Ediacara biota

The Ediacara ( /ˌiːdiˈækərə/; formerly Vendian) biota consisted of enigmatic tubular and frond-shaped, mostly sessile organisms which lived during the Ediacaran Period (ca. 635-542 Ma). Trace fossils of these organisms have been found worldwide, and represent the earliest known complex multicellular organisms.[note 1] The Ediacara biota radiated in an event called the Avalon Explosion, 575 million years ago,[1][2] after the Earth had thawed from the Cryogenian period's extensive glaciation, and largely disappeared contemporaneous with the rapid appearance of biodiversity known as the Cambrian explosion. Most currently existing body-plans of animals first appeared only in the fossil record of the Cambrian rather than the Ediacaran. For macroorganisms, the Cambrian biota completely replaced the organisms that populated the Ediacaran fossil record.

The organisms of the Ediacaran Period first appeared around 585 million years ago and flourished until the cusp of the Cambrian 542 million years ago when the characteristic communities of fossils vanished. The earliest reasonably diverse Ediacaran community was discovered in 1995 in Sonora, México, and is approximately 585 million years in age, roughly synchronous with the Gaskiers glaciation.[3] While rare fossils that may represent survivors have been found as late as the Middle Cambrian (510 to 500 million years ago) the earlier fossil communities disappear from the record at the end of the Ediacaran leaving only curious fragments of once-thriving ecosystems.[4] Multiple hypotheses exist to explain the disappearance of this biota, including preservation bias, a changing environment, the advent of predators and competition from other life-forms.

Determining where Ediacaran organisms fit in the tree of life has proven challenging; it is not even established that they were animals, with suggestions that they were lichens (fungus-alga symbionts), algae, protists known as foraminifera, fungi or microbial colonies, to hypothetical intermediates between plants and animals. The morphology and habit of some taxa (e.g. Funisia dorothea) suggest relationships to Porifera or Cnidaria.[5] Kimberella may show a similarity to molluscs, and other organisms have been thought to possess bilateral symmetry, although this is controversial. Most macroscopic fossils are morphologically distinct from later life-forms: they resemble discs, tubes, mud-filled bags or quilted mattresses. Due to the difficulty of deducing evolutionary relationships among these organisms some paleontologists have suggested that these represent completely extinct lineages that do not resemble any living organism. One paleontologist proposed a separate kingdom level category Vendozoa (now renamed Vendobionta)[6] in the Linnaean hierarchy for the Ediacaran biota. If these enigmatic organisms left no descendants their strange forms might be seen as a "failed experiment" in multicellular life with later multicellular life independently evolving from unrelated single-celled organisms.[7]

The Ediacara biota in context
view • discuss • edit
-650 —
–
-640 —
–
-630 —
–
-620 —
–
-610 —
–
-600 —
–
-590 —
–
-580 —
–
-570 —
–
-560 —
–
-550 —
–
-540 —
–
-530 —
–
-520 —
–
-510 —
–
-500 —
–
-490 —
 
 
Cryogenian
Ediacaran
Cambrian
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
←
Last Ediacaran communities
←
Last putative Ediacaran
←
←
First Ediacaran megafossil
←
Gaskiers
Glaciation
Aspidella
discs
Charnia
 Neoproterozoic
(last era of the Precambrian)
 Palæozoic
(first era of the Phanerozoic)
Axis scale: millions of years ago.
References: Waggoner 1998,[8] Hofmann 1990[9]

Contents

History

The first Ediacaran fossils discovered were the disc-shaped Aspidella terranovica in 1868. Their discoverer, A. Murray a geological surveyor, found them useful aids for correlating the age of rocks around Newfoundland.[10] However since they lay below the "Primordial Strata", the Cambrian strata that were then thought to contain the very first signs of life, it took four years for anybody to dare propose they could be fossils. Elkanah Billings' proposal was dismissed by his peers on account of their simple form and they were instead declared gas escape structures, inorganic concretions, or even tricks played by a malicious God to promote unbelief.[10] No similar structures elsewhere in the world were then known and the one-sided debate soon fell into obscurity.[10] In 1933, Georg Gürich discovered specimens in Namibia[11] but the firm belief that life originated in the Cambrian led to them being assigned to the Cambrian Period and no link to Aspidella was made. In 1946 Reg Sprigg noticed "jellyfishes" in the Ediacara Hills of Australia's Flinders Ranges[12] but these rocks were believed to be Early Cambrian so, while the discovery sparked some interest, little serious attention was garnered.

