Lawrencium

Lawrencium
103Lr
Lu ↑ Lr ↓ (Upp) nobelium ← lawrencium → rutherfordium
Lawrencium in the periodic table
Appearance
unknown
General properties
Name, symbol, number	lawrencium, Lr, 103
Pronunciation	i/ləˈrɛnsiəm/ lə-REN-see-əm
Element category	actinide sometimes considered a transition metal
Group, period, block	n/a, 7, d
Standard atomic weight	[262]
Electron configuration	[Rn] 7s2 5f14 7p1 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 8, 3
History
Naming	after Ernest Lawrence
Discovery	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (1961)
Physical properties
Phase	solid (predicted)
Melting point	1900 K, 1627 °C, 2961 (predicted) °F
Atomic properties
Oxidation states	3
Ionization energies	1st: 443.8 kJ·mol−1
	2nd: 1428.0 kJ·mol−1
	3rd: 2219.1 kJ·mol−1
Miscellanea
Crystal structure	hexagonal close-packed (predicted)[1]
CAS registry number	22537-19-5
Most stable isotopes
Main article: Isotopes of lawrencium
iso NA half-life DM DE (MeV) DP 262Lr syn 3.6 h ε 262No 261Lr syn 44 min SF/ε? 260Lr syn 2.7 min α 8.04 256Md 259Lr syn 6.2 s 78% α 8.44 255Md 22% SF 256Lr syn 27 s α 8.62,8.52,8.32... 252Md 255Lr syn 21.5 s α 8.43,8.37 251Md 254Lr syn 13 s 78% α 8.46,8.41 250Md 22% ε 254No only isotopes with half-lives over 5 seconds are included here
v t e

Lawrencium is a radioactive synthetic chemical element with the symbol Lr (formerly Lw) and atomic number 103. In the periodic table of the elements, it is a period 7 d-block element and the last element of the actinide series. Chemistry experiments have confirmed that lawrencium behaves as the heavier homologue to lutetium and is chemically similar to other actinides.

Lawrencium was first synthesized by the nuclear-physics team led by Albert Ghiorso on February 14, 1961, at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory of the University of California. The first atoms of lawrencium were produced by bombarding a three-milligram target consisting of three isotopes of the element californium with boron-10 and boron-11 nuclei from the Heavy Ion Linear Accelerator. The team suggested the name lawrencium (after Ernest Lawrence), and the symbol "Lw", but IUPAC changed the symbol to "Lr" in 1963.^[2][3] It was the final and the heaviest element of the actinide series to be synthesized.

All isotopes of lawrencium are radioactive; its most stable known isotope is lawrencium-262, with a half-life of approximately 3.6 hours. All its isotopes except for lawrencium-260, -261 and -262 decay with a half-life of less than a minute.

History

Discovery

An attempt to synthesize lawrencium was performed in 1958 by the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. This attempt involved bombarding ²⁴⁴Cm with ¹⁴N. A follow-up on this experiment was not performed, as the target was destroyed. Later, in 1960, the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory attempted to synthesize the element by bombarding ²⁵²Cf with ¹⁰B and ¹¹B. The results of this experiment were not conclusive.^[4]

Lawrencium was first synthesized by the nuclear-physics team of Albert Ghiorso, Torbjørn Sikkeland, Almon Larsh, Robert M. Latimer, and their co-workers on February 14, 1961, at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (now called the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) at the University of California. The first atoms of lawrencium were produced by bombarding a three-milligram target consisting of three isotopes of the element californium with boron-10 and boron-11 nuclei from the Heavy Ion Linear Accelerator (HILAC).^[5] The Berkeley team reported that the isotope ²⁵⁷Lr was detected in this manner, and that it decayed by emitting an 8.6 MeV alpha particle with a half-life of about eight seconds. This identification was later corrected to be ²⁵⁸Lr.^[5]

