Convergence in measure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Convergence in measure can refer to two distinct mathematical concepts which both generalize the concept of convergence in probability.

Definitions

Let f,f_{n}\ (n\in {\mathbb  N}):X\to {\mathbb  R} be measurable functions on a measure space (X,Σ,μ). The sequence (fn) is said to converge globally in measure to f if for every ε > 0,

\lim _{{n\to \infty }}\mu (\{x\in X:|f(x)-f_{n}(x)|\geq \varepsilon \})=0,

and to converge locally in measure to f if for every ε > 0 and every F\in \Sigma with \mu (F)<\infty ,

\lim _{{n\to \infty }}\mu (\{x\in F:|f(x)-f_{n}(x)|\geq \varepsilon \})=0.

Convergence in measure can refer to either global convergence in measure or local convergence in measure, depending on the author.

Properties

Throughout, f and fn (n \in N) are measurable functions X R.

  • Global convergence in measure implies local convergence in measure. The converse, however, is false; i.e., local convergence in measure is strictly weaker than global convergence in measure, in general.
  • If, however, \mu (X)<\infty or, more generally, if all the fn vanish outside some set of finite measure, then the distinction between local and global convergence in measure disappears.
  • If μ is σ-finite and (fn) converges (locally or globally) to f in measure, there is a subsequence converging to f almost everywhere. The assumption of σ-finiteness is not necessary in the case of global convergence in measure.
  • If μ is σ-finite, (fn) converges to f locally in measure if and only if every subsequence has in turn a subsequence that converges to f almost everywhere.
  • In particular, if (fn) converges to f almost everywhere, then (fn) converges to f locally in measure. The converse is false.
  • If μ is σ-finite, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem also holds if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.
  • If X = [a,b] ⊆ R and μ is Lebesgue measure, there are sequences (gn) of step functions and (hn) of continuous functions converging globally in measure to f.
  • If f and fn (nN) are in Lp(μ) for some p > 0 and (fn) converges to f in the p-norm, then (fn) converges to f globally in measure. The converse is false.
  • If fn converges to f in measure and gn converges to g in measure then fn + gn converges to f + g in measure. Additionally, if the measure space is finite, fngn also converges to fg.

Counterexamples

Let X={\mathbb  R}, μ be Lebesgue measure, and f the constant function with value zero.

  • The sequence f_{n}=\chi _{{[n,\infty )}} converges to f locally in measure, but does not converge to f globally in measure.
  • The sequence f_{n}=\chi _{{[{\frac  {j}{2^{k}}},{\frac  {j+1}{2^{k}}}]}} where k=\lfloor \log _{2}n\rfloor and j=n-2^{k}

(The first five terms of which are \chi _{{\left[0,1\right]}},\;\chi _{{\left[0,{\frac  12}\right]}},\;\chi _{{\left[{\frac  12},1\right]}},\;\chi _{{\left[0,{\frac  14}\right]}},\;\chi _{{\left[{\frac  14},{\frac  12}\right]}}) converges to 0 locally in measure; but for no x does fn(x) converge to zero. Hence (fn) fails to converge to f almost everywhere.

  • The sequence f_{n}=n\chi _{{\left[0,{\frac  1n}\right]}} converges to f almost everywhere (hence also locally in measure), but not in the p-norm for any p\geq 1.

Topology

There is a topology, called the topology of (local) convergence in measure, on the collection of measurable functions from X such that local convergence in measure corresponds to convergence on that topology. This topology is defined by the family of pseudometrics

\{\rho _{F}:F\in \Sigma ,\ \mu (F)<\infty \},

where

\rho _{F}(f,g)=\int _{F}\min\{|f-g|,1\}\,d\mu .

In general, one may restrict oneself to some subfamily of sets F (instead of all possible subsets of finite measure). It suffices that for each G\subset X of finite measure and \varepsilon >0 there exists F in the family such that \mu (G\setminus F)<\varepsilon . When \mu (X)<\infty , we may consider only one metric \rho _{X}, so the topology of convergence in finite measure is metrizable.

Because this topology is generated by a family of pseudometrics, it is uniformizable. Working with uniform structures instead of topologies allows us to formulate uniform properties such as Cauchyness.

References

  • D.H. Fremlin, 2000. Measure Theory. Torres Fremlin.
  • H.L. Royden, 1988. Real Analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • G.B. Folland 1999, Section 2.4. Real Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.