It was not until the British discovery of the iconic Charnia in 1957 that the pre-Cambrian was seriously considered as containing life. This frond-shaped fossil was found in England's Charnwood Forest,[13] and due to the detailed geologic mapping of the British Geological Survey there was no doubt that these fossils sat in Precambrian rocks. Palæontologist Martin Glaessner finally, in 1959, made the connection between this and the earlier finds[14][15] and with a combination of improved dating of existing specimens and an injection of vigour into the search many more instances were recognised.[16]

All specimens discovered until 1967 were in coarse-grained sandstone that prevented preservation of fine details making interpretation difficult. S.B. Misra's discovery of fossiliferous ash-beds at the Mistaken Point assemblage in Newfoundland changed all this as the delicate detail preserved by the fine ash allowed the description of features that were previously invisible.[17][18]

Poor communication, combined with the difficulty in correlating globally distinct formations, led to a plethora of different names for the biota. In 1960 the French name "Ediacarien" — after the Ediacaran Hills in South Australia, which take their name from aborigine Idiyakra, "water is present" — was added to the competing terms "Sinian" and "Vendian"[19] for terminal-Precambrian rocks and these names were also applied to the life-forms. "Ediacaran" and "Ediacarian" were subsequently applied to the epoch or period of geologic time and its corresponding rocks. In March 2004, the International Union of Geological Sciences ended the inconsistency by formally naming the terminal period of the Neoproterozoic after the Australian locality.[20]

Preservation

Main article: Ediacaran type preservation

All but the smallest fraction of the fossil record consists of the robust skeletal matter of decayed corpses. Hence, since Ediacaran biota had soft bodies and no skeletons, their abundant preservation is surprising. The absence of burrowing creatures living in the sediments undoubtedly helped;[21] since after the evolution of these organisms in the Cambrian, soft-bodied impressions were usually disturbed before they could fossilize.

Microbial mats

Microbial mats are areas of sediment stabilised by the presence of colonies of microbes which secrete sticky fluids or otherwise bind the sediment particles. They appear to migrate upwards when covered by a thin layer of sediment but this is an illusion caused by the colony's growth; individuals do not, themselves, move. If too thick a layer of sediment is deposited before they can grow or reproduce through it parts of the colony will die leaving behind fossils with a characteristically wrinkled ("elephant skin") and tubercular texture.[22]

Some Ediacaran strata with the texture characteristics of microbial mats contain fossils, and Ediacaran fossils are almost always found in beds that contain these microbial mats. Although microbial mats were once widespread the evolution of grazing organisms in the Cambrian vastly reduced their numbers[23] and these communities are now limited to inhospitable refugia where predators cannot survive long enough to eat them such as the stromatolites found in Hamelin Pool Marine Nature Reserve in Shark Bay, Western Australia where the salt levels can be as high as 1.5 or 2 times the normal level of the surrounding sea.

Fossilisation

The preservation of these fossils is one of their great fascinations to science. As soft-bodied organisms they would normally not fossilise and, unlike later soft-bodied fossil biota such as the Burgess Shale or Solnhofen Limestone, the Ediacara biota is not found in a restricted environment subject to unusual local conditions: they were a global phenomenon. The processes that were operating must have been systemic and worldwide. There was something very different about the Ediacaran Period that permitted these delicate creatures to be left behind and it is thought that the fossils were preserved by virtue of rapid covering by ash or sand, trapping them against the mud or microbial mats on which they lived.[24] Ash beds provide more detail and can readily be precisely dated to the nearest million years or better by means of radiometric dating.[25] However it is more common to find Ediacaran fossils under sandy beds deposited by storms or high-energy bottom-scraping ocean currents known as turbidites.[24] Soft-bodied organisms today almost never fossilise during such events but the presence of widespread microbial mats probably aided preservation by stabilising their impressions in the sediment below.[26]

What is preserved?

The rate of cementation of the overlying substrate relative to the rate of decomposition of the organism determines whether the top or bottom surface of an organism is preserved. Most disc-shaped fossils decomposed before the overlying sediment was cemented, the ash or sand then slumped in to fill the void, leaving a cast of the underside of the organism.

