The Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification, also known as WBQ or Welsh Bac, was introduced in October 2006[1]. Where offered, the WBQ runs alongside and complements qualifications such as A-levels and GCSEs. 31 schools and colleges are running a pilot scheme as of 2005[update]. The Welsh Assembly Government has announced staged roll-out of the WBQ across Wales from September 2007 and intends that at least one quarter of Welsh students will be studying for the qualification by 2010.
The WBQ is an inclusive diploma available at three levels: Foundation, Intermediate and Advanced
Contents |
The WJEC LEVEL 1 Welsh Baccalaureate Foundation Diploma Core Certificate at level 1 includes:
The WJEC LEVEL 2 Welsh Baccalaureate Intermediate Diploma Core Certificate at level 2 includes:
The WJEC LEVEL 3 Welsh Baccalaureate Advanced Diploma Core Certificate at level 3 includes:
The Options to be taken along with the Core can be, for example two GCE Advanced Levels, or a BTEC Level 3 Diploma.
In Wales, 63 % of WBQ students passed the qualification in 2006, compared to fewer than 50 % in 2005 and a 97 % pass rate in A-level subjects.[2]
Research on the Welsh Baccalaureate has been conducted by the University of Bath as well as the University of Nottingham.[3] This research clearly shows the positive impact of the Welsh Bac in broadening the learner experience. Due to the results of this research, the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ) is currently being rolled-out in Wales. However, the following concerns have been raised.
Compared to the International Baccalaureate, the breadth of the WBQ is questionable: It is possible to achieve the WBQ with no science content, for example; whereas the IB Diploma requires study of science, maths, a first language, a second language, and 'people and societies'. The IB Diploma can be prescriptive because it is based on a unique curriculum which allows six subjects to be studied simultaneously. The A-levels and National Diplomas of the WBQ are broader and require more time per subject; which limits the number of subjects.
It looked like nonsense but we needed the money... If I were a student I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole
In 2002, Colin Jenkins and John David, who developed the original WBQ proposal for the Insitute for Welsh Affairs (IWA), criticised the WBQ because it did not follow the IWA's model, based on the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. They said they were disappointed and considered the WBQ to be "missing a huge opportunity"[4] They considered the WBQ to be a "feeble quick fix", "not a baccalaureate", and as "curriculum 2000 with a bit of icing". They added that the language requirement was "a waste of time."[5]
Jane Davidson, Welsh Assembly Government Minister for Education, Lifelong Learning & Skills from 2000-2007, responded to the pair's criticism by stating that the WBQ is "a significant innovation which will broaden students' programmes and bring coherence to them. The programme will be distinctive, modern and proudly Welsh." She explained that "The contract to design and deliver the Welsh baccalaureate was awarded following a tender process... In the event we received no tenders based on the IWA model."[6] Jeff Jones (Welsh politician), chair of the WJEC when it bid for and developed the WBQ, stated in 2011 that he thought at the time that the WBQ "looked like nonsense" but that the WJEC "needed the money and in any case we had to bid because we were the Welsh exam board". Jones added that the WBQ was “really an A level with a load of nonsense added on” and added: “It isn’t a proper Bac where students at 18 would still be required to study maths, English, a science and a language, not meaningless Mickey Mouse additions. What the heck is the use of ‘Wales and the World’ for a start? No wonder Russell Group universities who can get students from England with four A stars are not that interested. If I were a student I wouldn’t touch it with a barge pole"[7]
Although the WBQ does provide 120 additional UCAS points, a range of universities, including the most selective ones or the most selective courses, permit little or no use of the IB as a substitution for entry tariffs at A-level. For example:
The UCAS tariff report at www.ucas.com/documents/tariff/tariff_reports/wbqreport.pdf
The Bath University report (by Thompson and Hayden) on the introduction of the WB at opus.bath.ac.uk/10379/