FtsZ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Molecular Structure of FtsZ

FtsZ is a protein encoded by the ftsZ gene that assembles into a ring at the future site of the septum of bacterial cell division. This is a prokaryotic homologue to the eukaryotic protein tubulin. FtsZ has been named after "Filamenting temperature-sensitive mutant Z". The hypothesis was that cell division mutants of E. coli would grow as filaments due to the inability of the daughter cells to separate from one another.

History

Discovery of the bacterial cytoskeleton is fairly recent. FtsZ was the first protein of the prokaryotic cytoskeleton to be identified.

The gene was discovered in the 1950s by Y. Hirota (ja:廣田幸敬) and his colleagues in a screen for bacterial cell division mutants.[1] In 1991 it was shown by Erfei Bi and Joseph Lutkenhaus that FtsZ assembled into the Z-ring.

Nuclear-encoded FtsZ in the moss Physcomitrella patens is required for chloroplast division and was the first identified protein essential for organelle division.[2]

Function

During cell division, FtsZ is the first protein to move to the division site, and is essential for recruiting other proteins that produce a new cell wall between the dividing cells. FtsZ's role in cell division is analogous to that of actin in eukaryotic cell division, but, unlike the actin-myosin ring in eukaryotes, FtsZ has no known motor protein associated with it. The origin of the cytokinetic force, thus, remains unclear, but it is believed that the localized synthesis of new cell wall produces at least part of this force. In liposomes Osawa (2009) showed FtsZ is capable of exerting a contractile force with no other proteins present.[3]

Erickson (2009) proposed how the roles of tubulin-like proteins and actin-like proteins in cell division became reversed in an evolutionary mystery.[4] The use of the FtsZ ring in dividing chloroplasts and some mitochondria further establishes their prokaryotic ancestry. It is interesting to note that L-form bacteria that lack a cell wall do not require FtsZ for division, which implies that bacteria may have retained components of an ancestral mode of cell division.[5]

Much is known about the dynamic polymerization activities of tubulin and microtubules, but little is known about these activities in FtsZ. While it is known that single-stranded tubulin protofilaments form into 13 stranded microtubules, the multistranded structure of the FtsZ-containing Z-ring is not known. It is only speculated that the structure consists of overlapping protofilaments.

Recently, proteins similar to tubulin and FtsZ have been discovered in large plasmids found in Bacillus species. They are believed to function as components of segrosomes, which are multiprotein complexes that partition chromosomes/plasmids in bacteria. The plasmid homologs of tubulin/FtsZ seem to have conserved the ability to polymerize into filaments.

The Contractile Ring

FtsZ has the ability to bind to GTP and also exhibits a GTPase domain that allows it to hydrolyze GTP to GDP and a phosphate group. In vivo, FtsZ forms filaments with a repeating arrangement of subunits, all arranged head-to-tail.[6] These filaments form a ring around the longitudinal midpoint, or septum, of the cell. This ring is called the Z-ring.

The GTP hydrolyzing activity of the protein is not essential to the formation of filaments or division. Mutants lacking the GTPase domain form twisted and disordered septa.[7] These cells with irregular septa can still divide, although abnormally. It is unclear as to whether FtsZ actually provides the physical force that results in division or serves as a marker for other proteins to execute division.

The Z-ring forms from smaller subunits of FtsZ filaments. These filaments may pull on each other and tighten to divide the cell

If FtsZ does provide force that divides the cell, it may do so through the relative movement of subunits. Computer models and in vivo measurements suggest that single FtsZ filaments cannot sustain a length more than 30 subunits long. In this model, FtsZ scission force comes from the relative lateral movement of subunits.[8] Lines of FtsZ would line up together parallel and pull on each other creating a "cord" of many strings that tightens itself.

In other models, FtsZ does not provide the contractile force but provides the cell a spatial scaffold for other proteins to execute the division of the cell. This is akin to the creating of a temporary structure by construction workers to access hard-to-reach places of a building. The temporary structure allows unfettered access and ensures that the workers can reach all places. If the temporary structure is not correctly built, the workers will not be able to reach certain places, and the building will be deficient.

