Klamath language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Klamath
Modoc
Native to United States
Region Southern Oregon and northern California
Ethnicity Klamath, Modoc
Extinct 2003[1]
Language codes
ISO 639-3 kla

Klamath /ˈklæməθ/,[2] also Klamath–Modoc /ˈklæməθ ˈmoʊdɒk/ and historically Lutuamian /ˌluːtuːˈæmiən/, is a Native American language that was spoken around Klamath Lake in what is now southern Oregon and northern California. It is the traditional language of the Klamath and Modoc peoples, each of whom spoke a dialect of the language. As of April 1998, it was spoken by only one person.[3] As of 2003, the last fluent Klamath speaker in Chiloquin, Oregon was 92 years old.[4] As of 2006 there were no fluent native speakers of either the Klamath or Modoc dialects. [5]

Klamath is thought to be a member of the Plateau Penutian branch of the Penutian language family, a family in which ablaut is common, just like in Indo-European. Evidence for this classification includes some consonant correspondences between Klamath and other alleged Penutian languages. For example, the Proto-Yokuts retroflexes */ʈ ʈʼ/ correspond to Klamath /tʃ tʃʼ/, and the Proto-Yokuts dentals */t̪ t̪ʰ t̪ʼ/ correspond to the Klamath alveolars /t tʰ tʼ/.

Phonology

Consonants

  Bilabial Coronal Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
Stop p pʰ pʼ t tʰ tʼ   k kʰ kʼ q qʰ qʼ ʔ
Nasal m m̥ mʼ n n̥ nʼ        
Fricative   s       h
Affricate   tʃ tʃʰ tʃʼ        
Approximant   l l̥ lʼ j ȷ̊ jʼ w w̥ wʼ    

Obstruents in Klamath except for /s/ all come in triplets of unaspirated, aspirated, and ejective sounds.[6] Sonorant triplets are voiced, voiceless, and "laryngealized" sounds, except for /h/ and /ʔ/.[7]

Most consonants can be geminated. The fricative /s/ is an exception, and there is evidence suggesting this is a consequence of a recent sound change.[8] Albert Samuel Gatschet recorded geminated /sː/ in the late 19th century, but this sound was consistently recorded as degeminated /s/ by M. A. R. Barker in the 1960s. Sometime after Gatschet recorded the language and before Barker did the same, */sː/ may have degeminated into /s/.

Syntax

Klamath word order is conditioned by pragmatics. There is no clearly defined verb phrase or noun phrase. Alignment is nominative–accusative, with nominal case marking also distinguishing adjectives from nouns. Many verbs obligatorily classify an absolutive case. There are directive and applicative constructions.[9]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Klamath reference at Ethnologue (17th ed., 2013)
  2. ↑ Laurie Bauer, 2007, The Linguistics Student’s Handbook, Edinburgh
  3. ↑ Chen, 1998; Maudlin, 1998.
  4. ↑ Haynes, Erin F. "Obstacles facing tribal language programs in Warm Springs, Klamath, and Grand Ronde". Coyote Papers 8: 87–102. Retrieved 2012-08-30. 
  5. ↑ Golla, Victor. (2011). California Indian Languages. Berkeley/Los Angeles, California : University of California Press. ISBN 9780520266674
  6. ↑ Blevins, 2004, p. 279.
  7. ↑ Blevins, 2004, pp. 279–80.
  8. ↑ Blevins, 2004.
  9. ↑ Rude, 1988.

References

  • Barker, M. A. R. (1963a). Klamath Texts. University of California Publications in Linguistics, volume 30. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • ———. (1963b). Klamath Dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics 31. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • ———. (1964). Klamath Grammar. University of California Publications in Linguistics 32. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Barker, Philip. (1959). The Klamath language. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
  • Blevins, J. (2004, July). Klamath sibilant degemination: Implications of a recent sound change. IJAL, 70, 279–289.
  • Chen, D. W. (1998, April 5). Blackboard: Lost languages; Kuskokwim not spoken here. New York Times.
  • de Angulo, Jaime (1931). The Lutuami language (Klamath-Modoc). Société des Américanistes. Retrieved 2012-08-30. 
  • Maudlin, W. S. (1998, April 17). Yale linguists part of effort to save dying languages. The Yale Herald. Retrieved May 6, 2008
  • Rude, Noel (1987). Some Sahaptian-Klamath grammatical correspondences. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 12:67-83.
  • Rude, Noel (1988). Semantic and pragmatic objects in Klamath. In In Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics, ed. by William Shipley, pp. 651–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Rude, Noel (1991). Verbs to promotional suffixes in Sahaptian and Klamath. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine. Typological Studies in Language 19:185-199. New York and Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Online texts

External links

Languages of California
Italics indicate extinct languages
Algic
Athabascan
Chumashan
Ohlone
Hokan
Penutian
Shastan
Uto Aztecan
Wintuan
Yokutsan
Language isolates
Mesoamerican
Asian
Indo-European
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.