John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill

Born	(1806-05-20)20 May 1806 Pentonville, London, England
Died	8 May 1873(1873-05-08) (aged 66) Avignon, France
Residence	United Kingdom
Nationality	British
Era	19th-century philosophy, Classical economics
Region	Western Philosophy
School	Empiricism, utilitarianism, liberalism
Main interests	Political philosophy, ethics, economics, inductive logic
Notable ideas	Public/private sphere, hierarchy of pleasures in Utilitarianism, liberalism, early liberal feminism, harm principle, Mill's Methods
Influenced by Plato, Aristotle, Ibn Taymiyyah, Epicurus, Aquinas, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Bentham, Hartley, Francis Place, James Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill, Smith, Ricardo, Tocqueville, von Humboldt, Goethe, Coleridge, Bain, Auguste Comte, Saint-Simon (Utopian Socialists),[1] Marmontel,[2] Wordsworth,[2] Coleridge[2]
Influenced William James, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Bertrand Russell, Isaiah Berlin, Karl Popper, Ronald Dworkin, H.L.A. Hart, Peter Singer, Wilhelm Dilthey, Paul Feyerabend, Zechariah Chafee, John Maynard Keynes, Will Kymlicka, Carlos Vaz Ferreira, A. C. Grayling, John Gray, Sam Harris, Paul Krugman, Norman Finkelstein, Christopher Hitchens, Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Signature

Part of a series on
Utilitarianism
Predecessors Epicurus David Hume Claude Adrien Helvétius William Godwin Francis Hutcheson
Key people Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill Henry Sidgwick Richard Mervyn Hare Peter Singer
Types of utilitarianism Preference Rule Act Two-level Total Average Negative Hedonism Enlightened self-interest
Key concepts Pain Suffering Pleasure Utility Happiness Eudaimonia Consequentialism Felicific calculus
Problems Mere addition paradox Paradox of hedonism Utility monster
Related topics Rational choice theory Game theory Social choice Neoclassical economics
Politics portal
v t e

John Stuart Mill, FRSE (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873) was an English philosopher, political economist and civil servant. He was an influential contributor to social theory, political theory and political economy. He has been called "the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century".^[3] Mill's conception of liberty justified the freedom of the individual in opposition to unlimited state control.^[4] He was a proponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham. Hoping to remedy the problems found in an inductive approach to science, such as confirmation bias, he clearly set forth the premises of falsifiability as the key component in the scientific method.^[5] Mill was also a Member of Parliament and an important figure in liberal political philosophy.

Biography

John Stuart Mill was born on Rodney Street in the Pentonville area of London, the eldest son of the Scottish philosopher, historian and economist James Mill, and Harriet Burrow. John Stuart was educated by his father, with the advice and assistance of Jeremy Bentham and Francis Place. He was given an extremely rigorous upbringing, and was deliberately shielded from association with children his own age other than his siblings. His father, a follower of Bentham and an adherent of associationism, had as his explicit aim to create a genius intellect that would carry on the cause of utilitarianism and its implementation after he and Bentham had died.^[6]

Mill was a notably precocious child. He describes his education in his autobiography. At the age of three he was taught Greek.^[7] By the age of eight he had read Aesop's Fables, Xenophon's Anabasis,^[7] and the whole of Herodotus,^[7] and was acquainted with Lucian, Diogenes Laërtius, Isocrates and six dialogues of Plato.^[7] He had also read a great deal of history in English and had been taught arithmetic, physics and astronomy.

At the age of eight he began studying Latin, the works of Euclid, and algebra, and was appointed schoolmaster to the younger children of the family. His main reading was still history, but he went through all the commonly taught Latin and Greek authors and by the age of ten could read Plato and Demosthenes with ease. His father also thought that it was important for Mill to study and compose poetry. One of Mill's earliest poetry compositions was a continuation of the Iliad. In his spare time, he also enjoyed reading about natural sciences and popular novels, such as Don Quixote and Robinson Crusoe.

His father's work, The History of British India was published in 1818; immediately thereafter, about the age of twelve, Mill began a thorough study of the scholastic logic, at the same time reading Aristotle's logical treatises in the original language. In the following year he was introduced to political economy and studied Adam Smith and David Ricardo with his father, ultimately completing their classical economic view of factors of production. Mill's comptes rendus of his daily economy lessons helped his father in writing Elements of Political Economy in 1821, a textbook to promote the ideas of Ricardian economics; however, the book lacked popular support.^[8] Ricardo, who was a close friend of his father, used to invite the young Mill to his house for a walk in order to talk about political economy.