The scaffold theory is supported by information that shows that the formation of the ring and localization to the membrane requires the concerted action of a number of accessory proteins. ZipA or the actin homologue FtsA permit initial FtsZ localization to the membrane.[9] Following localization to the membrane, division proteins of the Fts family are recruited for ring assembly.[10] Many of these proteins, such as FtsW, FtsK, and FtsQ are involved in stabilization of the Z ring and may also be active participants in the scission event.

Septal Localization and Intracellular Signaling

The formation of the Z-ring closely coincides with cellular processes associated with replication. Z-ring formation coincides with the termination of genome replication in E. coli and 70% of chromosomal replication in B. subtilis.[11] The timing of Z-ring formation suggests the possibility of a spatial or temporal signal that permits the formation of FtsZ filaments. There currently exist several models and mechanisms that regulate Z-ring formation.

The Min System

One model of Z-ring formation permits its formation only after a certain spatial signal that tells the cell that it is big enough to divide.[12] FtsZ polymerization is closely linked to the Min family of proteins, which were all discovered as E. coli mutants that could not produce a properly localized septum.[13] The Min proteins, which must prevent the FtsZ ring from being placed anywhere near the mid cell and nuclear material, are hypothesized to be involved in a spatial regulatory mechanism that links size increases prior to cell division to FtsZ polymerization in the middle of the cell.

The MinCDE system. MinD-ATP binds to a cell pole, also binds MinC, which prevents the formation of FtsZ polymers. The MinE ring causes hydrolysis of MinD’s bound ATP, turning it into ADP and releasing the complex from the membrane. The system oscillates as each pole builds up a concentration of inhibitor that is periodically dismantled.

The MinCDE system prevents FtsZ polymerization near certain parts of the plasma membrane. MinD localizes to the membrane only at cell poles and contains an ATPase and an ATP-binding domain. The ATP-binding domain is important because MinD can bind to the membrane only if it is bound to ATP.

Once MinD is anchored in the membrane, it polymerizes, forming clusters of MinD. These clusters bind and then activate another protein called MinC, which has activity only when bound by MinD.[14] MinC serves as a FtsZ inhibitor that prevents FtsZ polymerization. The high concentration of a FtsZ polymerization inhibitor at the poles prevents FtsZ from initiating division at anywhere but the mid-cell.[15]

MinE is involved in preventing the formation of MinCD complexes in the middle of the cell. MinE forms a ring near each cell pole. This ring is not like the Z-ring. Instead, it catalyzes the release of MinD from the membrane by activating MinD’s ATPase. This hydrolyzes the MinD’s bound ATP, preventing it from anchoring itself to the membrane.

MinE prevents the MinD/C complex from forming in the center but allows it to stay at the poles. Once the MinD/C complex is released, MinC becomes inactivated. This prevents MinC from deactivating FtsZ. As a consequence, this activity imparts regional specificity to Min localization.[16] Thus, FtsZ can form only in the center, where the concentration of the inhibitor MinC is minimal. Mutations that prevent the formation of MinE rings result in the MinCD zone extending well beyond the polar zones, preventing FtsZ to polymerize and to perform cell division.[17]

MinD requires a nucleotide exchange step to re-bind to ATP so that it can reassociate with the membrane after MinE release. The time lapse results in a periodicity of Min association that may yield clues to a temporal signal linked to a spatial signal. In vivo observations show that the oscillation of Min proteins between cell poles occurs approximately every 50 seconds.[18] Oscillation of Min proteins, however, is not necessary for all bacterial cell division systems. Bacillus subtilis has been shown to have static concentrations of MinC and MinD at the cell poles.[19] This system still links cell size to the ability to form a septum via FtsZ and divide.

