Focal-plane shutter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A focal-plane shutter. The metal shutter blades travel vertically.

In camera design, a focal-plane shutter (FPS) is a type of photographic shutter that is positioned immediately in front of the focal plane of the camera, that is, right in front of the photographic film or image sensor.

Two-curtain shutters

The traditional type of focal-plane shutter in 35 mm cameras, pioneered by Leitz for use in its Leica cameras, uses two shutter curtains, made of opaque rubberized fabric, that run horizontally across the film plane. For slower shutter speeds, the first curtain opens (usually) from right to left, and after the required time with the shutter open, the second curtain closes the aperture in the same direction. When the shutter is cocked again the shutter curtains are moved back to their starting positions, ready to be released.

Focal-plane shutter, low speed

See figure at right:

Figure 1: The black rectangle represents the frame aperture through which the exposure is made. It is currently covered by the first shutter curtain, shown in red. The second shutter curtain shown in green is on the right side.

Figure 2: The first shutter curtain moves fully to the left allowing the exposure to be made. At this point the flash is made to fire if one is attached and ready to do so.

Figure 3: After the required amount of exposure the second shutter curtain moves to the left to cover the frame aperture. When the shutter is recocked the shutter curtains are wound back to the right hand side ready for the next exposure.

This is a graphical representation only; the actual mechanisms are much more complex. For example, the shutter curtains actually roll on and off spools at either side of the frame aperture so as to use as little space as possible.

Faster shutter speeds are achieved by the second curtain closing before the first one has fully opened; this results in a vertical slit that travels horizontally across the film. Faster shutter speeds simply require a narrower slit, as the speed of travel of the shutter curtains is not normally varied. Using this technique, modern SLR cameras are capable of shutter speeds of up to 1/2000, 1/4000 or even 1/8000 of a second.

Focal-plane shutter, high speed

See figure at right:

Figure 1: The black rectangle represents the frame aperture through which the exposure is made. It is currently covered by the first shutter curtain, shown in red. The second shutter curtain shown in green is on the right side.

Figure 2: The first shutter curtain begins to move to the left allowing the exposure to be made. Because the exposure requires a very fast shutter speed, the second curtain begins to move across at a set distance from the first one.

Figure 3: The first shutter curtain continues to travel across the frame aperture followed by the second curtain. It would be pointless to use an electronic flash with this shutter speed as the short duration flash would only expose a very small amount of the frame as the rest is covered by either the first or second shutter curtain.

Figure 4: The first shutter curtain finishes moving, followed closely by the second curtain which is now covering the frame aperture completely. When the shutter is recocked both shutter curtains are wound back to the right hand side ready for the next exposure.

Vertical-travel shutters

Vertical-travel focal-plane shutter firing at 1/500 of a second – the gap between the curtains is clearly visible near the bottom.

Most modern 35 mm and digital SLR cameras now use vertical travel metal blade shutters. These work in precisely the same way as the horizontal shutters, but because of the shorter distance the shutter blades must travel (24 mm as opposed to 36 mm), the shutter blades can travel across the film plane in less time. This can result in faster flash synchronization speeds than are possible with the horizontal-curtain focal-plane shutter, and the shutter can reliably provide higher speeds (up to 1/8000 of a second).[1]

Advantages

One of the advantages of focal-plane shutters is that the shutter can be built into the body of a camera which accepts interchangeable lenses, eliminating the need for each lens to have a central shutter built into it.

Another advantage of the focal-plane shutter is that their fastest speeds are quite high: 1/4000 second[2] or even 1/8000 second;[3][4] much higher than the 1/500 second of the typical leaf shutter.[5] (See The Square-type metal-bladed focal-plane shutter and The quest for higher speed, below.)

Disadvantages

A "leaning" 1920's Dixi race car. The distortion is caused by a shutter wiping downward in the focal plane (upward in the scene).
Two sections of the frame are exposed differently due to a lightning strike that occurred during the exposure. A similar effect occurs if electronic flash is used when the shutter is set faster than X-sync.

The main disadvantage of the focal-plane shutter is that a durable and reliable one is a complex (and often expensive) device. While the concept of a travelling slit shutter is simple, a modern FP shutter is a computerized microsecond accurate timer,[6] governing sub-gram masses of exotic materials,[7] subjected to hundreds of g's acceleration,[8] moving with micron precision,[9] choreographed with other camera systems[10] for 100,000+ cycles.[11] This is why FP shutters are seldom seen in cheap or low quality cameras.

In addition, the typical focal-plane shutter has flash synchronization speeds that are slower than the typical leaf shutter's 1/500 sec.,[12] because the first curtain has to open fully and the second curtain must not start to close until the flash has fired. In other words, the very narrow slits of fast speeds will not be properly flash exposed. The fastest X-sync speed on a 35 mm camera is traditionally 1/60 sec. for horizontal Leica-type FP shutters and 1/125 sec. for vertical Square-type FP shutters.[13][14][15] Modern FP shutters have increased X-sync to 1/250 sec. with the use of exotic ultra-strong materials and computer control, and 1/8000 sec. through electronic sleight of hand. (See The quest for higher speed and Breaking the X-sync barrier, below.)

Main article: Rolling shutter

Focal-plane shutters may also produce image distortion of very fast moving objects or when panned rapidly, as described in the Rolling shutter article. A large relative difference between a slow wipe speed and a narrow curtain slit results in cartoonish distortion, because one side of the frame is exposed at a noticeably later instant than the other and the object's interim movement is imaged.