At age fourteen, Mill stayed a year in France with the family of Sir Samuel Bentham, brother of Jeremy Bentham. The mountain scenery he saw led to a lifelong taste for mountain landscapes. The lively and friendly way of life of the French also left a deep impression on him. In Montpellier, he attended the winter courses on chemistry, zoology, logic of the Faculté des Sciences, as well as taking a course of the higher mathematics. While coming and going from France, he stayed in Paris for a few days in the house of the renowned economist Jean-Baptiste Say, a friend of Mill's father. There he met many leaders of the Liberal party, as well as other notable Parisians, including Henri Saint-Simon.

This intensive study however had injurious effects on Mill's mental health, and state of mind. At the age of twenty^[9] he suffered a nervous breakdown. In chapter V of his Autobiography, he claims that this was caused by the great physical and mental arduousness of his studies which had suppressed any feelings he might have developed normally in childhood. Nevertheless, this depression eventually began to dissipate, as he began to find solace in the Mémoires of Jean-François Marmontel and the poetry of William Wordsworth.^[10]

Mill had been engaged in a pen-friendship with Auguste Comte, the founder of positivism and sociology, since Mill first contacted Comte in November 1841. Comte's sociologie was more an early philosophy of science than we perhaps know it today, and the positive philosophy aided in Mill's broad rejection of Benthamism.^[11]

Mill did not study at the University of Oxford or the University of Cambridge, because he refused to subscribe to the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England.^[12] Instead he followed his father to work for the East India Company until 1858, and attended University College, London, to hear the lectures of John Austin, the first Professor of Jurisprudence.^[13] He was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1856.^[14]

In 1851, Mill married Harriet Taylor after 21 years of an intimate friendship. Taylor was married when they met, and their relationship was close but generally believed to be chaste during the years before her first husband died. Brilliant in her own right, Taylor was a significant influence on Mill's work and ideas during both friendship and marriage. His relationship with Harriet Taylor reinforced Mill's advocacy of women's rights. He cites her influence in his final revision of On Liberty, which was published shortly after her death. Taylor died in 1858 after developing severe lung congestion, after only seven years of marriage to Mill.

Between the years 1865 and 1868 Mill served as Lord Rector of the University of St. Andrews. During the same period, 1865–68, he was a Member of Parliament for City and Westminster,^[15] and was often associated with the Liberal Party. During his time as an MP, Mill advocated easing the burdens on Ireland. In 1866, Mill became the first person in the history of Parliament to call for women to be given the right to vote, vigorously defending this position in subsequent debate. Mill became a strong advocate of such social reforms as labour unions and farm cooperatives. In Considerations on Representative Government, Mill called for various reforms of Parliament and voting, especially proportional representation, the Single Transferable Vote, and the extension of suffrage.

He was godfather to the philosopher Bertrand Russell.

On his religious views, Mill was an atheist.^[16][17]

Mill died in 1873 of erysipelas in Avignon, France, where he was buried alongside his wife.

Works

Theory of liberty

Mill's On Liberty addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. Mill states that it is acceptable for someone to harm himself as long as he is not harming others. He does argue, however, that individuals are prevented from doing lasting, serious harm to themselves or their property by the harm principle. Because no one exists in isolation, harm done to oneself may also harm others, and destroying property deprives the community as well as oneself.^[18] Mill excuses those who are "incapable of self-government" from this principle, such as young children or those living in "backward states of society".

Mill argues that despotism is an acceptable form of government for those societies that are "backward", as long as the despot has the best interests of the people at heart, because of the barriers to spontaneous progress.^[19] Though this principle seems clear, there are a number of complications. For example, Mill explicitly states that "harms" may include acts of omission as well as acts of commission. Thus, failing to rescue a drowning child counts as a harmful act, as does failing to pay taxes, or failing to appear as a witness in court. All such harmful omissions may be regulated, according to Mill. By contrast, it does not count as harming someone if – without force or fraud – the affected individual consents to assume the risk: thus one may permissibly offer unsafe employment to others, provided there is no deception involved. (Mill does, however, recognise one limit to consent: society should not permit people to sell themselves into slavery). In these and other cases, it is important to keep in mind that the arguments in On Liberty are grounded on the principle of Utility, and not on appeals to natural rights.

