Fumonisin B1
Fumonisin B1 | ||
---|---|---|
IUPAC name (2S,2'S)-2,2'-{[(5S,6R,7R,9R,11S,16R,18S,19S)-19-amino-11,16,18-trihydroxy-5,9-dimethylicosane-6,7-diyl]bis[oxy(2-oxoethane-2,1-diyl)]}disuccinic acid | ||
Other names Macrofusine | ||
Identifiers | ||
CAS number | 116355-83-0 | |
PubChem | 62314 | |
KEGG | C19241 | |
Jmol-3D images | Image 1 | |
| ||
| ||
Properties | ||
Molecular formula | C34H59NO15 | |
Molar mass | 721.83 g mol−1 | |
Appearance | White to off-white powder | |
(verify) (what is: / ?) Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C (77 °F), 100 kPa) | ||
Infobox references | ||
Fumonisin B1 is the most prevalent member of a family of toxins, known as fumonisins, produced by several species of Fusarium molds, such as Fusarium verticillioides,[1] which occur mainly in maize (corn), wheat and other cereals. Fumonisin B1 contamination of maize has been reported worldwide at mg/kg levels. Human exposure occurs at levels of micrograms to milligrams per day and is greatest in regions where maize products are the dietary staple.
Fumonisin B1 is hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic in all animal species tested. The earliest histological change to appear in either the liver or kidney of fumonisin-treated animals is increased apoptosis followed by regenerative cell proliferation. While the acute toxicity of fumonisin is low, it is the known cause of two diseases which occur in domestic animals with rapid onset: equine leukoencephalomalacia and porcine pulmonary oedema syndrome. Both of these diseases involve disturbed sphingolipid metabolism and cardiovascular dysfunction.
History
In 1970 an outbreak of Leukoenchephalomalacia (ELEM) in horses in South Africa was associated with the contamination of corn with the fungus Fusarium verticillioides.[2] It is one of the most prevalent seed-borne fungi associated with corn.[3] Another study was done on the possible role of fungal toxins in the etiology of human esophageal cancer in a region in South Africa. The diet of the people living in this area was homegrown corn and F. verticillioides was the most prevalent fungus in the corn consumed by the people with high incidence of esophageal cancer.[3] Further outbreaks of ELEM and people in certain regions with high incidence of esophageal cancer led to more research on F.verticillioides. Soon they found experimentally that F.verticillioides caused ELEM in horses and porcine pulmonary edema in pigs. It was found to be highly hepatotoxic and cardiotoxic in rats. In 1984 it was shown that the fungus was hepatocarcinogenic in rats.[3] The chemical nature of the metabolite(s) causing all this had still not been discovered in 1984. After discovery of the carcinogenicity of the fungus, isolation and chemical characterization of the mycotoxin(s) and carcinogen(s) produced by F.verticillioides was urgent. It wasn't until 1988 that the chemical nature of the carcinogen was unraveled. Fumonisin B1 and fumonisin B2 were isolated from cultures of F.verticillioides at PROMEC (Programme on Mycotoxins and Experimental Carcinogenesis).[4] The structures were elucidated in collaboration with the CSIR(Council for Scientific and Industrial Research).[5] Now approximate 15 different fumonisins are discovered, the most important ones being fumonisin B1, B2 and B3.[6]
Toxicokinetics
Regarding toxicokinetics there are no human data available, but research on animals has been done.