252
98Cf + 11
5B → 263–x
103Lr → 258
103Lr + 5 1
0n

In 1967, nuclear-physics researchers in Dubna, Russia, reported that they were not able to confirm assignment of an alpha emitter with a half-life of eight seconds to ²⁵⁷Lr.^[6] This isotope was later deduced to be ²⁵⁸Lr. Instead, the Dubna team reported an isotope with a half-life of about 45 seconds as ²⁵⁶Lr.^[7]

243
95Am + 18
8O → 261–x
103Lr → 256
103Lr + 5 1
0n

The Russian Joint Institute for Nuclear Research created lawrencium-256 in 1965 by bombarding ²⁴³Am with ¹⁸O to form lawrencium-256. The scientists at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research also discovered that the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory's claims for the isotope they synthesized, its energy, and its half-life were mistaken. The Russians proposed the name "rutherfordium" for the new element in 1967. They also changed their data to fit the claims made by the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. ^[4]

Further experiments have demonstrated an actinide chemistry for the new element, so by 1970 it was known that lawrencium is the last actinide.^[8] In 1971, the nuclear physics team at the University of California at Berkeley successfully performed a whole series of experiments aimed at measuring the nuclear decay properties of the lawrencium isotopes with mass numbers from 255 through 260.^[2][9]

In 1971, the IUPAC granted the discovery of lawrencium to the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, even though they did not have ideal data for the element's existence. However, in 1992, the IUPAC Trans-fermium Working Group (TWG) officially recognized the nuclear physics teams at Dubna and Berkeley as the co-discoverers of lawrencium.^[10][4] Because the name "lawrencium" had been in use for a long time by this point, it was made official by the Trans-fermium Working Group.^[4]

Naming

The origin of the name, ratified by the American Chemical Society, is in reference to the nuclear-physicist Ernest O. Lawrence, of the University of California, who invented the cyclotron particle accelerator. The symbol Lw was used originally,^[5] but the element was assigned the Lr symbol.^[10] In August 1997, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) ratified the name lawrencium and the symbol Lr during a meeting in Geneva.^[10]

Characteristics

Electronic structure

Lawrencium is element 103 in the periodic table. It is the first member of the 6d-block; in accordance with the Madelung rule, its electronic configuration should be [Rn]7s²5f¹⁴6d¹. However, results from quantum mechanical research have suggested that this configuration is incorrect, and is in fact [Rn]7s²5f¹⁴7p¹. A direct measurement of this is not possible. Though early calculations gave conflicting results,^[11] more recent studies and calculations confirm the suggestion.^[12][13]

A strict correlation between the periodic table blocks and the orbital-shell configurations for neutral atoms would classify lawrencium as a transition metal because it could be classed as a d-block element. However, lawrencium is classified as an actinide element according to the IUPAC recommendations.^[14]

Lawrencium is expected to be a solid under normal conditions and assume a hexagonal close-packed crystal structure (^c/_a = 1.58), similar to its lighter congener lutetium, though this is not yet known experimentally.^[1]

Experimental chemical properties

Gaseous phase

The first gaseous-phase studies of lawrencium were reported in 1969 by a nuclear physics team at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) in the Soviet Union. They used the nuclear reaction ²⁴³Am+¹⁸O to produce lawrencium nuclei, which they then exposed to a stream of chlorine gas, and a volatile chloride product was formed. This product was deduced to be ²⁵⁶LrCl₃, and this confirmed that lawrencium is a typical actinide element.^[15]

Aqueous phase

The first aqueous-phase studies of lawrencium were reported in 1970 by a nuclear physics team at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. This team used the nuclear reaction ²⁴⁹Cf+¹¹B to produce lawrencium nuclei. They were able to show that lawrencium forms a trivalent ion, similar to those of the other actinide elements, but in contrast with that of nobelium. Further experiments in 1988 confirmed the formation of a trivalent lawrencium(III) ion using anion-exchange chromatography using α-hydroxyisobutyrate (α-HIB) complex. Comparison of the elution time with other actinides allowed a determination of 88.6 ± 0.3 picometers for the ionic radius for Lr³⁺.^[16] Attempts to reduce lawrencium in the lawrencium(III) ionization state to lawrencium(I) using the potent reducing agent hydroxylamine hydrochloride were unsuccessful.^[17]

Nucleosynthesis

Fusion

²⁰⁵Tl(⁵⁰Ti,xn)^255-xLr (x=2?)