The question of what counts as a self-regarding action and what actions, whether of omission or commission, constitute harmful actions subject to regulation, continues to exercise interpreters of Mill. It is important to emphasise that Mill did not consider giving offence to constitute "harm"; an action could not be restricted because it violated the conventions or morals of a given society.

On Liberty involves an impassioned defence of free speech. Mill argues that free discourse is a necessary condition for intellectual and social progress. We can never be sure, he contends, that a silenced opinion does not contain some element of the truth. He also argues that allowing people to air false opinions is productive for two reasons. First, individuals are more likely to abandon erroneous beliefs if they are engaged in an open exchange of ideas. Second, by forcing other individuals to re-examine and re-affirm their beliefs in the process of debate, these beliefs are kept from declining into mere dogma. It is not enough for Mill that one simply has an unexamined belief that happens to be true; one must understand why the belief in question is the true one. Along those same lines Mill wrote, "unmeasured vituperation, employed on the side of prevailing opinion, really does deter people from expressing contrary opinions, and from listening to those who express them."^[20]

Social liberty and tyranny of majority

Mill believed that "the struggle between Liberty and Authority is the most conspicuous feature in the portions of history." For him, liberty in antiquity was a "contest... between subjects, or some classes of subjects, and the government." Mill defined "social liberty" as protection from "the tyranny of political rulers." He introduced a number of different concepts of the form tyranny can take, referred to as social tyranny, and tyranny of the majority respectively.

Social liberty for Mill meant putting limits on the ruler's power so that he would not be able to use his power on his own wishes and make decisions which could harm society; in other words, people should have the right to have a say in the government's decisions. He said that social liberty was "the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual". It was attempted in two ways: first, by obtaining recognition of certain immunities, called political liberties or rights; second, by establishment of a system of "constitutional checks".

However, in Mill's view, limiting the power of government was not enough. He stated, "Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself."^[21]

Liberty

John Stuart Mill's view on liberty, which was influenced by Joseph Priestley and Josiah Warren, is that the individual ought to be free to do as he wishes unless he harms others. Individuals are rational enough to make decisions about their well being. Government should interfere when it is for the protection of society. Mill explained:

The sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise, or even right...The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns him, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.^[22]

Mill added: "Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided the end be their improvement, and the means justified by actually effecting that end. Liberty, as a principle, has no application to any state of things anterior to the time when mankind have become capable of being improved by free and equal discussion."^[23]

Freedom of speech

An influential advocate of freedom of speech, Mill objected to censorship. He says:

I choose, by preference the cases which are least favourable to me – In which the argument opposing freedom of opinion, both on truth and that of utility, is considered the strongest. Let the opinions impugned be the belief of God and in a future state, or any of the commonly received doctrines of morality... But I must be permitted to observe that it is not the feeling sure of a doctrine (be it what it may) which I call an assumption of infallibility. It is the undertaking to decide that question for others, without allowing them to hear what can be said on the contrary side. And I denounce and reprobate this pretension not the less if it is put forth on the side of my most solemn convictions. However, positive anyone's persuasion may be, not only of the faculty but of the pernicious consequences, but (to adopt expressions which I altogether condemn) the immorality and impiety of opinion. – yet if, in pursuance of that private judgement, though backed by the public judgement of his country or contemporaries, he prevents the opinion from being heard in its defence, he assumes infallibility. And so far from the assumption being less objectionable or less dangerous because the opinion is called immoral or impious, this is the case of all others in which it is most fatal.^[24]

Mill outlines the benefits of 'searching for and discovering the truth' as a way to further knowledge. He argued that even if an opinion is false, the truth can be better understood by refuting the error. And as most opinions are neither completely true nor completely false, he points out that allowing free expression allows the airing of competing views as a way to preserve partial truth in various opinions.^[25] Worried about minority views being suppressed, Mill also argued in support of freedom of speech on political grounds, stating that it is a critical component for a representative government to have in order to empower debate over public policy.^[25] Mill also eloquently argued that freedom of expression allows for personal growth and self-realization. He said that freedom of speech was a vital way to develop talents and realise a person's potential and creativity. He repeatedly said that eccentricity was preferable to uniformity and stagnation.^[25]

