Quantum triviality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quantum field theory
Feynman diagram
History
Background Field theory Gauge theory Poincaré symmetry Quantum mechanics Spontaneous symmetry breaking
Symmetries Charge conjugation Crossing Parity Time reversal Symmetry in quantum mechanics
Tools Anomaly Effective field theory Expectation value Faddeev–Popov ghosts Feynman diagram Lattice gauge theory LSZ reduction formula Partition function Propagator Quantization Regularization Renormalization Vacuum state Wick's theorem Wightman axioms
Equations Dirac equation Klein–Gordon equation Proca equations Wheeler–DeWitt equation Bargmann–Wigner equations
Standard Model Electroweak interaction Higgs mechanism Quantum chromodynamics Quantum electrodynamics Yang–Mills theory
Incomplete theories Quantum gravity String theory Supersymmetry Technicolor Theory of everything
Scientists C. D. Anderson P. W. Anderson Bethe Bjorken Bogoliubov Brout Callan Coleman DeWitt Dirac Dyson Englert Fermi Feynman Fierz Fock Fröhlich Glashow Gell-Mann Gross Guralnik Heisenberg Higgs Haag Hagen 't Hooft Kendall Kibble Lamb Landau Lee Majorana Mills Nambu Nishijima Parisi Polyakov Salam Schwinger Skyrme Sudarshan Tomonaga Veltman Ward Weinberg Weyl Wilczek Wilson Yang Yukawa
v t e

In a quantum field theory, charge screening can restrict the value of the observable "renormalized" charge of a classical theory. If the only allowed value of the renormalized charge is zero, the theory is said to be "trivial" or noninteracting. Thus, surprisingly, a classical theory that appears to describe interacting particles can, when realized as a quantum field theory, become a "trivial" theory of noninteracting free particles. This phenomenon is referred to as quantum triviality. Strong evidence supports the idea that a field theory involving only a scalar Higgs boson is trivial in four spacetime dimensions,^[1] but the situation for realistic models including other particles in addition to the Higgs boson is not known in general. Nevertheless, because the Higgs boson plays a central role in the Standard Model of particle physics, the question of triviality in Higgs models is of great importance.

This Higgs triviality is similar to the Landau pole problem in quantum electrodynamics, where this quantum theory may be inconsistent at very high momentum scales unless the renormalized charge is set to zero, i.e., unless the field theory has no interactions. The Landau pole question is generally considered to be of minor academic interest for quantum electrodynamics because of the inaccessibly large momentum scale at which the inconsistency appears. This is not however the case in theories that involve the elementary scalar Higgs boson, as the momentum scale at which a "trivial" theory exhibits inconsistencies may be accessible to present experimental efforts such as at the LHC. In these Higgs theories, the interactions of the Higgs particle with itself are posited to generate the masses of the W and Z bosons, as well as lepton masses like those of the electron and muon. If realistic models of particle physics such as the Standard Model suffer from triviality issues, the idea of an elementary scalar Higgs particle may have to be modified or abandoned.

The situation becomes more complex in theories that involve other particles however. In fact, the addition of other particles can turn a trivial theory into a nontrivial one, at the cost of introducing constraints. Depending on the details of the theory, the Higgs mass can be bounded or even predictable.^[2] These quantum triviality constraints are in sharp contrast to the picture one derives at the classical level, where the Higgs mass is a free parameter.

Triviality and the renormalization group

The first evidence of possible triviality of quantum field theories was obtained by Landau, Abrikosov, Khalatnikov^[3]^[4]^[5] who obtained the following relation of the observable charge $g_{{obs}}$ with the “bare” charge $g_{0}$

$g_{{obs}}={\frac {g_{0}}{1+\beta _{2}g_{0}\ln \Lambda /m}}$

(1)

where $m$ is the mass of the particle, and $\Lambda$ is the momentum cut-off. If $g_{0}$ is finite, then $g_{{obs}}$ tends to zero in the limit of infinite cut-off $\Lambda$ . In fact, the proper interpretation of Eq.1 consists in its inversion, so that $g_{0}$ (related to the length scale $\Lambda ^{{-1}}$ ) is chosen to give a correct value of $g_{{obs}}$ :

$g_{0}={\frac {g_{{obs}}}{1-\beta _{2}g_{{obs}}\ln \Lambda /m}}$

(2)

The growth of $g_{0}$ with $\Lambda$ invalidates Eqs. (1) and (2) in the region $g_{0}\approx 1$ (since they were obtained for $g_{0}\ll 1$ ) and existence of the “Landau pole" in Eq.2 has no physical sense. The actual behavior of the charge $g(\mu )$ as a function of the momentum scale $\mu$ is determined by the Gell-Mann–Low equation

