Sensation (art exhibition)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Royal Academy, London

Sensation was an exhibition of the collection of contemporary art owned by Charles Saatchi, including many works by Young British Artists, which first took place 18 September – 28 December 1997 at the Royal Academy of Art in London and later toured to Berlin and New York. A proposed showing at the National Gallery of Australia was cancelled when the gallery's director decided the exhibition was "too close to the market."

The show generated controversy in London and New York due to the inclusion of images of Myra Hindley and the Virgin Mary. It was criticised by New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani and others for attempting to boost the value of the work by showing it in institutions and public museums.[1]

Works

Myra: 1995 depiction of the child killer Myra Hindley by the YBA Marcus Harvey

The artworks in Sensation were from the collection of Charles Saatchi, a leading collector, advertising mogul and publiciser of contemporary art. Norman Rosenthal, the Royal Academy of Arts exhibitions secretary, helped to stage the 110 works by 42 different artists. Many of the pieces had already become famous, or notorious, with the British public (for example, Damien Hirst's shark suspended in formaldehyde titled The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, Tracey Emin's tent titled Everyone I Have Ever Slept With 1963–1995), Marc Quinn's self-portrait (a frozen head made from pints of his own blood) and Sarah Lucas's explicitly sexual images and sculptures. Others had already achieved prominence in other ways, such as a successful advertising campaign using an idea from Gillian Wearing's photographs. Sensation was the first time that a wide audience had had the chance to see these works en masse. The Royal Academy posted this disclaimer to visitors on entry:

There will be works of art on display in the Sensation exhibition which some people may find distasteful. Parents should exercise their judgment in bringing their children to the exhibition. One gallery will not be open to those under the age of 18.[2]

London

The opening of Sensation at the Royal Academy caused a public furore and a media frenzy, with both broadsheet and tabloid journalists falling over themselves to comment on the show’s controversial images, and unprecedented crowds queuing up to see for themselves what all the fuss was about. Around a quarter of the RA's 80 academicians gave a warning that the exhibition was inflammatory. They and some members of the public complained about several other exhibits, notably the installations by Jake and Dinos Chapman, which were of child mannequins with noses replaced by penises and mouths in the form of an anus.

However, the biggest media controversy was over Myra, an image of the murderer Myra Hindley by Marcus Harvey.[2]

The Mothers Against Murder and Aggression protest group picketed the show, accompanied by Winnie Johnson, the mother of one of Hindley's victims,[3] who asked for the portrait, made up of hundreds of copies of a child's handprint, to be excluded to protect her feelings. Along with supporters she picketed the show's first day. Myra Hindley sent a letter from jail suggesting that her portrait be removed from the exhibition, reasoning that such action was necessary because the work was "a sole disregard not only for the emotional pain and trauma that would inevitably be experienced by the families of the Moors victims but also the families of any child victim."[4][5] Despite all the protest the painting remained hanging. Windows at Burlington House, the Academy's home, were smashed and two demonstrators hurled ink and eggs at the picture as a result, requiring it to be removed and restored. It was put back on display behind Perspex[6] and guarded by security men.

In a press conference on 16 September 1997, David Gordon, Secretary of the Royal Academy commented on the controversial portrait: "The majority view inside the Academy was that millions and millions of images of Myra Hindley have been reproduced in newspapers and magazines. Books have been written about the murders. Television programmes have been made. Hindley’s image is in the public domain; part of our consciousness; an awful part of our recent social history; a legitimate subject for journalism -- and for art."

The show was extremely popular with the general public, attracting over 300,000 visitors during its run,[6] helped by the media attention which the strong subject matter had received. The BBC described it as "gory images of dismembered limbs and explicit pornography".[7]

Berlin

Sensation was shown at the Berlin Hamburger Bahnhof museum (30 September 1998 – 30 January 1999) and proved so popular that it was extended past its original closing date of 28 December 1998. For art critic Nicola Kuhn from Der Tagesspiegel, there was "no sensation about Sensation". She claimed that the Berlin audience found the yBa's work "more sad and serious than irreverent, funny and dazzling"[8]

New York

Brooklyn Museum of Art

The exhibition was shown in New York City at the Brooklyn Museum from 2 October 1999 to 9 January 2000. The New York show was met with instant protest, centering on The Holy Virgin Mary by Chris Ofili, which had not provoked this reaction in London. While the press reported that the piece was "smeared", "splattered" or "stained" with elephant dung,[9][10] Ofili's work in fact showed a carefully rendered black Madonna decorated with a resin-covered lump of elephant dung. The figure is also surrounded by small collaged images of female genitalia from pornographic magazines; these seemed from a distance to be the traditional cherubim.