Human rights and slavery

In 1850, Mill sent an anonymous letter (which came to be known under the title "The Negro Question"), in rebuttal to Thomas Carlyle's anonymous letter to Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country. Carlyle had defended slavery on grounds of genetic inferiority and claimed that the West Indies development was due to British ingenuity alone and dismissed any notion that there was a debtedness to imported slaves for building the economy there. Mill's rebuttal and references to the ongoing debate in the US at the time regarding slavery were emphatic and eloquent. The full text, as well as a link to the Carlyle letter that prompted it, is available online.^[26]

Connection to feminism

Part of a series on
Feminist philosophy
Major works
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) The Subjection of Women (1869) The Second Sex (1949) Gender Trouble (1990)
Notable theorists
Mary Wollstonecraft · Simone de Beauvoir · Judith Butler
Important concepts
Feminism Gender Equality Performativity
v t e

Mill saw women's issues as important and began to write in favour of greater rights for women. With this, Mill can be considered among the earliest feminists. In his article, "The Subjection of Women" (1861, published 1869), Mill attempts to prove that the legal subjugation of women is wrong and that it should give way to perfect equality.^[27] He talks about the role of women in marriage and how he felt it needed to be changed. There, Mill comments on three major facets of women's lives that he felt are hindering them: society and gender construction, education, and marriage. Mill is also famous for being one of the earliest and strongest supporters of ever greater rights for women. His book The Subjection of Women is one of the earliest written on this subject by a male author.^{[citation needed]} He felt that the oppression of women was one of the few remaining relics from ancient times, a set of prejudices that severely impeded the progress of humanity.^[28]

Mill's ideas were opposed by Ernest Belfort Bax in his treatise, The Legal Subjection of Men.^[29]

Utilitarianism

The canonical statement of Mill's utilitarianism can be found in Utilitarianism. This philosophy has a long tradition, although Mill's account is primarily influenced by Jeremy Bentham and Mill's father James Mill.

Jeremy Bentham's famous formulation of utilitarianism is known as the "greatest-happiness principle". It holds that one must always act so as to produce the greatest aggregate happiness among all sentient beings, within reason. Mill's major contribution to utilitarianism is his argument for the qualitative separation of pleasures. Bentham treats all forms of happiness as equal, whereas Mill argues that intellectual and moral pleasures (higher pleasures) are superior to more physical forms of pleasure (lower pleasures). Mill distinguishes between happiness and contentment, claiming that the former is of higher value than the latter, a belief wittily encapsulated in the statement that "it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, are of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question."^[30]

Mill defines the difference between higher and lower forms of happiness with the principle that those who have experienced both tend to prefer one over the other. This is, perhaps, in direct contrast with Bentham's statement that "Quantity of pleasure being equal, push-pin is as good as poetry",^[31] that, if a simple child's game like hopscotch causes more pleasure to more people than a night at the opera house, it is more imperative upon a society to devote more resources to propagating hopscotch than running opera houses. Mill's argument is that the "simple pleasures" tend to be preferred by people who have no experience with high art, and are therefore not in a proper position to judge. Mill also argues that people who, for example, are noble or practice philosophy, benefit society more than those who engage in individualist practices for pleasure, which are lower forms of happiness. It is not the agent's own greatest happiness that matters "but the greatest amount of happiness altogether".^[32]

Mill supported legislation that would have granted extra voting power to university graduates on the grounds that they were in a better position to judge what would be best for society. (For he believed that education itself, not the intrinsic nature of educated people, qualified them to have more influence in government.)

The qualitative account of happiness that Mill advocates thus sheds light on his account presented in On Liberty. As Mill suggests in that text, utility is to be conceived in relation to humanity "as a progressive being", which includes the development and exercise of rational capacities as we strive to achieve a "higher mode of existence". The rejection of censorship and paternalism is intended to provide the necessary social conditions for the achievement of knowledge and the greatest ability for the greatest number to develop and exercise their deliberative and rational capacities.

Economic philosophy

Mill's early economic philosophy was one of free markets. However, he accepted interventions in the economy, such as a tax on alcohol, if there were sufficient utilitarian grounds. He also accepted the principle of legislative intervention for the purpose of animal welfare.^[33] Mill originally believed that "equality of taxation" meant "equality of sacrifice" and that progressive taxation penalised those who worked harder and saved more and was therefore "a mild form of robbery".^[34]

Given an equal tax rate regardless of income, Mill agreed that inheritance should be taxed. A utilitarian society would agree that everyone should be equal one way or another. Therefore receiving inheritance would put one ahead of society unless taxed on the inheritance. Those who donate should consider and choose carefully where their money goes—some charities are more deserving than others. Considering public charities boards such as a government will disburse the money equally. However, a private charity board like a church would disburse the monies fairly to those who are in more need than others.^[35]

