Montgomery curve
In mathematics the Montgomery curve is a form of elliptic curve, different from the usual Weierstrass form, introduced by Peter L. Montgomery in 1987.[1] It is used for certain computations, and in particular in different cryptography applications.
Definition
A Montgomery curve over a field is defined by the equation:
:
for certain and with .
Generally this curve is considered over a finite field (for example over a finite field of q elements, ) with characteristic different from 2 and with , ; but they are also considered over the rationals with the same restrictions for A and B.
Montgomery arithmetic
It is possible to do some "operations" between the points of an elliptic curve: "adding" two points consists on finding a third one such that ; "doubling" a point consists on computing (For more information about operations see The group law) and below.
A point on the elliptic curve in the Montgomery form can be represented in Montgomery coordinates , where are projective coordinates and for .
Notice that this kind of representation for a point loses information: indeed, in this case, there is no distinction between the affine points and because they are both given by the point . However, with this representation it is possible to obtain multiples of points, that is, given , to compute .
Now, considering the two points and : their sum is given by the point whose coordinates are:
If , then the operation becomes a "doubling"; the coordinates of are given by the following equations:
The first operation considered above (addition) has a time-cost of 3M+2S, where M denotes the multiplication between two general elements of the field on which the elliptic curve is defined, while S denotes squaring of a general element of the field.
The second operation (doubling) has a time-cost of 2M+2S+1D, where D denotes the multiplication of a general element by a constant; notice that the constant is , so can be chosen in order to have a small D.
Algorithm and example
The following algorithm represents a doubling of a point on an elliptic curve in the Montgomery form.
It is assumed that . The cost of this implementation is 1M + 2S + 1*A + 3add + 1*4. Here M denotes the multiplications required, S indicates the squarings, and a refers to the multiplication by A.
Example
Let be a point on the curve . In coordinates , with , .
Then:
The result is the point such that .
Addition
Given two points , on the Montgomery curve in affine coordinates, the point represents, geometrically the third point of intersection between and the line passing through and . It is possible to find the coordinates of , in the following way:
1) consider a generic line in the affine plane and let it pass through and (impose the condition), in this way, one obtains and ;
2) intersect the line with the curve , substituting the variable in the curve equation with ; the following equation of third degree is obtained:
.
As it has been observed before, this equation has three solutions that correspond to the coordinates of , and . In particular this equation can be re-written as:
3) Comparing the coefficients of the two identical equations given above, in particular the coefficients of the terms of second degree, one gets:
.
So, can be written in terms of , , , , as:
.
4) To find the coordinate of the point it is sufficient to substitute the value in the line . Notice that this will not give the point directly. Indeed, with this method one find the coordinates of the point such that , but if one needs the resulting point of the sum between and , then it is necessary to observe that: if and only if . So, given the point , it is necessary to find , but this can be done easily by changing the sign to the coordinate of . In other words, it will be necessary to change the sign of the coordinate obtained by substituting the value in the equation of the line.
Resuming, the coordinates of the point , are:
Doubling
Given a point on the Montgomery curve , the point represents geometrically the third point of intersection between the curve and the line tangent to ; so, to find the coordinates of the point it is sufficient to follow the same method given in the addition formula; however, in this case, the line y=lx+m has to be tangent to the curve at , so, if with
,
then the value of l, which represents the slope of the line, is given by:
by the implicit function theorem.
So and the coordinates of the point , are:
.
Equivalence with twisted Edwards curves
Let be a field with characteristic different from 2.
Let be an elliptic curve in the Montgomery form:
:
with ,
and let be an elliptic curve in the twisted Edwards form:
with , .
The following theorem shows the birational equivalence between Montgomery curves and twisted Edwards curves:[2]
Theorem (i) Every twisted Edwards curve is birationally equivalent to a Montgomery curve over . In particular, the twisted Edwards curve is birationally equivalent to the Montgomery curve where , and .
The map:
is a birational equivalence from to , with inverse:
- :
Notice that this equivalence between the two curves is not valid everywhere: indeed the map is not defined at the points or of the .
Equivalence with Weierstrass curves
Any elliptic curve can be written in Weierstrass form.
So, the elliptic curve in the Montogmery form
: ,
can be transformed in the following way: divide each term of the equation for by , and substitute the variables x and y, with and respectively, to get the equation
.
To obtain a short Weierstrass form from here, it is sufficient to replace u with the variable :
;
finally, this gives the equation:
.
See also
- Curve25519
- Table of costs of operations in elliptic curves, information about the running-time required in a specific case
Notes
- ↑ Peter L. Montgomery (1987). "Speeding the Pollard and Elliptic Curve Methods of Factorization". Mathematics of Computation 48 (177): 243–264. JSTOR 2007888.
- ↑ Daniel J. Bernstein, Peter Birkner, Marc Joye, Tanja Lange and Christiane Peters (2008). Twisted Edwards Curves. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-68159-5.
References
- Peter L. Montgomery (1987). "Speeding the Pollard and Elliptic Curve Methods of Factorization". Mathematics of Computation 48 (177): 243–264. JSTOR 2007888.
- Daniel J. Bernstein, Peter Birkner, Marc Joye, Tanja Lange and Christiane Peters (2008). Twisted Edwards Curves. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-68159-5.
- Wouter Castryck, Steven Galbraith, Reza Rezaeian Farashahi (2008). Efficient Arithmetic on Elliptic Curves using a Mixed Edwards-Montgomery Representation.