Controlled-access highway
A controlled-access highway is a highway designed for high-speed vehicular traffic, with all traffic flow and ingress/egress regulated. Common English terms are freeway and motorway. Terms in other languages include Autobahn, autostrada, autopista, autosnelweg and autoroute. It can be referred to less precisely as highway or with more precise terms such as expressway, Interstate, or parkway. They may also be called limited-access highways, although this term can also refer to a class of highway with somewhat less isolation from other traffic.
A controlled-access highway provides an unhindered flow of traffic, with no traffic signals, intersections or property access. They are free of any at-grade crossings with other roads, railways, or pedestrian paths, which are instead carried by overpasses and underpasses across the highway. Entrance and exit to the highway are provided at interchanges by slip roads (ramps), which allow for speed changes between the highway and arterial roads and collector roads. On the controlled-access highway, opposing directions of travel are generally separated by a central reservation containing a traffic barrier or just a strip of grass.
Controlled-access highways evolved during the first half of the 20th century. The Long Island Motor Parkway, opened in 1908 as a private venture, was the world's first limited-access roadway. Italy opened its first autostrada in 1925. Germany began to build its first 30-kilometre (19 mi) autobahn controlled-access highway without speed limits (then referred to as a dual highway) in 1932 between Cologne and Bonn (now A555). It then rapidly assembled a nationwide system of such roads in anticipation of their use in World War II. The first North American freeways (known as parkways) opened in the New York City area in the 1920s. Britain, heavily influenced by the railways, did not build its first motorway, the Preston By-pass, until 1958.
Most technologically advanced nations feature an extensive network of freeways or motorways. Many have a national-level system of route numbering.
Definition
There is no formal definition of the English-language words "motorway", "freeway" and "expressway", or of the equivalent words in other languages such as "autoroute", "Autobahn", "autostrade", "autoput", that are accepted worldwide—in most cases these words are defined by local statute or design standards. Descriptions that are widely used include:
ITE (including CITE) | OECD[1] | British Standards |
---|---|---|
FREEWAY:
A divided major roadway with full control of access and with no crossings at grade. This definition applies to toll as well as toll-free roads.
|
ROAD:
A roadway specially designed and built for motor traffic, which does not serve properties bordering on it, and which:
|
MOTORWAY:
Limited-access dual carriageway road, not crossed on the same level by other traffic lanes, for the exclusive use of certain classes of motor vehicle. |
History
Controlled-access highways, as they exist today, evolved during the first half of the twentieth century. The Long Island Motor Parkway, opened in 1908 as a private venture, was the world's first limited-access roadway. It included many modern features, including banked turns, guard rails and reinforced concrete tarmac.[2]
Modern controlled-access highways originated in the early 1920s in response to the rapidly increasing use of the automobile, the demand for faster movement between cities and as a consequence of improvements in paving processes, techniques and materials. These original high-speed roads were referred to as "dual highways" and, while divided, bore little resemblance to the highways of today. Opened in 1921, the AVUS in Berlin is the oldest controlled-access highway in Europe, although it was initially opened as a race track.
The first dual highway opened in Italy in 1924, between Milan and Varese, and now forms parts of the A8 and A9 motorways. This highway, while divided, contained only one lane in each direction and no interchanges. Shortly thereafter, in 1924, the Bronx River Parkway was opened to traffic. The Bronx River Parkway was the first road in North America to utilize a median strip to separate the opposing lanes, to be constructed through a park and where intersecting streets crossed over bridges.[3][4]
The Southern State Parkway opened in 1927, and the Long Island Motor Parkway was closed in 1937 and replaced by the Northern State Parkway which opened in 1931 and its continuation the Grand Central Parkway opened in 1936. Construction of the Bonn-Cologne autobahn began in 1929 and was opened in 1932 by the mayor of Cologne.[5]
In Canada, the first city–city controlled-access road was the Queen Elizabeth Way, which featured a cloverleaf and trumpet interchange when it opened in 1937, and until World War II, boasted the longest illuminated stretch of roadway built.[6] A decade later, the first section of Highway 401 was opened, based on earlier designs. It has since gone on to become the busiest highway in the world.
The word freeway was first used in February 1930 by Edward M. Bassett.[7][8][9] Bassett argued that roads should be classified into three basic types: highways, parkways, and freeways.[9] In Bassett's zoning and property law-based system, abutting property owners have the rights of light, air, and access to highways, but not parkways and freeways; the latter two are distinguished in that the purpose of a parkway is recreation, while the purpose of a freeway is movement.[9] Thus, as originally conceived, a freeway is simply a strip of public land devoted to movement to which abutting property owners do not have rights of light, air, or access.[9]
Design
Freeways, by definition, have no at-grade intersections with other roads, railroads or multi-use trails. Movable bridges, such as the Interstate Bridge on Interstate 5 between Oregon and Washington, do require drivers to stop for ship traffic.
The crossing of freeways by other routes is typically achieved with grade separation either in the form of underpasses or overpasses. In addition to sidewalks (footpaths) attached to roads that cross a freeway, specialized pedestrian footbridges or tunnels may also be provided. These structures enable pedestrians and cyclists to cross the freeway at that point without a detour to the nearest road crossing.
Access to freeways is typically provided only at grade-separated interchanges, though lower-standard right-in/right-out access can be used for direct connections to side roads. In many cases, sophisticated interchanges allow for smooth, uninterrupted transitions between intersecting freeways and busy arterial roads. However, sometimes it is necessary to exit onto a surface road to transfer from one freeway to another. One example in the United States (notorious for the resulting congestion) is the connection from Interstate 70 to the Pennsylvania Turnpike (Interstate 70 and Interstate 76) through the town of Breezewood, Pennsylvania.[10]
Speed limits are generally higher on freeways and are occasionally nonexistent (as on much of Germany's Autobahn network). Because higher speeds reduce decision time, freeways are usually equipped with a larger number of guide signs than other roads, and the signs themselves are physically larger. Guide signs are often mounted on overpasses or overhead gantries so that drivers can see where each lane goes. Exit numbers are commonly derived from the exit's distance in miles or kilometers from the start of the freeway. In some areas, there are public rest areas or service areas on freeways, as well as emergency phones on the shoulder at regular intervals.
In the United States, mileposts start at the southern or westernmost point on the freeway (either its terminus or the state line). California, Ohio, and Nevada use milepost systems in which the markers indicate mileage through the state's individual counties. However, in Nevada and Ohio, and some freeways that pass through Kern County, California, also use the standard milepost system concurrently with their respective postmile systems.
Cross sections
Two-lane freeways, often undivided, are sometimes built when traffic volumes are low or right-of-way is limited; they may be designed for easy conversion to one side of a four-lane freeway. Otherwise, freeways typically have at least two lanes in each direction; some busy ones can have as many as 16 or more lanes[lower-alpha 1] in total.
In San Diego, California, Interstate 5 has a similar system of express and local lanes for a maximum width of 21 lanes on a two-mile segment between Interstate 805 and California State Route 56. In Mississauga, Ontario, Highway 401 uses collector-express lanes for a total of 18 lanes through its intersection with 403/410 and 427.
These wide freeways may use separate collector and express lanes to separate through traffic from local traffic, or special high-occupancy vehicle lanes, either as a special restriction on the innermost lane or a separate roadway, to encourage carpooling. These HOV lanes, or roadways open to all traffic, can be reversible lanes, providing more capacity in the direction of heavy traffic, and reversing direction before traffic switches. Sometimes a collector/distributor road, a shorter version of a local lane, shifts weaving between closely spaced interchanges to a separate roadway or altogether eliminates it.