Later he altered his views toward a more socialist bent, adding chapters to his Principles of Political Economy in defence of a socialist outlook, and defending some socialist causes.^[36] Within this revised work he also made the radical proposal that the whole wage system be abolished in favour of a co-operative wage system. Nonetheless, some of his views on the idea of flat taxation remained,^[37] albeit altered in the third edition of the Principles of Political Economy to reflect a concern for differentiating restrictions on "unearned" incomes, which he favoured, and those on "earned" incomes, which he did not favour.^[38]

Mill's Principles, first published in 1848, was one of the most widely read of all books on economics in the period.^[39] As Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations had during an earlier period, Mill's Principles dominated economics teaching. In the case of Oxford University it was the standard text until 1919, when it was replaced by Marshall's Principles of Economics.

Economic democracy

Mill promoted economic democracy instead of capitalism, in the manner of substituting capitalist businesses with worker cooperatives. He says:

The form of association, however, which if mankind continue to improve, must be expected in the end to predominate, is not that which can exist between a capitalist as chief, and work-people without a voice in the management, but the association of the labourers themselves on terms of equality, collectively owning the capital with which they carry on their operations, and working under managers elected and removable by themselves.^[40]

Political democracy

Mill’s major work on political democracy, Considerations on Representative Government, defends two fundamental principles, extensive participation by citizens and enlightened competence of rulers.^[41] The two values are obviously in tension, and some readers have concluded that he is an elitist democrat,^[42] while others count him as an earlier participatory democrat.^[43] In one section he appears to defend plural voting, in which more competent citizens are given extra votes (a view he later repudiated). But in chapter 3 he presents what is still one of the most eloquent cases for the value of participation by all citizens. He believed that the incompetence of the masses could eventually be overcome if they were given a chance to take part in politics, especially at the local level.

Mill is one of the few political philosophers ever to serve in government as an elected official. In his three years in Parliament, he was more willing to compromise than the “radical” principles expressed in his writing would lead one to expect.^[44]

The environment

Mill demonstrated an early insight into the value of the natural world – in particular in Book IV, chapter VI of "Principles of Political Economy": "Of the Stationary State"^[45][46] in which Mill recognised wealth beyond the material, and argued that the logical conclusion of unlimited growth was destruction of the environment and a reduced quality of life. He concluded that a stationary state could be preferable to unending economic growth:

I cannot, therefore, regard the stationary state of capital and wealth with the unaffected aversion so generally manifested towards it by political economists of the old school.

If the earth must lose that great portion of its pleasantness which it owes to things that the unlimited increase of wealth and population would extirpate from it, for the mere purpose of enabling it to support a larger, but not a better or a happier population, I sincerely hope, for the sake of posterity, that they will be content to be stationary, long before necessity compel them to it.

Economic development

Mill regarded economic development as a function of land, labour and capital. While land and labour are the two original factors of production, capital is "a stock, previousdly accumulated of the products of former labour." Increase in wealth is possible only if land and capital help to increase production faster than the labour force. It is productive labour that is productive of wealth and capital accumulation. "The rate of capital accumulation is the function of the proportion of the labour force employed ' productively. Profits earned by employing unproductive labours are merely transfers of income; unproductive labour does not generate wealth or income" . It is productive labourers who do productive consumption. Productive consumption is that "which maintains and increase the productive capacity of the community." It implies that productive consumption is an input necessary to maintain productive labourers.^[47]

Control of population growth

Mill supported the Malthusian theory of population. By population he meant the number of the working class only. He was therefore concerned about the growth in number of labourers who worked for hire. He believed that population control was essential for improving the condition of the working class so that they might enjoy the fruits of the technological progress and capital accumulation. Mill advocated birth control. In 1823 Mill and a friend were arrested while distributing pamphlets on birth control by Francis Place to women in working class areas.^[48]

Wage fund

According to Mill, supply is very elastic in response to wages. Wages generally exceed the minimum subsistence level, and are paid out of capital. Hence, wages are limited by existing capital for paying wages. Thus, wage per worker can be derived by dividing the total circulating capital by the size of the working population. Wages can increase by an increase in the capital used in paying wages, or by decrease in the number of workers. If wages rise, supply of labour will rise. Competition among workers not only brings down wages, but also keeps some workers out of employment. This is based on Mill's notion that "demand for commodities is not demand for labourers". It means that income invested as advances of wages to labour creates employment, and not income spent on consumer goods. An increase in consumption causes a decline in investment. So increased investment leads to increases in the wage fund and to economic progress.

