Bodmin by-election, 1922

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Bodmin by-election, 1922 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Bodmin on 24 February 1922.

Vacancy

The by-election was caused by the death of the sitting Coalition Conservative MP, Sir Charles Augustin Hanson on 17 January 1922.[1] Hanson had been MP for Bodmin since himself winning the seat in a by-election on 15 August 1916.

Electoral history

General Election 1918

Electorate 30,279

Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Unionist 12,228 58.4
Liberal Isaac Foot 8,705 41.6
Majority 3,523 16.8
Turnout 69.1
Unionist hold Swing
  • Hanson was endorsed by the Coalition Government.

Candidates

The Unionists had already selected Major-General Sir Frederick Poole as the Coalition candidate to replace Sir Charles Hanson who had indicated he was standing down at the next election. [2] Poole was Hanson's son-in-law. [3] Poole has usually been described as a Coalition Conservative but The Times newspaper did refer to him as a Coalition Liberal in its report on the by-election polling day.[4] The Liberals adopted solicitor Isaac Foot who had fought Bodmin twice before. [5]

Issues

The Coalition was fighting on its record of having won the war and negotiated the peace and was relying on appeals to the electorate of being allowed to get on with the task of steering the country through the difficult domestic and international waters currently flowing around the British ship of state. Sir Austen Chamberlain in a letter to General Poole asked for the support of the electors for the giving of peace to Ireland and the restoration of that economic and financial stability necessary for good trade and prosperity.[6]

For the Independent Liberals, Foot attacked the government's record in waste and inefficiency. He said that the electorate had recognised the 1918 general election as a fraud and resented having been tricked by 'delusive promises' and 'crooked politics'.[7]

Lib-Lab Pact?

One question which was raised during the round of by-elections being fought at this time, as the date of the next general election neared, was if there was a some kind of electoral arrangement between the Independent, Asquithian Liberals and the Labour Party. Foot had no Labour opponent in Bodmin but Labour had not contested the seat at the 1918 general election either. The Executive Committee of the Labour Party in Bodmin did however issue a strong attack on the government's record, especially what it described as 'its wanton waste of the country's resources' and it recommended that Labour supporters should vote for Foot. [8]

By-elections were taking place at Manchester Clayton, Camberwell North and Wolverhampton West in this period as well as at Bodmin. In the other three seats the Independent Liberals did not stand candidates, allowing Labour to take on the Coalition in straight fights with the result that Manchester and Wolverhampton were Labour gains. The Coalition leadership regarded this as evidence that understandings, formal or unofficial, were being entered into by the opposition parties in anticipation of a similar but formal arrangement for the next general election, but that was denied by Labour and Liberal spokesmen. The Times tended to accept these denials, given the difficulty of imposing national arrangements on independently minded local Liberal and Labour constituency organisations, but clearly it was then in the interests of the opposition parties to avoid fighting each other as far as possible, as it made it easier to for the government candidate to win.[9]

One more likely reason that not as many Liberal candidates were coming forward at by-elections at this time was the decline in Liberal organisation in many constituencies and a general lack of morale amongst party workers both engendered by the split in the party between Coalition and Asquithian wings. [10]

Result

The result was a gain for the Liberal Party from the Coalition with Foot gaining 56% of the poll and a majority of 3,141 over Poole.

Bodmin by-election, 1922: Cornwall, Bodmin [11]

Electorate 32,578

Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Isaac Foot 13,751 56.4
Conservative Sir Frederick Cuthbert Poole 10,610 43.6
Majority 3.141 12.8
Turnout 74.8
Liberal gain from Conservative Swing

The size of the Liberal victory has been described by one historian as a 'landslide'. The result was said to have turned the tide for the Liberals in the region restoring the party as the true heir of the old Radical tradition [12] and that as a result Cornish Methodism now had a charismatic spokesman at Westminster. [13]

Aftermath

General Election, 1922: Cornwall, Bodmin [14]

Electorate 33,265

Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Isaac Foot 14,292 53.4
Conservative Sir Frederick Cuthbert Poole 12,467 46.6
Majority 1,825 6.8
Turnout 80.4
Liberal hold Swing

References

  1. ↑ The Times, 18 January 1922, p12
  2. ↑ The Times, 5 September 1921, p5
  3. ↑ The Times, 11 February 1922, p7
  4. ↑ The Times, 24 February 1922
  5. ↑ The Times, 30 January 1922, p12
  6. ↑ The Times, 21 February 1922, p10
  7. ↑ The Times, 27 February 1922, p10
  8. ↑ Michael Foot & Alison Highet, Isaac Foot: a Westcountry boy – Apostle of England; Politico’s Publishing, 2006 p138
  9. ↑ The Times, 21 February 1922, p10
  10. ↑ Chris Cook, The Age of Alignment: Electoral Politics in Britain, 1922-1929; Macmillan, 1975 p12
  11. ↑ F W S Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1918-1949; Political Reference Publications, Glasgow 1949, p310
  12. ↑ Garry Tregidga, The Liberal Party in South West-Britain since 1918: Decline, Dormancy and Rebirth; University of Exeter Press, 2000 p27
  13. ↑ Garry Tregidga (ed.) Killerton, Camborne and Westminster: The Political Correspondence of Sir Francis and Lady Acland, 1910-1929; Devon and Cornwall Record Society, 2006 p42
  14. ↑ F W S Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1918-1949; Political Reference Publications, Glasgow 1949, p310

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.