Pendulum (mathematics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Classical mechanics
History Timeline
Branches Statics Dynamics Kinetics Kinematics Applied mechanics Celestial mechanics Continuum mechanics Statistical mechanics
Formulations Newtonian mechanics (Vectorial mechanics) Analytical mechanics (Lagrangian mechanics Hamiltonian mechanics)
Fundamental concepts Space Time Mass Inertia Velocity Speed Acceleration Force Momentum Impulse Torque / Moment / Couple Angular momentum Moment of inertia Frame of reference Energy (kinetic potential) Mechanical work Mechanical power Virtual work D'Alembert's principle
Core topics Rigid body (dynamics Euler's equations) Motion (linear) Euler's laws of motion Newton's laws of motion Newton's law of universal gravitation Equations of motion Inertial / Non-inertial reference frame Fictitious force Mechanics of planar particle motion Displacement (vector) Relative velocity Friction Simple harmonic motion Harmonic oscillator Vibration Damping (ratio)
Rotational motion Circular motion (uniform non-uniform) Rotating reference frame Centripetal force Centrifugal force (rotating reference frame reactive) Coriolis force Pendulum Tangential / Rotational speed Angular acceleration Angular velocity Angular frequency Angular displacement
Scientists Galileo Newton Kepler Horrocks Halley Euler d'Alembert Clairaut Lagrange Laplace Hamilton Poisson Daniel / Johann Bernoulli Cauchy
v t e

The mathematics of pendulums are in general quite complicated. Simplifying assumptions can be made, which in the case of a simple pendulum allows the equations of motion to be solved analytically for small-angle oscillations.

Simple gravity pendulum

Animation of a pendulum showing the velocity and acceleration vectors
PLEASE NOTE:
The acceleration vector $\overrightarrow {a}$
is related to
the gravitational vector: $\overrightarrow {g}=G{\frac {mM}{r^{2}}}\$
... where
m is the bob mass
M is the Earth mass M_⊕
r is the Earth radius
and
G is the Gravitational constant in Standard gravity.

A so-called "simple pendulum" is an idealization of a "real pendulum" but in an isolated system using the following assumptions:

The rod or cord on which the bob swings is massless, inextensible and always remains taut;
The bob is a point mass;
Motion occurs only in two dimensions, i.e. the bob does not trace an ellipse but an arc.
The motion does not lose energy to friction or air resistance.

The differential equation which represents the motion of a simple pendulum is

${\frac {{\mathrm {d}}^{2}\theta }{{\mathrm {d}}t^{2}}}+{\frac {g}{\ell }}\sin \theta =0$

(Eq. 1)

where $g$ is acceleration due to gravity, $\ell$ is the length of the pendulum, and $\theta$ is the angular displacement.

"Force" derivation of (Eq. 1) Figure 1. Force diagram of a simple gravity pendulum. Please take the time to consider Figure 1 on the right, showing the forces acting on a simple pendulum. Note that the path of the pendulum sweeps out an arc of a circle. The angle $\theta$ is measured in radians, and this is crucial for this formula. The blue arrow is the gravitational force acting on the bob, and the violet arrows are that same force resolved into components parallel and perpendicular to the bob's instantaneous motion. The direction of the bob's instantaneous velocity always points along the red axis, which is considered the tangential axis because its direction is always tangent to the circle. Consider Newton's second law, $F=ma\,$ where F is the sum of forces on the object, m is mass, and a is the acceleration. Because we are only concerned with changes in speed, and because the bob is forced to stay in a circular path, we apply Newton's equation to the tangential axis only. The short violet arrow represents the component of the gravitational force in the tangential axis, and trigonometry can be used to determine its magnitude. Thus, $F=-mg\sin \theta =ma\,$ $a=-g\sin \theta \,$ where $g$ is the acceleration due to gravity near the surface of the earth. The negative sign on the right hand side implies that $\theta$ and $a$ always point in opposite directions. This makes sense because when a pendulum swings further to the left, we would expect it to accelerate back toward the right. This linear acceleration $a$ along the red axis can be related to the change in angle $\theta$ by the arc length formulas; $s$ is arc length: $s=\ell \theta \,$ $v={ds \over dt}=\ell {d\theta \over dt}$ $a={d^{2}s \over dt^{2}}=\ell {d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}$ thus: ${d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}+{g \over \ell }\sin \theta =0$

