Pather Panchali

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pather Panchali
Poster

A poster of Pather Panchali
Directed by Satyajit Ray
Screenplay by Satyajit Ray
Based on Pather Panchali 
by Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay
Starring Subir Banerjee
Kanu Banerjee
Karuna Banerjee
Uma Dasgupta
Chunibala Devi
Tulsi Chakrabarti
Music by Ravi Shankar
Cinematography Subrata Mitra
Editing by Dulal Dutta
Studio Government of West Bengal
Distributed by Aurora Film Corporation (1955)
Edward Harrison (1958)
Merchant Ivory Productions
Sony Pictures Classics (1995)
Release dates
  • 26 August 1955 (1955-08-26) (India)
Running time 112–126 minutes[lower-alpha 1]
Country India
Language Bengali
Budget INR 70,000–150,000[lower-alpha 2] (approximately US$14,613–31,315)[lower-alpha 3]

Pather Panchali (Pôther Pãchali, [pɔt̪ʰer pãtʃali], English: Song of the Little Road) is a 1955 Bengali drama film directed by Satyajit Ray and produced by the Government of West Bengal, India. It is based on Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay's 1929 Bengali novel of the same name and is Ray's directorial debut. It features Subir Banerjee, Kanu Banerjee, Karuna Banerjee, Uma Dasgupta and Chunibala Devi in major roles. The first film in The Apu Trilogy, Pather Panchali depicts the childhood of the protagonist Apu (Subir Banerjee) and his elder sister Durga (Uma Dasgupta), and the harsh village life of their poor family.

Production was interrupted due to funding problems and took nearly three years. The film was shot mainly on location, had a limited budget,[lower-alpha 2] featured mostly amateur actors, and was made by an inexperienced crew. The sitar virtuoso Ravi Shankar composed its soundtrack using classical Indian ragas. Following its premiere in 1955 during an exhibition in New York's Museum of Modern Art, Pather Panchali was released in Calcutta the same year to enthusiastic reception. A special screening was attended by the Chief Minister of West Bengal and the then Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru. Critics have praised its realism, humanity and soul-stirring quality, while others have counted its slow pace a drawback, and some have condemned it for romanticising poverty. Scholars have commented on the film's lyrical realism (influenced by Italian neorealism), its portrayal of the poverty and small delights of daily life, and the use of what Darius Cooper has termed the "epiphany of wonder", among other themes.

The tale of Apu's life is continued in the two subsequent installments of Ray's Apu Trilogy: Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956) and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu, 1959). Pather Panchali is described as a turning point in Indian cinema, as it was among the films that heralded the Parallel Cinema movement, which espoused authenticity and social realism. The first film from independent India to attract major international critical attention, it won India's National Film Award for Best Feature Film in 1955, the "Best Human Document" award at the 1956 Cannes Film Festival, and several other awards, establishing Ray as a distinguished filmmaker. It features in several lists of great films.

Plot

Harihar Roy (Kanu Banerjee) earns a meagre living as a pujari (priest) in Nischindipur, rural Bengal, and dreams of a better career as a poet and playwright. Harihar's wife, Sarbajaya (Karuna Banerjee), takes care of their two children, Durga (Uma Dasgupta) and Apu (Subir Banerjee), and Harihar's elderly cousin sister, Indir Thakrun (Chunibala Devi). Because of their limited resources, Sarbajaya resents having to share her home with the old and helpless cripple Indir. At times, Sarbajaya's taunts become offensive, forcing Indir to take temporary refuge in the home of another relative. Durga is fond of Indir and often gives her fruit she has stolen from a wealthy neighbour’s orchard. One day, the neighbour's wife accuses Durga of stealing a bead necklace (which Durga denies) and blames Sarbajaya for encouraging her tendency to steal.

As the elder sister, Durga cares for her brother Apu with motherly affection, although she spares no opportunity to tease him. They share the simple joys of life, such as sitting quietly under a tree, viewing pictures in a bioscope shown by a travelling vendor, running after the candy man who passes through the village, and watching a jatra (a type of folk theatre) performed by a troupe of actors. Every evening they are delighted by the sound of a distant train's whistle. One day they run away from home to catch a glimpse of the train, returning to discover Indir lying dead.

Unable to earn a good living in the village, Harihar travels to the city to seek a better job. He promises Sarbajaya that he will return with money to repair their dilapidated house. During his absence, the family sinks deeper into poverty. Sarbajaya grows increasingly lonely and bitter. One day during the monsoon season, Durga dances playfully in the downpour for a long time. She catches a cold and develops a high fever from which, lacking adequate medical care, she does not recover. On a night of incessant rain and gusty winds, she dies. Harihar returns home and starts to show Sarbajaya the merchandise he has brought from the city. Sarbajaya, who remains silent, breaks down at the feet of her husband, and Harihar screams as he discovers that he has lost his daughter. The family decide to leave their ancestral home. As they start packing, Apu finds the necklace that Durga had earlier denied having stolen; he throws it into a pond. Apu and his parents leave the village on an ox-cart.

