata
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
(unranked): Angiosperms
(unranked): Eudicots
(unranked): Rosids
Order: Fabales
Family: Fabaceae
Subfamily: Faboideae
Tribe: Dalbergieae[1][2]
Genus: Stylosanthes
Sw.

Stylosanthes is a genus of flowering plants in the legume family, Fabaceae and contains numerous highly important pasture and forage species. It was recently assigned to the informal monophyletic Pterocarpus clade.

Description

The genus is characterised by trifoliate leaves and small yellow flowers [3] Species may be annual or perennial and morphology varies between species as well as within species in response to grazing pressure. Some species such as S. scabra grow as a low woody shrub to 1.5 m, while others such as S. humilis will grow as a herbaceous shrub but can adopt a prostrate growth form and thrive under high grazing pressure.[4]

Stylosanthes scabra foliage and flowers, Central Queensland

Taxonomy and range

Taxonomy of the genus remains unsettled and controversial, with various authors favouring between 25 and 42 species, with at least 40 additional synonyms.[5] The taxonomy is complicated by the existence of numerous natural tetraploid and hybrid populations[6] Species within the genus fall within two subgenera: Styposanthes and Stylosanthes. Styposanthes possess a small rudimentary secondary floral axis which is absent from Stylosanthes [7] Stylosanthes is closely related to the peanut genus Arachis.[5]

All except two species of the genus are native to the Americas. S. fruticosa has a native range that extends from South Africa to Ethiopia, across Arabian Peninsula to Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka [8] and S. erecta is endemic to Tropical Africa, from Tanzania to Senegal.[9] The putative species S. sundaica, has a range that encompasses Malesia but is considered by most authors to be an adventive polypoliod variety of S. humilis.[8] Ecological range extends from savanna and thorn scrub to tropical forest and montane forests.[5]

Species

The following is a list of currently accepted Stylosanthes species, subject to change with further study.[10]

  • Stylosanthes acuminata
  • Stylosanthes angustifolia
  • Stylosanthes aurea
  • Stylosanthes bahiensis
  • Stylosanthes biflora
  • Stylosanthes bracteata
  • Stylosanthes calcicola
  • Stylosanthes campestris
  • Stylosanthes capitata
  • Stylosanthes cayennensis
  • Stylosanthes debilis
  • Stylosanthes dissitiflora
  • Stylosanthes erecta
  • Stylosanthes figueroae
  • Stylosanthes fruticosa
  • Stylosanthes grandifolia
  • Stylosanthes guianensis
  • Stylosanthes guineensis
  • Stylosanthes hamata
  • Stylosanthes hippocampoides
  • Stylosanthes hispida
  • Stylosanthes humilis
  • Stylosanthes ingrata
  • Stylosanthes leiocarpa
  • Stylosanthes linearifolia
  • Stylosanthes longiseta
  • Stylosanthes macrocarpa
  • Stylosanthes macrocephala
  • Stylosanthes macrosoma
  • Stylosanthes mexicana
  • Stylosanthes montevidensis
  • Stylosanthes nervosa
  • Stylosanthes pilosa
  • Stylosanthes ruellioides
  • Stylosanthes scabra
  • Stylosanthes sericeiceps
  • Stylosanthes suborbiculata
  • Stylosanthes subsericea
  • Stylosanthes suffruticosa
  • Stylosanthes sympodialis
  • Stylosanthes tomentosa
  • Stylosanthes tuberculata
  • Stylosanthes viscosa

Usage

Species within the genus have many properties that make them valuable forage species. They are capable of nitrogen fixation and are capable of improving soil fertility in addition to providing high protein stock feed.[11] The genus is also noted for its ability to extract phosphorus from soils where it is not available to other species.[12] Seeds are hard and long lived leading to high soil seed banks and rapid recovery following fire or heavy grazing. Seed survives passage through the gut of grazing animals and is dispersed widely in this manner allowing for rapid dispersal.[4] Many species are adapted to hot, dry climates and are drought resistant.[13]

These traits have made the genus the world’s most widely used tropical pasture legume.[13] Stylosanthes has been introduced across the tropical world as a pasture species. Its most important use has been in Australia where over a million hectares of primarily native pasture have been oversown with Stylosanthes species; primarily S. hamata, S. scabra and S. humilis [14] This can lead to a ten-fold increase in productivity, though 2-3 fold increases are normal.[4] Stylosanthes are the most important forage legumes in South America [15] and the most important pasture legumes of tropical India.[16] Stylosanthes are also important forage species in tropical Africa.[4]

