Diamond anvil cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Schematics of the core of a diamond anvil cell. The diamond size is a few millimeters at most

A diamond anvil cell (DAC) is a device used in scientific experiments. It allows compressing a small (sub-millimeter sized) piece of material to extreme pressures, which can exceed 300 gigapascals (3,000,000 bars / 2,960,770 atmospheres).[1]

The device has been used to recreate the pressure existing deep inside planets, creating materials and phases not observed under normal conditions. Notable examples include the non-molecular ice X,[2] polymeric nitrogen[3] and metallic xenon (an inert gas at lower pressures).

A DAC consists of two opposing diamonds with a sample compressed between the culets. Pressure may be monitored using a reference material whose behavior under pressure is known. Common pressure standards include ruby[4] fluorescence, and various structurally simple metals, such as copper or platinum.[5] The uniaxial pressure supplied by the DAC may be transformed into uniform hydrostatic pressure using a pressure transmitting medium, such as argon, xenon, hydrogen, helium, paraffin oil or a mixture of methanol and ethanol.[6] The pressure-transmitting medium is enclosed by a gasket and the two diamond anvils. The sample can be viewed through the diamonds and illuminated by X-rays and visible light. In this way, X-ray diffraction and fluorescence; optical absorption and photoluminescence; Mössbauer, Raman and Brillouin scattering; positron annihilation and other signals can be measured from materials under high pressure. Magnetic and microwave fields can be applied externally to the cell allowing nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance and other magnetic measurements.[7] Attaching electrodes to the sample allows electrical and magnetoelectrical measurements as well as heating up the sample to a few thousand degrees. Much higher temperatures (up to 7000 K)[8] can be achieved with laser-induced heating,[9] and cooling down to millikelvins has been demonstrated.[6]

Principle

The operation of the diamond anvil cell relies on a simple principle:

p={\frac  {F}{A}}

where p is the pressure, F the applied force, and A the area.

Therefore high pressure can be achieved by applying a moderate force on a sample with a small area, rather than applying a large force on a large area. In order to minimize deformation and failure of the anvils that apply the force, they must be made from a very hard and virtually incompressible material, such as diamond.

History

The first diamond anvil cell in the NIST museum of Gaithersburg. Shown in the image above is the part which compresses the central assembly.

Percy Williams Bridgman, the great pioneer of high-pressure research during the first half of the 20th century, revolutionized the field of high pressures with his development of an opposed anvil device with small flat areas that were pressed one against the other with a lever-arm. The anvils were made of tungsten carbide (WC). This device could achieve pressure of a few gigapascals, and was used in electrical resistance and compressibility measurements. The invention of the diamond anvil cell in the late 1950s at the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) by Weir, Lippincott, Van Valkenburg, and Bunting further refined the process.[10] The principles of the DAC are similar to the Bridgman anvils but in order to achieve the highest possible pressures without breaking the anvils, they were made of the hardest known material: a single crystal diamond. The first prototypes were limited in their pressure range and there was not a reliable way to calibrate the pressure. During the following decades DACs have been successively refined, the most important innovations being the use of gaskets and the ruby pressure calibration. The DAC evolved to be the most powerful lab device for generating static high pressure.[11] The range of static pressure attainable today extends to the estimated pressures at the Earth's center (~360 GPa).

Components

There are many different DAC designs but all have four main components:

  1. The force-generating device — relies on the operation of either a lever arm, tightening screws, or pneumatic or hydraulic pressure applied to a membrane. In all cases the force is uniaxial and is applied to the tables (bases) of the two anvils
  2. Two opposing diamond anvils — made of high gem quality, flawless diamonds, usually with 16 facets. They typically weigh 1/8 to 1/3 carat (25 to 70 mg). The culet (tip) is ground and polished to a hexadecagonal surface parallel to the table. The culets of the two diamonds face one another, and must be perfectly parallel in order to produce uniform pressure and to prevent dangerous strains. Specially selected anvils are required for specific measurements—for example, low diamond absorption and luminescence is required in corresponding experiments.
  3. Gasket — a foil of ~0.2 mm thickness (before compression) that separates the two culets. It has an important role: to contain the sample with a hydrostatic fluid in a cavity between the diamonds, and to prevent anvil failure by supporting the diamond tips, thus reducing stresses at the edges of the culet. Standard gasket materials are hard metals and their alloys, such as stainless steel, Inconel, rhenium, iridium or tungsten carbide. They are not transparent to X-rays, and thus if X-ray illumination through the gasket is required then lighter materials, such as beryllium, boron nitride,[12] boron[13] or diamond[14] are used as a gasket.
  4. Pressure-transmitting medium — homogenizes the pressure. Methanol:ethanol 4:1 mixture is rather popular because of ease of handling. However, above ~20 GPa it turns into a glass and thus the pressure becomes nonhydrostatic.[6] Argon, hydrogen and helium are usable up to the highest pressures, and ingenious techniques have been developed to seal them in the cell.[6]

Uses

Prior to the invention of the diamond anvil cell, static high-pressure apparatus required large hydraulic presses which weighed several tons and required large specialized laboratories. The simplicity and compactness of the DAC meant that it could be accommodated in a wide variety of experiments. Some contemporary DACs can easily fit into a cryostat for low-temperature measurements, and for use with a superconducting electromagnet. In addition to being hard, diamonds have the advantage of being transparent to a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum from infrared to gamma rays, with the exception of the far ultraviolet and soft X-rays. This makes the DAC a perfect device for spectroscopic experiments and for crystallographic studies using hard X-rays.