Conversely, quilted fossils tend to decompose after the cementation of the overlying sediment; hence their upper surfaces are preserved. Their more resistant nature is reflected in the fact that in rare occasions quilted fossils are found within storm beds as the high-energy sedimentation did not destroy them as it would have the less-resistant discs. Further, in some cases, the bacterial precipitation of minerals formed a "death mask" creating a mould of the organism.[10]

Morphology

Forms of Ediacaran fossil
The earliest discovered potential embryo, preserved within an acanthomorphic acritarch. The term 'acritarch' describes a range of unclassified cell-like fossils.
Tateana inflata (= 'Cyclomedusa' radiata) is the attachment disk of an unknown organism. Metric scale.
A cast of the quilted Charnia, the first accepted complex Precambrian organism. Charnia was once interpreted as a relative of the sea pens.
Spriggina, a possible precursor to the trilobites, may be one of the predators that led to the demise of the Ediacaran fauna[27] and subsequent diversification of animals.[28]
A late Ediacaran trace fossil preserved on a bedding plane.
A chain of trace fossils created by a grazing Yorgia, terminating with a body fossil of the organism itself (right).

The Ediacaran biota exhibited a vast range of morphological characteristics. Size ranged from millimetres to metres; complexity from "blob-like" to intricate; rigidity from sturdy and resistant to jelly-soft. Almost all forms of symmetry were present.[24] These organisms differed from earlier fossils by displaying an organised, differentiated multicellular construction and centimetre-plus sizes.

These disparate morphologies can be broadly grouped into form taxa:

"Embryos" 
Recent discoveries of Precambrian multicellular life have been dominated by reports of embryos, particularly from the Doushantuo Formation in China. Some finds[29] generated intense media excitement[30] though some have claimed they are instead inorganic structures formed by the precipitation of minerals on the inside of a hole.[31] Other "embryos" have been interpreted as the remains of the giant sulfur-reducing bacteria akin to Thiomargarita,[32] a view which is highly contested yet gradually gaining supporters.[33][34]
Microfossils dating from 632.5 million years ago — just 3 million years after the end of the Cryogenian glaciations — may represent embryonic 'resting stages' in the life cycle of the earliest known animals.[35] An alternative proposal is that these structures represent adult stages of the multicellular organisms of this period.[36]
Discs 
Circular fossils, such as Ediacaria, Cyclomedusa and Rugoconites led to the initial identification of Ediacaran fossils as cnidaria which include jellyfish and corals.[12] Further examination has provided alternative interpretations of all disc-shaped fossils: not one is now confidently recognised as a jellyfish. Alternate explanations include holdfasts and protists;[37] the patterns displayed where two meet have led to many 'individuals' being identified as microbial colonies,[38][39] and yet others may represent scratch marks formed as stalked organisms spun around their holdfasts.[40] Useful diagnostic characters are often lacking because only the underside of the organism is preserved by fossilization.
Bags 
Fossils such as Pteridinium preserved within sediment layers resemble "mud-filled bags". The scientific community is a long way from reaching a consensus on their interpretation.[41]
Toroids 
The fossil Vendoglossa tuberculata from the Nama Group, Namibia, has been interpreted as a dorso-ventrally compressed stem-group metazoan, with a large gut cavity and a transversely ridged ectoderm. The organism is in the shape of a flattened torus, with the long axis of its toroidal body running through the approximate center of the presumed gut cavity.[42]
Quilted organisms 
The organisms considered in Seilacher's revised definition of the Vendobionta[6] share a "quilted" appearance and resembled an inflatable mattress. Sometimes these quilts would be torn or ruptured prior to preservation: such damaged specimens provide valuable clues in the reconstruction process. For example the three (or more) petaloid fronds of Swartpuntia germsi could only be recognised in a posthumously damaged specimen — usually multiple fronds were hidden as burial squashed the organisms flat.[43]
These organisms appear to form two groups; the fractal rangeomorphs and the simpler erniettomorphs.[44] Including such fossils as the iconic Charnia and Swartpuntia, the group is both the most iconic of the Ediacaran biota and the most difficult to place within the existing tree of life. Lacking any mouth, gut, reproductive organs, or indeed any evidence of internal anatomy, their lifestyle was somewhat peculiar by modern standards; the most widely accepted hypothesis holds that they sucked nutrients out of the surrounding seawater by osmotrophy [45]or osmosis.[46]
Non-Ediacaran Ediacarans 
Some Ediacaran organisms have more complex details preserved which has allowed them to be interpreted as possible early forms of living phyla excluding them from some definitions of the Ediacaran biota.
The earliest such fossil is the reputed bilaterian Vernanimalcula claimed by some, however, to represent the infilling of an egg-sac or acritarch.[31][47] Later examples are almost universally accepted as bilaterians and include the mollusc-like Kimberella,[48] Spriggina (pictured)[27] and the shield-shaped Parvancorina[49] whose affinities are currently debated.[50]
A suite of fossils known as the Small shelly fossils are represented in the Ediacaran, most famously by Cloudina[51] a shelly tube-like fossil that often shows evidence of predatory boring, suggesting that whilst predation may not have been common in the Ediacaran Period it was at least present.
Representatives of modern taxa existed in the Ediacaran, some of which are recognisable today. Sponges, red and green algæ, protists and bacteria are all easily recognisable with some pre-dating the Ediacaran by thousands of millions of years . Possible arthropods have also been described.[52]
Trace fossils 
With the exception of some very simple vertical burrows[53](p186)[54] the only Ediacaran burrows are horizontal lying on or just below the surface. Such burrows have been taken to imply the presence of motile organisms with heads which would probably have had a bilateral symmetry. This could place them in the bilateral clade of animals[53] but they could also have been made by simpler organisms feeding as they slowly rolled along the sea floor.[55] Putative "burrows" dating as far back as 1,100 million years may have been made by animals which fed on the undersides of microbial mats which would have shielded them from a chemically unpleasant ocean;[56] however their uneven width and tapering ends make a biological origin so difficult to defend[57] that even the original proponent no longer believes they are authentic.[58]
The burrows observed imply simple behaviour, and the complex efficient feeding traces common from the start of the Cambrian are absent. Some Ediacaran fossils, especially discs, have been interpreted tentatively as trace fossils but this hypothesis has not gained widespread acceptance. As well as burrows, some trace fossils have been found directly associated with an Ediacaran fossil. Yorgia and Dickinsonia are often found at the end of long pathways of trace fossils matching their shape;[59] these fossils are thought to be associated with ciliary feeding but the precise method of formation of these disconnected and overlapping fossils largely remains a mystery.[60] The potential mollusc Kimberella is associated with scratch marks, perhaps formed by a radula.[61]
Biologist Mikhail Matz from The University of Texas at Austin and his colleagues recently discovered grape-sized protists, single-celled organisms, which are able to make tracks resembling those of multi-cellular animals. Although these organisms are slow-moving their movement is persistent. This suggests that some of the trace fossils of the Ediacara may have been from protists making it difficult to find distinctions between single- and multi-cellular life in the early fossil record.[62]

Classification and interpretation

Classification of the Ediacarans is difficult, and hence a variety of theories exist as to their placement on the tree of life.

Cnidarians

Since the most primitive eumetazoans—multi-cellular animals with tissues—are cnidarians, the first attempt to categorise these fossils designated them as jellyfish and Sea pens.[63] However, more recent discoveries have established that many of the circular forms formerly considered "cnidarian medusa" are actually holdfasts – sand-filled vesicles occurring at the base of the stem of upright frond-like Ediacarans. A notable example is the form known as Charniodiscus, a circular impression later found to be attached to the long 'stem' of a frond-like organism that now bears the name.[64][65]

The link between certain frond-like Ediacarans and sea pens has been thrown into doubt by multiple lines of evidence; chiefly the derived nature of the most frond-like pennatulacean octocorals, their absence from the fossil record before the Tertiary, and the apparent cohesion between segments in Ediacaran frond-like organisms.[66] Some researchers have suggested that an analysis of "growth poles" discredits the pennatulacean nature of Ediacaran fronds.[67][68]

"The dawn of animal life"

Martin Glaessner proposed in The Dawn of Animal Life (1984) that the Ediacara biota were recognisable crown group members of modern phyla, but were unfamiliar because they had yet to evolve the characteristic features we use in modern classification.[69]

Adolf Seilacher responded by suggesting that the Ediacaran sees animals usurping giant protists as the dominant life form.[70] The modern xenophyophores are giant single-celled protozoans found throughout the world's oceans, largely on the abyssal plain. A recent genetic study suggested that the xenophyophores are a specialized group of Foraminifera. There are approximately 42 recognized species in 13 genera and 2 orders; one of which, Syringammina fragilissima, is among the largest known protozoans at up to 20 centimeters in diameter.