The dynamic behavior of the Min proteins has been reconstituted in vitro using an artificial lipid bilayer as mimic for the cell membrane. MinE and MinD can self-organize into parallel and spiral protein waves by a reaction-diffusion-like mechanism.[20]

Communicating Distress

FtsZ polymerization is also linked to stressors like DNA damage. DNA damage induces a variety of proteins to be manufactured, one of them called SulA.[21] SulA prevents the polymerization and GTPase activity of FtsZ. SulA accomplishes this task by binding to self-recognizing FtsZ sites. By sequestering FtsZ, the cell can directly link DNA damage to inhibiting cell division.[22]

Preventing DNA damage

Like SulA, there are other mechanisms that prevent cell division that would result in disrupted genetic information sent to daughter cells. So far, two proteins have been identified in E. coli and B. subtilis that prevent division over the nucleoid region: Noc and SlmA. Noc gene knockouts result in cells that divide without respect to the nucleoid region, resulting in its asymmetrical partitioning between the daughter cells. The mechanism is not well understood, but thought to involve sequestration of FtsZ, preventing polymerization over the nucleoid region.[23] SlmA, like SulA, has been observed to sequester FtsZ, preventing the formation of the polymerized Z Ring over the nucleoid region.[24]

References

  1. Chen JC, Weiss DS, Ghigo JM, Beckwith J (15 January 1999). "Septal Localization of FtsQ, an Essential Cell Division Protein in Escherichia coli". J. Bacteriol. 181 (2): 521–30. PMC 93406. PMID 9882666. 
  2. Löwe J, Amos LA (January 1998). "Crystal structure of the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ". Nature 391 (6663): 203–6. doi:10.1038/34472. PMID 9428770. 
  3. Romberg L, Levin PA (2003). "Assembly dynamics of the bacterial cell division protein FTSZ: poised at the edge of stability". Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57: 125–54. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.012903.074300. PMID 14527275. 
  4. Scheffers D, Driessen AJ (September 2001). "The polymerization mechanism of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ". FEBS Lett. 506 (1): 6–10. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02855-1. PMID 11591361. 
  5. van den Ent F, Amos L, Löwe J (December 2001). "Bacterial ancestry of actin and tubulin". Current Opinion in Microbiology 4 (6): 634–8. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(01)00262-4. PMID 11731313. 
  6. Mendieta J, Rico AI, López-Viñas E, Vicente M, Mingorance J, Gómez-Puertas P (May 2009). "Structural and Functional Model for Ionic (K+/Na+) and pH Dependence of GTPase Activity and Polymerization of FtsZ, the Prokaryotic Ortholog of Tubulin". Journal of Molecular Biology. 390: 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.018. PMID 19447111. 
  7. Mingorance J, Rivas G, Vélez, M, Gómez-Puertas P, Vicente M (Aug 2011). "Strong FtsZ is with the force: mechanisms to constrict bacteria". Trends in Microbiology. 18: 348–56. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.001. PMID 20598544. 
  1. Ishikawa,Hajime;Kuroiwa,Tsuneyoshi;Nagata,Kazuhiro. (03 2005). 『細胞生物学事典』. 朝倉書店. pp. 159–160. ISBN 978-4-254-17118-1. 
  2. R. Strepp, S. Scholz, S. Kruse, V. Speth, R. Reski (1998): Plant nuclear gene knockout reveals a role in plastid division for the homolog of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ, an ancestral tubulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95: 4368–4373.
  3. Masaki Osawa, David E. Anderson, and Harold P. Erickson (2009). "Reconstitution of Contractile FtsZ Rings in Liposomes". Science 320 (7): 792–4. doi:10.1126/science.1154520. PMC 2645864. PMID 18420899. 
  4. Erickson, Harold P. (2007). "Evolution of the cytoskeleton". BioEssays 29 (7): 668–77. doi:10.1002/bies.20601. PMC 2630885. PMID 17563102. 
  5. Leaver M, Domínguez-Cuevas P, Coxhead JM, Daniel RA, Errington J (February 2009). "Life without a wall or division machine in Bacillus subtilis". Nature 457 (7231): 849–853. doi:10.1038/nature07742. PMID 19212404. 
  6. Desai A, Mitchison TJ (1997). "Microtubule polymerization dynamics". Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13: 83–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83. PMID 9442869. 