This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR. Evidence was provided for the formation of ²⁵³Lr in the 2n exit channel.

²⁰³Tl(⁵⁰Ti,xn)^253-xLr

This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR.

²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ti,pxn)^255-xLr (x=1?)

This reaction was reported in 1984 by Yuri Oganessian at the FLNR. The team was able to detect decays of ²⁴⁶Cf, a descendant of ²⁵⁴Lr.

²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁵Sc,xn)^253-xLr

This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR. Results are not readily available.

²⁰⁹Bi(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^257-xLr (x=2)

This reaction has been used to study the spectroscopic properties of ²⁵⁵Lr. The team at GANIL used the reaction in 2003 and the team at the FLNR used it between 2004 and 2006 to provide further information for the decay scheme of ²⁵⁵Lr. The work provided evidence for an isomeric level in ²⁵⁵Lr.

Hot fusion

²⁴³Am(¹⁸O,xn)^261-xLr (x=5)

This reaction was first studied in 1965 by the team at the FLNR. They were able to detect activity with a characteristic decay of 45 seconds, which was assigned to ²⁵⁶Lr or ²⁵⁷Lr. Later work suggests an assignment to ²⁵⁶Lr. Further studies in 1968 produced an 8.35–8.60 MeV alpha activity with a half-life of 35 seconds. This activity was also initially assigned to ²⁵⁶Lr or ²⁵⁷Lr and later to solely ²⁵⁶Lr.

²⁴³Am(¹⁶O,xn)^259-xLr (x=4)

This reaction was studied in 1970 by the team at the FLNR. They were able to detect an 8.37 MeV alpha activity with a half-life of 22s. This was assigned to ²⁵⁵Lr.^[9]

²⁴⁸Cm(¹⁵N,xn)^263-xLr (x=3,4,5)

This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL in their large study of lawrencium isotopes. They were able to assign alpha activities to ²⁶⁰Lr,²⁵⁹Lr and ²⁵⁸Lr from the 3-5n exit channels.

²⁴⁸Cm(¹⁸O,pxn)^265-xLr (x=3,4)

This reaction was studied in 1988 at the LBNL in order to assess the possibility of producing ²⁶²Lr and ²⁶¹Lr without using the exotic ²⁵⁴Es target. It was also used to attempt to measure an electron capture (EC) branch in ^261mRf from the 5n exit channel. After extraction of the Lr(III) component, they were able to measure the spontaneous fission of ²⁶¹Lr with an improved half-life of 44 minutes. The production cross-section was 700 pb. On this basis, a 14% electron capture branch was calculated if this isotope was produced via the 5n channel rather than the p4n channel. A lower bombarding energy (93 MeV c.f. 97 MeV) was then used to measure the production of ²⁶²Lr in the p3n channel. The isotope was successfully detected and a yield of 240 pb was measured. The yield was lower than expected compared to the p4n channel. However, the results were judged to indicate that the ²⁶¹Lr was most likely produced by a p3n channel and an upper limit of 14% for the electron capture branch of ^261mRf was therefore suggested.

²⁴⁶Cm(¹⁴N,xn)^260-xLr (x=3?)