Cast

Production

Novel and title

Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay's novel Pather Panchali is a classic bildungsroman (a type of coming-of-age story) in the canon of Bengali literature.[2][3] It appeared in 1928 as a serial in a Calcutta periodical[4] and was published as a book in 1929.[5] The novel depicts a poor family's struggle to survive in their rural ancestral home and the growing up of Apu, the son of the family. The later part of the novel, where Apu and his parents leave the village and settle in Benaras, formed the basis of Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956), the second film of the Apu trilogy.[6]

Satyajit Ray, working as a graphic designer for Signet Press, created the illustrations for a new abridged edition of the book in 1944.[7][8] At that time, he read the unabridged novel.[9] D.K. Gupta, the owner of Signet, told Ray that the abridged version would make a great film.[10] The idea attracted Ray, and around 1946–47, when he was considering making a film,[11] he chose Pather Panchali because of certain qualities that, in his opinion, "made it a great book: its humanism, its lyricism, and its ring of truth".[12] The author's widow permitted Ray to make a film based on the novel; the agreement was in principle only, and no financial arrangement was made.[13]

The Bengali word path literally means path, and pather means "of the path". Panchali refers to a type of narrative folk song that used to be performed in Bengal and was the forerunner of another type of folk performance, known as jatra.[14] English translations of the Bengali title include Song of the Little Road,[4] The Lament of the Path,[15][16] Song of the Road,[17] and Song of the Open Road.[18]

Influences

In 1949 the French director Jean Renoir came to Calcutta to shoot his film The River (1951).[19] Ray, a founding member of the Calcutta Film Society (established in 1947), helped him find locations in the countryside.[19] Ray told Renoir about his idea of filming Pather Panchali, which had been in his mind for some time, and Renoir encouraged him to proceed.[20] In 1950 Ray was sent to London by his employer, the advertising agency D.J. Keymer, to work at its headquarters. During his six months in London, he watched about 100 films.[21] Among these, Vittorio De Sica's neorealist film Bicycle Thieves (1948) had a profound impact on him. In a 1982 lecture, Ray said that he had come out of the theatre determined to become a filmmaker.[21] The film made him believe that it was possible to make realistic cinema shot on location with an amateur cast.[22]

The realist narrative style of Pather Panchali is indebted to Italian neorealism and the works of Renoir.[23][24] The international success of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon (1950) and Bimal Roy's 1953 film Do Bigha Zamin (which was shot partly on location and was about a peasant family) inspired Ray to hope that Pather Panchali also might find an international audience.[25] In addition to these foreign influences, Ray was influenced by Bengali literature and the native Indian theatrical tradition, particularly the rasa theory of classical Sanskrit drama. (Darius Cooper describes the complicated doctrine of rasa as "center[ed] predominantly on feeling experienced not only by the characters but also conveyed in a certain artistic way to the spectator".[26])

Script

The film did not have a script; it was made from Ray's drawings and notes.[27] Ray completed the first draft of the notes during his sea voyage to and from London in 1950.[28] Before the start of principal photography, he created a storyboard dealing with details and continuity.[29] Years later, he donated those drawings and notes to Cinémathèque Française.[30]

In his book Apur Panchali (the Bengali translation of his 1994 book My Years with Apu: A Memoir), Ray wrote that many characters from the original novel had been omitted from the film and that he had rearranged some sequences of the novel to make the narrative better as cinema.[31] Changes include Indir's death, which occurs early in the novel at a village shrine in the presence of adults, while in the film Apu and Durga find her corpse in the open.[6] The scene of Apu and Durga running to catch a glimpse of the train is not in the novel, in which neither child ever sees the train, although they try.[6] In the film, Durga's fatal fever is attributed to a monsoon downpour, while the novel identifies no specific cause.[6] The ending of the film—the family's departure from the village—is not the end of the novel.[6]

Ray tried to extract a simple theme from the random sequences of significant and trivial episodes of the novel, while preserving what W. Andrew Robinson describes as the "loitering impression" it creates.[6] According to Ray, "the script had to retain some of the rambling quality of the novel because that in itself contained a clue to the feel of authenticity: life in a poor Bengali village does ramble."[12] Robinson comments that the film, with Ray's adaptation, focuses mainly on Apu and his family and lacks the novel's greater detail about the village as a whole.[32]

Casting

Kanu Banerjee, an established Bengali film actor, portrayed Harihar, father of Apu and Durga. Sarbajaya, wife of Harihar, was played by Karuna Banerjee, an amateur theatre actress of the Indian People's Theatre Association (IPTA), who was the wife of Ray's friend.[33] Uma Dasgupta, who won the part of Durga through an audition,[33] also had prior experience of acting in the theatre.[34] For the role of Apu, Ray advertised in newspapers for boys of five to seven years of age.[33] The candidates who auditioned did not meet his requirements, but Ray's wife spotted a boy in their neighbourhood, and this boy, Subir Banerjee, was cast as Apu. (The surname of three of the main actors was Banerjee, but they were not related to each other). The hardest role to fill was the wizened old Indir. Ray eventually found Chunibala Devi, a retired stage actress living in one of Calcutta's red light districts, as the ideal candidate.[35] Several minor roles were played by the villagers of Boral, the shooting location.[34]

Filming

Apu and Durga running to catch a glimpse of a train, a famous scene of the film[1]

Shooting started on 27 October 1952.[34] Boral, a village near Calcutta, was selected in early 1953 as the main location for principal photography, and night scenes were shot in-studio.[34] The technical team included several first-timers, including Ray himself and cinematographer Subrata Mitra, who had never operated a film camera. Art director Bansi Chandragupta had professional experience, having worked with Jean Renoir on The River. Both Mitra and Chandragupta went on to establish themselves as respected professionals.[36][37]