Absorption
FB1 is taken orally via food. Overall FB1 is poorly absorbed, less than 6%.[7] Absorption of orally administered fumonisin B1 (10 mg/kg body weight) to rats is low (3.5% of dose) but rapid (Tmax = 1.02h).[8] FB1 does not significantly permeate through the human skin and hence has no significant systemic health risk after dermal exposure.[9]
Distribution
After absorption, some appears to be retained in liver and kidneys. For rats that were fed diets containing fumonisins for several weeks, the concentrations of the fumonisins in the kidneys were approximately 10-fold higher than in the liver.[10]
Plasma distribution of the absorbed dose conformed to a two-compartment open model and the tissue (liver, kidney) concentration time results were consistent with a one-compartment open model.[8]
Excretion
Elimination half-life in rats is 3.15h for plasma, 4.07h for liver, and 7.07h for kidney.[8] However, FB1 is rapidly excreted mostly in its original form. Small amounts are excreted in urine; the most are excreted in feaces.[7]
Toxicodynamics
Because of their similarity, fumonisins are able to inhibit sphingosine-sphinganin-transferases and ceramide synthases and are therefore competitive inhibitors of sphingolipid biosynthesis and metabolism.
Figure 2 shows the sphingolipid metabolism (schematic) and the inhibition caused by fumonisins. Fumonisin B1 inhibits the enzyme ceramide synthase (sphingosine N-acyltransferase), which acylates sphingoid bases. This blocks the formation of ceramide via two pathways: It inhibits de formation via de novo sphinganine and fatty acyl-CoA and via sphingosine produced by the breakdown of ceramide by ceramidase. The inhibition results in increased concentrations of sphinganine, sphingosine and their 1-phosphate metabolites and in decreased concentrations of complex sphingolipids. The accumulation of sphinganine and sphingosine is a primary cause of the toxicity of fumonisin B1 [11] Spinganine and sphingosine are cytotoxic, and have growth inhibitory effects. Also, these sphingoid bases induce apoptosis. Increased apoptosis seems to play an important role in the toxic effects including tumor induction.[7] However, it should be mentioned that the reduced concentration of ceramide and the increased concentration of sphingosine-1-phosphate (as a result of FB1 intake) cause an inhibition of apoptosis and promote mitosis and regeneration.[11] The balance between the intracellular concentration of compounds that inhibit apoptosis and those that induce apoptosis will determine the cellular response.[10] Also, the decreased concentrations of complex sphingolipids appear to play a role in the abnormal behavior and altered morphology of the affected cells.[10]
Mechanism of action
The proposed mechanism of action is depicted in figure 3. Fumonisin B1 occupies the space and electrostatic interactions of both sphinganine (or sphingosine) and fatty acyl-CoA in ceramide synthase. The part of FB1 that has structural similarity with sphingoid bases (the aminopentol part) may interact with the sphinganine binding site, whereas the negatively charged tricarbyllic acid groups may interact with the fatty acyl-CoA binding site.[7]
Because FB1 also occupies the fatty acyl-CoA space, it isn’t acylated, since acyl-CoA is necessary for the acylation; FB1 only inhibits ceramide synthase. However, when the tricarbillic acid groups are removed from FB1 by hydrolysis, the resulting product (aminopentol, AP1) doesn’t only act as an inhibitor, but also as a substrate for ceramide synthase; aminopentol is acylated by ceramide synthase to form N-palmitoyl-AP1.[11] This supports the suggestion that the aminopentol part of FB1 occupies the space of sphinganine in the enzyme. N-palmitoyl-AP1 is an even more potent inhibitor of ceramide synthase and may therefore play a role in the toxicity of nixtamalized fumonisins.[11]
Toxic effects
The risks of fumonisin B1 have been evaluated by The World Health Organization’s International Programme on Chemical Safety(IPCS) and the Scientific Committee on Food(SCF) of the European Commission. They determined a tolerable daily intake(TDI) for FB1, FB2, FB3, alone or in combination of 2 µg/kg body weight.[12] Until now, nothing about the kinetics and metabolism of fumonisin B1 in humans have been reported. On other animals much research has been done, but it might not be comparable to humans. In mice the elimination of FB1 is very rapid, but in humans it could be much slower considering their body weight.[6] There are several possible pathways that cause toxic effects of Fumonisin B1. Most toxic effects are due to altered sphingolipid metabolism by inhibition of ceramide synthase. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) could occur. This increases oxidative stress and induce lipid peroxidation and could damage cells. In agreement with this some studies showed decreased levels of gluthation(GSH) in liver, but other studies showed even elevated levels of GSH.[6] Cytotoxic effects have also been reported.[6] Another effect of exposure to FB1 is apoptosis. This has been observed in a number of different cells and tissues. Inhibition of ceramide synthase is not responsible for this effect. The main factors could be DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 activation.[6] FB1 has also immunotoxic effects, but much more research is necessary to get a clear overview of the effects on the immune system.