In some parts of the world, notably parts of the US, frontage roads form an integral part of the freeway system. These parallel surface roads provide a transition between high-speed "through" traffic and local traffic. Frequent slip-ramps provide access between the freeway and the frontage road, which in turn provides direct access to local roads and businesses.[11]
Except on some two-lane freeways (and very rarely on wider freeways), a median separates the opposite directions of traffic. This strip may be as simple as a grassy area, or may include a crash barrier such as a "Jersey barrier" or an "Ontario Tall Wall" to prevent head-on collisions.[12] On some freeways, the two carriageways are built on different alignments; this may be done to make use of available corridors in a mountainous area or to provide narrower corridors through dense urban areas.[citation needed]
Control of access
Control of access is a legal status which limits the types of vehicles which can use a highway and the points at which they can access it.
Freeways are usually limited to motor vehicles of a minimum power or weight; signs may prohibit bicyclists, pedestrians and equestrians and impose a minimum speed. It is possible for non-motorized traffic to use facilities within the same right-of-way, such as sidewalks constructed along freeway-standard bridges and multi-use paths next to freeways such as the Suncoast Trail along the Suncoast Parkway in Florida.
In some US jurisdictions, especially where freeways replace existing roads, non-motorized access on freeways is permitted. Different states of the United States have different laws. Cycling on freeways in Arizona may be prohibited only where there is an alternative route judged equal or better for cycling.[13] Wyoming, the least populated state, allows cycling on all freeways. Oregon allows bicycles except on specific urban freeways in Portland and Medford.[14]
In countries such as the United Kingdom new motorways require an Act of Parliament to ensure restricted right of way. Since upgrading an existing road (the "Queens's Highway") to a full motorway will result in extinguishing the right of access of certain groups such as pedestrians, cyclists, and slow-moving traffic, many controlled access roads are not full motorways.[15] In some cases motorways are linked by short stretches of road where alternative rights of way are not practicable such as the Dartford Crossing (the furthest downstream public crossing of the Thames) or where it was not economic to build a motorway alongside the existing road such as the former Cumberland Gap. The A1 is a good example of piece-wise upgrading to motorway standard—as of January 2013, the 639-kilometre-long (397 mi) route had five stretches of motorway (designated as A1(M)).
Continental European non-motorway dual carriageways can have limits as high as 110–120 kilometres per hour (68–75 mph). US Route 23 (US 23) in Ohio has a speed limit as high as 65 mph (105 km/h) but isn't legally a freeway-class road since it has no disclaimers saying that low-speed vehicles are prohibited; it also has at-grade intersections like expressway-class roadways.
Research shows 85 percent of motor vehicle-bicycle crashes follow turning or crossing at intersections.[16] Freeway travel eliminates almost all those conflicts save at entrance and exit ramps—which, at least on those freeways where cycling has not been banned, have sufficient room and sight for cyclists and motorists. An analysis of crashes in Arizona showed no safety problems with cycling on freeways. Fewer than one motor vehicle-bicycle crash a year was recorded on nearly 2000 shoulder-miles open to cyclists in Arizona.[17]
Major arterial roads will often have partial access control, meaning that side roads will intersect the main road at grade, instead of using interchanges, but driveways may not connect directly to the main road, and drivers must use intersecting roads to access adjacent land. There may be occasional interchanges with other major arterials. Examples include US 23 between SR 15's eastern terminus and Delaware, Ohio, along with SR 15 between its eastern terminus and I-75, US 30, SR 29/US 33, and US 35 in western and central Ohio. This type of road is sometimes called an expressway.
Construction techniques
The most frequent way freeways are laid out is usually by building them from the ground up after things such as forestry or buildings are cleared away. Sometimes they deplete farmland, but other methods have been developed for economic, social, and even environmental reasons.
Full freeways are sometimes made by converting at-grade expressways or by replacing at-grade intersections with overpasses; however, any at-grade intersection that ends a freeway remains.[citation needed] Often, when there is a two-lane undivided freeway or expressway, it is converted by constructing a twin corridor on the side by leaving a median between the two travel directions. The opposing side for the old two-way corridor becomes a passing lane.
Other techniques involve building a new carriageway on the side of a divided highway that has a lot of private access on one side and sometimes has long driveways on the other side since an easement for widening comes into place, especially in rural areas.
When a "third" carriageway is added, sometimes it can shift a directional carriageway by 50–200 feet (15–61 m) (or maybe more depending on land availability) as a way to retain private access on one side that favors over the other. Other methods involve constructing a service drive that shortens the long driveways (typically by less than 100 metres (330 ft)).
Intersections and access points
An intersection is a highway layout that permits traffic from one controlled-access highway to access another and vice versa whereas an access point is a highway layout where traffic from a distributor or local road can join a controlled-access highway. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, do not distinguish between the two, but other, such as Germany; make a distinction using the work Kreuz (cross) for the former and Ausfahrt (exit) for the other. In all cases one road crosses the other via a bridge.
The inter-connecting roads, or slip-roads, which link the two roads, can follow any one of a number of patterns. The actual pattern is determined by a number of factors including local topology, traffic density, land cost, building costs etc. In some jurisdictions feeder/distributor lanes are common, especially for cloverleaf interchanges; in others, such as the United Kingdom, where the roundabout interchange is common, feeder/distributor lanes are seldom seen.
A few of the more common types of junction are shown below:[18][19][20]
Various interchange layouts | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Environmental effects
Controlled-access highways have been constructed both between major cities as well as within them, leading to the sprawling suburban development found near most modern cities. They ideally serve to reduce travel times and accident rates, though the higher speeds have increased the severity and death rates of the collisions that do occur. [citation needed]
Highways have been heavily criticized by environmentalists, urbanists, and preservationists for the noise,[21] pollution, and economic shifts they bring.[22] Additionally, they have been criticized by the driving public for the inefficiency with which they handle peak hour traffic.[23][24][25]
Often, rural highways open up vast areas to economic development and municipal services, generally raising property values. In contrast to this, above-grade highways in urban areas are often a source of lowered property values, contributing to urban decay. Even with overpasses and underpasses, neighbourhoods are divided—especially impoverished ones where residents are less likely to own a car, or to have the political and economic influence to resist construction efforts.[26] Beginning in the early 1970s, the US Congress identified freeways and other urban highways as responsible for most of the noise exposure of the US population.[27] Subsequently, computer models were developed to analyze freeway noise and aid in their design to help minimize noise exposure.[28]
Some cities have implemented freeway removal policies in which freeways have even been demolished and reclaimed as boulevards or parks, notably in Seoul (Cheonggyecheon), Portland (Harbor Drive), New York City (West Side Highway), Boston (Central Artery), San Francisco (Embarcadero Freeway) and Milwaukee (Park East Freeway).
An alternative to surface or above ground freeway construction has been the construction of underground urban freeways using tunnelling technologies. This has been extremely successful in the Australian cities of Sydney (which has five such freeways) and Melbourne (which has two such freeways). This has had the benefit of removing traffic from surface roads and in the case of Melbourne's Eastlink Motorway, has helped preserve an ecologically sensitive area from destruction.
Other Australian cities face similar problems (lack of available land, cost of home acquisition, aesthetic problems, and community opposition). Brisbane, which also has to contend with physical boundaries (the river) and heavy population increases, has embraced underground tunnel freeways. There are currently two open to traffic (Clem Jones Tunnel (Clem7) and Airport Link), one under construction (Legacy Way) and one (East-West Link) is currently in planning. All of the tunnels are designed to act as an inner-city ring road or bypass system and include provisions for public transport, whether underground or in reclaimed space on the surface.[29] In Canada, the extension of Highway 401 into Detroit, known as the Herb Gray Parkway, has been designed with numerous tunnels and underpasses which provide land for parks and recreational uses.