Mitra had met Ray on the set of The River, where Mitra was allowed to observe the production, take still photographs and make notes about lighting for personal reference. Having become friends, Mitra kept Ray informed about the production and showed his photographs. Ray was impressed enough by them to promise him an assistant's position on Pather Panchali, and when production neared, Ray invited him to shoot the film. As Mitra had no prior filmmaking experience and was only 21, the choice was met with scepticism by those who knew of the production. Mitra himself later speculated that Ray was nervous about working with an established crew.[38]

Funding was a problem from the outset. No producer was willing to produce the film, as it lacked stars, songs and action scenes.[13][39] On learning of Ray's plan, one producer, Mr Bhattacharya of Kalpana Movies, contacted Bandyopadhyay's widow to request the filming rights and get the film directed by Debaki Bose, a well-established director. The widow declined.[40] The estimated budget for the production was 70,000 rupees (about US$14,613 in 1955).[39][lower-alpha 3] One producer, Rana Dutta, gave money to continue shooting, but stopped doing so after some other films he had produced flopped.[25]

Ray had to borrow money to shoot enough footage to persuade prospective producers to finance the whole film.[13] To raise funds during production, Ray continued working as a graphic designer, pawned his life insurance policy and sold his collection of LP records. Production manager Anil Chowdhury convinced Ray's wife, Bijoya, to pawn her jewels.[25] Ray still ran out of money partway through filming. Shooting had to be suspended for nearly a year, and thereafter it could be done only in intermittent bursts.[41] Ray acknowledged later that the delays had made him tense, and that three miracles had saved the film: "One, Apu's [Subir Banerjee] voice did not break. Two, Durga [Uma Dasgupta] did not grow up. Three, Indir Thakrun [Chunibala Devi] did not die."[42]

Bidhan Chandra Roy, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, was requested by an influential friend of Ray's mother to help the production.[41] Roy obliged, and government officials saw the footage.[43] The Home Publicity Department of the government of West Bengal assessed the cost of backing the film[42] and sanctioned a loan, given in installments, allowing Ray to finish production.[lower-alpha 4] The government misunderstood the nature of the film, believing it to be a documentary for rural uplift,[41] and recorded the loan as being for "roads improvement", a reference to the film's title.[44]

Monroe Wheeler, head of the Department of Exhibitions and Publications of New York's Museum of Modern Art (MoMA),[45] who was in Calcutta in 1954, heard about the project and met Ray. He considered the incomplete footage to be of very high quality and encouraged Ray to finish the film so that it could be shown during an exhibition in MoMA the following year.[41] About six months after Wheeler's visit, American director John Huston visited India for some early location scouting for The Man Who Would Be King (which was eventually made in 1975).[46] Wheeler had asked Huston to check the progress of Ray's project.[47] Huston saw excerpts of the unfinished film and recognised "the footage as the work of a great film-maker".[46] Thanks to Huston's positive feedback, MoMA helped Ray with additional money.[48] It took three years to complete the shooting.[49]

Soundtrack

Ravi Shankar (1988 photograph) composed the soundtrack for the film.

The soundtrack of the film was composed by the sitar player Ravi Shankar, who was at an early stage of his career, having debuted in 1939.[50] The background scores feature pieces based on several ragas of Indian classical music, played mostly on the sitar. The soundtrack, described in a 1995 issue of The Village Voice as "at once plaintive and exhilarating",[51] is featured in The Guardian's 2007 list of 50 greatest film soundtracks.[52] It has also been cited as a major influence on The Beatles, specifically George Harrison.[53]

Shankar saw about half the film in a roughly edited version before composing the background score, but he was already familiar with the story.[54][46] According to Robinson, when Ray met Shankar the latter hummed a tune that was folk-based but had "a certain sophistication".[46] This tune, usually played on a bamboo flute, became the main theme for the film. The majority of the score was composed in an all-night session lasting about eleven hours.[46] Shankar also composed two solo sitar pieces—one based on the raga Desh (traditionally associated with rain), and one sombre piece based on the raga Todi. [55] He created a piece based on the raga Patdeep, played on the tar shehnai, to accompany the scene in which Harihar learns of Durga's death.[56] The film's cinematographer, Subrata Mitra, performed on sitar for parts of the soundtrack.[57]

Release and reception

Ray and his team worked day and night during post-production and just managed to get the film ready to send to MoMA to be shown in conjunction with the Textiles and Ornamental Arts of India exhibition in May 1955.[56][58] The film, billed as The Story of Apu and Durga, lacked subtitles.[56] It was one of a series of six evening performances at MoMA, including the US debut of sarod player Ali Akbar Khan and the classical dancer Shanta Rao. Pather Panchali's MoMA opening was well received.[56] The film had its domestic premiere at the annual meeting of the Advertising Club of Calcutta.[59] The response was not positive, and Ray felt "extremely discouraged".[59] Before its general release in Calcutta, Ray himself designed large advertisements, including a neon sign showing Apu and Durga running, which was strategically placed in a busy location in the city.[59] Pather Panchali was released in a Calcutta cinema on 26 August 1955 and received a poor initial response.[59] Thanks to word of mouth, the screenings started filling up within a week or two. It opened again at another cinema, where it ran for seven weeks.[59] A delay in subtitling led to the postponement of the UK release until December 1957.[60] It went on to great success in the US in 1958, running for eight months at the Fifth Avenue Playhouse in New York.[60]