For a horizontal Leica-type FP shutter, the image is stretched if the object moves in the same direction as the shutter curtains, and compressed if travelling in the opposite direction of them. For a downward firing vertical Square-type FP shutter, the top of the image leans forward.[16][17] In fact, the use of leaning to give the impression of speed in illustration is a caricature of the distortion caused by the slow wiping vertical FP shutters of large format cameras from the first half of the twentieth century.[18]

Electro-optical shutters

Instead of using relatively slow-moving mechanical shutter curtains, electro-optic devices such as Pockels cells can be employed as shutters. While not commonly used, they completely avoid the problems associated with travelling-curtain shutters such as flash synchronisation limitations and image distortions when the object is moving. Such shutters are significantly more costly than mechanical shutters.

The rotary focal-plane shutter

Besides the horizontal Leica and vertical Square FP shutters, other types of FP shutters exist. The most prominent is the rotary or sector FP shutter. The rotary disc shutter is common in film movie cameras, but rare in still cameras. These spin a round metal plate with a sector cutout in front of the film. In theory, rotary shutters can control their speeds by narrowing or widening the sector cutout (by using two overlapping plates and varying the overlap) and/or by spinning the plate faster or slower.[19] However, for simplicity's sake, most still camera rotary shutters have fixed cutouts and vary the spinning speed. The Olympus Pen F and Pen FT (1963 and 1966, both from Japan) half frame 35 mm SLRs spun a semicircular titanium plate to 1/500 sec.[20]

Semicircular rotary shutters also have the advantage of unlimited X-sync speed, but all rotary FP shutters have the disadvantage of the bulk required for the plate spin. The Univex Mercury (1938, USA) half frame 35 mm camera had a very large dome protruding out the top of the main body to accommodate its 1/1000 sec. rotary shutter.[21] They also produce very unusual distortion at very high speed because of the angular sweep of the exposure wipe. Bulk can be reduced by substituting blade sheaves for the plate, but then the rotary FP shutter essentially becomes a regular bladed FP shutter.[22]

The revolving drum focal-plane shutter

The revolving drum is an unusual FP shutter that has been used in several specialized panoramic cameras such as the Panon Widelux (1959, Japan) and KMZ Horizont (1968, Soviet Union).[23] Instead of using an extremely short focal length (wide-angle) lens to achieve an extra wide field of view, these cameras have a medium-wide lens encapsulated in a drum with a rear vertical slit. As the entire drum is horizontally pivoted on the lens's nodal point, the slit wipes an extra wide aspect image onto film held against a curved focal plane.[24] The Widelux produced a 140° wide image in a 24×59 mm frame on 135 film with a Lux 26mm f/2.8 lens and controlled shutter speed by varying rotation speed on a fixed slit width.[25][26]

In the Kodak Cirkut (1907, USA) and Globus Globuscope (1981, USA) cameras, the entire camera and lens revolved as the film was pulled past the slit in the opposite direction. The Globuscope produced a 360° angle of view image in a 24×160 mm frame on 135 film with a 25 mm lens and had adjustable slit width with a constant rotation speed.[27][28][29]

Revolving FP shutters produce images with unusual distortion where the image center seems to bulge toward the viewer, while the periphery appears to curve away, because the lens's field of view changes as it swivels. This distortion will disappear if the photograph is mounted on a circularly curved support and viewed with the eye at the center.[30] Revolving shutters must also rotate smoothly; otherwise uneven exposure will result in ugly vertical banding in the image. Since the rotation may take several seconds to complete, no matter the shutter speed, the camera should be tripod mounted. For the same reason, flash cannot be used with these cameras.[31]

These cameras are often used for photographing large groups of people (e.g. the 'school' photograph). For this purpose the subjects are arranged in a shortened semicircle with the camera at the centre such that all the subjects are the same distance from the camera and facing the camera. Once the exposure is made and processed, the panoramic print shows everyone in a straight line facing in the same direction. The distortion present in the background betrays the technique.[32]

History and technical development

The earliest daguerreotype (invented 1839) photographic cameras did not have shutters, because the lack of sensitivity of the process and the small apertures of available lenses meant that exposure times were measured in many minutes. A photographer could easily control exposure time by removing and returning the camera lens' lens cap or plug.[33]

However, during the 1800s, as one increased-sensitivity process replaced another, and larger apertures lenses became available, exposure times shortened to seconds and then to fractions of seconds. Exposure timing control mechanisms became a necessary accessory and then a standard camera feature.[34]

The single-curtain focal-plane shutter

The earliest manufactured shutter was the drop shutter[35] of the 1870s. This was an accessory guillotine-like device – a wooden panel with slit cutout mounted on rails in front of the camera lens that gravity dropped at a controlled rate. As the slit passed the lens, it "wiped" the exposure onto the photographic plate.[33] With rubber bands to increase the drop speed, a 1/500 or 1/1000 sec. shutter speed could be reached. Eadweard Muybridge used shutters of this type in his famous trotting horse studies.[36]

By the 1880s, lens front mounted accessory shutter boxes were available,[37] containing a rubberized silk cloth curtain (also called a blind) with one or more width slit cutouts wound around two parallel drums and using springs to pull a slit from one drum to the other. These shutters offered a wide range of shutter speeds by adjusting the spring tension and selecting a slit width.[38]