  7. Bi EF, Lutkenhaus J (1991). "FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli". Nature 354 (3–5): 161–164. doi:10.1038/354161a0. PMID 1944597. 
  8. Lan G, Debrowsky TM, Daniels BR, Wirtz D, Sun SX. (2009). "Condensation of FtsZ can Drive Bacterial Cell Division". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (1): 121–126. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807963106. PMC 2629247. PMID 19116281. 
  9. Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J (2005). "Tethering the Z ring to the membrane through a conserved membrane targeting sequence in FtsA". Mol Microbiol 55 (6): 1722–1734. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04522.x. PMID 15752196. 
  10. Buddelmeijer N, Beckwith J (2002). "Assembly of cell division proteins at the E. coli cell center". Current Opinion in Microbiology 5 (6): 553–557. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00374-0. PMID 12457697. 
  11. Harry EJ (2001). "Coordinating DNA replication with cell division: lessons from outgrowing spores". Biochimie 83 (1): 75–81. doi:10.1016/S0300-9084(00)01220-7. PMID 11254978. 
  12. Weart RB, Levin PA (2003). "Growth Rate-Dependent Regulation of Medial FtsZ Ring Formation". J Bacteriol 185 (9): 2826–2834. doi:10.1128/JB.185.9.2826-2834.2003. PMC 154409. PMID 12700262. 
  13. De Boer PA, Crossley RE, Rothfield LI (1989). "A division inhibitor and a topological specificity factor coded for by the minicell locus determine proper placement of the division septum in E. coli". Cell 56 (4): 641–649. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90586-2. PMID 2645057. 
  14. Hu Z, Gogol EP, Lutkenhaus J (2002). "Dynamic assembly of MinD on phospholipid vesicles regulated by ATP and MinE". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 (10): 6761–6766. doi:10.1073/pnas.102059099. PMC 124476. PMID 11983867. 
  15. Huang KC, Meir Y, Wingreen NS (2003). "Dynamic structures in Escherichia coli: Spontaneous formation of MinE rings and MinD polar zones". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 (22): 12724–12728. doi:10.1073/pnas.2135445100. PMC 240685. PMID 14569005. 
  16. Hu Z, Saez C, Lutkenhaus J (2003). "Recruitment of MinC, an Inhibitor of Z-Ring Formation, to the Membrane in Escherichia coli: Role of MinD and MinE". J Bacteriol 185 (1): 196–203. doi:10.1128/JB.185.1.196-203.2003. PMC 141945. PMID 12486056. 
  17. Hu Z, Lutkenhaus J (2001). "Topological regulation of cell division in E. coli: spatiotemporal oscillation of MinD requires stimulation of its ATPase by MinE and phospholipid". Mol Cell 7 (6): 1337–1343. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00273-8. PMID 11430835. 
  18. Dajkovic A, Lutkenhaus J (2006). "Z Ring as Executor of Bacterial Cell Division". J Mol Micro Bio 11 (3–5): 140–151. doi:10.1159/000094050. PMID 16983191. 
  19. Marston AL, Thomaides HB, Edwards DH, Sharpe ME, Errington J (1998). "Polar localization of the MinD protein of Bacillus subtilis and its role in selection of the mid-cell division site". Genes Dev 12 (21): 3419–3430. doi:10.1101/gad.12.21.3419. PMC 317235. PMID 9808628. 
  20. Loose M, Fischer-Friedrich E, Ries J, Kruse K, Schwille P (2008). "Spatial Regulators for Bacterial Cell Division Self-Organize into Surface Waves in Vitro". Science 320 (5877): 789–792. doi:10.1126/science.1154413. PMID 18467587. 
  21. He AS, Rohatgi PR, Hersh MN, Rosenberg SM (2006). "Roles of E. coli double-strand-break-repair proteins in stress-induced mutation". DNA Repair 5 (2): 258–273. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.10.006. PMID 16310415. 
  22. Mukherjee A, Lutkenhaus J (1998). "Dynamic assembly of FtsZ regulated by GTP hydrolysis". The EMBO Journal 17 (2): 462–469. doi:10.1093/emboj/17.2.462. PMC 1170397. PMID 9430638. 
  23. Wu LJ, Errington J (2006). "Coordination of cell division and chromosome segregation by a nucleoid occlusion protein in Bacillus subtilis". Cell 117 (7): 915–925. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.002. PMID 15210112. 
  24. Bernhardt TG, de Boer PA (2005). "SlmA, a nucleoid-associated, FtsZ-binding protein required for blocking septal ring assembly over chromosomes in E. coli". Mol Cell 18 (5): 555–564. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.012. PMID 15916962. 
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.