In India the film's reception was enthusiastic. The Times of India wrote, "It is absurd to compare it with any other Indian cinema [...] Pather Panchali is pure cinema".[61] Chief Minister Bidhan Chandra Roy arranged a special screening in a Calcutta theatre for Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who was impressed by the film.[62] Despite opposition from some within the Governments of West Bengal and India because of its depiction of poverty, Pather Panchali was sent to the 1956 Cannes Film Festival with Nehru's personal approval.[63] It was screened towards the end of the festival, coinciding with a party given by the Japanese delegation, and only a small number of critics attended. Although some were initially unenthusiastic at the prospect of yet another Indian melodrama, one found "the magic horse of poetry ... invading the screen".[64] The film was subsequently awarded the Best Human Document prize at the festival.[64]

Lindsay Anderson commented after the Cannes screening that Pather Panchali had "the quality of ultimate unforgettable experience".[65] In subsequent years critics have given positive reviews. A 1958 review in Time described Pather Panchali as "perhaps the finest piece of filmed folklore since Robert Flaherty's Nanook of the North".[15] In her 1982 book 5001 Nights at the Movies, Pauline Kael commented, "Beautiful, sometimes funny, and full of love, it brought a new vision of India to the screen".[66] Basil Wright considered it "a new and incontrovertible work of art".[67][lower-alpha 5] James Berardinelli wrote in 1996 that the film "touches the souls and minds of viewers, transcending cultural and linguistic barriers".[68] In 2006 Philip French of The Observer called it "one of the greatest pictures ever made".[69] Twenty years after the release of Pather Panchali, Akira Kurosawa summarised the effect of the film as overwhelming, and lauded its ability "to stir up deep passions".[70]

The reaction was not uniformly positive. After watching the film, François Truffaut is reported to have said, "I don't want to see a movie of peasants eating with their hands."[44] Bosley Crowther, the most influential critic of The New York Times,[71] wrote in a 1958 review of the film, "Any picture as loose in structure or as listless in tempo as this one is would barely pass as a "rough cut" with the editors in Hollywood", even though he praised its gradually emerging poignancy and poetic quality.[17] The Harvard Crimson commented in 1959 that its fragmentary nature "contributes to the film's great weakness: its general diffuseness, its inability to command sustained attention. For Pather Panchali, remarkable as it may be, is something of a chore to sit through."[72] Early in 1980s, Ray was criticised by Indian Member of Parliament and former actress Nargis Dutt, who accused him of "exporting poverty".[73] While many critics celebrated Pather Panchali as a eulogy of third world culture, others criticised it for what they took to be romanticisation of such a culture.[74]

As of December 2013, the film has a 97% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on an aggregate of 34 reviews.[75] Pather Panchali is available in DVD in Region 2 (DVD region code) PAL and Region 1 NTSC formats. Artificial Eye Entertainment is the distributor of Region 2 while Columbia Tri-Star is the distributor of Region 1 format.[76]

Themes

In his 1958 review, Crowther writes that Pather Panchali delicately illustrates how "poverty does not always nullify love" and how even very poor people can enjoy the little pleasures of their world.[17] Marie Seton describes how the film intersperses the depiction of poverty and the delights and pleasures of youth.[77] She represents the bond between Durga and Indir, and their fate, as signifying a philosophical core: that both young and old die.[78] Seton writes of the film's "lyrical" qualities, noting especially the imagery immediately before the onset of monsoon.[79]

Darius Cooper discusses the use of different rasa in the film,[80] observing Apu's repeated "epiphany of wonder",[lower-alpha 6][81] brought about not only by what Apu sees around him, but also when he uses his imagination to create another world.[82] Cooper has analysed that the immersive experience of the film corresponds to this epiphany of wonder. Stephen Teo uses the scene in which Apu and Durga discover railway tracks as an example of gradual build-up of the epiphany and the resulting immersive experience.[83]

Sharmishtha Gooptu discusses the idea that the idyllic village life portrayed in Pather Panchali represents authentic Bengali village life, which disappeared during the upheavals of the partition of Bengal in 1947. She suggests that the film seeks to connect an idealised past (pre-partition) with the actual present (post-partition, when the film was made),[84] and that the film uses prototypes of rural Bengal to construct an image of the ideal village.[85]

Mitali Pati and Suranjan Ganguly discuss Ray's use of eye-level shots, natural lighting, long takes, and other techniques to achieve realism.[86] Mainak Biswas has commented that Pather Panchali comes very near to the concept of Italian neorealism, as there are many passages in the film during which there is no dramatic development, even though the usual realities of life, such as the changing of seasons, passing of a day, are concretely filmed.[87]