Toxic effects in humans
Neural tube defects
Neural tube defect (NTD) are defects of the brain and spinal cord in the embryo resulting from failure of the neural tube to close.[13] Epidemiological studies and clinical trials have pointed out folate deficiency as a major risk factor for NTD.[14] FB1 disrupts sphingolipid metabolism and therefore this could affect folate uptake and cause NTD.[6] In 1990 and 1991 a sudden outbreak of neural tube defects occurred along the Texas-Mexico border. It is believed that this outbreak might have been due to high levels of FB1 that were observed in corn during previous years.[15] Also regions in China and South Africa with high corn consumption show a high prevalence of NTD.[6][16]
Esophageal cancer
It is thought that there is a relationship between the occurrence of F.verticillioides and human esophageal cancer. A low socioeconomic status and a less variated diet, that mainly exists of corn and wheat, is associated with the appearance of esophageal cancer.[6] This derives from epidemiologic studies in various countries. Other studies show that a higher level of concentrations of FB1, FB2 and F. verticillioides are present in corn growing in regions with a high percentage of esophageal cancer. This in contrast with regions with low levels of F.verticillioides, FB1 and FB2 in corn.[17] On top of this it seems that people with a high corn intake are at higher risk to develop esophageal cancer than people with low corn intake. This is observed by people in regions in Italy, Iran, Kenia, Zimbabwe, United States and Brazil with high incidence of esophageal cancer.[18] Another study on the relationship between sphingolipid levels and cancer incidence didn’t show any significant relationship between serum shpingolipids and risk of esophageal cancer. This is quite remarkable, because elevated levels of spingolipids shinganine and shingosine are believed to be biomarkers for exposure of FB1.[6]
Acute mycotoxicosis
Acute mycotoxicosis is food poisoning by food products contaminated by fungi. In 1995 an outbreak of disease characterized by diarrhea and abdominal pain occurred in 27 villages in India. This was the result of consumption of moldy sorghum and corn due to rain damage. This outbreak was studied and the mycotoxicosis was connected to consumption of unleavened bread. Corn and sorghum samples were collected from the households and examined. The corn and sorghum were contaminated by Fusarium and Aspergillus and contained high levels of FB1 compared with samples of unaffected households.[6]
Toxic effects in animals
Much research has been done on toxic effects of FB1 in animals. In vivo studies indicate that liver and kidneys are the main target organs.[6] Fumonisins are poorly absorbed, rapidly eliminated and not metabolized in animals.[19] In pigs and rats there is a wide distribution of FB1 and small amounts have been found to accumulate only in liver and kidneys. In vervet monkeys, some FB1 is partially hydrolyzed in the gut.[6]
Carcinogenic effects
In rats and mice that were exposed to FB1 tumor formation occurred. Several studies on this subject have been done. Depending on the strain of mice being used different carcinomas were shown.[6] FB1 is shown to be nongenotoxic. Therefore the mechanisms responsible for cancer development should lie elsewhere. Important mechanisms for cancer development due to fumonisin B1 could be oxidative damage (ROS-production) and lipid peroxidation. Hepatic and renal tumors could also be due to apoptosis by FB1. As a response to this there could be continuous regeneration of cells, causing cancer. It seems to be that disrupted sphingolipid metabolism is the causative factor for FB1-induced carcinogenicity, as is the case with the toxic effects.[6] Based on all these animal studies FB1 is classified by The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).[20]
Porcine pulmonary edema