A variant of the diamond anvil, the hydrothermal diamond anvil cell (HDAC) is used in experimental petrology/geochemistry for the study of aqueous fluids, silicate melts, immiscible liquids, mineral solubility and aqueous fluid speciation at geologic pressures and temperatures. The HDAC is sometimes used to examine aqueous complexes in solution using the synchrotron light source techniques XANES and EXAFS. The design of HDAC is very similar to that of DAC, but it is optimized for studying liquids.[15]

Innovative uses

An innovative use of the diamond anvil cell is testing the sustainability and durability of life under high pressures. This innovative use can be used in the search for life on extrasolar planets. One reason the DAC is applicable for testing life on extrasolar planets is panspermia, a form of interstellar travel. When panspermia occurs, there is high pressure upon impact and the DAC can replicate this pressure. Another reason the DAC is applicable for testing life on extrasolar planets is that planetary bodies that hold the potential for life may have incredibly high pressure on their surface.

Anurag Sharma, a geochemist, James Scott, a microbiologist, and others at the Carnegie Institution of Washington performed an experiment with the DAC using this new innovative application. Their goal was to test microbes and discover under what level of pressure they can carry out life processes. The experiment was performed under 1.6 GPa of pressure, which is more than 16,000 times Earth’s surface pressure (Earth’s surface pressure is 985 hPa). The experiment began by placing a solution of bacteria, specifically Escherichia coli and Shewanella oneidensis, in a film and placing it in the DAC. The pressure was then raised to 1.6 GPa. When raised to this pressure and kept there for 30 hours, only about 1% of the bacteria survived. The experimenters then added a dye to the solution. If the cells survived the squeezing and were capable of carrying out life processes, specifically breaking down formate, the dye would turn clear. 1.6 GPa is such great pressure that during the experiment the DAC turned the solution into ice-IV, a room-temperature ice. When the bacteria broke down the formate in the ice, liquid pockets would form because of the chemical reaction. The bacteria were also able to cling to the surface of the DAC with their tails.[16]

However, there is some skepticism with this experiment. People debate whether carrying out the simple process of breaking down formate is enough to consider the bacteria living. Art Yayanos, an oceanographer at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, believes an organism should only be considered living if it can reproduce. Another issue with the DAC experiment is that when high pressures occur, there are usually high temperatures present as well, but in this experiment there were not. This experiment was performed at room-temperature, which causes some skepticism of the results.[16]

Moving past the 10 years of skepticism, new results from independent research groups [17] have shown the validity of Sharma et al. (2002) [18] work. This is a significant step that reiterates the need for a new approach to the old problem of studying environmental extremes through experiments. There is practically no debate whether microbial life can survive pressures up to 600 MPa, which has been shown over the last decade or so to be valid through a number of scattered publications.[18] What is significant in this approach of Sharma et al. 2002 work is the elegantly straightforward ability to monitor systems at extreme conditions that have since remained technically inaccessible. While the simplicity and the elegance of this experimental approach is mind boggling; the results are rather expected and consistent with most biophysical models. This novel approach lays a foundation for future work on microbiology at non-ambient conditions by not only providing a scientific premise, but also laying the technical feasibility for future work on non-ambient biology and organic systems.

There is another group of scientists performing similar tests with a low-pressure diamond anvil cell. This low-pressure DAC has better imaging quality and signal collection. It is designed to sense pressures in the 0.1–600 MPa range, much lower than the high pressure DAC. The new low-pressure DAC also has a new asymmetric design, as opposed to a symmetric design the old, high pressure DAC used. In this experiment Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the microbe being observed. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is more commonly known as baker’s yeast. These microbes can only grow in pressures ranging from 15–50 MPa, while pressures over 200 MPa are likely to kill the cells. The microbes were also incubated at 30 °C. Their tests showed that the yeast completed its cell cycle in 97±5 minutes.[19]

In June 2013, Chrystèle Sanloup et al. reported using a diamond anvil cell to create reactions between Xenon and ice (the solid state of water) to create a compound of xenon, oxygen and hydrogen at pressures above 50 GPa and a temperature of 1500 K, that are conditions found in the interiors of the Solar System's gas giant planets, Uranus and Neptune. X-ray crystallography data was used to determine a hexagonal lattice with four xenon atoms per unit cell. The results are consistent with the compound being Xe4O12H12, and lead to the conjecture that xenon is expected to be depleted in the atmospheres of the giant planets as a result of sequestration at depth. [20][21]