Accolades

Pather Panchali has won many national and international awards.[88] It won the 1955 National Film Award for Best Feature Film (President's Gold Medal) and the National Film Award for Best Feature Film in Bengali (President's Silver Medal) in India's 3rd National Film Awards.[89] It was in competition for the Palme d'Or in 1956 Cannes Film Festival,[90] in which it won the award for Best Human Document[88] and an OCIC Award – Special Mention. It was nominated for Best Film in the 1958 British Academy Film Awards.[91] Several other awards followed: Vatican Award (Rome),[92] Golden Carbao (Manila),[88] and Diploma of Merit at the Edinburgh International Film Festival in 1956;[92] Selznick Golden Laurel for Best Film at the Berlin International Film Festival and Golden Gate for Best Director as well as Golden Gate for Best Picture at the San Francisco International Film Festival in 1957;[92] Best Film at the Vancouver International Film Festival, Critics' Award for Best Film at the Stratford Film Festival,[92][93] and Best Foreign Language Film at the National Board of Review Awards in 1958;[94] Best Foreign Film at the Afro Arts Theater,[92] New York in 1959; Kinema Jumpo Award for Best Foreign Film in Japan in 1966;[92] and Bodil Award for Best Non-European Film in Denmark in 1969.[95]

Sight & Sound, the British Film Institute's film magazine, included the film several times in its Critics' Poll list of all-time greatest films in 1962 (ranked at No. 11),[96] 1992 (ranked at No. 6)[97] and 2002 (ranked at No. 22).[98] The magazine ranked the film at No. 42 in its 2012 list of "Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time".[99] In 1998, in the Asian film magazine Cinemaya's critics' poll of all-time greatest films, Pather Panchali was ranked at No. 2.[100] The Village Voice ranked the film at No. 12 (tied with The Godfather) in its Top 250 "Best Films of the Century" list in 1999, based on a poll of critics.[101]

Pather Panchali was included in various other all-time greatest film lists, including Time Out magazine's "Centenary Top One Hundred Films" in 1995,[102] the San Francisco Chronicle "Hot 100 Films From the Past" in 1997,[103] the Rolling Stone "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years" in 1999,[104] "The New York Times Guide to the Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made" in 2002,[105] the British Film Institute's (BFI) Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films in 2005,[106] and BFI's "Top 10 Indian Films" of all time.[107] It was included in 2013 in CNN-IBN's list of "100 greatest Indian films of all time",[108] and in NDTV's list of "India's 20 greatest films".[109] The Apu Trilogy as a whole was included in film critic Roger Ebert's list of "100 Great Movies" in 2001[110] and in Time magazine's All-Time 100 best movies list in 2005.[111]

Legacy

Apur Panchali (2013) is a Bengali film directed by Kaushik Ganguly, which depicts the real-life story of Subir Bannerjee, the actor who portrayed Apu in Pather Panchali.[112] Pather Panchali was followed by two films that continued the tale of Apu's life—Aparajito (The Unvanquished) in 1956 and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu) in 1959. The three films together are known as the Apu Trilogy. Aparajito portrays the adolescent Apu, his education in a rural school and in a Calcutta college. Its central theme is the poignant relationship between a doting mother and her ambitious young son. Apur Sansar tells the story of Apu's adult life, his reaction to the premature death of his wife, and his final bonding with his son whom he left as an infant. Both sequels won many national and international awards. Ray did not initially plan to make a trilogy: he decided to make the third film only after being asked about the possibility of a trilogy at the 1957 Venice Film Festival,[113] where Aparajito won the Golden Lion award.[114]

Pather Panchali was the first film made in independent India to receive major critical attention internationally, and it placed India on the world cinema map.[115][67] It helped to introduce Parallel Cinema, a new tradition of Indian film-making in which authenticity and social realism were key themes,[116] breaking the rule of the Indian film establishment.[1][117] Although Pather Panchali was described as a turning point in Indian cinema,[118] some commentators preferred the view that it refined a "realist textual principle" that was already there.[23] In 1963 Time noted that thanks to Pather Panchali, Satyajit Ray was one of the "hardy little band of inspired pioneers" of a new cinematic movement that was enjoying a good number of imitators worldwide.[119] The film has since been considered as a "global landmark" and "among the essential moviegoing experiences".[120] On 2 May 2013, commemorating Satyajit Ray's birthday, the Indian version of search engine Google displayed a doodle that featured Apu and Durga running through a field to see a train.[121][122]

After Pather Panchali, Ray went on to make a total of 37 films, including feature films, documentaries and shorts. His work included scripting, casting, scoring, cinematography, art direction, editing and designing his own credit titles and publicity material. He developed a distinctive style of film-making[123] based on visual lyricism and strong humanism,[124][125] as in his debut film Pather Panchali. Thus Ray established himself as an auteur of cinema.[123]