Porcine pulmonary edema due to FB1 is intensively studied after the first report in 1981 of swine with pulmonary edema after exposure to corn contaminated with F.verticillioides. Alteration in sphingolipid biosynthesis are reported, especially in lung, heart, kindey and liver tissue. Lethal pulmonary edema was developed within 4–7 days after exposure to feed with concentrations of FB1 >16 mg/kg body weight (>92 ppm). Doses of 10ppm developed a milder form of pulmonary edema.[6]
Equine leukoencephalomalacia
Leukoenchephalomalacia (ELEM) is a neurotoxic disease of horses. Outbreaks of this disease in the 20th century resulted in a number of studies. Apparently FB1 was the cause for this disease. There were shown elevated levels of serum enzyme levels that indicate liver damage. They were normally observed by an elevation of the sphinganine/sphingosine ratio. FB1 possibly induces cardiovascular function, because of the elevated sphinganine/sphingosine ratio. This could be one of the main factors that causes ELEM.[21]
Toxicity in laboratory animals
Effects of feeding rats with FB1 for up to 90 days were usually nephrotoxicity. Between different strains of rats, sensitivity to FB1 varied. In the kidneys the main effect was apoptosis. Also tubular atrophy and regeneration as well as decreased kidney weight was reported.[6] Histopathologic effects on rat liver were reported after both short- and long-term exposure. The main cause was apoptosis. Mice don’t seem to be very sensitive to nephrotoxic effects in comparison with rats. In mouse kidneys little histological changes were seen by high dose exposure. The liver was also the main target organ in mice. Pathology is similar as in rats, with apoptosis and hepatocellular hyperplasia.[6] Fumonisin B1 is possibly embryotoxic if the dose is maternally toxic. A number of studies on genotoxicity inidicated no mutagenetic effects. Although fumonisin could damage DNA directly by production of reactive oxygen species(ROS).[6] Mouse embryos were exposed to FB1 and they showed inhibited sphingolipid synthesis and growth. It caused NTD. Folic acid uptake was dramatically inhibited. Treatment after exposure with folic acid reduced NTD by 50–65%.[6]
Tolerable Daily Intake
The risks of fumonisin B1 have been evaluated by The World Health Organization’s International Programme on Chemical Safety(IPCS) and the Scientific Committee on Food(SCF) of the European Commission. They determined a tolerable daily intake(TDI) for FB1, FB2, FB3, alone or in combination of 2 µg/kg body weight.[22]
Detoxification
The inhibition of ceramide synthase by FB1 is thought to be reversible, since the binding is formed by noncovalent interactions. Factors that will probably induce this reversibility are reduction of cellular FB1-concentration and increasing of cellular concentrations of the substrates for ceramide synthase.[11] Also, the rate of removal of the accumulated sphinganine and sphingosine will affect the detoxification. The information on metabolism and biotransformation of FB1 is very sparse. However, metabolism most likely occurs in the gut since partially hydrolysed and fully hydrolysed FB1 were recovered in faeces but not in bile of Vervet monkeys.[7] Bioavailability of FB1 can be reduced by treating fumonisin-contaminated corn with glucomannans extracted from the cell wall of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These polysaccharides are able to bind certain mycotoxins and have a 67% binding capacity for fumonisins.[23]
References
- ↑ Fumonisin B1 product specification by Fermentek
- ↑ Marasas WFO, Nelson PE, Toussoun TA. (1984). Toxigenic Fusarium Species. Identity and Mycotoxicology. Pennsylvania State University Press.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Marasas WF. (May 2001). "Discovery and occurrence of the fumonisins: A historical perspective". Environ Health Perspect. 109 suppl 2: 239–43. PMC 1240671. PMID 11359691.
- ↑ Gelderblom WCA, Jasklewicz K, Marasas WFO, Thiel PG, Horak MJ, Vleggaar R, Kriek NPJ,. "Fumonisins – novel mycotoxins with cancer promoting activity produced by Fusarium moniliforme". Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1806–1811 (1988).