New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who had seen the work in the catalogue but not in the show, called it "sick stuff" and threatened to withdraw the annual $7 million City Hall grant from the Brooklyn Museum hosting the show, because "You don't have a right to government subsidy for desecrating somebody else's religion."[6] Cardinal John O'Connor, the Archbishop of New York, said, "one must ask if it is an attack on religion itself," and the president of America's biggest group of Orthodox Jews, Mandell Ganchrow, called it "deeply offensive".[11] William A. Donohue, President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said the work "induces revulsion".[6] Giuliani started a lawsuit to evict the museum, and Arnold Lehman, the museum director, filed a federal lawsuit against Giuliani for a breach of the First Amendment.[11]

Hillary Clinton spoke up for the museum, as did the New York Civil Liberties Union.[12] The editorial board of The New York Times said, Giuliani's stance "promises to begin a new Ice Age in New York's cultural affairs."[13] The paper also carried a full-page advertisement in support signed by over 100 actors, writers and artists, including Susan Sarandon, Steve Martin, Norman Mailer, Arthur Miller, Kurt Vonnegut and Susan Sontag.[11] Ofili, who is Roman Catholic, said, "elephant dung in itself is quite a beautiful object."[11]

The United States House of Representatives passed a nonbinding resolution to end federal funding for the museum on 3 October 1999, and New York City did stop funding to the Brooklyn Museum. On 1 November, federal judge Nina Gershon ordered the City not only to restore the funding that was denied to the Museum, but also to refrain from continuing its ejectment action. On 16 December 1999, a 72-year-old man was arrested for criminal mischief after smearing the Ofili painting with white paint, which was soon removed.[14] The museum produced a yellow stamp, saying the artworks on show "may cause shock, vomiting, confusion, panic, euphoria and anxiety."[11] and Ofili's painting was shown behind a Plexiglass screen, guarded by a museum attendant and an armed police officer.[13] Jeffrey Hogrefe, art critic for the New York Observer, commented about the museum, "They wanted to get some publicity and they got it. I think it was pretty calculated."[6] The editor-in-chief of the New York Art & Auction magazine, Bruce Wolmer,said: "When the row eventually fades the only smile will be on the face of Charles Saatchi, a master self-promoter."[11]

Australia

The show was scheduled to open in June 1999 at the National Gallery of Australia, but was cancelled with the director, Brian Kennedy, saying that, although it was due to be funded by the Australian government, it was "too close to the market" since finance for the Brooklyn exhibition included $160,000 from Saatchi, who owned the work; $50,000 from Christie's, who had sold work for Saatchi; and $10,000 from dealers of many of the artists.[15] Kennedy said he was unaware of this when he accepted the show. Saatchi's contribution, the largest single one, was not disclosed by the Brooklyn Museum, until it appeared in court documents.[15] Similarly, when the show opened in London at the Royal Academy, there had been criticisms that it would raise the value of the work.[15]

Artists exhibited in Sensation

YBAs

Other artists from the Saatchi collection

Notes and references

  1. ↑ Herszenhorn, David M. (30 September 1999), Brooklyn Museum Accused of Trying to Lift Art Value, New York Times, retrieved 29 September 2009 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Dalrymple, Theodore (Winter 1998), "Trash, Violence, and Versace: But Is It Art?", City Journal, retrieved 25 February 2008 
  3. ↑ Alberge, Dalya (19 September 1997), "Attacks force Hindley portrait to be moved" (subscription required), The Times, retrieved 29 September 2009 
  4. ↑ Lyall, Sarah (20 September 1997), "Art That Tweaks British Propriety]", New York Times, retrieved 25 February 2008 
  5. ↑ Young, Alison. "Judging the Image: Art, Value, Law". Routledge, January, 2005. p. 34. ISBN 0-415-30183-1
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 "Sensation sparks New York storm", BBC, 23 September 1999. Retrieved 17 October 2008.
  7. ↑ "Entertainment Sensational hit for Royal Academy", BBC, 30 December 1997. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  8. ↑ Hatton, Rita and Walker, John. (2010) "Charles Saatchi & Sensation". Excerpt fr. Supercollector: A critique of Charles Saatchi (4th ed.). artdesigncafe. Retrieved 20 August 2011.
  9. ↑ Judging the image: art, value, law, Alison Young, Routledge, 2005, ISBN 0-415-30184-X, p.38-41
  10. ↑ Feminine look: sexuation, spectatorship, subversion, Jennifer Friedlander, SUNY Press, 2008 ISBN 0-7914-7295-7, p.88
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Davies, Hugh; Fenton, Ben (2 October 1999), "Whiff of sensation hits New York", The Daily Telegraph, retrieved 17 October 2008 
  12. ↑ Nagourney, Adam (28 September 1999), First Lady Assails Mayor Over Threat to Museum, New York Times, retrieved 19 July 2009 
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Rapp, Christopher. "Dung Deal - Brooklyn Museum of Art's "Sensation" exhibition", National Review, 25 October 1999. Retrieved 17 October 2008.
  14. ↑ "Vandal Attacks Ofili Madonna", Art in America, February 2000, retrieved 20 July 2009 
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Vogel, Carol. "Australian Museum cancels controversial art show", The New York Times, 1 December 1999. Retrieved 17 October 2008.

Further reading

  • Rosenthal, Norman, Adams, Brooks, Royal Academy of Arts (Great Britain), Saatchi Collection. Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi Collection. April 1998. Thames and Hudson. London. book cover image
  • Hirst, Damien. Damien Hirst pictures from the Saatchi Gallery. London: Booth-Clibborn Editions, 2001.
  • Rothfield, Lawrence (ed). Unsettling 'Sensation': Arts-Policy from the Brooklyn Museum of Art Controversy. Rutgers University Press, 2001.
  • Stallabrass, Julian, High Art Lite: British Art in the 1990s. London and New York: Verso, 2006

External links


Artworks
Films
Solo shows
Group shows
Movement
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.