This reaction was studied briefly in 1958 at the LBNL using an enriched ²⁴⁴Cm target (5% ²⁴⁶Cm). They observed a ~9 MeV alpha activity with a half-life of ~0.25 seconds. Later results suggest a tentative assignment to ²⁵⁷Lr from the 3n channel

²⁴⁴Cm(¹⁴N,xn)^258-xLr

This reaction was studied briefly in 1958 at the LBNL using an enriched ²⁴⁴Cm target (5% ²⁴⁶Cm). They observed a ~9 MeV alpha activity with a half-life of ~0.25s. Later results suggest a tentative assignment to ²⁵⁷Lr from the 3n channel with the ²⁴⁶Cm component. No activities assigned to reaction with the ²⁴⁴Cm component have been reported.

²⁴⁹Bk(¹⁸O,αxn)^263-xLr (x=3)

This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL in their large study of lawrencium isotopes. They were able to detect an activity assigned to ²⁶⁰Lr.^[9] The reaction was repeated in 1988 to study the aqueous chemistry of lawrencium. A total of 23 alpha decays were measured for ²⁶⁰Lr, with a mean energy of 8.03 MeV and an improved half-life of 2.7 minutes. The calculated cross-section was 8.7 nb.

²⁵²Cf(¹¹B,xn)^263-xLr (x=5,7??)

This reaction was first studied in 1961 at the University of California by Albert Ghiorso by using a californium target (52% ²⁵²Cf). They observed three alpha activities of 8.6, 8.4 and 8.2 MeV, with half-lives of about 8 and 15 seconds, respectively. The 8.6 MeV activity was tentatively assigned to ²⁵⁷Lr.^[5] Later results suggest a reassignment to ²⁵⁸Lr, resulting from the 5n exit channel. The 8.4 MeV activity was also assigned to ²⁵⁷Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to ²⁵⁶Lr. This is most likely from the 33% ²⁵⁰Cf component in the target rather than from the 7n channel. The 8.2 MeV was subsequently associated with nobelium.

²⁵²Cf(¹⁰B,xn)^262-xLr (x=4,6)

This reaction was first studied in 1961 at the University of California by Albert Ghiorso by using a californium target (52% ²⁵²Cf). They observed three alpha activities of 8.6, 8.4 and 8.2 MeV, with half-lives of about 8 and 15 seconds, respectively. The 8.6 MeV activity was tentatively assigned to ²⁵⁷Lr.^[5] Later results suggest a reassignment to ²⁵⁸Lr. The 8.4 MeV activity was also assigned to ²⁵⁷Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to ²⁵⁶Lr. The 8.2 MeV was subsequently associated with nobelium.

²⁵⁰Cf(¹⁵N,αxn)^260-xLr (x=3)

This reaction was studied in 1971 at the LBNL. They were able to identify a 0.7 s alpha activity with two alpha lines at 8.87 and 8.82 MeV. This was assigned to ²⁵⁷Lr.^[9]

²⁴⁹Cf(¹¹B,xn)^260-xLr (x=4)

This reaction was first studied in 1970 at the LBNL in an attempt to study the aqueous chemistry of lawrencium. They were able to measure a Lr³⁺ activity.^[9] The reaction was repeated in 1976 at Oak Ridge and the 26s lifetime of ²⁵⁶Lr was confirmed by measurement of coincident X-rays.

²⁴⁹Cf(¹²C,pxn)^260-xLr (x=2)

This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL. They were able to detect an activity assigned to ²⁵⁸Lr from the p2n channel.^[9]

²⁴⁹Cf(¹⁵N,αxn)^260-xLr (x=2,3)

This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL. They were able to detect an activities assigned to ²⁵⁸Lr and ²⁵⁷Lr from the α2n and α3n and channels.^[9] The reaction was repeated in 1976 at Oak Ridge and the synthesis of ²⁵⁸Lr was confirmed.

²⁵⁴Es + ²²Ne – transfer

This reaction was studied in 1987 at the LLNL. They were able to detect new spontaneous fission (SF) activities assigned to ²⁶¹Lr and ²⁶²Lr, resulting from transfer from the ²²Ne nuclei to the ²⁵⁴Es target. In addition, a 5 ms SF activity was detected in delayed coincidence with nobelium K-shell X-rays and was assigned to ²⁶²No, resulting from the electron capture of ²⁶²Lr.

