Banks–Zaks fixed point

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In quantum chromodynamics (and also N = 1 superquantum chromodynamics) with massless flavors, if the number of flavors, Nf, is sufficiently small (i.e. small enough to guarantee asymptotic freedom, depending on the number of colors), the theory can flow to an interacting conformal fixed point of the renormalization group. If the value of the coupling at that point is less than one (i.e. one can perform perturbation theory in weak coupling), then the fixed point is called a Banks–Zaks fixed point. The existence of the fixed point was first reported by William E. Caswell in 1974, and later used by Banks and Zaks in their analysis of the phase structure of vector-like gauge theories with massless fermions. For this reason one also justifiably finds references to a Caswell-Banks–Zaks fixed point.

More specifically, suppose that we find that the beta function of a theory up to two loops has the form

\beta (g)=-b_{0}g^{3}+b_{1}g^{5}+{\mathcal {O}}(g^{7})\,

where b_{0} and b_{1} are positive constants. Then there exists a value g=g_{\ast } such that \beta (g_{\ast })=0:

g_{\ast }^{2}={\frac {b_{0}}{b_{1}}}.

If we can arrange b_{0} to be smaller than b_{1}, then we have g_{\ast }^{2}<1. It follows that when the theory flows to the IR it is a conformal, weakly coupled theory with coupling g_{\ast }.

For the case of a non-Abelian gauge theory with gauge group SU(N_{c}) and Dirac fermions in the fundamental representation of the gauge group for the flavored particles we have

b_{0}={\frac {1}{16\pi ^{2}}}{\frac {1}{3}}(11N_{c}-2N_{f})\;\;\;\;{\text{ and }}\;\;\;\;b_{1}=-{\frac {1}{(16\pi ^{2})^{2}}}\left({\frac {34}{3}}N_{c}^{2}-{\frac {1}{2}}N_{f}\left(2{\frac {N_{c}^{2}-1}{N_{c}}}+{\frac {20}{3}}N_{c}\right)\right)

where N_{c} is the number of colors and N_{f} the number of flavors. Then N_{f} should lie just below {\tfrac {11}{2}}N_{c} in order for the Banks–Zaks fixed point to appear. Note that this fixed point only occurs if, in addition to the previous requirement on N_{f} (which guarantees asymptotic freedom),

{\frac {11}{2}}N_{c}>N_{f}>{\frac {68N_{c}^{2}}{(16+20N_{c})}}

where the lower bound comes from requiring b_{1}>0. This way b_{1} remains positive while -b_{0} is still negative (see first equation in article) and one can solve \beta (g)=0 with real solutions for g.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike; additional terms may apply for the media files.