In 1883, Ottomar Anschütz (Germany) patented a camera with an internal roller blind shutter mechanism, just in front of the photographic plate. Thus the focal-plane shutter in modern recognizable form was born.[39] Goerz manufactured the Anschütz Camera (Germany) as the first production FP shutter camera in 1890.[40] Francis Blake invented a type of focal plane shutter camera by 1889 that achieved shutter speeds of 1/2000 second, and exhibited numerous stop-action photographs.[41] Note that a drop shutter-like mechanism with adjustable slit was used at the focal plane of an apparently one-off William England camera in 1861 and this is considered the first FP shutter of any kind.[36]

Single curtain, vertical travelling, fixed-width slit, focal-plane shutters with adjustable spring tension and slit-width selection remained popular in large and medium format cameras for the next half-century. The lens on a single curtain FP shutter camera must have its lens cap on when the shutter is cocked; otherwise the film will be double exposed when the blind's cutout re-passes the film gate. A camera-mounted FP shutter's main advantage over the competing interlens leaf shutter was ability to use a very narrow slit to offer an action stopping 1/1000 second shutter speed at a time when leaf shutters topped out at 1/250 sec. – although the available contemporaneous ISO 1 to 3 equivalent speed emulsions limited the opportunities to use the high speeds.[42]

However, these older focal-plane shutters wiped the exposure fairly slowly, even under the highest available spring tension, because the delicate curtain was too fragile to survive the necessary accelerative shocks to move faster. The large relative difference between a slow downward wipe speed and a narrow curtain slit resulted in cartoonish distortion of very fast moving objects instead of truly freezing their motion.(See Section 4: "Disadvantages," above.)

Folmer and Schwing (USA) was the most famous proponent of single curtain FP shutters, with their large format sheet film Graflex single-lens reflex and Graphic press cameras using them from 1905 to 1973. Their most common 4×5 inch shutters had four slit widths ranging from 1½ to ⅛ inch and up to six spring tensions for a speed range of 1/10 to 1/1000 second.[43][44][45]

The Leica-type dual-curtain focal-plane shutter

Shutter curtains of a Zorki 1c, similar to Leica II

In 1925, the Leica A (Germany) 35 mm camera was introduced with a dual-cloth-curtain, horizontal-travelling-slit, focal-plane shutter.[46][47] A dual curtain FP shutter does not have precut slits and the spring tension is not adjustable. The exposure slit is formed by drawing open the first curtain onto one drum and then pulling closed the second curtain off a second drum after a clockwork escapement timed delay (imagine two overlapping window shades) and moves at one speed (technically the curtains are still accelerating slightly) across film gate. Faster shutter speeds are provided by timing the second shutter curtain to close sooner after the first curtain opens and narrowing the slit wiping the film (see schematic figures above). Dual curtain FP shutters are self-capping; the curtains are designed to overlap as the shutter is cocked to prevent double exposure.[48]

Although self-capping dual curtain FP shutters date back to the late nineteenth century,[49] the Leica design made them popular and virtually all FP shutters introduced since 1925 are dual curtain models. As perfected in the 1954 Leica M3 (West Germany),[50][51] a typical Leica-type horizontal FP shutter for 35 mm cameras is pre-tensioned to traverse the 36 millimeter wide film gate in 18 milliseconds (at 2 meters per second) and supports slit widths for a speed range of 1 to 1/1000 sec. A minimum 2 mm wide slit produces a maximum 1/1000 sec. effective shutter speed.[48] Note that the dual curtain FP shutter suffers the same fast speed distortion problems as the single curtain type. Similar technology FP shutters were also common in medium format 120 roll film cameras.

Horizontal cloth FP shutters are normally limited to 1/1000 sec. maximum speed because of the difficulties in precisely timing extremely narrow slits and the unacceptable distortion resulting from a relatively slow wipe speed. Their maximum flash synchronization speed is also limited because the slit is only fully open to the film gate (36 mm wide or wider) and able to be flash exposed down to 1/60 sec. X-synchronization (nominal; 18 ms = 1/55 sec. actual maximum; in reality, a 40 mm slit [to allow for variance] gives 1/50 sec. [⅓ stop slow]). (See Section 4: "Disadvantages," above.)

Some horizontal FP shutters managed to exceed these limits by narrowing the slit or increasing curtain velocity beyond the norm. However, these tended to be sophisticated ultra-high precision models used in expensive professional-level cameras. For example, the Nikon F2 (Japan) 35 mm single-lens reflex (SLR) camera of 1971 had a horizontal FP shutter with stronger titanium foil curtains to safely traverse the film gate in 10 ms (at 3.6 m/s and allowing 1/80 sec. X-sync) with a 1.8 mm slit giving a 1/2000 sec. top speed.[52]

The Square-type metal-bladed focal-plane shutter

In 1960, the Konica F (Japan) 35 mm SLR began a long term incremental increase in maximum shutter speeds with its "High Synchro" FP shutter.[53] This shutter greatly improved efficiency over the typical Leica shutter by using stronger metal blade sheaves that were "fanned" much faster, vertically along the minor axis of the 24×36 mm frame. As perfected in 1965 by Copal, the Copal Square's slit traversed the 24 mm high film gate in 7 ms[54] (3.4 m/s). This doubled flash X-sync speed to 1/125 sec. In addition, a minimum 1.7 mm wide slit would double top shutter speed to a maximum 1/2000 sec. Note, most Squares were derated to 1/1000. sec in the interest of reliability.[55]

The Square's metal blades were also immune to the drying out, rotting and pinholing that cloth curtained shutters could suffer from as they aged.[56][57] In addition, Squares came from the supplier as complete drop-in modules, so camera designers could concentrate on camera design and leave shutter design to specialist subcontractors. This had previously been an advantage of leaf shutters.[58]