In 1998 Mark McMenamin claimed that Ediacarans did not possess an embryonic stage, and thus could not be animals. He believed that they independently evolved a nervous system and brains, meaning that "the path toward intelligent life was embarked upon more than once on this planet", though this idea has not been widely accepted.[37]

New phylum

Seilacher most famously suggested that the Ediacaran organisms represented a unique and extinct grouping of related forms descended from a common ancestor (clade) and created the kingdom Vendozoa,[71][72] named after the now-obsolete Vendian era. He later excluded fossils identified as metazoans and relaunched the phylum "Vendobionta".

He described the Vendobionta as quilted cnidarians lacking stinging cells. This absence precludes the current cnidarian method of feeding, so Seilacher suggested that the organisms may have survived by symbiosis with photosynthetic or chemoautotrophic organisms.[73] Mark McMenamin saw such feeding strategies as characteristic for the entire biota, and referred to the marine biota of this period as a "Garden of Ediacara".[74]

Lichens

Gregory Retallack's hypothesis that Ediacaran organisms were lichens[75] has failed to gain widespread acceptance.[76][77] He argues that the fossils are not as squashed as jellyfish fossilised in similar situations, and their relief is closer to petrified wood. He points out the chitinous walls of lichen colonies would provide a similar resistance to compaction, and claims the large size of the organisms — sometimes over a metre across, far larger than any of the preserved burrows — also hints against a classification with the animals.

Other interpretations

Almost every possible phylum has been used to accommodate the Ediacaran biota at some point,[78] from algae,[79] to protists known as foraminifera,[80] to fungi[81] to bacterial or microbial colonies,[38] to hypothetical intermediates between plants and animals.[82]

Origin

It took almost 4 billion years from the formation of the Earth for the Ediacaran fossils to first appear, 655 million years ago. Whilst putative fossils are reported from 3,460 million years ago,[83][84] the first uncontroversial evidence for life is found 2,700 million years ago,[85] and cells with nuclei certainly existed by 1,200 million years ago:[86] Why did it take so long for forms with an Ediacaran grade of organisation to appear?

It could be that no special explanation is required: the slow process of evolution simply required 4 billion years to accumulate the necessary adaptations. Indeed, there does seem to be a slow increase in the maximum level of complexity seen over this time, with more and more complex forms of life evolving as time progresses, with traces of earlier semi-complex life such as Nimbia, found in the 610 million year old Twitya formation,[87] (and possibly older rocks dating to 770 million years ago[88]) possibly displaying the most complex morphology of the time.

The alternative train of thought is that it was simply not advantageous to be large until the appearance of the Ediacarans: the environment favoured the small over the large. Examples of such scenarios today include plankton, whose small size allows them to reproduce rapidly to take advantage of ephemerally abundant nutrients in algal blooms. But for large size never to be favourable, the environment would have to be very different indeed.

A primary size-limiting factor is the amount of atmospheric oxygen. Without a complex circulatory system, low concentrations of oxygen cannot reach the centre of an organism quickly enough to supply its metabolic demand.

On the early earth, reactive elements such as iron and uranium existed in a reduced form; these would react with any free oxygen produced by photosynthesising organisms. Oxygen would not be able to build up in the atmosphere until all the iron had rusted (producing banded iron formations), and other reactive elements had also been oxidised. Donald Canfield detected records of the first significant quantities of atmospheric oxygen just before the first Ediacaran fossils appeared[89] — and the presence of atmospheric oxygen was soon heralded as a possible trigger for the Ediacaran radiation.[90] Oxygen seems to have accumulated in two pulses; the rise of small, sessile (stationary) organisms seems to correlate with an early oxygenation event, with larger and mobile organisms appearing around the second pulse of oxygenation.[91] However, the assumptions underlying the reconstruction of atmospheric composition have attracted some criticism, with widespread anoxia having little effect on life where it occurs in the Early Cambrian and the Cretaceous.[92]