Explanatory notes

  1. Different sources identify different running times for the film. A Museum of Modern Art anthology states 112 minutes. (Bee, Hellczer & McFadden 2013, p. 204) An LA Weekly notice states 115 minutes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.laweekly.com/movies/pather-panchali-179696/|title=Pather Panchali|work=LA Weekly|accessdate=2 December 2013 | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203033918/http://www.laweekly.com/movies/pather-panchali-179696/ |archivedate= 3 December 2013}}</ref> Stuart Jeffries of The Guardian states 125 minutes in a 2010 report.<ref>{{cite web|last=Jeffries|first=Stuart|url=http://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/oct/20/pather-panchali-ray-arthouse | title= Pather Panchali: No 12 best arthouse film of all time | work=The Guardian|date=19 October 2010| accessdate=2 December 2013| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017070224/http://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/oct/20/pather-panchali-ray-arthouse |archivedate= 17 October 2013}}</ref> Rovi Hal Erickson of the The New York Times states 126 minutes in a review summary in NYT Critics' Pick.<ref name="erickson nyt"/> In 2005 Doug Pratt states 125 minutes but mentions that most references list the running time at about 10 minutes less than that. (Pratt 2005, p. 908) 5 [[Ci <ref name="budgetamount" group="lower-alpha">Satyajit Ray wrote in ''My Years with Apu: A Memoir'' (1994) that the budget was [[Indian rupees|Rs]] 70,000, ([[#CITEREFRay1996|Ray 1996]], p.&nbsp;36) and the loan from the government of West Bengal was Rs 70,000. ([[#CITEREFRay1996|Ray 1996]], p.&nbsp;60) During an interview in 1970, in reply to the question "How much did the production of ''Pather Panchali'' cost in all, if you count in the value of the rupee today?", Ray said, "In those days it cost a little over Rs. 150,000, whereas an average film now costs twice that much." ([[#CITEREFIsaksson2007|Isaksson 2007]], p.&nbsp;40) </ref> <ref name="exchange" group="lower-alpha">The exchange rate in 1955 was 4.79 Indian rupees ([[File:Indian Rupee symbol.svg|baseline|alt=INR|link=|7px]]) per 1 US dollar (US$). ([[#CITEREFKalra2012|Kalra 2012]], p.&nbsp;408) </ref> <ref name="govtloan" group="lower-alpha"> Ray writes that the amount of loan was Rs 70,000. ([[#CITEREFRay2005|Ray 2005]], p.&nbsp;77) </ref> <ref name="wrightyear" group="lower-alpha">The comment by Basil Wright appears in James Chapman's 2003 book ''Cinemas of the World: Film and Society from 1895 to the Present''. The year of the comment is not mentioned. ([[#CITEREFChapman2003|Chapman 2003]], p.&nbsp;323) </ref> Nehru]]. Critics have praised its realism,Darius Cooper uses the term "epiphany of wonder" to denote the rasa of camatkara. He quotes Abhinavabharati by Abhinavagupta to explain the camatkara rasa: "... camatkara is an uninterrupted (acchina) state of immersion (avesha) in an enjoyment characterized by the presence of a sensation of inner fullness (trpti). It might be said indeed that camatkara is the action proper to a tasting (cam) or enjoying subject, i.e., to a person immersed in the inner movement (trpti) of a magical (adbhuta) enjoyment." (Cooper 2000, pp. 24–25) Cooper says that through Apu the "universe is revealed. To Apu is given the dominant quality of camatkara, and it is through this sense of wonder that Apu is made to discover and enjoy not only the world that constantly surrounds him but also that other world created by his pratibha or imagination." (Cooper 2000, p. 25)
  2. 2.0 2.1
  3. 3.0 3.1