Square-type FP shutters were originally bulky in size and noisy in operation, limiting their popularity in the 1960s among camera designers and photographers.[22] Although Konica and Nikkormat were major users of the Copal Square, many other brands including Asahi Pentax, Canon, Leica and Minolta continued to refine the Leica-type shutter for reliability, if not speed; moving from three axis to four axis designs (one control axis for each curtain drum axis, instead of one control for both drums).[59]

New compact and quieter Square designs, with simpler construction and greater reliability, were introduced in the 1970s.[60] The most notable were the Copal Compact Shutter (CCS), introduced by the Konica Autoreflex TC (1976),[61] and the Seiko Metal Focal-Plane Compact (MFC), first used in the Pentax ME (1977; all from Japan).[62] The vertical blade type supplanted the horizontal cloth type as the dominant FP shutter type in the 1980s. Even Leica Camera (originally E. Leitz), long a champion of the horizontal cloth FP shutter for its quietness, switched to a vertical metal FP shutter in 2006 for its first digital rangefinder (RF) camera, the Leica M8 (Germany).[63]

Note that the Contax (Germany) 35 mm RF camera of 1932 had a vertical travel FP shutter with dual brass-slatted roller blinds with adjustable spring tension and slit width, and a top speed of 1/1000 sec. (the Contax II of 1936 had a claimed 1/1250 sec. top speed.), but it was woefully unreliable and not an antecedent of the modern Square shutter.[64][65]

The quest for higher speed

Although the Square shutter improved the FP shutter in most ways, it still limited maximum flash X-sync speed to 1/125 sec. (Unless using special long-burn FP flash bulbs that burn throughout the slit wipe, making slit width irrelevant.[66][67]) Any quality leaf shutter of the 1960s could achieve at least 1/500 sec. flash sync. Greater FP shutter X-sync speed would require further strengthening the curtains, by using exotic materials, allowing them to move even faster and widen the slits.

Copal collaborated with Nippon Kogaku to improve the Compact Square shutter for the Nikon FM2 (Japan) of 1982 by using honeycomb pattern etched titanium foil, stronger and lighter than plain stainless steel, for its blade sheaves. This permitted cutting shutter-curtain travel time by nearly half to 3.6 ms (at 6.7 m/s) and allowed 1/200 sec. flash X-sync speed. A bonus was a distortionless top speed of 1/4000 sec. (with 1.7 mm slit).[68] The Nikon FE2 (Japan), with an improved version of this shutter, had a 3.3 ms (at 7.3 m/s) curtain travel time and boosted X-sync speed to 1/250 sec. in 1983. The top speed remained 1/4000 sec. (with 1.8 mm slit).[69]

The fastest focal-plane shutter ever used in a film camera was the 1.8 ms curtain travel time (at 13.3 m/s) duralumin and carbon fiber bladed one introduced by the Minolta Maxxum 9xi (named Dynax 9xi in Europe, α-9xi in Japan) in 1992. It provided a maximum 1/12,000 sec. (with 1.1 mm slit) and 1/300 sec. X-sync.[70] A further improved version of this shutter, spec'ed for 100.000 actuations, was used in the Minolta Maxxum 9 (named Dynax 9 in Europe, α-9 in Japan) in 1998 and Minolta Maxxum 9Ti (named Dynax 9Ti in Europe, α-9Ti in Japan) in 1999.[71]

The electronically controlled focal-plane shutter

A parallel development to faster speed FP shutters was electronic shutter control as part of the general trend of electronic governance of all camera systems. In 1966,[citation needed] the VEB Pentacon Praktica electronic (East Germany) was the first SLR with an electronically controlled FP shutter.[72] It used electronic circuitry to time its shutter instead of the traditional spring/gear/lever clockwork mechanisms. In 1971, the Asahi Pentax Electro Spotmatic (Japan; name shortened to Asahi Pentax ES in 1972; called Honeywell Pentax ES in USA) tied its electronically controlled shutter to its exposure control light meter to provide electronic aperture-priority autoexposure.[73][74]

The traditional 1/1000 sec. and 1/2000 sec. top speeds of horizontal and vertical FP shutters are on the knife's edge of mechanical controllability – often ¼ stop too slow, even in ultra-high-quality models.[75] Spring powered geartrains become inadequate to durably control and reliably time any higher accelerations and shocks.[76] For example, some highly tensioned FP shutters could suffer from "shutter curtain bounce." This phenomenon is exactly what it sounds like – if the curtains are not properly braked after crossing the film gate, they might crash and bounce; reopening the shutter and causing double exposure ghosting bands on the image edge.[77] Even the Nikon F2's ultra-high precision shutter suffered from this as an early production teething problem.[78] As the Square-type FP shutter's blades moved faster and faster to provide shorter and shorter shutter speeds, the need for better blade timing control only increased.