Periods of intense cold have also been suggested as a barrier to the evolution of multicellular life. The earliest known embryos, from China's Doushantuo Formation, appear just a million years after the Earth emerged from a global glaciation, suggesting that ice cover and cold oceans may have prevented the emergence of multicellular life.[93] Potentially, complex life may have evolved before these glaciations, and been wiped out. However, the diversity of life in modern Antarctica has sparked disagreement over whether cold temperatures increase or decrease the rate of evolution.

In early 2008 a team analysed the range of basic body structures ("disparity") of Ediacaran organisms from three different fossil beds: Avalon in Canada, 575  to 565 million years ago; White Sea in Russia, 560  to 550 million years ago; and Nama in Namibia, 550  to 542 million years ago, immediately before the start of the Cambrian. They found that, while the White Sea assemblage had the most species, there was no significant difference in disparity between the three groups, and concluded that before the beginning of the Avalon timespan these organisms must have gone through their own evolutionary "explosion", which may have been similar to the famous Cambrian explosion .[94]

Disappearance

The low resolution of the fossil record means that the disappearance of the Ediacarans remains something of a mystery. There appears to have been a relatively abrupt disappearance at the end of the Ediacaran period; reports of Cambrian "Ediacarans" like Thaumaptilon are not universally accepted. The cause — and reality — of this disappearance is open to debate.

Preservation bias

The sudden vanishing of Ediacaran fossils at the Cambrian boundary could simply be because conditions no longer favoured the fossilisation of Ediacaran organisms, which may have continued to thrive unpreserved.[22] However, if they were common, more than the occasional specimen[4][95] might be expected in exceptionally preserved fossil assemblages (Konservat-Lagerstätten) such as the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang[96] — unless such assemblages represent an environment never occupied by the Ediacaran biota, or unsuitable conditions for their preservation.

Predation and grazing

It is suggested that by the Early Cambrian, organisms higher in the food chain caused the microbial mats to largely disappear. If these grazers first appeared as the Ediacaran biota started to decline, then it may suggest that they destabilised the microbial substrate, leading to displacement or detachment of the biota; or that the destruction of the mat destabilised the ecosystem, causing extinctions.

Alternatively, skeletonised animals could have fed directly on the relatively undefended Ediacaran biota.[37] However, if the interpretation of the Ediacaran age Kimberella as a grazer is correct then this suggests that the biota had already had limited exposure to "predation".[48]

There is however little evidence for any trace fossils in the Ediacaran Period, which may speak against the active grazing theory. Further the onset of the Cambrian Period is defined by the appearance of a worldwide trace fossil assemblage, quite distinct from the activity-barren Ediacaran Period.

Competition

It is possible that increased competition due to the evolution of key innovations amongst other groups, perhaps as a response to predation,[21] drove the Ediacaran biota from their niches. However, this argument has not successfully explained similar phenomena. For instance, the bivalve molluscs' "competitive exclusion" of brachiopods was eventually deemed to be a coincidental result of two unrelated trends.[97]

Change in environmental conditions

While it is difficult to infer the effect of changing planetary conditions on organisms, communities and ecosystems, great changes were happening at the end of the Precambrian and the start of the Early Cambrian. The breakup of the supercontinents,[98] rising sea levels (creating shallow, "life-friendly" seas),[99] a nutrient crisis,[100] fluctuations in atmospheric composition, including oxygen and carbon dioxide levels,[101] and changes in ocean chemistry[102] (promoting biomineralisation)[103] could all have played a part.

