Disjunction elimination

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the theorem of propositional logic which expresses Disjunction elimination, see Case analysis.

In propositional logic, disjunction elimination[1][2][3] (sometimes named proof by cases or case analysis), is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof. It is the inference that if a statement P implies a statement Q and a statement R also implies Q, then if either P or R is true, then Q has to be true. The reasoning is simple: since at least one of the statements P and R is true, and since either of them would be sufficient to entail Q, Q is certainly true.

If I'm inside, I have my wallet on me.
If I'm outside, I have my wallet on me.
It is true that either I'm inside or I'm outside.
Therefore, I have my wallet on me.

It is the rule can be stated as:

{\frac  {P\to Q,R\to Q,P\lor R}{\therefore Q}}

where the rule is that whenever instances of "P\to Q", and "R\to Q" and "P\lor R" appear on lines of a proof, "Q" can be placed on a subsequent line.

Formal notation

The disjunction elimination rule may be written in sequent notation:

(P\to Q),(R\to Q),(P\lor R)\vdash Q

where \vdash is a metalogical symbol meaning that Q is a syntactic consequence of P\to Q, and R\to Q and P\lor R in some logical system;

and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

(((P\to Q)\land (R\to Q))\land (P\lor R))\to Q

where P, Q, and R are propositions expressed in some formal system.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.