Freeway opponents have found that freeway expansion is often self-defeating: expansion simply generates more traffic. That is, even if traffic congestion is initially shifted from local streets to a new or widened freeway, people will begin to run errands and commute to more remote locations. Over time, the freeway and its environs become congested again as both the average number and distance of trips increases. This idea is known as induced demand.[30][31]
Urban planning experts such as Drusilla Van Hengel, Joseph DiMento, and Sherry Ryan argue that although properly designed and maintained freeways may be convenient and safe, at least in comparison to uncontrolled roads, they may not expand recreation, employment and education opportunities equally for different ethnic groups, or for people located in certain neighborhoods of a given city.[32] Still, they may open new markets to some small businesses.[33]
Construction of urban freeways for the US Interstate Highway System, which began in the late 1950s, led to the demolition of thousands of city blocks, and the dislocation of many more thousands of people. The citizens of many inner city areas responded with the freeway and expressway revolts. Through the study of Washington's response, it can be shown that the most effective changes came not from executive or legislative action, but instead from policy implementation. One of the foremost rationales for the creation of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) was that an agency was needed to mediate between the conflicting interests of interstates and cities. Initially, these policies came as regulation of the state highway departments. Over time, USDOT officials re-focused highway building from a national level to the local scale. With this shift of perspective came an encouragement for alternative transportation, and locally based planning agencies.[34]
At present, freeway expansion has largely stalled in the United States, due to a multitude of factors that converged in the 1970s: higher due process requirements prior to taking of private property, increasing land values, increasing costs for construction materials, local opposition to new freeways in urban cores, the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (which imposed the requirement that each new federally funded project must have an environmental impact statement or report), and falling gas tax revenues as a result of the nature of the flat-cent tax (it is not automatically adjusted for inflation), the tax revolt movement,[35] and growing popular support for high-speed mass transit in lieu of new freeways.[citation needed]
Route numbering
United Kingdom
Great Britain
In England and Wales, the numbers of major motorways followed a numbering system separate to that of the A-road network, though based on the same principle of zones.[36] Running clockwise from the M1 the zones were defined for Zones 1 to 4 based on the proposed M2, M3 and M4 motorways. The M5 and M6 numbers were reserved for the other two planned long distance motorways.[37] The Preston Bypass, the UK's first motorway, should have been numbered A6(M) under the scheme decided upon, but it was decided to keep the number M6 as had already been applied.[37] Certain portions or bypasses of A-roads may be designated as motorways, the name of these portions being given the suffix "(M)". An example is the A1(M).[38]
In Scotland, where the Scottish Office (superseded by the Scottish Government in 1999) rather than the Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation had the decision, there is no zonal pattern, but rather the A-road rule is strictly enforced. It was decided to reserve the numbers 7, 8 and 9 for Scotland.[39] The M8 follows the route of the A8, and the A90 became part of the M90 when the A90 was re-routed along the path of the A85.
Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland a distinct numbering system is used, which is separate from the rest of the United Kingdom, though the classification of roads along the lines of A, B, and C is universal throughout the UK and the Isle of Man. According to a written answer to a parliamentary question to the Northern Ireland Minister for Regional Development, there is no known reason as to how Northern Ireland's road numbering system was devised.[40] However motorways, as in the rest of the UK, are numbered M, with the two major motorways coming from Belfast being numbered M1 and M2. The M12 is a short spur of the M1 with the M22 being a short continuation (originally intended to be a spur) of the M2. There are two other motorways, the short M3, the M5 and a motorway section of the A8 road, known as the A8(M).
Republic of Ireland
In the Republic of Ireland, motorway and national road numbering is quite different from the UK convention. Since the passage of the Roads Act 1993, all motorways are part of, or form, national primary roads. These routes are numbered in series, (usually, radiating anti-clockwise from Dublin, starting with the N1/M1) using numbers from 1 to 33 (and, separately from the series, 50). Motorways use the number of the route of which they form part, with an M prefix rather than N for national road (or in theory, rather than R for regional road).[41] In most cases, the motorway has been built as a bypass of a road previously forming the national road (e.g. the M7 bypassing roads previously forming the N7)—the bypassed roads are reclassified as regional roads, although updated signposting may not be provided for some time, and adherence to signage colour conventions is lax (regional roads have black-on-white directional signage, national routes use white-on-green).
Under the previous legislation, the Local Government (Roads and Motorways) Act 1974, motorways theoretically existed independently to national roads, however the short sections of motorway opened during this act, except for the M50, always took their number from the national road that they were bypassing. The older road was not downgraded at this point (indeed, regional roads were not legislated for at this stage). Older signage at certain junctions on the M7 and M11 can be seen reflecting this earlier scheme, where for example N11 and M11 can be seen coexisting.
The M50, an entirely new national road, is an exception to the normal inheritance process, as it does not replace a road previously carrying an N number. The M50 was nevertheless legislated in 1994 as the N50 route (it had only a short section of non-motorway section form the Junction 11 Tallaght to Junction 12 Firhouse until its extension as the Southern Cross Motorway). The M50's designation was chosen as a recognizable number. As of 2010, the N34 is the next unused national primary road designation. In theory, a motorway in Ireland could form part of a regional road.[41]
Elsewhere
In Hungary, similar to Ireland, motorway numbers can be derived from the original national highway numbers (1–7), with an M prefix attached, e.g. M7 is on the route of the old Highway 7 from Budapest towards Lake Balaton and Croatia. New motorways not following the original Budapest-centered radial highway system get numbers M8, M9, etc., or M0 in the case of the ring road around Budapest.
Also in the Netherlands, motorway numbers can be derived from the original national highway numbers, but with an A (Autosnelweg) prefix attached, like A9.
In Germany federal motorways have the prefix A (Autobahn). If the following number is an odd number the motorway generally follows a north–south direction, even-numbered motorways generally follow an east–west direction. Other controlled-access dual carriageways) in Germany can be federal highways (Bundesstraßen), state highways (Landesstraßen), district highways (Kreisstraßen) and city highways (Stadtstraßen), each with their own numbering system.
In New Zealand, as well as in the Scandinavian countries, in Finland, Brazil and Russia, motorway numbers are also derived from the state highway route that they form a part of, but unlike Hungary and Ireland, they are not distinguished from non motorway sections of the same state highway route. In the cases where a new motorway acts as a bypass of a state highway route, the original state highway is either stripped of that status or renumbered. A low road number means a road suitable for long distance driving. In Switzerland, as of April 2011, there are 1,763.6 kilometres (1,095.9 mi) of a planned 1,893.5 kilometres (1,176.6 mi) of motorway completed. The country is mountainous with a high proportion of tunnels, there are 220 totaling 200 kilometres (120 mi), which is over 12% of the total motorway length.[42]
In Australia, motorway numbering varies from state to state. Currently most states are adopting numbering systems with the prefix M for motorways.
In Pakistan, motorways are denoted with the prefix M.
Regional variation
While the design characteristics listed above are generally applicable around the globe, every jurisdiction provides its own specifications and design criteria for controlled-access highways.
Australia
Most of Australia's capital cities feature a motorway network within their urban areas. Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, while Canberra, Adelaide, Hobart and the regional centres of Newcastle, Geelong, Gold Coast, and Wollongong feature a selection of limited-access routes. Outside these areas traffic volumes do not generally demand motorway-standard access, although heavily trafficked regional corridors such as Sydney–Newcastle (M1 M1 Pacific Motorway), Brisbane–Gold Coast (M1 Pacific Motorway), Melbourne–Geelong (M1 Princes Freeway), Perth-Mandurah (SR2 Kwinana Freeway) and that form part of major long-distance routes feature high-standard motorway links.
The M31(The Hume Highway/Freeway connecting Sydney and Melbourne) and the M23(The Federal Highway (Australia); a spur route off the M31 that connects Canberra with Sydney) are the only two major interstate highways that are completed to a continuous dual carriageway standard. In addition, construction on the A1/M1(The Pacific Highway connecting Sydney and Brisbane) are underway to upgrade the M1 to dual carriageway highway. There is also plans to upgrade the A25 (The Barton Highway; another spur off the M31 that connects Canberra with Melbourne) to a dual carriageway highway.
It should be noted that although these inter-city highways are dual carriageway they are not controlled access highways. Most of these inter-city highways have driveways to adjacent property and at-grade junctions for smaller roads.
Unlike many other countries, Australia's motorways are being opened to cyclists. As the respective state governments upgrade their state's motorways bicycle lanes are being added and/or shoulders widened alongside the motorways.