Rate of capital accumulation

According to Mill, the rate of capital accumulation depends on: (1) "the amount of fund from which saving can be made" or "the size of the net produce of the industry", and (2) the " disposition to save". Capital is the result of savings, and the savings come from the "abstinence from present consumption for the sake of future goods". Although capital is the result of saving, it is nevertheless consumed. This means saving is spending. Since saving depends on the net produce of the industry, it grows with profits and rent which go into making the net produce. On the other hand, the disposition to save depends on (1) the rate of profit and (2) the desire to save, or what Mill called "effective desire of accumulation". However, profit also depends on the cost of labour, and the rate of profit is the ratio of profits to wages. When profits rise or wages fall, the rate of profits increases, which in turn increases the rate of capital accumulation. Similarly, it is the desire to save which tends to increase the rate of capital accumulation.

Rate of profit

According to Mill, the ultimate tendency in an economy is for the rate of profit to decline due to diminishing returns in agriculture and increase in population at a Malthusian rate.^{[citation needed]}

Major publications

Title	Date	Source
"Two Letters on the Measure of Value"	1822	"The Traveller"
"Questions of Population"	1823	"Black Dwarf"
"War Expenditure"	1824	Westminster Review
"Quarterly Review – Political Economy"	1825	Westminster Review
"Review of Miss Martineau's Tales"	1830	Examiner
"The Spirit of the Age"	1831	Examiner
"Use and Abuse of Political Terms"	1832
"What is Poetry"	1833, 1859
"Rationale of Representation"	1835
"De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [i]"	1835
"State of Society In America"	1836
"Civilization"	1836
"Essay on Bentham"	1838
"Essay on Coleridge"	1840
"Essays On Government"	1840
"De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [ii]"	1840
A System of Logic	1843
Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy	1844
"Claims of Labour"	1845	Edinburgh Review
The Principles of Political Economy: with some of their applications to social philosophy	1848
"The Negro Question"	1850	Fraser's Magazine
"Reform of the Civil Service"	1854
Dissertations and Discussions	1859
A Few Words on Non-intervention	1859
On Liberty	1859
'Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform	1859
Considerations on Representative Government	1861
"Centralisation"	1862	Edinburgh Review
"The Contest in America"	1862	Harper's Magazine
Utilitarianism	1863
An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy	1865
Auguste Comte and Positivism	1865
Inaugural Address at St. Andrews – Rectorial Inaugural Address at the University of St. Andrews, concerning the value of culture	1867
"Speech In Favor of Capital Punishment"[49][50]	1868
England and Ireland	1868
"Thornton on Labor and its Claims"	1869	Fortnightly Review
The Subjection of Women	1869
Chapters and Speeches on the Irish Land Question	1870
On Nature	1874
Autobiography of John Stuart Mill	1873
Three Essays on Religion	1874
On Social Freedom: or the Necessary Limits of Individual Freedom Arising Out of the Conditions of Our Social Life	1907	"Oxford and Cambridge Review"
"Notes on N.W. Senior's Political Economy"	1945	Economica

See also

• List of liberal theorists
• Mill's Methods
• Women's suffrage in the United Kingdom

Notes

References

External links

Mill's works

Wikisource has original works written by or about: John Stuart Mill

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: John Stuart Mill

• John Stuart Mill's diary of a walking tour at Mount Holyoke College

Secondary works

Further information

Wikimedia Commons has media related to John Stuart Mill.

Wikisource has original works written by or about: John Stuart Mill

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: John Stuart Mill

Parliament of the United Kingdom
Preceded by Sir George de Lacy Evans	Member of Parliament for Westminster 1865–1868	Succeeded by William Henry Smith
Academic offices
Preceded by William Stirling of Keir	Rector of the University of St Andrews 1865–1868	Succeeded by James Anthony Froude

v t e Classical economists Francis Hutcheson Bernard Mandeville David Hume Adam Smith Jean-Baptiste Say Thomas Malthus James Mill Francis Place David Ricardo Henry Thornton John Ramsay McCulloch James Maitland, 8th Earl of Lauderdale Jeremy Bentham Jean Charles Léonard de Sismondi Johann Heinrich von Thünen John Stuart Mill Henry Charles Carey Nassau William Senior Edward Gibbon Wakefield John Rae Frédéric Bastiat Thomas Tooke Robert Torrens