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Cousins 2004, pp. 237–238.
  2. Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2013, p. 277.
  3. Gugelberger 1996, p. 173.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Robinson 1989, p. 74.
  5. Sekhar, Saumitra. "Pather Panchali". Banglapedia. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2013. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Robinson 1989, p. 75.
  7. Ray 2010, p. 22.
  8. Robinson 1989, p. 58.
  9. Ray 2010, pp. 22–23.
  10. Ray 2010, p. 23.
  11. Isaksson 2007, p. 39.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Ray 2005, p. 33.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Robinson 1989, p. 77.
  14. Mohanta, Sambaru Chandra. "Panchali". Banglapedia. The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 24 May 2005. Retrieved 6 September 2013. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Harrison, Edward (20 October 1958). "Cinema: New Picture". Time. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. (subscription required)
  16. Hal Erickson, Rovi. "Pather Panchali (1955)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2013. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Crowther, Bosley (23 September 1958). "Screen: Exotic Import; Pather Panchali' From India Opens Here". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  18. Herman, Jan; Thomas, Kevin (28 May 1998). 'Pather%20Panchali'%20and%20'October'%20represent%20pinnacles%20of%20film%20achievement. "The Orange Screen; A Peek at the Best; Pather Panchali and October represent pinnacles of film achievement". Los Angeles Times. Archived from 'Pather+Panchali'+and+'October'+represent+pinnacles+of+film+achievement.&pqatl=google the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2008. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 Robinson 1989, p. 67.
  20. Ray 1996, p. 17.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Robinson 1989, p. 71.
  22. Ray 1996, p. 25.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Ruberto & Wilson 2007, p. 16.
  24. Corrigan & White 2012, p. 252.
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 Robinson 1989, p. 82.
  26. Cooper 2000, pp. 1–4.
  27. Ray 2010, p. 44.
  28. Ray 2010, p. 42.
  29. Ray 2010, pp. 45–46.
  30. Robinson 1989, p. 76.
  31. Ray 2010, p. 45.
  32. Robinson 1989, pp. 75–76.
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 Robinson 1989, p. 79.
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Robinson 1989, p. 78.
  35. Robinson 1989, p. 80.
  36. Ettedgui 1999, pp. 48–59.
  37. Gulzar, Nihalni & Chatterjee 2003, p. 539.
  38. Ettedgui 1999, p. 50.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Ray 2010, p. 51.
  40. Ray 1996, pp. 33–34.
  41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 Robinson 1989, p. 83.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Robinson 1989, p. 84.
  43. Ray 2010, p. 77.
  44. 44.0 44.1 "Filmi Funda Pather Panchali (1955)". The Telegraph. 20 April 2005. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013. 
  45. McGill, Douglas c. (16 August 1988). "Monroe Wheeler, Board Member of Modern Museum, Is Dead at 89". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 13 June 2008. 
  46. 46.0 46.1 46.2 46.3 46.4 Robinson 1989, p. 87.
  47. Robinson 1989, p. 86.
  48. Amitav Ghosh in his essay Satyajit Ray in Khair 2005, pp. 3–4
  49. Mehta 1998, p. 222.
  50. Lavezzoli 2006, p. 53.
  51. Hoberman, J (11 April 1995). "The Hunger Artist". The Village Voice. p. 51. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  52. "The 50 greatest film soundtracks". The Observer. 18 March 2007. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 12 May 2008. 
  53. Leng 2006, pp. 48–9.
  54. Ray 2010, p. 92.
  55. Robinson 1989, pp. 87–88.
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 56.3 Robinson 1989, p. 88.
  57. Ettedgui 1999, pp. 49.
  58. Silver, Charles (13 November 2012). "Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali". Inside Out. Museum of Modern Art. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 59.3 59.4 Robinson 1989, p. 89.
  60. 60.0 60.1 Robinson 1989, p. 105.
  61. Seton 2003, p. 87.
  62. Basu, Dilip. "Films of Satyajit Ray: Getting Started". Satyajit Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California – Santa Cruz. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2008. 
  63. Robinson 1989, p. 103.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Seton 2003, p. 9.
  65. Seton 2003, p. 88.
  66. Kael 2011, p. 569.
  67. 67.0 67.1 Chapman 2003, p. 323.
  68. Berardinelli, James (1996). "Review: Pather Panchali". ReelViews. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2008. 
  69. French, Philip (5 May 2002). "Pather Panchali". The Observer. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2006. 
  70. Robinson 1989, p. 91.
  71. McFadden, Robert D. (8 March 1981). "Bosley Crowther, 27 Years a Critic of Films for Times, is Dead at 75". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2008. 
  72. Quint, Peter E. (2 November 1959). "Pather Panchali". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on 8 May 2005. Retrieved 25 May 2008. 
  73. Robinson 1989, p. 327.
  74. Cooper 2000, p. 2.
  75. Pather Panchali at Rotten Tomatoes
  76. "Pather Panchali". dvdcompare. www.dvdbeaver.com. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2008. 
  77. Seton 2003, p. 81.
  78. Seton 2003, p. 82.
  79. Seton 2003, p. 84.
  80. Cooper 2000, pp. 24–40.
  81. Cooper 2000, pp. 24–26.
  82. Cooper 2000, p. 25.
  83. Teo 2013, p. 49.
  84. Gooptu 2010, p. 148.
  85. Gooptu 2010, p. 149.
  86. Pati & Ganguly 1996, p. 417.
  87. Biswas 2007, pp. 87–88.
  88. 88.0 88.1 88.2 "Awards for Satyajit Ray". Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California – Santa Cruz. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  89. "3rd National Film Awards" (PDF). Directorate of Film Festivals. p. 6. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 5 December 2013. 
  90. "Awards 1956 : All Awards". Festival de Cannes. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 5 December 2013. 
  91. "Film And British Film in 1958". British Academy of Film and Television Arts. Archived from the original on 9 December 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2013. 
  92. 92.0 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 Robinson 1989, p. 366.
  93. "Indian Film Honored; Pather Panchali Wins Prize at Stratford, Ont., Fete". The New York Times. 14 July 1958. p. 16. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 24 May 2008. 
  94. "1958 Award Winners". National Board of Review of Motion Pictures. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 24 November 2013. 
  95. "Awards 1969, Bodil Awards" (in Danish). Filmmedarbejderforeningen. Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  96. Johnson, Eric. "Sight and Sound Poll 1962: Critics". Archived from the original on 22 February 2012. Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  97. "The Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll: 1992". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 9 March 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2008. 
  98. "Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll 2002: The rest of the critics' list". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 24 April 2009. 
  99. Christie, Ian (1 August 2012). "The Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time". Sight & Sound. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013. 
  100. Totaro, Donato (31 January 2003). "The "Sight & Sound" of Canons". Offscreen Journal (Canada Council for the Arts). Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  101. "Take One: The First Annual Village Voice Film Critics' Poll". The Village Voice. 1999. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2006. 
  102. "Top 100 Films (Centenary) from Time Out Film Guide". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  103. "Hot 100 Films From the Past by San Francisco Chronicle Film Critics". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  104. "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years by Rolling Stone Magazine". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  105. "The Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made". The New York Times. 2002. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  106. "The Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films by the British Film Institute (BFI)". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  107. "Top 10 Indian Films". British Film Institute. 2002. Archived from the original on 25 May 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  108. "100 Years of Indian Cinema: The 100 greatest Indian films of all time". CNN-IBN. 17 April 2013. Retrieved 3 January 2014. 
  109. "India's 20 greatest films". NDTV. Retrieved 3 January 2014. 
  110. Ebert, Roger (4 March 2001). "The Apu Trilogy (1959)". rogerebert.com. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
  111. Schickel, Richard (30 January 2010). "All-time 100 Movies". Time. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  112. Ganguly, Ruman (29 March 2013). "Parambrata starts shooting for Apur Panchali". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  113. Wood 1972, p. 61.
  114. Bergan 2006, p. 497.
  115. Gulzar, Nihalni & Chatterjee 2003, p. 612.
  116. Likhi, Abhilaksh (15 August 1999). "Sense & Cinema". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  117. Das Gupta 1980, pp. 32–42.
  118. Bhaskaran, Gautaman (5 September 2004). "Ray's eternal song". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  119. "A Religion of Film". Time. 20 September 1963. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008. (subscription required)
  120. Clark, Mike (30 October 2003). "New on DVD". USA Today. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  121. Saxena, Anupam (2 May 2013). "Google doodles Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali on filmmaker's birth anniversary". NDTV. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  122. "Satyajit Ray's 92nd Birthday". Google. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  123. 123.0 123.1 Santas 2002, p. 18.
  124. Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2004, p. 32.
  125. Goristas, Helen. "Satyajit Ray". Senses of Cinema. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 19 May 2008. 