Belgium
Before the 1970s, lorry drivers took long detours just to avoid Belgium. The country was at the time well known for its poor road standards.[citation needed] Since from the early 1970s, Belgium has built a very good motorway system. This concerns through passing motorways to and from the Netherlands, Germany, Luxembourg, France and the UK by ferries. They connect to the main cargo and ferry harbours, city ring roads, local motorways. Belgium today has the longest total motorway length per area unit of any country in the world.[citation needed] Most of the motorway system has at least three lanes in each direction, and all motorways have overhead lighting, even far from towns and cities.
Brazil
Although some 10,000 kilometres (6,200 mi) of Brazilian highway is built to motorway-standard, there is no distinct designation for controlled-access highways in the Brazilian federal and state highway systems. The term autoestrada (Portuguese for "motorway") is not commonly used in Brazil; the terms estrada ("road") and especially rodovia ("highway") are instead preferred. Nevertheless, the most technically advanced motorways in Brazil are defined Class 0 motorways by the National Department of Transport Infrastructure (DNIT). These motorways are built to safely allow for vehicular speeds of up to 130 km/h (81 mph). In mountainous terrain, the maximum allowable grade is 5% and maximum allowable radius is 665 m (with 12% super-elevation).
São Paulo state, with 4,700 kilometres (2,900 mi) of motorway, has the most in the country. It is also the state with more highways conceded to the private sector, resulting in the highest value of toll fares per kilometer of highway.
Brazil's first motorway, the Rodovia Anhanguera, was completed in 1953 as an upgrade of the earlier single-carriageway highway. That same year, construction of the second carriageway of Rodovia Anchieta began. Motorway construction, most projects in the form of upgrades of older single-carriageway highways, quickened in the following decades. The current Class 0 motorways include: Rodovia dos Bandeirantes, Rodovia dos Imigrantes, Rodovia Castelo Branco, Rodovia Ayrton Senna/Carvalho Pinto, Rodovia Osvaldo Aranha (also known as "Free-way") and São Paulo's Metropolitan Beltway Rodoanel Mario Covas, all modern, post-70's highways meeting modern European standards. Other stretches of highway such as the under-construction south BR-101 and Rodovia Régis Bittencourt are of older design standards.
Bulgaria
Legislation in Bulgaria defines two types of highways: motorways (Aвтомагистрала, Avtomagistrala) and expressways (Скоростен път, Skorosten pat). The main differences are that motorways have emergency lanes and the maximum allowed speed limit is 140 km/h (87 mph), while expressways do not have emergency lanes and the speed limit is 120 km/h (75 mph). As of July 2013, 618 kilometres (384 mi) of motorways are in service, with another 141 kilometres (88 mi) under various stages of construction. More than 400 kilometres (250 mi) are planned. Also, several expressways are planned.
Canada
Canada has no national system for controlled-access highways. With the exception of the Trans Canada Highway all highways, including the controlled-access ones, are under provincial jurisdiction. The largest networks in the country are in Ontario (400-series highways) and Quebec (Autoroutes of Quebec). These roads are influenced by US standards, but have design innovations and differences. The total length of dual-carriageways with controlled access in Canada is 6,350 kilometres (3,950 mi), of which 564 kilometres (350 mi) are in British Columbia, 642 kilometres (399 mi) in Alberta, 59 kilometres (37 mi) in Saskatchewan, 2,135 kilometres (1,327 mi) in Ontario, 1,941 kilometres (1,206 mi) in Quebec, and 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) in the Maritimes.
China
The National Trunk Highway System (NTHS) expressway network of the People's Republic of China is the longest in the world. The total length of China's expressways was 97,355 kilometres (60,494 mi) by the end of 2012.[43] Only in 2012, 12,409 kilometres (7,711 mi) of expressways were added to this network.
Expressways in China are a fairly recent addition to a complicated network of roads. According to Chinese government sources, China did not have any expressways before 1988.[44] One of the earliest expressways nationwide was the Jingshi Expressway between Beijing and Shijiazhuang in Hebei province. This expressway now forms part of the Jingzhu Expressway, currently one of the longest expressways nationwide at over 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi).
Denmark
Denmark has a well covered motorway system today, which due to the county's geography with many islands have been difficult to build. The longest bridges are the Great Belt and the Øresund bridges to Skåne (Scania) in southern Sweden. Both are motorways with dual electrical train tracks added. A motorway tunnel across the Fehmarn Belt to Germany is planned. Around Copenhagen, two ring motorways have been built. Even roads with less than 10.000 vehicles per day have been built in the most northern part of Jutland. This was made to assure that all ferry traffic will be directed to the motorway system as soon as possible.[citation needed]
Norway
Norway has just 407 kilometres (253 mi) of motorway. Most of it is around the big cities, Oslo and Bergen, and on the E6 and E18. There is also some on the E39. Most motorways use four-ramp parclo interchanges, or a diamond interchange with roundabouts. The first motorwway was built in 1964, just outside Oslo. The motorways themselves are similar to those in the US and Canada, with a yellow stripe towards the median, and white stripes between the lanes and on the edge.
El Salvador
The RN-21 (East–West, Boulevard Monseñor Romero), is the very first freeway to be built in El Salvador and in Central America. The freeway passes the northern area of the city of Santa Tecla, La Libertad. It has a small portion serving Antiguo Cuscatlan, La Libertad, and merges with the RN-5 (East–West, Boulevard de Los Proceres/Autopista del Aeropuerto) in San Salvador. The total length of the RN-21 is 9.35 kilometres (5.81 mi) and is currently working as a traffic reliever in the metropolitan area. The RN-21 was named in honor of the first mayor of San Salvador, Diego de Holguin, due to political reasons it was renamed to Boulevard Monseñor Romero, in honor to Óscar Romero. The first phase of the highway was completed in 2009, and the second phase was completed and opened in November 2012.
France
The Autoroute system in France consists largely of toll roads, except around large cities and in parts of the north. It is a network of 12,000 km (7,500 mi) worth of motorways. Autoroute destinations are shown in blue, while destinations reached through a combination of autoroutes are shown with an added autoroute logo. Toll autoroutes are signalled with the word péage (toll).
Germany
Germany's network of expressways with controlled access includes federal Autobahnen and Bundesstraßen as well as Landestraßen (State Highways), Kreisstraßen (District Highways) and Gemeindestraßen (municipal highways). The federal autobahn network has a total length of about 12,800 km, or 7,950 miles (in 2010), making it one of the most dense networks in the world. The German autobahns have no general speed limit (though about 47% of the total length is subject to local and/or conditional limits), but the advisory speed limit (Richtgeschwindigkeit) is 130 km/h (81 mph). The lower class expressways usually have speed limits of 120 km/h or lower.
India
Expressways in India make up more than 942 km (585 mi) of the Indian National Highway System[45] on which they are the highest class of road. The National Highways Development Project is underway to add an additional 18,637 km (11,580 mi) of expressways to the network by the year 2022.[46][47] The National Highways Network of India, is a network of highways that is managed and maintained by agencies of the Government of India.Currently India has of 71,000 km of National Highways out of which 16,000 plus km are 4 or 6 laned and remaining 55,000 km are 2 laned.[48][49]
Iran
The history of freeways in Iran goes back to before the Iranian Revolution. The first freeway in Iran was built at that time, between Tehran and Karaj with additional construction and the studies of many other freeways started as well. Today Iran has about 1,600 kilometres (990 mi) of freeway.
Ireland
In the Republic of Ireland the Local Government (Roads and Motorways) Act 1974 made motorways possible, although the first section, the M7 Naas Bypass, did not open until 1983. The first section of the M50 opened in 1990, a part of which was Ireland's first toll motorway, the West-Link. However it would be the 1990s before substantial sections of motorway were opened in Ireland, with the first completed motorway—the 83-kilometre (52 mi) M1 motorway—being finished in 2005.