See also

References

  1. Hemley, R. J.; Ashcroft, N. W. (1998). "The Revealing Role of Pressure in the Condensed Matter Sciences" (PDF). Physics Today 51 (8): 26. Bibcode:1998PhT....51h..26H. doi:10.1063/1.882374. 
  2. Goncharov, A. F.; Struzhkin, V. V.; Somayazulu, M. S.; Hemley, R. J.; Mao, H. K. (Jul 1986). "Compression of ice to 210 gigapascals: Infrared evidence for a symmetric hydrogen-bonded phase". Science 273 (5272): 218–230. Bibcode:1996Sci...273..218G. doi:10.1126/science.273.5272.218. PMID 8662500. 
  3. Eremets, MI; Hemley, RJ; Mao, Hk; Gregoryanz, E (May 2001). "Semiconducting non-molecular nitrogen up to 240 GPa and its low-pressure stability". Nature 411 (6834): 170–174. Bibcode:2001Natur.411..170E. doi:10.1038/35075531. PMID 11346788. 
  4. Forman, Richard A.; Piermarini, Gasper J.; Barnett, J. Dean; Block, Stanley (1972). "Pressure Measurement Made by the Utilization of Ruby Sharp-Line Luminescence". Science 176 (4032): 284–5. Bibcode:1972Sci...176..284F. doi:10.1126/science.176.4032.284. PMID 17791916. 
  5. Kinslow, Ray; Cable, A. J. (1970). High-velocity impact phenomena. Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-408950-X. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Jayaraman, A. (1986). "Ultrahigh pressures". Reviews of Scientific Instruments 57 (6): 1013. Bibcode:1986RScI...57.1013J. doi:10.1063/1.1138654. 
  7. Bromberg, Steven E.; Chan, I. Y. (1992). "Enhanced sensitivity for high-pressure EPR using dielectric resonators". Review of Scientific Instruments 63 (7): 3670. Bibcode:1992RScI...63.3670B. doi:10.1063/1.1143596. 
  8. Chandra Shekar, N. V. et al. (2003). "Laser-heated diamond-anvil cell (LHDAC) in materials science research". J. Mater. Sci. Techn. 19: 518. 
  9. Subramanian, N. et al. (2006). "Development of laser-heated diamond anvil cell facility for synthesis of novel materials". Current Science 91: 175. 
  10. The Diamond Anvil Pressure Cell. NIST
  11. Block, S. and Piermarini, G. (1976). "The Diamond Cell Stimulates High-Pressure Research". Physics Today 29 (9): 44. doi:10.1063/1.3023899. 
  12. Funamori, N; Sato, T (2008). "A cubic boron nitride gasket for diamond-anvil experiments". The Review of scientific instruments 79 (5): 053903. Bibcode:2008RScI...79e3903F. doi:10.1063/1.2917409. PMID 18513075. 
  13. Lin, Jung-Fu; Shu, Jinfu; Mao, Ho-Kwang; Hemley, Russell J.; Shen, Guoyin (2003). "Amorphous boron gasket in diamond anvil cell research". Review of Scientific Instruments 74 (11): 4732. Bibcode:2003RScI...74.4732L. doi:10.1063/1.1621065. 
  14. Zou, Guangtian; Ma, Yanzhang; Mao, Ho-Kwang; Hemley, Russell J.; Gramsch, Stephen A. (2001). "A diamond gasket for the laser-heated diamond anvil cell". Review of Scientific Instruments 72 (2): 1298. Bibcode:2001RScI...72.1298Z. doi:10.1063/1.1343864. 
  15. Bassett, W.A. et al. (1993). "A new diamond anvil cell for hydrothermal studies to 2.5 GPa and from −190 to 1200 °C". Review of Scientific Instruments 64 (8): 2340. Bibcode:1993RScI...64.2340B. doi:10.1063/1.1143931. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 Couzin, J. (2002). "Weight of the world on microbes' shoulders". Science 295 (5559): 1444–1445. doi:10.1126/science.295.5559.1444b. PMID 11859165. 
  17. Vanlinit, D. et al. (2011). "Rapid Acquisition of Gigapascal-High-Pressure Resistance by Escherichia coli". mBio 2 (1): e00130–10. doi:10.1128/mBio.00130-10. 
  18. 18.0 18.1 Sharma, A., et al. (2002). "Microbial activity at Gigapascal pressures". Science 295 (5559): 1514–1516. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1514S. doi:10.1126/science.1068018. PMID 11859192. 
  19. Oger, Phil M.; Daniel, Isabelle; Picard, Aude (2006). "Development of a low-pressure diamond anvil cell and analytical tools to monitor microbial activities in situ under controlled p and t". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) 1764 (3): 434–442–230. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.11.009. PMID 16388999. 
  20. Reactivity of Xenon with Ice at Planetary Conditions, Chrystèle Sanloup et al, Americam Physical Society Physical Review Letters, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265501, 24 June 2013, accessed 10 July 2013
  21. Impossible chemistry: making the unreactive, react, Helen Maynard-Casely, The Conversation, 18 June 2013, accessed 10 July 2013

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.