"Torque" derivation of (Eq. 1) Equation (1) can be obtained using two definitions for torque. ${\mathbf {\tau }}={\mathbf {r}}\times {\mathbf {F}}={{d{\mathbf {L}}} \over {dt}}$ First start by defining the torque on the pendulum bob using the force due to gravity. ${\mathbf {\tau }}={\mathbf {l\times F_{g}}},$ where ${\mathbf {l}}$ is the length vector of the pendulum and ${\mathbf {F_{g}}}$ is the force due to gravity. For now just consider the magnitude of the torque on the pendulum. ${\mathbf {\|\tau \|}}=-mgl\sin \theta ,$ where $m$ is the mass of the pendulum, $g$ is the acceleration due to gravity, $l$ is the length of the pendulum and $\theta$ is the angle between the length vector and the force due to gravity. Next rewrite the angular momentum. ${\mathbf {L}}={\mathbf {r\times p}}=m{\mathbf {r\times (\omega \times r)}}$ . Again just consider the magnitude of the angular momentum. ${\mathbf {\|L\|}}=mr^{2}\omega =ml^{2}{d\theta \over dt}$ . and is time derivative ${d \over dt}{\mathbf {\|L\|}}=ml^{2}{d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}$ , According to ${{\mathbf {\tau }}={d{\mathbf {L}} \over dt}}$ , we can get by comparing the magnitudes $-mgl\sin \theta =ml^{2}{d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}$ , thus: ${d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}+{g \over l}\sin \theta =0,$ which is the same result as obtained through force analysis.

"Energy" derivation of (Eq. 1)

Figure 2. Trigonometry of a simple gravity pendulum.

It can also be obtained via the conservation of mechanical energy principle: any object falling a vertical distance $h$ would acquire kinetic energy equal to that which it lost to the fall. In other words, gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Change in potential energy is given by

$\Delta U=mgh\,$

change in kinetic energy (body started from rest) is given by

$\Delta K={1 \over 2}mv^{2}$

Since no energy is lost, those two must be equal

${1 \over 2}mv^{2}=mgh$

$v={\sqrt {2gh}}\,$

Using the arc length formula above, this equation can be rewritten in favor of ${d\theta \over dt}$

$v={\ell }{d\theta \over dt}={\sqrt {2gh}}$

${d\theta \over dt}={1 \over \ell }{\sqrt {2gh}}$

$h$ is the vertical distance the pendulum fell. Look at Figure 2, which presents the trigonometry of a simple pendulum. If the pendulum starts its swing from some initial angle $\theta _{0}$ , then $y_{0}$ , the vertical distance from the screw, is given by

$y_{0}=\ell \cos \theta _{0}\,$

similarly, for $y_{1}$ , we have

$y_{1}=\ell \cos \theta \,$

then $h$ is the difference of the two

$h=\ell \left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)$

in terms of ${d\theta \over dt}$ gives

${d\theta \over dt}={\sqrt {{2g \over \ell }\left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)}}$

(Eq. 2)

This equation is known as the first integral of motion, it gives the velocity in terms of the location and includes an integration constant related to the initial displacement ( $\theta _{0}$ ). We can differentiate, by applying the chain rule, with respect to time to get the acceleration

${d \over dt}{d\theta \over dt}={d \over dt}{\sqrt {{2g \over \ell }\left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)}}$

${\begin{aligned}{d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}&={1 \over 2}{-(2g/\ell )\sin \theta \over {\sqrt {(2g/\ell )\left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)}}}{d\theta \over dt}\\&={1 \over 2}{-(2g/\ell )\sin \theta \over {\sqrt {(2g/\ell )\left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)}}}{\sqrt {{2g \over \ell }\left(\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}\right)}}=-{g \over \ell }\sin \theta \end{aligned}}$

${d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}+{g \over \ell }\sin \theta =0,$

which is the same result as obtained through force analysis.