Under the Transport 21 infrastructural plan,[50] motorways or high quality dual carriageways were built between Dublin and the major cities of Cork, Galway, Limerick and Waterford by the end of 2010. Other shorter sections of motorway either have been or will be built on some other main routes. In 2007 legislation (the Roads Bill 2007) was created to allow existing roads be designated motorways by order because previously legislation allowed only for newly built roads to be designated motorways.
As a result, most HQDCs nationwide (other than some sections near Dublin on the N4 and N7, which did not fully meet motorway standards) were reclassified as motorways. The first stage in this process occurred when all the HQDC schemes open or under construction on the N7 and N8, and between Kinnegad and Athlone on the N6 and Kilcullen and south of Carlow on the N9, were reclassified motorway on 24 September 2008. Further sections of dual carriageway were reclassified in 2009.
As of December 2011, the Republic of Ireland has around 1,017 kilometres (632 mi) of motorways.
Israel
Controlled-access highways in Israel are designated by a blue color. Blue highways are completely grade-separated by may include bus stops and other elements that may slow down traffic on the right lane.
Italy
The first motorway ever built in the world was the Autostrada dei laghi, inaugurated on 21 September 1924 in Milan. It linked Milan to Varese; it was then extended to Como, near the border with Switzerland, inaugurated on 28 June 1925. Piero Puricelli, the engineer who designed this new type of road, decided to cover the expenses by introducing a toll.[51][52]
Other motorways built before World War II in Italy were Naples-Pompeii, Florence-Pisa, Padua-Venice, Milan-Turin, Milan-Bergamo-Brescia and Rome-Ostia.
Type B highway (or strada extraurbana principale), commonly but unofficially known as superstrada, is a divided highway with at least two lanes for each direction, paved shoulder on the right, no cross-traffic and no at-grade intersections. Access restrictions on such highways are exactly the same of autostrade, as well as signage at the beginning and the end of the highway (with the only difference being the background color, blue instead of green).
Japan
National expressways (高速自動車国道 Kōsoku Jidōsha Kokudō) make up the majority of controlled-access highways in Japan. The network boasts an uninterrupted link between Aomori Prefecture at the northern part of Honshū and Kagoshima Prefecture at the southern part of Kyūshū, linking Shikoku as well. Additional expressways serve travellers in Hokkaidō and on Okinawa Island, although those are not connected to the Honshū-Kyūshū-Shikoku grid. Expressways have a combined length of 8,730 km as of March 2005.[53]
Korea
Since Gyeongin Expressway linking Seoul and Incheon opened in 1968, national expressway system in South Korea has been expanded into 36 routes, with total length of 3,913 km as of 2011. Most of expressways are 4-lane roads, while 1,030 km (26%) have 6 to 10 lanes. Speed limit is typically 100 km/h for routes with 4 or more lanes, and 80 km/h for 2-lane routes. Some south-north routes, including some sections of Gyeongbu Expressway, have limit of 110 km/h.
Expressways in South Korea were originally numbered in order of construction. Since 24 August 2001, they have been numbered in a scheme somewhat similar to that of the Interstate Highway System in the United States. Furthermore, the symbols of the South Korean highways are similar to the US red, white and blue.
- Arterial routes are designated by two-digit numbers, with north-south routes having odd numbers, and east-west routes having even numbers. Primary routes (i.e. major thoroughfares) have 5 or 0 as their last digit, while secondary routes end in other digits.
- Branch routes have three-digit route numbers, where the first two digits match the route number of an arterial route. This differs from the American system, whose last two digits match the primary route.
- Belt lines have three-digit route numbers where the first digit matches the respective city's postal code. This also differs from American numbering.
- Route numbers in the range 70–99 are not used in South Korea; they are reserved for designations in the event of Korean reunification.
- The Gyeongbu Expressway kept its Route 1 designation, as it is South Korea's first and most important expressway.
New Zealand
The term Motorway in New Zealand encompasses multilane divided freeways as well as narrower 2-4-lane undivided expressways with varying degrees of grade separation; the term Motorway describes the legal traffic restrictions rather than the type of road.[54]
New Zealand's motorway network is small due to the nation's low population density and low traffic volumes making it uneconomical to build controlled-access highways outside the major urban centres.
New Zealand's first motorway opened in December 1950 near Wellington, running from Johnsonville to Tawa. This 5 km (3.1 mi) motorway now forms the southern part of the Johnsonville-Porirua Motorway and part of State Highway 1.[55] Auckland's first stretch of motorway was opened in 1953 between Ellerslie and Mount Wellington (between present-day Exit 435 and Exit 438), and now forms part of the Southern Motorway.[56]
Most major urban areas in New Zealand feature limited-access highways. Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin contain motorways, with only Auckland having a substantial motorway network.
Pakistan
Pakistan has a network of high-quality, international-standard limited access (or access-controlled) Motorways and Expressways, which are maintained and operated by the National Highway Authority. Pakistan also has the second largest network of motorways in South Asia just behind India. In August 2012, operational Motorways and Expressways in Pakistan had a combined length of 679.5 km (422.2 mi) with another 1,261 km (784 mi) under construction. NHA plans to construct an additional 1,915 km (1,190 mi) of Motorways in the next 10 years.
Pakistan's motorways are part of Pakistan's National Trade Corridor project that aims to link Pakistan's three Arabian Sea ports of Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar to the rest of the country and further on with Afghanistan, Central Asia and China.
Pakistan's first motorway, the M2, was inaugurated in November 1997. The M2 is a 367 km (228 mi) long, six-lane motorway that links Pakistan's federal capital, Islamabad, with Punjab's provincial capital, Lahore. Since the completion of the M2, two additional motorways have become operational. These are the 54 km (34 mi) four-lane (with capacity to increase to six lanes) M3 (Pindi Bhattian-Faisalabad), which links the M2 to Faisalabad and the 154 km (96 mi) six-lane M1 (Peshawar-Swabi-Islamabad).
Under-construction motorways include:
- M4 (Faisalabad-Multan), estimated to be completed in 2014 with a total length of 233 km (145 mi)
- M8 (Ratodero–Gwadar), estimated to be completed in 2016 with a total length of 892 km (554 mi)
- M9 (Hyderabad–Karachi), estimated to be completed in 2014 with a total length of 136 km (85 mi)
Planned motorways include:
- M5 (Multan–Dera Ghazi Khan), with a total length of 80 km (50 mi).
- M6 (Dera Ghazi Khan–Ratodero), with a total length of 365 km (227 mi).
- M7 (Dadu–Hub), with a total length of 270 km (170 mi).
Poland
The highways in Poland are divided into motorways and expressways. As of May 2013, there are 1,370 kilometres (851 mi) of motorways[57] (autostrady, singular: autostrada) and 1,055 kilometres (656 mi) of expressways[57] (drogi ekspresowe, singular: droga ekspresowa).
Motorways in Poland are limited-access roads which can be only dual carriageways. As of May 2013 there are 1,370 kilometres (851 mi) of motorways in Poland. Additionally, there are also 237 kilometres (147 mi) of motorways under construction (May 2013).[58]
Expressways in Poland are limited-access roads which can be dual or single carriageways. As of May 2013 there are 1,055 kilometres (656 mi) of expressways in Poland. There are about 440 kilometres (273 mi) of expressways in various stages of construction.[57] The start of an expressway in Poland is marked with sign of white car on blue background, while number sign for an expressway is of red background and white letters, with the letter S preceding a number.