At first, electromagnets controlled by analogue resistor/capacitor timers were used to govern the release of the second shutter curtain (though still operated by spring power).[79] In 1979, the Yashica Contax 139 Quartz (Japan) introduced more precise digital piezoelectric quartz[80] (shortly followed by ceramic) oscillator circuits (ultimately under digital microprocessor control) to time and sequence its entire exposure cycle – including its vertical FP shutter.[81] Electric "coreless" micromotors, with near instantaneous on/off capability and very high power for their size, would drive both curtains (and other camera systems), replacing springs altogether, in the late 1980s.[82][83] Minimizing mechanical moving parts also helped to prevent inertial shock vibration problems.[84]

Electronic control also made it simpler to time very long shutter speeds.[84] A spring-wound clockwork escapement must completely unwind fairly quickly and limit the longest speed – generally to one full second,[85] although the Kine Exakta (Germany) offered 12 sec. in 1936.[86] The Olympus OM-2's electronically timed horizontal FP shutter could reach 60 sec. in 1975[87] and the Olympus OM-4 (both Japan) reached 240 sec. in 1983.[88] The Pentax LX (Japan, 1980) and Canon New F-1 (Japan, 1981) even had hybrid electromechanical FP shutters that timed their fast speeds mechanically, but used electronics to only extend the slow speed range; the LX to 125 sec.,[89] the F-1N to a modest 8 sec.[90] Note, the Nikon F4 (Japan, 1989) was specified to reach a timed shutter speed of 999 hours with the use of the accessory electronic Multi Control Back MF-23.[91] In theory, the longest available speed is limited only by available battery power for the electronics. This caught some 1970s photographers by surprise when they attempted very long "B" exposures and found their camera batteries had died in the middle because of the era's power hungry electronics and ruined the exposure.

Breaking the X-sync barrier

Electronics are also responsible for pushing the focal-plane shutter's X-sync speed beyond its mechanical limits. As stated earlier, a horizontal FP shutter for 35 mm cameras is only fully open and usable for flash exposure down to 1/60 sec., while vertical FP shutters are usually limited to 1/125 sec. At higher speeds, a normal 1 millisecond electronic flash burst would only partially expose the film – the part open to the slit. (See Sections 4: "Disadvantages," and 7.2 "The Leica-type dual curtain focal-plane shutter," above.)

In 1986, the Olympus OM-4T (Japan) introduced a system that could synchronize a specially dedicated accessory Olympus F280 Full Synchro electronic flash to pulse its light at a 20 kilohertz rate for up to 40 ms, to illuminate its horizontal FP shutter's slit as it crossed the entire film gate – in effect, simulating long-burn FP flashbulbs – allowing flash exposure at shutter speeds as fast as 1/2000 sec. This allowed daylight plus fill-flash use in almost any situation. However, there is a concomitant loss of flash range.[92][93] Extended "FP flash" sync speeds began appearing in many high-end 35 mm SLRs in the mid-1990s,[94] and reached 1/12,000 sec. in the Minolta Maxxum 9 (Japan; called Dynax 9 in Europe, Alpha 9 in Japan) of 1998.[95] They are still offered in some digital-SLRs to 1/8000 sec.[96][97] Leaf shutter cameras are not affected by this issue – they have completely different limitations.

The focal-plane shutter today

Focal-plane shutter top speed peaked at 1/16,000 sec. (and 1/500 sec. X-sync) in 1999 with the Nikon D1 digital SLR. The D1 used electronic assist from its sensor for the 1/16,000 sec. speed and its 15.6×23.7 mm "APS-size" sensor was smaller than 35 mm film and therefore easier to cross quickly for 1/500 sec. X-sync.[98]

However, with very limited need for such extremely fast speeds, FP shutters retreated to 1/8000 sec. in 2003 (and 1/250 sec. X-sync in 2006) – even in professional level cameras. In addition, since no specialized timers are needed for extremely slow speeds, the slowest speed setting is usually 30 sec.[96][97]

Instead, over the last twenty years, most effort has gone into improving durability and reliability. Whereas the best mechanically controlled shutters were rated for 150,000 cycles[99] and had an accuracy of ±¼ stop from nominal value (more typically 50,000 cycles at ±½ stop), today's best electronically controlled FP shutters can last 300,000 cycles and have no noticeable speed error.[100]

In last few years, digital point-and-shoot cameras have been using timed electronic sampling of the image sensor, replacing the traditional mechanical leaf shutter, with delicate moving parts that can wear out, used by film P/S's. Something similar is now also occurring with more sophisticated digital cameras that, in the past, would have used focal-plane shutters. For example, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 (2011, Japan) interchangeable lens digital camera has an FP shutter, but in its 20 frames per second SH Burst mode, it locks its mechanical shutter open and electronically scans its digital sensor, albeit with resolution reduced to 4 megapixels from 16 MP.[101]