Small-angle approximation

The differential equation given above is not easily solved, and there is no solution that can be written in terms of elementary functions. However adding a restriction to the size of the oscillation's amplitude gives a form whose solution can be easily obtained. If it is assumed that the angle is much less than 1 radian, or

$\theta \ll 1\,$ ,

then substituting for sin θ into Eq. 1 using the small-angle approximation,

$\sin \theta \approx \theta \,$ ,

yields the equation for a harmonic oscillator,

${d^{2}\theta \over dt^{2}}+{g \over \ell }\theta =0.$

The error due to the approximation is of order θ³ (from the Maclaurin series for sin θ).

Given the initial conditions θ(0) = θ₀ and dθ/dt(0) = 0, the solution becomes,

$\theta (t)=\theta _{0}\cos \left({\sqrt {g \over \ell \,}}\,t\right)\quad \quad \quad \quad \theta _{0}\ll 1.$

The motion is simple harmonic motion where θ₀ is the semi-amplitude of the oscillation (that is, the maximum angle between the rod of the pendulum and the vertical). The period of the motion, the time for a complete oscillation (outward and return) is

$T_{0}=2\pi {\sqrt {{\frac {\ell }{g}}}}\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \theta _{0}\ll 1$

which is known as Christiaan Huygens's law for the period. Note that under the small-angle approximation, the period is independent of the amplitude θ₀; this is the property of isochronism that Galileo discovered.

Rule of thumb for pendulum length

$T_{0}=2\pi {\sqrt {{\frac {\ell }{g}}}}$ can be expressed as $\ell ={{\frac {g}{\pi ^{2}}}}\times {{\frac {T_{0}^{2}}{4}}}.$

If SI units are used (i.e. measure in metres and seconds), and assuming the measurement is taking place on the Earth's surface, then $\scriptstyle g\approx 9.81$ m/s², and $\scriptstyle g/\pi ^{2}\approx {1}$ (0.994 is the approximation to 3 decimal places).

Therefore a relatively reasonable approximation for the length and period are,

$\ell \approx {{\frac {T_{0}^{2}}{4}}},$

$T_{0}\approx 2{\sqrt {\ell }}$

Arbitrary-amplitude period

For amplitudes beyond the small angle approximation, one can compute the exact period by first inverting the equation for the angular velocity obtained from the energy method (Eq. 2),

Figure 3. Deviation of the "true" period of a pendulum from the small-angle approximation of the period. "True" value was obtained using Matlab to numerically evaluate the elliptic integral.

Figure 4. Relative errors using the power series.

${dt \over d\theta }={\sqrt {\ell \over 2g}}{1 \over {\sqrt {\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}}}}$

and then integrating over one complete cycle,

$T=t(\theta _{0}\rightarrow 0\rightarrow -\theta _{0}\rightarrow 0\rightarrow \theta _{0}),$

or twice the half-cycle

$T=2t\left(\theta _{0}\rightarrow 0\rightarrow -\theta _{0}\right),$

or 4 times the quarter-cycle

$T=4t\left(\theta _{0}\rightarrow 0\right),$

which leads to

$T=4{\sqrt {\ell \over 2g}}\int _{0}^{{\theta _{0}}}{1 \over {\sqrt {\cos \theta -\cos \theta _{0}}}}\,d\theta .$

This integral can be re-written in terms of elliptic integrals as

$T=4{\sqrt {\ell \over g}}F\left({\theta _{0} \over 2},\csc {\theta _{0} \over 2}\right)\csc {\theta _{0} \over 2}$

where $F$ is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind defined by

$F(\varphi ,k)=\int _{0}^{\varphi }{1 \over {\sqrt {1-k^{2}\sin ^{2}{u}}}}\,du\,.$