On 15 May 2004 the Regulation of the Council of Ministers (on the network of motorways and express roads) referred to a network of motorways and expressways in Poland totaling about 7,200 km (4,470 mi) (including about 2,000 km (1,240 mi) of motorways).[59] Regulation from February 2007 added roads S2 and S79 to the list.[60] Regulation from October 2009 supplemented plans with road S61.[61]
Portugal
Portugal was the third country in Europe—after Italy and Germany—to build a motorway (Portuguese: autoestrada, plural: autoestradas), opening, in 1944, the Lisbon-Estádio Nacional section of the present A5 (Autoestrada da Costa do Estoril).[62]
Additional motorway sections were built in the 1960s and 1970s. However, the large scale building of motorways started only in the late 1980s. Presently, Portugal has a very well developed network of motorways, with about a 3,000-kilometre (1,900 mi) extension, that connects all the high populated coastal regions of the country and the main cities of the less populated interior regions.[63]
Most of the Portuguese motorways are tolled, but, during the late 1990s and the 2000s, a number of non-tolled motorways were built, these being classified as Scut (Sem custos para o utilizador, no costs for the user). Because of economic reasons, the Scut concept was abolished between 2010 and 2011, these motorways starting to be also paid by its users. Having only electronic tolls, former Scut motorways can only be used by vehicles equipped with electronic payment devices.
Portuguese motorways form an independent network (Rede Nacional de Autoestradas, National Motorway Network), that overlaps the Fundamental and Complementary subnetworks of the National Highway Network (Rede Rodoviária Nacional). Each motorway section overlapping with the Fundamental subnetwork is part of an IP (Itinerário principal, Principal route) and each motorway section overlapping with the Complementary subnetwork is part of an IC (Itinerário complementar, Complementary route). So, a motorway can overlap sections of different IP or IC routes and, on the other hand, an IP or IC route can overlap sections of different motorways. An example is A22 motorway that overlaps sections of IP1 and of IC4 routes and another example is IP1 route that overlaps sections of A22, A2, A12, A1 and A3 motorways.
The National Motorway Network has a proper numbering system in which each motorway has a number prefixed by the letter "A". In most of the cases, a motorway signage indicates only its A number. The number of the IP or IC of which a motorway section is part of is not signed, except in some short motorways that have not a proper A number.
Romania
Romania currently has 635 kilometres (395 mi) of motorway in use, with another 61 kilometres (38 mi) under construction. In recent years, a master plan for the national motorway network has been developed and many works have begun around the country, which will result in significant changes in the following years.
- A1: Bucharest-Nadlac highway: 291.1 of 576 kilometres (180.9 of 357.9 mi) built (Bucharest–Pitești, Sibiu Bypass, Sibiu-Săliște, Cunța–Deva, Lugoj Bypass and Timișoara–Arad); estimated completion in 2020
- A2: Autostrada Soarelui (Highway of the Sun): all 202.7 kilometres (126.0 mi) built (Bucharest–Cernavodă-Constanța);
- A3: Autostrada Transilvania (Transylvania highway): 107.3 of 584 kilometres (66.7 of 362.9 mi) built (București–Ploiești, Câmpia Turzii–Cluj–Napoca) ; estimated completion in 2020
- A4: Autostrada Constanței: all 21.8 kilometres (13.5 mi) built (Constanța Bypass);
- A6: Lugoj-Calafat highway: 10.4 of 260 kilometres (6.5 of 161.6 mi) built (Balinț–Lugoj); estimated completion in 2020;
- A10: Sebeș-Turda highway: 70 kilometres (43 mi) planned for completion by 2016;
- Ax: East-West highway: 307 kilometres (191 mi) planned for completion by 2020;
- Ax: Autostrada Moldova (Moldova highway): 314 kilometres (195 mi) planned for completion by 2018;
- Ax: Pitești–Craiova highway: 121 kilometres (75 mi) planned for completion by 2017
South Africa
In South Africa, the term freeway differs from most other parts of the world. A freeway is a road where certain restrictions apply.[64] The following are forbidden from using a freeway:
- a vehicle drawn by an animal;
- a pedal cycle (such as a bicycle);
- a motor cycle having an engine with a cylinder capacity not exceeding 50 cm3 or that is propelled by electrical power;
- a motor tricycle or motor quadrucycle;
- pedestrians
Drivers may not use hand signals on a freeway (except in emergencies) and the minimum speed on a freeway is 60 km/h (37 mph). Drivers in the rightmost lane of multi-carriageway freeways must move to the left if a faster vehicle approaches from behind to overtake.
Despite popular opinion that "freeway" means a road with at least two carriageways, single carriageway freeways exist, as is evidenced by the statement that "the roads include 1400 km of dual carriageway freeway, 440 km of single carriageway freeway and 5300 km of single carriage main road with unlimited access."[65] The Afrikaans translation of freeway is snelweg (literally fast road or expressway).
Spain
The Spanish network of autopistas and autovias has a length of 15,152 km (9,415 mi). Autopistas are specifically reserved for automobile travel, so all vehicles not able to sustain at least 60 km/h (37 mph) are banned from them. General speed limits are mandated by the Spanish Traffic Law as 60–120 km/h (37–75 mph). Specific limits may be imposed based on road, meteorologic or traffic conditions. Spanish legislation requires an alternate route to be provided for slower vehicles. Many, but not all, autopistas are toll roads, which also mandates an alternate toll-free route under the Spanish laws.
Thailand
The Thai motorway network is an intercity motorway network that spans 145 kilometres (90 mi). It is to be extended to over 4,000 kilometres (2,500 mi) according to the master plan.
Thailand's motorway network is considered to be separate from Thailand's expressway network, which is the system of usually elevated expressways within Greater Bangkok. Thailand also has a provincial highway network.
The Thai highway network spans over 70,000 kilometres (43,000 mi) across all regions of Thailand. These highways, however, are often dual carriageways with frequent u-turn lanes and intersections slowing down traffic. Coupled with the increase in the number of vehicles and the demand for a limited-access motorway, the Thai Government issued a Cabinet resolution in 1997 detailing the motorway construction master plan. Some upgraded sections of highway are being turned into a "motorway", while other motorways are being purpose-built.
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan's motorways are larger than Thailand's. However, Turkmenistan has the motorway route numbers same as the US.
United Kingdom
Great Britain
A map Shewing Future Pattern of Principal National Routes was issued by the Ministry of War Transport in 1946[66] shortly before the law that allowed roads to be restricted to specified classes of vehicle (the Special Roads Act 1949) was passed.[67] The first section of motorway, the M6 Preston Bypass, opened in 1958[68] followed by the first major section of motorway (the M1 between Crick and Berrygrove), which opened in 1959.[68] From then onwards, motorways opened on a regular basis right into the 1980s;[69] by 1972 the first 1,000 miles (1,609 km) of motorway had been built.[70]
Whilst roads outside of urban areas continued to be built throughout the 1970s, opposition to urban routes became more pronounced. Most notably, plans by the Greater London Council for a series of ringways were cancelled following extensive road protests and a rise in costs.[71] In 1986 the compromised, single-ring, M25 motorway was completed.[72] In 1996 the total length of motorways reached 2,000 miles (3,219 km).[73]
Motorways in Great Britain will nearly always have the following characteristics...
1.) No traffic lights (except occasionally on slip roads prior to the main carriageway)
2.) Pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles below a specific engine size are banned.
3.) Exit is nearly always via a numbered junction and slip road only with minor rare exceptions.
4.) There is a central reservation separating traffic flowing in opposing directions (the only exception to this is the A38 (M) in Birmingham where the central reservation is replaced by another lane which traffic can flow in 2 directions on at certain times. There was another small spur motorway near Manchester with no solid central reservation, but this was declassified as a motorway in the 2000s.
5.) No roundabouts on the main carriageway (This is only the case however on motorways beginning with M (so called M class)). In the case of Upgraded A Roads ending with M there are numerous cases of roundabouts on the main carriageway. In all M class motorways bar one, there are no roundabouts except where they Mark the point at which the numbered motorway in question ends or the motorway designation ends. The only exception in Great Britain to this is the M271 in Southampton which has a roundabout on the main carriageway where it meets the M27, but then continues as the M271 after the junction. This motorway has been criticized as being "illegal", and as undermining the meaning of an "M Class" motorway.
