Stochastic electrodynamics

Stochastic electrodynamics (SED) is a variant of classical electrodynamics (CED) of theoretical physics. SED consists of a set of controversial theories that posit the existence of a classical Lorentz Invariant radiation field having statistical properties similar to that of the electromagnetic zero-point field (ZPF) of quantum electrodynamics (QED).

Investigations of SED have been concerned with:

1. The degree to which this prescription might cause SED to mimic some behaviors traditionally considered to be the exclusive domain of quantum mechanics; and
2. A possible classical ZPF-based origin for gravity, inertia and the photoelectric effect ^[1]

The reported results are subject to considerable argument. Even so, there is a fair amount of interest in SED as this suggests the possibility of anti-gravity, reactionless drives or free energy so claims for practical devices do occasionally appear. No practical devices have been publicly demonstrated or subjected to any universally agreed upon independent review.

Classical background field

The background field is introduced as a Lorentz force in the (classical) Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation (see: Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac force), where the classical statistics of the electric and magnetic fields and quadratic combinations thereof are chosen to match the vacuum expectation values of the equivalent operators in QED. The field is generally represented as a discrete sum of Fourier components each with amplitude and phase that are independent classical random variables, distributed so that the statistics of the fields are isotropic and unchanged under boosts. This prescription is such that each Fourier mode at frequency (f) is expected to have an energy of hf/2, equaling that of the ground state of the vacuum modes of QED. Unless cutoff, the total field has an infinite energy density, with a spectral energy density (per unit frequency per unit volume) [2h/c³]f³ where h is Planck's constant. Consequently the background field is a classical version of the electromagnetic ZPF of QED, though in SED literature the field is commonly referred to simply as 'the ZPF' without making that distinction. It should be noted that any finite cutoff frequency of the field itself would be incompatible with Lorentz invariance. For this reason, some researchers prefer to think of cutoff frequency in terms of the response of particles to the field rather than as a property the field itself.

Brief history

Stochastic electrodynamics is a term for a collection of research efforts of many different styles based on the ansatz that there exists a Lorentz invariant random electromagnetic radiation. The basic ideas have been around for a long time; but Marshall (1963) and Brafford seem to have been the originators of the more concentrated efforts starting in the 1960s. Thereafter, Boyer (for reviews see Boyer 1975, 1980, 1985) and de la Pena & Cetto (1996, 2005) were perhaps the most prolific contributors to SED in the 1970s and beyond. Others have made contributions, alterations and proposals concentrating on the application of SED to problems in QED. A separate thread has been the investigation of an earlier proposal by Walther Nernst attempting to use the SED notion of a classical ZPF to explain inertial mass as due to a vacuum reaction.

In 2000, Trevor Marshall derived an experimental prediction of SED dubbed "spontaneous parametric up-conversion" (SPUC)^[2] as a dual process to the well-known spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). SPUC was tested in 2009 and 2010 with positive results.^[3][4]

In 2010, Cavalleri et al. introduced SEDS ('pure' SED, as they call it, plus spin) as a fundamental improvement which they claim potentially overcomes all the known drawbacks to SED. They also claim SEDS resolves four observed effects that are so far unexplained by QED, i.e., 1) the physical origin of the ZPF, and its natural upper cutoff; 2) an anomaly in experimental studies of the neutrino rest mass; 3) the origin and quantitative treatment of 1/f noise; and 4) the high-energy tail (~ 10²¹ eV) of cosmic rays. Two double-slit electron diffraction experiments are proposed to discriminate between QM and SEDS.^[5]

Scope of SED

SED has been used in attempts to provide a classical explanation for effects previously considered to require quantum mechanics (here restricted to the Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation and QED) for their explanation. It has also been used to motivate a classical ZPF-based underpinning for gravity and inertia. There is not universal agreement on the successes and failures of SED, either in its congruence with standard theories of quantum mechanics, QED, and gravity, or in its compliance with observation. The following SED-based explanations are relatively uncontroversial and are free of criticism at the time of writing:

• The Casimir force ^[6]
• The Van der Waals force ^[7]
• Diamagnetism ^[8]
• The Unruh effect ^[9]

The following SED-based calculations and SED-related claims are more controversial and some have been subject to published criticism:

• The ground state of the harmonic oscillator ^[10]
• The ground state of the hydrogen atom ^[11]
• de Broglie waves ^[12]
• Inertia ^[13]
• Gravitation ^[14]
• Non-locality and tests of Bell's theorem ^[15]

Zero point energy

According to Haisch and Rueda, inertia arises as an electromagnetic drag force on accelerating particles, produced by interaction with the zero-point field. In their 1998 Ann. Phys. paper (see citations), they speak of a "Rindler flux", presumably meaning the Unruh effect, and claim to have computed a nonzero "z.p.f. momentum". This computation rests upon their claim to compute a nonzero "z.p.f. Poynting vector".

These proposals for zero point energy suggest a source of low or no cost free energy from the vacuum as well as the hope of developing a reactionless drive.^[16] NASA continues to make assessments:^[17][18] In the usual interpretation of vacuum energy it is not possible to use it to do work.^[19] However, SED takes a rather more literal, classical interpretation, and views the very high energy density of the electromagnetic vacuum as propagating waves, which must necessarily carry considerable energy and momentum flux, ordinarily not evident in the absence of matter, because the flux is isotropic.^{[citation needed]}

Fictional references

Arthur C. Clarke describes a "SHARP drive" (for Sakharov, Haisch, Rueda and Puthoff) in his 1997 novel "3001: The Final Odyssey".

See also

• Andrei Sakharov
• Anti-gravity
• Casimir effect
• Harold E. Puthoff
• Perpetual motion
• Reactionless drive
• Vacuum energy
• Zero-point energy
• Physique synergétique (French)

Notes and in-line references

References

• Marshall, T. W. (1963). "Random Electrodynamics". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 276 (1367): 475. Bibcode:1963RSPSA.276..475M. doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0220. 
• Sakharov, A. D. (1968). "Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation". Sov. Phys. Doklady 12: 1040. Bibcode:1968SPhD...12.1040S. 
• Boyer, Timothy H. (1975). "Random electrodynamics: The theory of classical electrodynamics with classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation". Phys. Rev. D 11 (4): 790–808. Bibcode:1975PhRvD..11..790B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.790. 
• Boyer, T. H. (1980). "A Brief Survey of Stochastic Electrodynamics". Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics.  ISBN 0-306-40277-7
• Boyer, Timothy H. (1985). "The Classical Vacuum". Scientific American Aug.: 70–78. 
• Haisch, B.; Rueda, A.; and Puthoff, H. E. (1994). "Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force". Phys. Rev. A 49 (2): 678–694. Bibcode:1994PhRvA..49..678H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.678. PMID 9910287.  on-line version from Haisch's website
• de la Pena, L.; and Cetto, A. M. (1996). The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ISBN 0-7923-3818-9. OCLC 33281109.  ISBN 0-7923-3818-9
• Rueda, Alfonso; and Haisch, Bernard (1998). "Contribution to inertial mass by reaction of the vacuum to accelerated motion". Found. Phys. 28 (7): 1057–1108. doi:10.1023/A:1018893903079.  physics/9802030
• Rueda, Alfonso, and Haisch, Bernard (2005). "Gravity and the Quantum Vacuum Inertia Hypothesis". Ann. Phys. 14 (8): 479–498. arXiv:gr-qc/0504061. Bibcode:2005AnP...517..479R. doi:10.1002/andp.200510147.  gr-qc/0504061
• de la Pena, L.; and Cetto, A. M. (2005). "Contribution from stochastic electrodynamics to the understanding of quantum mechanics". arXiv:quant-ph/0501011 [quant-ph]., a review paper

External links

• California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics, a physics organization founded by Bernard Haisch
• H. E. Puthoff, Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations: A New Rosetta Stone of Physics?