v t e Schools of economic thought Pre-modern Ancient schools Medieval Islamic Scholasticism Early modern Cameralism Mercantilism Physiocrats School of Salamanca Modern American (National) Anarchist Birmingham Classical English historical Georgism German historical Lausanne Malthusian Marxian Mutualism Neoclassical Neomercantilism Ricardian 20th century Austrian Capability approach Carnegie Chicago Circuitism Constitutional Evolutionary Institutional Keynesian Modern Monetary Theory Monetarism Neo-Keynesian Neo-Malthusian Neo-Marxian Neo-Ricardian New classical New institutional Post-Keynesian Public choice Saltwater/Freshwater Stockholm Supply-side Virginia Related Economics Heterodox economics History of economic thought History of macroeconomic thought

Links to related articles v t e Social and political philosophy Philosophers Al-Ghazali Alinsky Aristotle Aurobindo Averroes Augustine Aquinas Badiou Bakunin Baudrillard Benoist Bentham Berlin Bonald Bosanquet Burke Camus Chanakya Cicero Chomsky Comte Confucius Debord Đilas Durkheim Engels Foucault Fourier Gandhi Gehlen Gentile Gramsci Grotius Habermas Han Fei Hobbes Hume Kant Kirk Kropotkin Le Bon Leibniz Le Play Locke Luxemburg Machiavelli Maistre Malebranche Marcuse Maritain Marsilius Marx Mencius Michels Mill Montesquieu Möser Mozi Muhammad Negri Nietzsche Nozick Oakeshott Ortega Pareto Plamenatz Plato Popper Rand Rawls Renan Rousseau Royce Russell Santayana Sarkar Sartre Schmitt Searle Shang Sombart Spann Spencer Smith Spirito Stirner Strauss Taine Taylor Thoreau Vaisheshika Vivekananda Walzer Žižek Social theories Anarchism Authoritarianism Collectivism Communism Conflict theories Confucianism Conservatism Consensus theory Contractualism Gandhism Individualism Legalism Liberalism Libertarianism Mohism National liberalism Social constructionism Social constructivism Social Darwinism Social determinism Socialism Utilitarianism Social concepts Civil disobedience Democracy Four occupations Justice Law Mandate of Heaven Peace Property Revolution Rights Social contract Society War more... Related articles Philosophy of economics Philosophy of education Philosophy of history Jurisprudence Philosophy of social science Philosophy of love Philosophy of sex Social epistemology Portal Category Task Force v t e Ethics Related articles Applied ethics Axiology Bioethics Business ethics Christian ethics Descriptive ethics Discourse ethics Environmental ethics Evolutionary ethics Islamic ethics Jewish ethics Legal ethics Medical ethics Meta-ethics Normative ethics Nursing ethics Professional ethics Religious ethics Sexual ethics Philosophers Plato Aristotle Cicero Confucius Augustine of Hippo Mencius Mozi Xunzi Thomas Aquinas Baruch Spinoza David Hume Immanuel Kant Georg W. F. Hegel Arthur Schopenhauer Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill Søren Kierkegaard Henry Sidgwick Friedrich Nietzsche G. E. Moore Karl Barth Paul Tillich Dietrich Bonhoeffer Philippa Foot John Rawls Bernard Williams J. L. Mackie G. E. M. Anscombe Alasdair MacIntyre R. M. Hare Peter Singer Derek Parfit Thomas Nagel Robert Merrihew Adams Charles Taylor Christine Korsgaard Martha Nussbaum more... Theories Consequentialism Deontology Virtue ethics Ethics of care Pragmatic ethics Particularism Role ethics Concepts Autonomy Axiology Belief Conscience Consent Equality Care Evaluative diversity Evil Free will Good Happiness Justice Morality Norm Freedom Principles Suffering or Pain Stewardship Sympathy Trust Value Virtue Wrong full index... Portal Category Task Force Stubs Discussion v t e Philosophy of science Philosophy of Biology Chemistry Physics thermal and statistical Social science Environment Technology Mind Artificial intelligence Information Perception Space and time Psychology Computer science Concepts Analysis Analytic–synthetic distinction A priori and a posteriori Causality Commensurability Construct Creative synthesis Demarcation problem Empirical evidence Explanatory power Explanandum Fact Falsifiability Feminist method Ignoramus et ignorabimus Inductive reasoning Ingenuity Inquiry Intertheoretic reduction Models of scientific inquiry Nature Objectivity Observation Paradigm Problem of induction Scientific law Scientific method