See also

References

  1. ↑ R. E. Jacobson et al. (2000). Manual of Photography (Ninth ed. ed.). Focal Press. ISBN 0-240-51574-9. 
  2. ↑ Anonymous, K200D/K20D: Pentax. no city of publication: Pentax Corp., 2008. pp 33-34.
  3. ↑ Anonymous, Canon EOS System Spring 2008. Lake Success, NY: Canon USA, 2008. pp 18-20.
  4. ↑ Anonymous, [Nikon] Digital SLR Comparison Guide: Fall Collection 2008. Melville, NY: Nikon Inc., 2008. p 10.
  5. ↑ Norman Goldberg, Camera Technology: The Dark Side of the Lens. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1992. ISBN 0-12-287570-2. pp 65-66.
  6. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology' p 78
  7. ↑ Anonymous, "Modern Tests: Nikon FM2: Fastest Shutter and Sync" pp 98-101, 112. Modern Photography, Volume 46, Number 9; September 1982. ISSN 0026-8240.
  8. ↑ Tony Gioia, "SLR Notebook: Window on a Shutter." p 32. Modern Photography, Volume 52, Number 8; August 1988. ISSN 0026-8240.
  9. ↑ Anonymous. "Test: Nikon F5: Simply the quickest shooting, most advanced, safety-loaded pro AF SLR ever." pp 70-79. Popular Photography, Volume 61 Number 5; May 1997. ISSN 0032-4582.
  10. ↑ Michael J. Langford, Basic Photography. Fifth Edition. London, UK: Focal Press/Butterworth, 1986. ISBN 0-240-51256-1. pp 71-73.
  11. ↑ Michael J. McNamara, "Test: Nikon D3: Best Ever: Believe the buzz. It's all true. Really." pp 80-83. Popular Photography & Imaging, Volume 72 Number 3; March 2008. ISSN 1542-0337.
  12. ↑ Peter Kolonia, "The War Continues: 35mm Vs. 2¼: Does moving to 2¼ from 35mm really pay back in quality what you lose in convenience?" pp 76-83. Popular Photography, Volume 59 Number 11; November 1995. ISSN 0032-4582. p 78.
  13. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology. pp 221-223.
  14. ↑ Alan Horder; editor, The Manual of Photography. (formerly The Ilford Manual of Photography.) Sixth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Chilton Book Company/Focal Press Limited, 1971. ISBN 0-8019-5655-2. pp 174, 197-199.
  15. ↑ Michael J. Langford, Advanced Photography: A Grammar of Techniques. Fourth Edition. New York, NY: Focal Press Limited, 1980. ISBN 0-8038-0396-6 (USA edition). pp 91-99.
  16. ↑ Michael J. Langford, Basic Photography: A Primer for Professionals. Third Edition. Garden City, NY: Amphoto/Focal Press Limited, 1973. ISBN 0-8174-0640-9. pp 109-111.
  17. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology. pp 80-86, 115-117.
  18. ↑ Robert G. Mason and Norman Snyder; editors. The Camera. Life Library of Photography. New York, New York: TIME-LIFE Books, 1970. No ISBN. pp 162-163.
  19. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology pp 86-87.
  20. ↑ Jason Schneider, "The Camera Collector: Half-frame 35's of the 60's, Part 3. Wherein collectors immortalize the only SLRs of their kind" pp 64, 75. Modern Photography, Volume 39, Number 2; February 1975. ISSN 0026-8240.
  21. ↑ S. F. Spira with Eaton S. Lothrop, Jr and Jonathan R. Spira. The History of Photography as Seen Through the Spira Collection. New York, NY: Aperture, 2001 ISBN 0-89381-953-0. pp 154, 159-160.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Norman Goldberg, "3 new shutters: how they work" pp 74-77, 124. Popular Photography, Volume 82, Number 3; March 1975. ISSN 0032-4582.
  23. ↑ John Wade, The Collector's Guide to Classic Cameras: 1945-1985. Small Dole, UK: Hove Books, 1999. ISBN 1-897802-11-0. pp 113-117.
  24. ↑ Kraszna-Krausz, A.; chairman of editorial board, The Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. Revised Desk Edition, 1973 reprint. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1969. no ISBN. p 1048.
  25. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Photography's Annual Guide to 47 Top Cameras: Widelux F-7" p 158. Modern Photography, Volume 38, Number 12; December 1974. ISSN 0026-8240.
  26. ↑ "Modern Photography's Annual Guide '84: 48 Top Cameras: Widelux F7" p 118. Modern Photography, Volume 47, Number 12; December 1983. ISSN 0026-8240.
  27. ↑ John Owens, "Whirled Tour: Lessons from an all-around photographer," pp 12-13. Popular Photography, Volume 72 Number 9; September 2008. ISSN 1542-0337.
  28. ↑ Harold Martin, "Time Exposure: 25 Years Ago: Cover: July 1981," p 112. Popular Photography & Imaging, Volume 70 Number 7; July 2006. ISSN 1542-0337.
  29. ↑ Wade, Collector's Guide pp 117-118.
  30. ↑ Roger W. Hicks, "Panoramic Cameras; Gear To Help You Get The WIDE View," Shutterbug; January 2006 from http://www.shutterbug.com/equipmentreviews/35mm_cameras/0106panoramic/index.html retrieved 7 January 2008.
  31. ↑ Dan Richards, "Hands On: Noblex ProSport: Can a serious panoramist find happiness with a sub-$1000 camera? Does the Noblex lens swivel?" pp 48, 50, 58. Popular Photography, Volume 63, Number 7; July 1999.
  32. ↑ Shooting a panoramic photograph
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Langford, 3rd ed. p 104.
