Significance (policy debate)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Part of the series Policy Debate | |
| Organization | |
| Policy debate competitions | |
| Format | |
| Structure of policy debate · Resolution Constructive · Rebuttal · Prep time | |
| Participants | |
|
Affirmative · Negative · Judge | |
| Types of Arguments | |
|
Stock Issues · Case· Disadvantage | |
| Argumentative Concepts | |
Significance is a stock issue in policy debate which establishes the importance of the harms in the status quo. As a stock issue has fallen out of favor with the debate community almost all debaters and judges now believe that any plan which is preferable to the status quo is significant.
Significance derives from the word "substantially" which appears in most resolutions, and one can argue that Significance has been subsumed by the option for the negative to use a Topicality violation on that word.
| ||||||||
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.