References

  • Bee, Harriet Schoenhotz; Hellczer, Cassandra; McFadden, Sarah, eds. (2013). MoMA Highlights: 350 Works from The Museum of Modern Art, New York. The Museum of Modern Art. ISBN 978-0-87070-846-6. 
  • Bergan, Ronald (2006), Film, Dorking Kindersley, ISBN 978-1-40531-280-6 .
  • Biswas, Moinak (2007). "In the mirror of an alternative globalism: the neorealist encounter in India". In Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema. Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-3324-2. 
  • Chapman, James (2003), Cinemas of the World: Film and Society from 1895 to the Present, Reaktion Books, ISBN 1-86189-162-8 .
  • Cooper, Darius (2000), The Cinema of Satyajit Ray: Between Tradition and Modernity, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-62980-2 .
  • Corrigan, Timothy; White, Patricia (2012). The Film Experience: An Introduction. Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 978-0-312-68170-8. 
  • Cousins, Mark (2004), The Story of Film: A Worldwide History of Film from the Host of the BBC's Scene by Scene, Thunder's Mouth Press, ISBN 1-56025-612-5 .
  • Das Gupta, Chidananda (Autumn 1980). "New Directions in Indian Cinema". Film Quarterly (University of California Press) 34 (1). doi:10.1525/fq.1980.34.1.04a00070. ISSN 0015-1386. OCLC 1569205. 
  • Ettedgui, Peter (1999), Cinematography: Screencraft, Focal Press, ISBN 0-240-80382-5 .
  • Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004), Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change, Trentham Books, ISBN 1-85856-329-1 .
  • Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2013). Routledge Handbook of Indian Cinemas. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-77284-9. 
  • Gooptu, Sharmistha (2010). Bengali Cinema: 'An Other Nation'. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-84334-5. 
  • Gugelberger, Georg M. (1996). The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-1844-6. 
  • Gulzar; Nihalni, Govind; Chatterjee, Saibal (2003), "Biographies", Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema, Popular Prakashan, ISBN 81-7991-066-0 .
  • Isaksson, Folke (2007). "Conversation with Satyajit Ray". In Cardullo, Bert. Satyajit Ray: Interviews. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1-57806-937-8. 
  • Kael, Pauline (2011). 5001 Nights at the Movies. Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-1-250-03357-4. 
  • Kalra, Bhawna (February 2012). "Devaluation of Indian Rupee against US $: A Historical Perspective" (PDF). International Journal of Research in Economics & Social Sciences (Euro Asia Research and Development Association) 2 (2). ISSN 2249-7382. Retrieved 8 December 2013. 
  • Khair, Tabish (2005), Amitav Ghosh : A Critical Companion, Orient Longman, ISBN 81-7824-113-7 .
  • Lavezzoli, Peter (2006), The Dawn of Indian Music in the West, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-8264-1815-5 .
  • Leng, Simon (2006). While My Guitar Gently Weeps: The Music of George Harrison. Hal Leonard Corporation. ISBN 1423406095. 
  • Mehta, Ved (1998), "City of Dreadful Night", A Ved Mehta Reader: The Craft of the Essay, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-07561-8 .
  • Pati, Mitali; Ganguly, Suranjan (1996). "Perspectives on Bengali film and literature". In Natarajan, Nalini; Nelson, Emmanuel Sampath. Handbook of Twentieth-century Literatures of India. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-28778-7. 
  • Pratt, Douglas (2005). Doug Pratt's DVD: Movies, Television, Music, Art, Adult, and More!. UNET 2 Corporation. ISBN 978-1-932916-01-0. 
  • Ray, Satyajit (2010). Apur Panchali (in Bengali). Ananda Publishers. ISBN 8172153678. 
  • Ray, Satyajit (1996). My Years with Apu. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-024780-0. 
  • Ray, Satyajit (2005), Our Films, Their Films, Orient Longman, ISBN 81-250-1565-5 .
  • Robinson, Andrew (1989). Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06946-6. 
  • Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. (2007), Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema, Wayne State University Press, ISBN 0-8143-3324-9 .
  • Santas, Constantine (2002), Responding to film: A Text Guide for Students of Cinema Art, Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN 0-8304-1580-7 .

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.