Decay products

Isotopes of lawrencium have also been identified in the decay of heavier elements. Observations to date are summarised in the table below:

List of lawrencium isotopes produced as other nuclei decay products

Parent nuclide	Observed lawrencium isotope
267Bh, 263Db	259Lr
278Uut, 274Rg, 270Mt, 266Bh, 262Db	258Lr
261Db	257Lr
272Rg, 268Mt, 264Bh, 260Db	256Lr
259Db	255Lr
266Mt, 262Bh, 258Db	254Lr
261Bh, 257Dbg,m	253Lrg,m
260Bh, 256Db	252Lr

Isotopes

Eleven isotopes of lawrencium plus one isomer have been synthesized with ²⁶²Lr being the longest-lived and the heaviest, with a half-life of 216 minutes. ²⁵²Lr is the lightest isotope of lawrencium to be produced to date.^[18]

Nuclear isomerism

A study of the decay properties of ²⁵⁷Db (see dubnium) in 2001 by Hessberger et al. at the GSI provided some data for the decay of ²⁵³Lr. Analysis of the data indicated the population of two isomeric levels in ²⁵³Lr from the decay of the corresponding isomers in ²⁵⁷Db. The ground state was assigned spin and parity of 7/2-, decaying by emission of an 8794 keV alpha particle with a half-life of 0.57s. The isomeric level was assigned spin and parity of 1/2-, decaying by emission of an 8722 keV alpha particle with a half-life of 1.49 s.^[19]

Recent work on the spectroscopy of ²⁵⁵Lr formed in the reaction ²⁰⁹Bi(⁴⁸Ca,2n)²⁵⁵Lr has provided evidence for an isomeric level.

See also

References

Bibliography

• Silva, Robert J. (2011). "Chapter 13. Fermium, Mendelevium, Nobelium, and Lawrencium". In Morss, Lester R.; Edelstein, Norman M. and Fuger, Jean. The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements. Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0211-0_13. ISBN 978-94-007-0210-3. 

External links

• Chart of Nuclides. nndc.bnl.gov
• Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division: Periodic Table – Lawrencium
• Lawrencium at The Periodic Table of Videos (University of Nottingham)

v t e Periodic table
	1	2															3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18
1	H																															He
2	Li	Be																									B	C	N	O	F	Ne
3	Na	Mg																									Al	Si	P	S	Cl	Ar
4	K	Ca															Sc	Ti	V	Cr	Mn	Fe	Co	Ni	Cu	Zn	Ga	Ge	As	Se	Br	Kr
5	Rb	Sr															Y	Zr	Nb	Mo	Tc	Ru	Rh	Pd	Ag	Cd	In	Sn	Sb	Te	I	Xe
6	Cs	Ba	La	Ce	Pr	Nd	Pm	Sm	Eu	Gd	Tb	Dy	Ho	Er	Tm	Yb	Lu	Hf	Ta	W	Re	Os	Ir	Pt	Au	Hg	Tl	Pb	Bi	Po	At	Rn
7	Fr	Ra	Ac	Th	Pa	U	Np	Pu	Am	Cm	Bk	Cf	Es	Fm	Md	No	Lr	Rf	Db	Sg	Bh	Hs	Mt	Ds	Rg	Cn	Uut	Fl	Uup	Lv	Uus	Uuo
Alkali metal Alkaline earth metal Lan­thanide Actinide Transition metal Poor metal Metalloid Polyatomic nonmetal Diatomic nonmetal Noble gas Unknown chemical properties
Large version

v t e Chemical elements named after scientists Always considered Bohrium Copernicium Curium Einsteinium Fermium Lawrencium Meitnerium Mendelevium Nobelium Roentgenium Rutherfordium Seaborgium Indirectly Flerovium via Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions Gadolinium via mineral gadolinite See also Chemical element name etymologies Chemical elements naming controversies Places used in the names of chemical elements