Northern Ireland
Legal authority existed in the Special Roads Act (Northern Ireland) 1963 similar to that in the 1949 Act.[74] The first motorway to open was the M1 motorway, though it did so under temporary powers until the Special Roads Act had been passed.[75] Work on the motorways continued until the 1970s when the oil crisis and The Troubles both intervened causing the abandonment of many schemes.[76]
United States
In the United States, a freeway is defined by the federal government's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as a divided highway with full control of access.[77] This means two things. First, adjoining property owners do not have a legal right of access,[78] meaning that they cannot connect their lands to the highway by constructing driveways, although frontage roads provide access to properties adjacent to a freeway in many places. When an existing road is converted into a freeway, all existing driveways must be removed and access to adjacent private lands must be blocked with fences or walls.
Second, traffic on a freeway is "free-flowing". All cross-traffic (and left-turning traffic) is relegated to overpasses or underpasses, so that there are no traffic conflicts on the main line of the highway which must be regulated by traffic lights, stop signs, or other traffic control devices. Achieving such free flow requires the construction of many overpasses, underpasses, and ramp systems. The advantage of grade-separated interchanges is that freeway drivers can almost always maintain their speed at junctions since they do not need to yield to vehicles crossing perpendicular to mainline traffic.
In contrast, an expressway is defined as a divided highway with partial control of access.[79] Expressways may have driveways and at-grade intersections, though these are usually less numerous than on ordinary arterial roads.
This distinction was apparently[citation needed] first developed in 1949 by the Special Committee on Nomenclature of what is now the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.[80] In turn, the definitions were incorporated into AASHTO's official standards book, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which would become the national standards book of USDOT under a 1966 federal statute. The same distinction has also been codified into the statutory law of eight states: California,[81] Minnesota,[82] Mississippi,[83] Missouri,[84] Nebraska,[85] North Dakota,[86] Ohio,[87] and Wisconsin.[88]
However, each state codified the federal distinction slightly differently. California expressways do not necessarily have to be divided, though they must have at least partial access control. For both terms to apply, in Wisconsin, a divided highway must be at least four lanes wide; and in Missouri, both terms apply only to divided highways at least 10 miles (16 km) long that are not part of the Interstate Highway System. In North Dakota and Mississippi, expressways may have "full or partial" access control and "generally" have grade separations at intersections; a freeway is then defined as an expressway with full access control. Ohio's statute is similar, but instead of the vague word generally, it imposes a requirement that 50% of an expressway's intersections must be grade-separated for the term to apply.[89] Only Minnesota enacted the exact MUTCD definitions, in May 2008.
The term expressway is also used for what the federal government calls "freeways";[90] Where the terms are distinguished, freeways can be characterized as expressways upgraded to full access control, while not all expressways are freeways.
Examples in the United States of roads which are technically expressways (under the federal definition), but contain the word "freeway" in their names: State Fair Freeway in Kansas, Chino Valley Freeway, Rockaway Freeway in New York, and Shenango Valley Freeway (a portion of US 62) in Pennsylvania.
Unlike some countries, not all freeways in the US are part of a single national freeway network (although together with non-freeways, they form the National Highway System). For example, many state highways such as California State Route 99 have significant freeway sections. Many sections of the older United States Numbered Highways network have been upgraded to freeways but have kept their existing US Highway numbers.[citation needed]
See also
- List of controlled access highway systems
- List of OECD countries by road network size
Notes
- ↑ Portions of the Downtown Connector in Atlanta, Georgia have eight lanes in each direction.
References
- ↑ Staff (26 February 2004). "Glossary of Statistical Terms". OECD. Retrieved 3 September 2009.
- ↑ Patton, Phil (9 October 2008). "A 100-Year-Old Dream: A Road Just for Cars". The New York Times.
- ↑ "Built to Meander, Parkway Fights to Keep Measured Pace". The New York Times. 6 June 1995. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- ↑ Hershenson, Roberta (18 June 1995). "Bronx River Parkway On an Endangered List". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- ↑ "German Myth 8 Hitler and the Autobahn". German.about.com.
- ↑ Shragge, John & Bagnato, Sharon (1984). From Footpaths to Freeways. Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Historical Committee. p. 55. ISBN 0-7743-9388-2.
- ↑ Karnes, Thomas L. (2009). Asphalt and Politics: A History of the American Highway System. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co. p. 131.
- ↑ Korr, Jeremy (2008). "Physical and Social Constructions of the Capital Beltway". In Mauch, Christof; Zeller, Thomas. 'The World Beyond the Windshield: Roads and Landscapes in the United States and Europe. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. p. 195.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Bassett, Edward M. (February 1930). "The Freeway: A New Kind of Thoroughfare". American City 42: 95.
- ↑ Roig-Franzia, Manuel (22 November 2001). "The Town That Stops Traffic: Travelers Encounter Way Station as Way of Life in Breezewood". Washington Post. p. B1.
- ↑ Staff. "Chapter 2, Section 5". Access Management Manual. Texas Department of Transportation.
- ↑ Anonymous (March 1992). "Median Barriers Prove Their Worth". Public Works 123 (3): 72–73.
- ↑ "Controlled-Access Highways as Bikeways" (PDF). Arizona Department of Transportation. PGP 1030.
- ↑ "OAR Banning Non-Motorized Travel On Some Interstate Freeways in Oregon". Oregon Department of Transportation. Retrieved 12 October 2009.
- ↑ "Using the Highway". Your Rights: The Liberty Guide to Human Rights. Liberty. 18 August 2008. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
- ↑ "Bicycling facts and figures".
- ↑ Moeur, Richard C. (October 2002). "Bicycle–Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona: Analysis from January 1, 1991 to June 30, 2002" (PDF). Arizona Department of Transportation.
- ↑ "Roadway Design Manual". Texas Department of Transportation. March 2010. 6: Freeways. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ "Woodruff Road Corridor Study". 2013. Chapter 4*: Interchange Modifications. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ "13: Motorway Signs, Signals and Road Markings". Road Signs. ukmotorists.com. Retrieved 24 April 2012.
- ↑ Martin, Hugo (20 April 2003). "Sounding Off On Noise: Freeways' Neighbors Struggle To Drown Out Road Racket, Experts Say The Din Creates Mental And Physical Hazards". Los Angeles Times. p. B1.
- ↑ Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities..
- ↑ McCreery, Sandy (23 July 2001). "Don't just sit there, enjoy it!". New Statesman. p. 23.
- ↑ Smilgis, Martha (20 July 1987). "Trapped Behind the Wheel: Clever Commuters Learn to Live in the Slow Lane". Time: 64–65.
- ↑ "Doing The Turnpike Crawl". The New York Times. 6 July 1986. p. CN16.
- ↑ Spivak, Jeffrey (27 July 1999). "Today's Road Opening Represents Progress, Pain". Kansas City Star. p. A1.
- ↑ Senate Public Works Committee. "Noise Pollution and Abatement Act of 1972". S. Rep. No. 1160, 92nd Cong. 2nd session.
- ↑ "The Relationship between Highway Planning and Urban Noise". Proceedings of the ASCE, Urban Transportation Division Specialty Conference (Chicago: American Society of Civil Engineers, Urban Transportation Division). May 21–23, 1973.
- ↑ TransApex. Brisbane City Council http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/BCC:BASE:257180067:pc=PC_1783. Missing or empty
|title=
(help) - ↑ Cervero, Robert (Spring 2003). "Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis". Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2): 145–164.
- ↑ Martin, Hugo (10 April 2002). "Will More Freeways Bring More Traffic?". Los Angeles Times. p. B1.
- ↑ Van Hengel, Drusilla; DiMento, Joseph & Ryan, Sherry (March 1999). "Equal Access? Travel Behaviour Change in the Century Freeway Corridor, Los Angeles" (PDF). Urban Studies 36 (1): 547.
- ↑ Borth, Christy (1969). Mankind on the Move: The Story of Highways. Washington, DC: The Automobile Safety Foundation. pp. 248, 264.
- ↑ Mohl, Raymond A. (2008). "The Interstates and the Cities: The US Department of Transportation and the Freeway Revolt, 1966–1973". The Journal of Policy History 20: 193–226.