  34. ↑ Michael R. Peres; editor in chief, Focal Encyclopedia of Photography: Digital Imaging, Theory and Applications, History, and Science. Fourth Edition. Boston, Massachusetts: Focal Press/Elsevier, 2007. ISBN 0-240-80740-5. pp 27-35, 51-59.
  35. ↑ Peres, p 58.
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 Mason and Snyder, p 136.
  37. ↑ Cornell Capa; editorial director, ICP Encyclopedia of Photography. New York, NY: Crown Publishers Inc., 1984. ISBN 0-517-55271-X. p 460.
  38. ↑ Langford, 3rd ed. p 105.
  39. ↑ Todd Gustavson, Camera: A History of Photography From Daguerreotype to Digital. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc., 2009. ISBN 978-1-4027-5656-6. p 32.
  40. ↑ Colin Harding, Classic Cameras. Lewes, East Sussex, UK: Photographers’ Institute Press, 2009. ISBN 978-1-86108-529-0. pp 80-81.
  41. ↑ Elton W. Hall, Francis Blake: An Inventor's Life, Massachusetts Historical Society, 2004
  42. ↑ Lothrop & Schneider, "The SLR: Part 1," p 43.
  43. ↑ Anonymous, Graflex and Graphic Focal Plane Shutter Photography. Rochester, NY: Folmer Graflex Corporation, 1931. no ISBN pp 2, 4-5.
  44. ↑ Thomas Evans, “The Early Graflex Focal Plane Shutter,” pp 1-3. Graflex Historic Quarterly, Volume 13 Issue 2; Second Quarter 2008.
  45. ↑ C. B. (Carroll Bernard) Neblette, Photography: Its Materials and Processes. Sixth Edition (since 1927), 1964 reprint. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1962. no ISBN. pp 111-113.
  46. ↑ Jason Schneider, "The Camera Collector: You can't beat the system. Leitz knew that over 50 years ago, and proceeded to give us the world's first 'system 35.'" pp 54-56. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 6; June 1984. ISSN 0026-8240.
  47. ↑ Anonymous, "Test: Leica 0-series: What's it like to shoot with a 1923 Leica replica? Inconvenient as hell—and lots of fun!" pp 86-90, 208-209. Popular Photography, Volume 65 Number 9; September 2001. ISSN 0032-4582.
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Goldberg, Camera Technology. pp 78-79.
  49. ↑ Jason Schneider, “The Camera Collector: Zeiss-Ikon’s answer to the Leica was the Contax, a camera praised and damned for its brilliantly complex design.” pp 18, 22-23, 150. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 10; October 1984. ISSN 0026-8240.
  50. ↑ Jason Schneider, "The Camera Collector: I'm still no Leica collector, but the best of 'em exemplify 'form follows function'." pp 50, 52, 54-55. Modern Photography, Volume 47, Number 10; October 1983. ISSN 0026-8240.
  51. ↑ John Wade, The Collector's Guide to Classic Cameras: 1945-1985. Small Dole, UK: Hove Books, 1999. ISBN 1-897802-11-0. pp 79-80.
  52. ↑ B. Moose Peterson, Nikon Classic Cameras, Volume II; F2, FM, EM, FG, N2000 (F-301), N2020 (F-501), EL series. First Edition. Magic Lantern Guides. Rochester, NY: Silver Pixel Press, 1996. ISBN 1-883403-38-3. pp 21-22, 24-26.
  53. ↑ Peres, p 780.
  54. ↑ Peterson, pp 21, 52.
  55. ↑ Rudolph Lea, The Register of 35mm Single Lens Reflex Cameras: From 1936 to the Present. Second Edition. Hückelhoven, Germany: Rita Wittig Fachbuchverlag, 1993. ISBN 3-88984-130-9. pp 30-31, 47, 68-69, 121-126, 173-174.
  56. ↑ Anonymous. "Too Hot to Handle," p 59. Volume 47, Number 3; March 1983. ISSN 0026-8240.
  57. ↑ Stephen Gandy, “USED Leica M Buyer's Check List,” from http://www.cameraquest.com/leicamchecklist.htm retrieved 5 January 2006.
  58. ↑ Goldberg, "3 new shutters," p 77.
  59. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology pp 71-72.
  60. ↑ Herbert Keppler, "Keppler on the SLR: Pentax sets out to knock off Canon and Olympus with smallest SLR's ever – Rollei's unbelievable SL2000" pp 55-57, 186, 208, 212-214, 230. Modern Photography, Volume 40, Number 12; December 1976. ISSN 0026-8240.
  61. ↑ Norman Goldberg, Michele Frank and Leif Ericksenn. "Lab Report: Konica Autoreflex TC" pp 118-121, 140-141, 173, 191. Popular Photography, Volume 84, Number 7; July 1977. ISSN 0032-4582.
  62. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Tests: [Pentax ME] Smallest 35mm SLR: Fully Automatic Only" pp 115-121. Modern Photography, Volume 41, Number 4; April 1977. ISSN 0026-8240.
  63. ↑ Anonymous, Leica M System: The fascination of the moment – analog and digital. Solms, Germany: Leica Camera, 2006. pp 62-63.
  64. ↑ Jason Schneider, "The Camera Collector: Zeiss-Ikon's answer to the Leica was the Contax, a camera praised and damned for its brilliantly complex design." pp 18, 22-23, 150. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 10; October 1984. ISSN 0026-8240.
  65. ↑ Jason Schneider, "The Camera Collector: The Contax saga, Part II. The world's best rangefinder made it the pro 35 of the 30s." pp 44-45, 62-63. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 11; November 1984. ISSN 0026-8240.
  66. ↑ Langford, Advanced Photography pp 76-77.
  67. ↑ Langford, 5th ed. p 55.