Or more concisely by the substitution $\sin {u}={\frac {\sin {\theta \over 2}}{\sin {\theta _{0} \over 2}}}$ expressing $\theta$ in terms of $u$ ,

$T=4{\sqrt {\ell \over g}}\,K\left(\sin {\theta _{0} \over 2}\right)$

(Eq. 3)

where $K$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind defined by

$K(k)=F\left({\pi \over 2},k\right)=\int _{0}^{{\pi /2}}{1 \over {\sqrt {1-k^{2}\sin ^{2}{u}}}}\,du\,.$

For comparison of the approximation to the full solution, consider the period of a pendulum of length 1 m on Earth (g = 9.80665 m/s²) at initial angle 10 degrees is $4{\sqrt {1\ {\mathrm {m}} \over g}}K\left({\sin {10^{\circ } \over 2}}\right)\approx 2.0102\ {\mathrm {s}}$ . The linear approximation gives $2\pi {\sqrt {1\ {\mathrm {m}} \over g}}\approx 2.0064\ {\mathrm {s}}$ . The difference between the two values, less than 0.2%, is much less than that caused by the variation of g with geographical location.

From here there are many ways to proceed to calculate the elliptic integral:

Legendre polynomial solution for the elliptic integral

Given Eq. 3 and the Legendre polynomial solution for the elliptic integral:

$K(k)={\frac {\pi }{2}}\left\{1+\left({\frac {1}{2}}\right)^{2}k^{{2}}+\left({\frac {1\cdot 3}{2\cdot 4}}\right)^{2}k^{{4}}+\cdots +\left[{\frac {\left(2n-1\right)!!}{\left(2n\right)!!}}\right]^{2}k^{{2n}}+\cdots \right\},$

where $n!!$ denotes the double factorial, an exact solution to the period of a pendulum is:

${\begin{alignedat}{2}T&=2\pi {\sqrt {\ell \over g}}\left(1+\left({\frac {1}{2}}\right)^{2}\sin ^{2}\left({\frac {\theta _{0}}{2}}\right)+\left({\frac {1\cdot 3}{2\cdot 4}}\right)^{2}\sin ^{4}\left({\frac {\theta _{0}}{2}}\right)+\left({\frac {1\cdot 3\cdot 5}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6}}\right)^{2}\sin ^{6}\left({\frac {\theta _{0}}{2}}\right)+\cdots \right)\\&=2\pi {\sqrt {\ell \over g}}\cdot \sum _{{n=0}}^{\infty }\left[\left({\frac {(2n)!}{(2^{n}\cdot n!)^{2}}}\right)^{2}\cdot \sin ^{{2n}}\left({\frac {\theta _{0}}{2}}\right)\right].\end{alignedat}}$

Figure 4 shows the relative errors using the power series. T₀ is the linear approximation, and T₂ to T₁₀ include respectively the terms up to the 2nd to the 10th powers.

Figure 5. Potential energy and phase portrait of a simple pendulum. Note that the x-axis, being angle, wraps onto itself after every 2π radians.

Power series solution for the elliptic integral

Another formulation of the above solution can be found if the following Maclaurin series:

$\sin {\theta _{0} \over 2}={\frac {1}{2}}\theta _{0}-{\frac {1}{48}}\theta _{0}^{3}+{\frac {1}{3840}}\theta _{0}^{5}-{\frac {1}{645120}}\theta _{0}^{7}+\cdots .$

is used in the Legendre polynomial solution above. The resulting power series is:^[1]