Stylosanthes are important green manure species in West and Central Africa, primarily S. guianensis and S. hamata, and species are planted and harvested for commercial leaf meal production for poultry and pig feed in China and India. The genus has also been utilized as a nitrogen input into low input or organic cropping systems. Species are utilized as fallow species in Peru, Africa and Australia. S. hamata used for intercropping with grain crops in India and Africa with yield increases up to 25%.[4]

Stylosanthes species have been utilized for land reclamation, soil stabilization and soil regeneration work because of their drought resistance, ability to restore soil fertility, improve soil physical properties and provide permanent vegetation cover [17][16][18]

Despite their ability to dramatically improve productivity in grazing lands, Stylosanthes can also cause problems. Stylosanthes can dominate pasture at the expense of grass which can lead to problems because the plants provides less protection from erosion than grass.[4] Stylosanthes dominance can also lead to soil acidification, as soil nitrate levels build up and are then leached down the soil profile.[19] Stylosanthes species are considered invasive species and environmental weeds in Australia, Taiwan, the pacific Islands and Hawaii.[20] Many Stylosanthes species are susceptible to anthracnose fungus (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) which retards growth and seed development,[4] and this had led to numerous commercial cultivars being abandoned.

References

  1. Lavin M, Pennington RT, Klitgaard BB, Sprent JI, de Lima HC, Gasson PE. (2001). "The dalbergioid legumes (Fabaceae): delimitation of a pantropical monophyletic clade". Am J Bot 88 (3): 503–33. PMID 11250829. 
  2. Cardoso D, Pennington RT, de Queiroz LP, Boatwright JS, Van Wykd B-E, Wojciechowskie MF, Lavin M. (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". S Afr J Bot 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001. 
  3. "Stylosanthes". 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Cameron, D and Chakraborty, S. 2004 Forage potential of Stylosanthes in different production systems Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Maas, B and Sawkins, 2004 M. History, relationships and diversity among Stylosanthes species of commercial significance . Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  6. Gillies, A. and Abbott, R. 1996 Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Stylosanthes (Leguminosae) based upon chloroplast DNA variation Plant Systematics and Evolution 200:3-4
  7. Chandra, A. 2009 Diversity among Stylosanthes species: Habitat, edaphic and agro-climatic affinities leading to cultivar development Journal of Environmental Biology
  8. 8.0 8.1 "Stylosanthes fruticosa". 
  9. "Taxon: Stylosanthes erecta P. Beauv". 
  10. http://www.theplantlist.org/browse/A/Leguminosae/Stylosanthes/ Stylosanthes at Theplantlist.org
  11. Coates, D.B., Miller, C.P., Hendricksen, R.E., Jones, R.J. 1997. Stability and productivity of Stylosanthes pastures in Australia. II. Animal production from Stylosanthes pastures . Tropical Grasslands 31:5
  12. Kretschmer, A. and Pitman, W.2001 Germplasm Resources of Tropical Forage Legumes . CRC Press LLC.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Jone, P.G., Sawkins, M.C., Maas, B.L. and Kerridge, P.C. 1997 GIS and Genetic Diversity –case Studies in Stylosanthes XVIII International Grassland Congress, June 8–19, Winnipeg, Canada.
  14. Liu, C. J. 1997 Geographical distribution of genetic variation in Stylosanthes scabra revealed by RAPD analysis . Euphytica 9:1
  15. Hall, T and Glatzle, A. 2004 Cattle production from Stylosanthes pastures Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Chandra, A., Patha, P. and Bhat, R 2006 Stylosanthes research in India: Prospects and challenges ahead Current Science, 90:7
  17. Pathak, P., Ramesh, C. and Bhatt, R. 2004 Stylosanthes in the reclamation and development of degraded soils in India . Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  18. Obi, M.E. 1999. The physical and chemical responses of a degraded sandy clay loam soil to cover crops in southern Nigeria . Plant and Soil 211, 165–172Ramesh, C.R., Bhag Mal, Hazra, C.R., Sukanya, D.H., Ramamurthy, V. & Chakraborty, S. 1997. Stylosanthes development and utilisation in India . Tropical Grasslands 31, 467–476.
  19. Noble, A.D., Cannon, M. & Muller, D. 1997. Evidence of accelerated soil acidification under Stylosanthes-dominated pastures . Australian Journal of Soil Research 35.
  20. Chakraborty, S. 2004 High-yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.