  68. ↑ "Modern Tests: Nikon FM2" pp 98, 101.
  69. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Tests: Nikon FE2 Adds Superfast Shutter And Much More" pp 86-92. Modern Photography, Volume 47, Number 10; October 1983. ISSN 0026-8240.
  70. ↑ Anonymous, "Popular Photography: Test: Minolta Maxxum 9xi: It's awesome. It's top of the line. But is it a real pro?" pp 48-56. Popular Photography, Volume 100 Number 2; February 1993. ISSN 0032-4582.
  71. ↑ Minolta (1999). Minolta Dynax 9. Camera borchure (German), 20 pages, 1. and 2. edition, Minolta Co., Ltd. / Minolta GmbH, Osaka / Ahrensburg, Minolta article code 9242-2098-3Z (1. edition) and 9242-2098-3Z/2.99 (2. edition).
  72. ↑ Lea, pp 11, 240-241.
  73. ↑ Danilo Cecchi, Asahi Pentax and Pentax SLR 35mm Cameras: 1952-1989. Hove Collectors Book. Susan Chalkley, translator. Hove, Sussex, UK: Hove Foto Books, 1991. pp 74-77.
  74. ↑ John Wade, A Short History of the Camera. Watford, Hertfordshire, UK: Fountain Press/Argus Books Limited, 1979. ISBN 0-85242-640-2. pp 122-123.
  75. ↑ Anonymous. "Too Hot to Handle" p 74. Modern Photography, Volume 46, Number 4; April 1982. ISSN 0026-8240.
  76. ↑ Langford, Advanced Photography pp 55-56.
  77. ↑ Herbert Keppler, editor, 124 Ways You Can Test Cameras Lenses And Equipment. New York, NY: American Photographic Book Publishing Co., Inc. (Amphoto), 1962. no ISBN. p 47.
  78. ↑ B. Moose Peterson, Nikon Classic Cameras, Volume II; F2, FM, EM, FG, N2000 (F-301), N2020 (F-501), EL series. First Edition. Magic Lantern Guides. Rochester, NY: Silver Pixel Press, 1996. ISBN 1-883403-38-3. p 20.
  79. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology pp 76-77.
  80. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Tests: Contax 139 [Quartz]: Compact And Impressive SLR" pp 108-113. Modern Photography, Volume 44, Number 3; March 1980. ISSN 0026-8240.
  81. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology p 78.
  82. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Tests: Nikon N8008: A High Performance, Ultra Controllable SLR" pp 58-64, 102, 108, 112, 122. Modern Photography, Volume 52, Number 8; August 1988. ISSN 0026-8240.
  83. ↑ Goldberg, Camera Technology. pp 209-210.
  84. ↑ 84.0 84.1 Langford, Advanced Photography. p 56.
  85. ↑ Langford, 5th ed. p 56.
  86. ↑ Ivor Matanle, Collecting and Using Classic SLRs. First Paperback Edition. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson, 1997. ISBN 0-500-27901-2. pp 16, 51-53.
  87. ↑ Anonymous, "Modern Tests: [Olympus] OM-2: Unique Auto SLR Is In Tiniest Package" pp 104-108. Modern Photography, Volume 40, Number 5; May 1976. ISSN 0026-8240.
  88. ↑ Anonymous, "Modern Tests: Olympus OM-4 Has Multiple Spot, LCD Panel Metering" pp 78-86. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 5; May 1984. ISSN 0026-8240.
  89. ↑ Anonymous, "Modern Tests: Pentax LX: New Challenge To Nikon" pp 92-100, 144. Modern Photography, Volume 45, Number 1; January 1981. ISSN 0026-8240.
  90. ↑ Anonymous. “Modern Tests: Canon’s New F-1: A Versatile ’Pro’” pp 98-109. Modern Photography, Volume 46, Number 1; January 1982. ISSN 0026-8240.
  91. ↑ Bill Hansen and Michael Dierdorff. Japanese 35mm SLR Cameras: A Comprehensive Data Guide. Small Dole, UK: Hove Books, 1998. ISBN 1-874707-29-4. p 158.
  92. ↑ Anonymous. "Modern Tests: Olympus OM-4T: More Than Just A Titanium Armored SLR" pp 46-50, 78. Modern Photography, Volume 51, Number 6; June 1987. ISSN 0026-8240.
  93. ↑ Bob Schwalberg, "Flash: The Light Fantastic: Special Effects Flash: The standard synchronized flash shot may now be an endangered species." pp 75-77. Popular Photography, Volume 96, Number 4; April 1989. ISSN 0032-4582.
  94. ↑ Anonymous. "Popular Photography: 41 1996 Top 35mm Cameras Star Rated" pp 59, 61-92. Popular Photography, Volume 59 Number 12; December 1995. ISSN 0032-4582. (Canon EOS Elan IIE, p 63; Minolta Maxxum 700si, p 64; Nikon N90S, p68; Sigma SA-300N, p 71.)
  95. ↑ Anonymous. "Test: Minolta Maxxum 9: Does this claimed professional-level camera really make the grade?" pp 84-91, 130. Popular Photography, Volume 63 Number 3; March 1999.
  96. ↑ 96.0 96.1 Canon EOS System. pp 18-20.
  97. ↑ 97.0 97.1 [Nikon] Digital Comparison. p 10.
  98. ↑ McNamara, Michael J. "New Frontiers: Nikon's D1: Has the perfect digital SLR arrived, or is it just a glimpse of what's to come?" pp 50, 52, 54. Popular Photography, Volume 64 Number 8; August 2000. ISSN 0032-4582.
  99. ↑ Anonymous, "Modern Tests: Nikon F3: Successor to Nikon F2 and F" pp 112-121, 124, 128. Modern Photography, Volume 44, Number 6; June 1980. ISSN 0026-8240.
  100. ↑ McNamara, "Nikon D3" p 83.
  101. ↑ Philip Ryan, “Lab: ILC Test: Panasonic LUMIX DMC-G3: Tiny Terror: Good Things Come In Panasonic’s Small Package,” pp 72, 74, 76, 100. Popular Photography, Volume 75 Number 8; August 2011. ISSN 1542-0337.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.