Scientific revolution Scientific theory Testability Theory choice Theory‐ladenness Underdetermination Related topics Artificial intelligence Epistemology Faith and rationality History and philosophy of science History of science History of evolutionary thought Metaphysics Pseudoscience Relationship between religion and science Rhetoric of science Sociology of scientific knowledge Criticism of science Alchemy Metatheory of science Confirmation holism Coherentism Constructive empiricism Constructive realism Constructivist epistemology Contextualism Conventionalism Positivism Reductionism Determinism Fallibilism Foundationalism Deductive-nomological model Hypothetico-deductive model Inductionism Infinitism Instrumentalism Pragmatism Model-dependent realism Naturalism Physicalism Rationalism and empiricism Received view of theories and semantic view of theories Scientific realism and anti-realism Scientific essentialism Scientific formalism Scientific skepticism Scientism Structuralism Uniformitarianism Vitalism Philosophers of science Ancient Plato Aristotle Stoicism Epicurians Medieval Averroes Roger Bacon William of Ockham Hugh of Saint Victor Dominicus Gundissalinus Robert Kilwardby Early modern Francis Bacon Thomas Hobbes René Descartes Galileo Galilei Isaac Newton Late modern Immanuel Kant Friedrich Schelling Auguste Comte William Whewell Wilhelm Windelband John Stuart Mill Herbert Spencer Pierre Duhem Henri Poincaré Wilhelm Wundt Contemporary Albert Einstein John Dewey Bertrand Russell Alfred North Whitehead Rudolf Carnap W.V.O. Quine Adolf Grünbaum Bas van Fraassen Berlin Circle Carl Gustav Hempel C. D. Broad Charles Sanders Peirce Daniel Dennett Hans Reichenbach Ian Hacking Imre Lakatos Jürgen Habermas Karl Theodor Jaspers Karl Pearson Karl Popper Larry Laudan Mario Bunge Michael Polanyi Michael Dummett Otto Neurath Paul Häberlin Paul Feyerabend Pierre Gassendi R. B. Braithwaite Stephen Toulmin Thomas Kuhn Vienna Circle Portal Category v t e Property Types Common property Community property Intangible property Intellectual property indigenous Personal property Private property Public property State property Crown property Crown land Tangible property immovable real Commons Common land communal Common-pool resource Digital commons Freedom to roam Global commons Information commons Knowledge commons Disposession Collectivization Eminent domain Enclosures Eviction Expropriation Farhud Forced migration population transfer Land reform Primitive accumulation Privatization Regulatory taking Slavery bride-buying human trafficking wage wife selling Tax inheritance poll property Theft Theory Bundle of rights Comedy of the commons Common good Common good (economics) Excludability First possession Free rider problem Game theory Georgism Gift economy Homestead principle Labor theory of property Law of rent rent-seeking Natural rights Ownership common customary self state Property rights primogeniture usufruct women's Right to property Rivalry Tragedy of the anticommons Applications Acequia Air rights Ejido Biopiracy Fishing rights Forest rights (India) Grazing rights Pannage Hunting rights poaching Inheritance Land rights aboriginal indigenous squatting Land tenure Littoral rights Mineral rights bergregal Open access Property law alienation easement restraint on alienation real estate title Right of way Water rights prior-appropriation riparian Scholars/ Key works Frédéric Bastiat Ronald Coase Henry George Garrett Hardin Tragedy of the Commons David Harvey John Locke Two Treatises of Government Karl Marx Marcel Mauss The Gift John Stuart Mill Elinor Ostrom Karl Polanyi The Great Transformation Pierre-Joseph Proudhon What Is Property? David Ricardo Jean-Jacques Rousseau The Social Contract Adam Smith The Wealth of Nations Categories: Property Property law by country

Authority control WorldCat VIAF: 100189299 LCCN: n79007044 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 1271 GND: 118582461 SELIBR: 205613 NKC: jn20000604033

Persondata
Name	Mill, John Stuart
Alternative names
Short description	English philosopher
Date of birth	(1806-05-20)20 May 1806
Place of birth	Pentonville, London, England, United Kingdom
Date of death	8 May 1873(1873-05-08)
Place of death	Avignon, France