- ↑ Bezuidenhout SC, Gelderblom WCA, Gorst-Allman CP, Horak RM, Marasas WFO, Spiteller G, Vleggaar R. (1988). "Structure eludicidation of the fumonisins, mycotoxins from Fusarium moniliforme". J Chem Soc Chem Comm: 743–745.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 H Stockmann-Juvalla and K Savolainen (2008). "A review of the toxic effects and mechanisms of action of fumonisin B1". Human & Experimental Toxicology 27 (11): 799–809. doi:10.1177/0960327108099525.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 European commission (2000). "Fumonisin B1". Opinion of the scientific committee on food on Fusarium toxins (27).
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 MR Martinez -Larranaga (December). "Toxicokinetics and oral bioavailability of fumonisin B1.". Veterinary and Human Toxicology 41 (6): 357–62. PMID 10592940.
- ↑ Boonen, Jente; Malysheva, Svetlana V.; Taevernier, Lien; Diana Di Mavungu, José; De Saeger, Sarah; De Spiegeleer, Bart (2012). "Human skin penetration of selected model mycotoxins". Toxicology 301 (1–3): 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2012.06.012. PMID 22749975.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Riley, R.T., Voss, K.A. (2006). "Differential sensitivity of rat kidney and liver to fumonisin toxicity: organ-specific differences in toxin accumulation and sphingoid base metabolism". Toxicol. Sci. 92 (1): 335–345. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj198. PMID 16613836.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Merrill Jr., A.H., Sullards, M.C.,Wang, E., Voss, K.A., Riley, R.T. (2001). "Sphingolipid metabolism: roles in signal transduction and disruption by fumonisins". Environmental Health Perspectives 109: 283–289. doi:10.2307/3435020. PMC 1240677. PMID 11359697.
- ↑ SCF. Updated opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Fumonisin B1,B2 and B3. Retrieved April 2011.
- ↑ "Neural Tube Defects (NTD)". Retrieved April 2011.
- ↑ Blom HJ, Shaw GM, den Heijer M, Finnel RH (2006). ", Neural tube defects and folate: case far from closed". Nat Rev Neurosci 7 (9): 724–731. doi:10.1038/nrn1986. PMC 2970514. PMID 16924261.
- ↑ "Neural Tube Defects and the Texas-Mexico Border". Retrieved April 2011.
- ↑ Cornell J, Nelson MM, Beighton P (1975–1980). "Neural tube defects in Cape Town area". S Afr Med J 64 (3): 83–84. PMID 6346521.
- ↑ Wild CP, Gong YY (29 October 2009). "Mycotoxins and human disease: a largely ignored global health issue". Carcinogenesis 31 (1): 71–82. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp264. PMC 2802673. PMID 19875698.
- ↑ International programme on chemical safety. Geneva: World Health Organization (2001). WHO. Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food (WHO food additives series 47). pp. 103–279.
- ↑ International programme on chemical safety. Geneva: World Health Organization (2000). WHO. Fumonisin B1 (Environmental health criteria 219).
- ↑ International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2002). Summaries & Evaluations, Fumonisin B1 (82). p. 301.
- ↑ Goel S, Schumacher J, Lenz SD, Kemppainen BW. (1996). "Effects of fusarium moniliforme isolates on tissue and serum sphingolipid concentrations in horses". Vet Hum Toxicol. 38 (4): 265–70. PMID 8829343.
- ↑ "SCF, Updated opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Fumonisin B1,B2 and B3". Retrieved April 2011.
- ↑ Yiannikouris A., Jouany J. (2002). "Mycotoxins in feeds and their fate in animals: a review". Animal Research 51 (2): 81–99. doi:10.1051/animres:2002012.
External links
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)- Good review on Fumonisin B11
- Fumonisin Toxicosis, Merck Veterinary Manual
|