${\frac {dg}{d\ln \mu }}=\beta (g)=\beta _{2}g^{2}+\beta _{3}g^{3}+\ldots$

(3)

which gives Eqs.(1),(2) if it is integrated under conditions $g(\mu )=g_{{obs}}$ for $\mu =m$ and $g(\mu )=g_{0}$ for $\mu =\Lambda$ , when only the term with $\beta _{2}$ is retained in the right hand side. The general behavior of $g(\mu )$ depends on the appearance of the function $\beta (g)$ . According to classification by Bogoliubov and Shirkov,^[6] there are three qualitatively different situations:

if $\beta (g)$ has a zero at the finite value $g*$ , then growth of $g$ is saturated, i.e. $g(\mu )\to g*$ for $\mu \to \infty$ ;
if $\beta (g)$ is non-alternating and behaves as $\beta (g)\propto g^{\alpha }$ with $\alpha \leq 1$ for large $g$ , then the growth of $g(\mu )$ continues to infinity;
if $\beta (g)\propto g^{\alpha }$ with $\alpha >1$ for large $g$ , then $g(\mu )$ is divergent at finite value $\mu _{0}$ and the real Landau pole arises: the theory is internally inconsistent due to indeterminacy of $g(\mu )$ for $\mu >\mu _{0}$ .

The latter case corresponds to the quantum triviality in full theory (beyond its perturbation context), as can be seen by a reductio ad absurdum. Indeed, if $g_{{obs}}$ is finite, the theory is internally inconsistent. The only way to avoid it, is to tend $\mu _{0}$ to infinity, which is possible only for $g_{{obs}}\to 0$ .

Formula (1) is interpreted differently in the theory of critical phenomena. In this case, $\Lambda$ and $g_{0}$ have a direct physical sense, being related to the lattice spacing and the coefficient in the effective Landau Hamiltonian. The trivial theory with $g_{{obs}}=0$ is obtained in the limit $m\to 0$ , which corresponds to the critical point. Such triviality has a physical sense and corresponds to absence of interaction between large-scale fluctuations of the order parameter. The fundamental question arises, if such triviality holds for arbitrary (and not only small) values of $g_{0}$ ? This question was investigated by Kenneth G. Wilson using the real-space renormalization group^[7] and strong evidence for the positive answer was obtained. Subsequent numerical investigations of the lattice field theory confirmed Wilson’s conclusion.

However, it should be noted that “Wilson triviality” signifies only that $\beta$ -function is non-alternating and has not non-trivial zeros: it excludes only the case (a) in the Bogoliubov and Shirkov classification. The “true” quantum triviality is a stronger property, corresponding to the case (c). If “Wilson triviality” is confirmed by numerous investigations and can be considered as firmly established, the evidence of “true triviality” is scarce and allows a different interpretation. As a result, the question of whether the Standard Model of particle physics is nontrivial (and whether elementary scalar Higgs particles can exist) remains an important unresolved question. The evidence in favor of its positive solution has appeared recently^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11] and the implications for the Standard Model and the resulting Higgs Boson mass bounds have been discussed in .^[12]

References

↑ R. Fernandez, J. Froehlich, A. D. Sokal (1992). Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory. Springer. ISBN 0-387-54358-9.
↑ D. J. E. Callaway (1988). "Triviality Pursuit: Can Elementary Scalar Particles Exist?". Physics Reports 167 (5): 241–320. Bibcode:1988PhR...167..241C. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90008-7.
↑ L. D. Landau, A. A. Abrikosov, and I. M. Khalatnikov (1954). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 497.
↑ L. D. Landau, A. A. Abrikosov, and I. M. Khalatnikov (1954). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 773.
↑ L. D. Landau, A. A. Abrikosov, and I. M. Khalatnikov (1954). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 1177.
↑ N. N. Bogoliubov, D. V. Shirkov (1980). Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-04223-5.
↑ K. G. Wilson (1975). "The Renormalization Group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem". Reviews of Modern Physics 47: 4. Bibcode:1975RvMP...47..773W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.47.773.
↑ Callaway, D.; Petronzio, R. (1987). "Is the standard model Higgs mass predictable?". Nuclear Physics B 292: 497. Bibcode:1987NuPhB.292..497C. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90657-2.
↑ I. M. Suslov (2008). "Renormalization Group Functions of the φ⁴ Theory in the Strong Coupling Limit: Analytical Results". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 107 (3): 413. arXiv:1010.4081. Bibcode:2008JETP..107..413S. doi:10.1134/S1063776108090094.
↑ I. M. Suslov (2010). "Asymptotic Behavior of the β Function in the φ⁴ Theory: A Scheme Without Complex Parameters". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 111 (3): 450. arXiv:1010.4317. Bibcode:2010JETP..111..450S. doi:10.1134/S1063776110090153.
↑ Frasca, Marco (2011). "Mapping theorem and Green functions in Yang-Mills theory" (PDF). The many faces of QCD. Trieste: Proceedings of Science. p. 039. arXiv:1011.3643. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
↑ Lindner, M. (1986). "Implications of triviality for the standard model". Zeitschrift für Physik C 31: 295. Bibcode:1986ZPhyC..31..295L. doi:10.1007/BF01479540.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.

Quantum triviality

Triviality and the renormalization group

See also

References