${\begin{alignedat}{2}T&=2\pi {\sqrt {\ell \over g}}\left(1+{\frac {1}{16}}\theta _{0}^{2}+{\frac {11}{3072}}\theta _{0}^{4}+{\frac {173}{737280}}\theta _{0}^{6}+{\frac {22931}{1321205760}}\theta _{0}^{8}+{\frac {1319183}{951268147200}}\theta _{0}^{{10}}+{\frac {233526463}{2009078326886400}}\theta _{0}^{{12}}+...\right)\end{alignedat}}.$

Arithmetic-geometric mean solution for elliptic integral

Given Eq. 3 and the Arithmetic-geometric mean solution of the elliptic integral:

$K(k)={\frac {\pi /2}{M(1-k,1+k)}},$

where $M(x,y)$ is the arithmetic-geometric mean of $x$ and $y$ .

This yields an alternative and faster-converging formula for the period:^[2]

$T={\frac {2\pi }{M(1,\cos(\theta _{0}/2))}}{\sqrt {\frac {\ell }{g}}}.$

Examples

The animations below depict several different modes of oscillation given different initial conditions. The small graph above the pendulums are their phase portraits.

Initial angle of 0°, a stable equilibrium.
Initial angle of 45°
Initial angle of 90°
Initial angle of 135°
Initial angle of 170°
Pendulum with just barely enough energy for a full swing
Pendulum with enough energy for a full swing
Initial angle of 180°, unstable equilibrium.

Compound pendulum

A compound pendulum (or physical pendulum) is one where the rod is not massless, and may have extended size; that is, an arbitrarily shaped rigid body swinging by a pivot. In this case the pendulum's period depends on its moment of inertia I around the pivot point.

The equation of torque gives:

$\tau =I\alpha \,$

where:

$\alpha$ is the angular acceleration.

$\tau$ is the torque

The torque is generated by gravity so:

$\tau =-mgL\sin \theta \,$

where:

L is the distance from the pivot to the center of mass of the pendulum

θ is the angle from the vertical

Hence, under the small-angle approximation $\scriptstyle \sin \theta \approx \theta \,$ ,

$\alpha \approx -{\frac {mgL\theta }{I}}$

This is of the same form as the conventional simple pendulum and this gives a period of:

$T=2\pi {\sqrt {{\frac {I}{mgL}}}}$

^[3]

And a frequency of:

$f={\frac {1}{T}}={\frac {1}{2\pi }}{\sqrt {{\frac {mgL}{I}}}}$

Physical interpretation of the imaginary period

The Jacobian elliptic function that expresses the position of a pendulum as a function of time is a doubly periodic function with a real period and an imaginary period. The real period is of course the time it takes the pendulum to go through one full cycle. Paul Appell pointed out a physical interpretation of the imaginary period:^[4] if θ₀ is the maximum angle of one pendulum and 180° − θ₀ is the maximum angle of another, then the real period of each is the magnitude of the imaginary period of the other. This interpretation, involving dual forces in opposite directions, might be further clarified and generalized to other classical problems in mechanics with dual solutions.^[5]

References

↑ Nelson, Robert; M. G. Olsson (February 1986). "The pendulum — Rich physics from a simple system". American Journal of Physics 54 (2): pp. 112–121. doi:10.1119/1.14703. Retrieved 2012-04-30. Cite uses deprecated parameters (help)
↑ Carvalhaes, Claudio G.; Suppes, Patrick (December 2008), "Approximations for the period of the simple pendulum based on the arithmetic-geometric mean", Am. J. Phys. 76 (12͒): 1150–1154, doi:10.1119/1.2968864͔, ISSN 0002-9505, retrieved 2013-12-14
↑ Physical Pendulum
↑ Paul Appell, "Sur une interprétation des valeurs imaginaires du temps en Mécanique", Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Scéances de l'Académie des Sciences, volume 87, number 1, July, 1878
↑ Adlaj, S. Mechanical interpretation of negative and imaginary tension of a tether in a linear parallel force field , Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference on Mechanics "SIXTH POLYAKHOV READINGS", January 31 - February 3, 2012, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 13-18.

External links

Mathworld article on Mathieu Function

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.