Scientology Justice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Scientology Justice system is the Church of Scientology's internal means of assessing and dealing with violations of their code of ethics. These violations include those outside of the Church as well as within it.

The Scientology Handbook, a compilation of texts by founder L. Ron Hubbard, says "When the individual fails to put in his own ethics, the group takes action against him and this is called justice" and also notes that "Man cannot be trusted with justice. The truth is, man cannot really be trusted with 'punishment'." ^[1]

Committee of Evidence

A Committee of Evidence, abbreviated as "Comm Ev", and is a tribunal that deals with serious offenses. According to Scientology policy, the Committee of Evidence is only convened at a church member's request or when there is evidence of serious wrongdoing by a church member.

Administrative procedure

Administratively, the Committee of Evidence is initiated by a convening authority, usually the LRH Communicator of the organization. This person does so at the request, usually, of another church executive who makes formal accusations of violations of church ethics codes. A chairman, a secretary, and two to five other members are chosen by the convening authority who must be "senior" to the accused.^[2] Their task is to read and hear evidence for and against the accused church member. They have two weeks to complete the Committee of Evidence. Committee of Evidence policy explicitly bars any legal representation for the accused.^[3]

After reviewing evidence, the secretary and members vote on whether they think the accused church member is guilty or not guilty of each of the presented charges. Conviction on a charge is by majority vote. The Committee of Evidence then recommends punishment, which in principle, must be done in accordance with L. Ron Hubbard's policies. The outcome of a Committee of Evidence is issued in a document called the "Findings and Recommendations". All Committee of Evidence members must sign this document whether they agree with it or not.^[4] The only means of recourse are: A review Committee of Evidence, where the committee is supposed to just listen to the recordings and review the documents of the original Committee of Evidence, then issue new Findings and Recommendations, a petition by the accused church member to have the Committee of Evidence cancelled, which is directed to an executive highly-placed in the church hierarchy or a Board of Review in which the charges are reviewed by newly appointed Committee of Evidence members. Both the Board of Review and the Review Committee of Evidence have the option of making new recommendations.^[5]^[6]

The Committee of Evidence in practice

In a lecture given on 2 August 1970, Hubbard admitted that Committees of Evidence were very unpopular with Scientologists: "..This, of course, requires something that is very unpopular, which is a Committee of Evidence."^[7] Committee of Evidence members face being investigate and prosecuted by a Committee of Evidence themselves if the convening authority believes they were not aggressive enough in pursuit of the Committee of Evidence findings.^[8]

Court of Ethics

A court of ethics is convened by an ethics officer or church executive senior to the church staff member being charged. The offenses being accused are of non-serious nature and the sentences are at the discretion of the person who convened the court of ethics. The court is not supposed to engage in investigation, but rather operate only on known evidence.^[9]

References

↑ Church of Scientology, The Scientology Handbook, 1994 hardcover edition, pg.361–362.
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 24 February 1972, "Injustice" pp. 4–5
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 17 July 1966 Issue II, "Evidence, Admissibility of in Hearings, Boards or Committees"
↑ Hubbard Communications Office HCOPL 7 September 1963, "Committees of Evidence, Scientology Jurisprudence, Administration of" p.6
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 24 February 1972 Issue I, "Injustice", Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 7 September 1963, "Committees of Evidence, Scientology Jurisprudence, Administration of".
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 22 September 1963, "Concerning Committees of Evidence".
↑ 700802–1 A Short Briefing to Guardians Office Technical Personnel, 23 minutes into the lecture
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 24 February 1965, "Addendum to HCO Policy Letter of 7 Sept. 63 Committees of Evidence, Scientology Jurisprudence, Administration of"
↑ Hubbard Communications Office, HCOPL 26 May 1965, "Courts of Ethics"

External links

v t e Scientology

Beliefs and practices	Assists Body thetan The Bridge Comm Evs Dead File Disconnection Doctrine of Exchange E-meter Ethics Keeping Scientology Working Holidays Implant Incident Jesus in Scientology LGBT topics and Scientology Marriage Medical claims MEST Operating Thetan OT VIII Other religions Reincarnation Rundowns Sec Check Silent birth Space opera Supernatural abilities Study Tech Thetan Tone scale Training routines Xenu

Dianetics	History of Dianetics Auditing Black Dianetics Clear Dianetics: MSMH Engram Reactive mind

History and controversies	Abortion Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia Death of Lisa McPherson Death of Elli Perkins Death of Kaja Ballo Fair Game The Fishman Affidavit Project Normandy Keith Henson Operation Clambake Operation Snow White Operation Freakout List of Guardian's Office operations Psychiatry Scientology as a business Suppressive Person The Internet Scientology and Me The Secrets of Scientology "The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power" Lawrence Wollersheim Project Chanology Amy Scobee

Litigation	Church of Scientology v. Gerald Armstrong Church of Scientology International v. Fishman and Geertz Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al. Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia Hernandez v. Commissioner Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto R. v. Church of Scientology of Toronto Arenz, Röder and Dagmar v. Germany Church of Scientology v. Sweden X. and Church of Scientology v. Sweden Religious Technology Center v. Netcom United States v. Hubbard

Organizations	Church of Scientology Church of Scientology International Sea Org RPF Celebrity Centre Trementina Base Church of Spiritual Technology Office of Special Affairs Gold Base (The Hole) International Association of Scientologists Religious Technology Center L. Ron Hubbard House Hubbard Association of Scientologists International Free Zone

Countries	Status by country Australia Belgium Canada France Germany New Zealand Russia United Kingdom United States

Officials	Bob Adams John Carmichael Tommy Davis Jessica Feshbach David Gaiman Leisa Goodman L. Ron Hubbard Mary Sue Hubbard Heber Jentzsch David Miscavige Michele Miscavige Kendrick Moxon Karin Pouw Mark Rathbun Mike Rinder Michelle Stith Kurt Weiland

Popular culture	Ali's Smile: Naked Scientology "A Token of My Extreme" A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant Being Tom Cruise The Bridge Bowfinger The Profit Revolt in the Stars South Park The Master

Affiliated organizations and recruitment	ABLE CBAA Celebrities (List of members) Citizens Commission on Human Rights Criminon Cult Awareness Network Moxon & Kobrin Narconon Nation of Islam New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Project Oxford Capacity Analysis Safe Environment Fund Second Chance Program Trademarks Volunteer Ministers The Way to Happiness WISE

Portal Wiktionary Wikibooks Wikiquote WikiSource Wikimedia Commons Wikinews Wikiversity

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.