- ↑ Taylor, Brian D. (Winter 1995). "Public Perceptions, Fiscal Realities, and Freeway Planning: The California Case". Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (1): 43–59.
- ↑ "How the Motorways Were Numbered" (Memorandum). Ministry of Transport. November 1961. Retrieved 28 December 2007 – via Pathetic Motorways. "Mr Usborne explained that his proposal followed the principle of the sector system on which trunk and classified roads were already numbered, although the sectors themselves, which were six in number, were somewhat different."
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 Wykes, C. H. (7 July 1959). "How the Motorways Were Numbered" (Memorandum). Ministry of Transport. Retrieved 28 December 2007 – via Pathetic Motorways. "The result of applying such a system to current plans would be the appropriate numbering of the London–Yorkshire Motorway as M1, with provision for extension still further north as required. M.2 would be reserved for any possible Channel Ports Motorway, the Medway Towns Bypass meanwhile becoming A.2(M) and the Maidstone Bypass A.20(M). M3 would be reserved for a motorway in the direction of Portsmouth–Southampton, starting with the Exeter Radial. M.4 would be applied to the South Wales Radial. The remaining single figure numbers would not be required for radials and could therefore, continuing clockwise, be applied to the Bristol–Birmingham Motorway—M5 and the Penrith–Birmingham plus Dunchurch Bypass—M6. The Preston Bypass was numbered M6 in advance and although under these proposals it should initially have been A6(M), I see no reason to make any change from M.6 pending the ultimate completion of the whole route."
- ↑ Wykes, C. H. (30 September 1959). "How the Motorways Were Numbered" (Memorandum). Ministry of Transport. Retrieved 28 December 2007 – via Pathetic Motorways. "Where, however, a motorway is merely a by-pass along an existing route such as the Doncaster Bypass along Route A.1, it will not be given a separate M number, but in order to make it clear that it is a motorway and that motorway Regulations apply to it, the letter M will be added in brackets to the existing route-number: e.g. A.1(M) for the Doncaster Bypass. This will preserve the continuity of the route-number of long-distance all-purpose roads. Generally speaking by-passes that are eventually linked to form a continuous motorway will preserve the existing route-number (plus M in brackets) until they are so linked."
- ↑ Payne, B. A. (10 July 1959). "How the Motorways Were Numbered" (Memorandum). Ministry of Transport. Retrieved 28 December 2007 – via Pathetic Motorways. "1. The numbers 7, 8 and 9, which were used in Scotland, should be reserved for the use of Scottish Motorways."
- ↑ Northern Ireland Assembly Information Office. "The Northern Ireland Assembly". Northern Ireland Assembly. Retrieved 10 August 2009.
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 Staff (2006). "Roads Act 1993 (Classification of National Roads) Order 2006" (PDF). Department of Transport (Republic of Ireland). Retrieved 8 April 2007.
- ↑ "European Traffic Police Network (TISPOL) " (PDF). Retrieved 7 April 2012.
- ↑ "过去五年新增铁路里程1.97万公里 新增高速公路4.2万公里 - 2013两会 - 新华网". News.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
- ↑ MacLeod, Calum (29 January 2006). "China's Highways Go the Distance". USA Today. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- ↑ CIA World Factbook, India
- ↑ Dash, Dipak Kumar (23 November 2009). "By 2022, Govt to Lay 18,637 km of Expressways". Times of India.
- ↑ Kumar, Ashutosh. "Expressway Cost Pegged at Rs20 Crore/km". Daily News and Analysis.
- ↑ "Welcome to NHAI". NHAI. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
- ↑ http://www.nhai.org/images/aprilwebsitemap2012/Phase%20%20I%20II%20III%20Eng.jpg
- ↑ "Transport 21 Infrastructure Plan, Ireland". Transport21.ie. Retrieved 15 December 2010.
- ↑ "German Myth 8: Hitler's Autobahn?". Retrieved 3 April 2006.
- ↑ "1924 Mile Posts". Retrieved 3 April 2006.
- ↑ "Roads in Japan: Arterial High-standard Highways". Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Retrieved 11 April 2008.
- ↑ "Part 3: Motorways and Expressways". Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings (MOTSAM). New Zealand Transport Agency. June 2009.
- ↑ "FAQs". Transit New Zealand. Retrieved 21 March 2007.
- ↑ "CMI Transit". Retrieved 7 June 2007.
- ↑ 57.0 57.1 57.2 "Polish Motorways and Expressways Stats". SkyScraperCity (in Polish).
- ↑ "Statystyka] Autostrady i drogi ekspresowe—bez komentowania brig]". SkyscraperCity. Retrieved 6 December 2013.
- ↑ Dz.U. 2004 nr 128 poz. 1334(Polish)
- ↑ Dz.U. 2007 nr 35 poz. 220(Polish)
- ↑ Dz.U. 2009 nr 187 poz. 1446(Polish)
- ↑ http://www.ipim.gov.mo/worldwide_partner_detail.php?tid=3431&mode=print&lang=pt-pt
- ↑ Portugal é dos países com mais autoestradas na Europa Diário de Notícias—acedido em 21 April 2009
- ↑ Road Traffic Act No 29 of 1989
- ↑ "Transportation: Roads". South Africa: Stats and Facts. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
- ↑ "A New Way to Travel".
- ↑ "Special Roads Act 1949" (PDF). Office of Public Sector Information. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
- ↑ 68.0 68.1 "Statistics". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
- ↑ "Opening dates for Motorways in the UK in chronological order". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
- ↑ Porter, John & Bridle, Ron (2002). The Motorway Achievement. Thomas Telford. p. 223. ISBN 0-7277-3196-3. "...the construction industry was commissioned, in sequences of contracts spread over the years, to build 1000 miles of new motorway and duly so by 1972..."
- ↑ "Post-war and beyond". Chris' British Road Directory. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
- ↑ "M25 London Orbital Motorway (Junctions 13 to 30)". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
- ↑ Porter, John & Bridle, Ron (2002). The Motorway Achievement. Thomas Telford. p. 189. ISBN 0-7277-3196-3. "With 2000 miles of motorway completed and in operation by 1996..."
- ↑ "Conceptions and early history of the motorways in Northern Ireland". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
- ↑ "M1 Belfast to Dungannon and M12 to Craigavon". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
- ↑ "Westlink (M1 to M2)". Motorway Archive. The Motorway Archive Trust. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
- ↑ "Section 1A.13". Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Rev 1, 2003 ed ed.) (Federal Highway Administration). para. 29. See also 23 CFR 750.153(k).
- ↑ This part of the word's meaning was codified in 1939 at Section 23.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. See also People v. Scheinman, 248 Cal. App. 2d 180, 182, 56 Cal. Rptr. 168, 168–169 (1967) (interpreting Section 23.5 to find that a property owner had deeded to the State just the access from the side of his property directly abutting a future freeway but not the access through a connecting road which the state wished to close in order to upgrade an expressway to a freeway).
- ↑ "Section 1A.13". Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Rev. 1, 2003 ed.). para. 27.
- ↑ American Association of State Highway Officials (1962). AASHO Highway Definitions (Washington DC: American Association of State Highway Officials). p. 1–3.
- ↑ Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 257.
- ↑ Minn. Stat., § 160.02, subds. 18b & 19.
- ↑ Miss. Code Ann., § 65-5-3, subds. (b) and (c).
- ↑ Mo. Rev. Stat., § 304.010.
- ↑ Neb. Rev. Stat., §§ 60-618.01 and 60-621.
- ↑ N.D. Cent. Code, § 24-01-01.1 (2006).
- ↑ Ohio Rev. Code Ann., § 4511.01, subds. (YY) and (ZZ).
- ↑ Wis. Stat., §§ 59.84(1)(b) and 346.57(1)(am).
- ↑ Ohio Rev. Code Ann., § 4511.01, subd. (ZZ).
- ↑ "freeway". American Heritage Dictionary – via bartleby.com.
External links
|