Assemblages

Ediacaran-type fossils are recognised globally in 25 localities[20] and a variety of depositional conditions, and are commonly grouped into three main types, named after typical localities. Each assemblage tends to occupy its own region of morphospace, and after an initial burst of diversification changes little for the rest of its existence.[104]

Avalon-type assemblage

The Avalon-type assemblage is defined at Mistaken Point in Canada, the oldest locality with a large quantity of Ediacaran fossils.[105] The assemblage is easily dated because it contains many fine ash-beds, which are a good source of zircons used in the uranium-lead method of radiometric dating. These fine-grained ash beds also preserve exquisite detail. Constituents of this biota appear to survive through until the extinction of all Ediacarans at the base of the Cambrian.[104]

The biota comprises deep sea dwelling rangeomorphs[106] such as Charnia, all of which share a fractal growth pattern. They were probably preserved in situ (without post-mortem transportation), although this point is not universally accepted. The assemblage, while less diverse than the Ediacara- or Nama-types, resembles Carboniferous suspension-feeding communities, which may suggest filter feeding[107] — by most interpretations, the assemblage is found in water too deep for photosynthesis. The low diversity may reflect the depth of water — which would restrict speciation opportunities — or it may just be too young for a rich biota to have evolved. Opinion is currently divided between these conflicting hypotheses.[108]

Ediacara-type assemblage

The Ediacara-type assemblage is named after Australia's Ediacara Hills, and consist of fossils preserved in areas near the mouths of rivers (prodeltaic facies). They are typically found in interbedded sandy and silty layers formed below the normal base of wave-related water motion, but in waters shallow enough to be affected by wave motion during storms. Most fossils are preserved as imprints in microbial mats, but a few are preserved within sandy units.[108][104]

Biota ranges[108]
view • talk • edit
Axis scale: millions of years ago, dated with U/Pb of zircons

Nama-type assemblage

The Nama assemblage is best represented in Namibia. Three-dimensional preservation is most common, with organisms preserved in sandy beds containing internal bedding. Dima Grazhdankin believes that these organisms represent burrowing organisms,[41] while Guy Narbonne maintains they were surface dwellers.[109] These beds are sandwiched between units comprising interbedded sandstones, siltstones and shales – with microbial mats, where present, usually containing the fossils. The environment is interpreted as sand bars formed at the mouth of a delta's distributaries.[108]

Significance of assemblages

In the White Sea region of Russia, all three assemblage types have been found in close proximity. This, and the faunas' considerable temporal overlap, makes it unlikely that they represent evolutionary stages or temporally distinct communities. Since they are globally distributed — described on all continents except Antarctica — geographical boundaries do not appear to be a factor;[110] the same fossils are found at all palæolatitudes (the latitude where the fossil was created, accounting for continental drift) and in separate sedimentary basins.[108]

It is most likely that the three assemblages mark organisms adapted to survival in different environments, and that any apparent patterns in diversity or age are in fact an artefact of the few samples that have been discovered — the timeline (right) demonstrates the paucity of Ediacaran fossil-bearing assemblages. An analysis of one of the White Sea fossil beds, where the layers cycle from continental seabed to inter-tidal to estuarine and back again a few times, found that a specific set of Ediacaran organisms was associated with each environment.[108]

As the Ediacaran biota represent an early stage in multicellular life's history, it is unsurprising that not all possible modes of life are occupied. It has been estimated that of 92 potentially possible modes of life — combinations of feeding style, tiering and motility — no more than a dozen are occupied by the end of the Ediacaran. Just four are represented in the Avalon assemblage.[111] The lack of large-scale predation and vertical burrowing are perhaps the most significant factors limiting the ecological diversity; the emergence of these during the Early Cambrian allowed the number of lifestyles occupied to rise to 30.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Simple multicellular organisms such as red algae evolved at least 1,200 million years ago.

References

  1. ^ Two Explosive Evolutionary Events Shaped Early History Of Multicellular Life
  2. ^ Bing Shen, Lin Dong,Shuhai Xiao, Michał Kowalewski The Avalon Explosion: Evolution of Ediacara Morphospace Science 4 January 2008: Vol. 319 no. 5859 pp. 81-84, doi:10.1126/science.1150279
  3. ^ McMenamin, M. A. S. (1996). "Ediacaran biota from Sonora, Mexico". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 93: 4990–4993. 
  4. ^ a b Conway Morris, S. (1993). "Ediacaran-like fossils in Cambrian Burgess Shale–type faunas of North America". Palaeontology 36 (0031–0239): 593–635. 
  5. ^ Droser, ML; Gehling, JG (2008). "Synchronous Aggregate Growth in an Abundant New Ediacaran Tubular Organism". Science 319 (5870): 1660–1662. Bibcode 2008Sci...319.1660D. doi:10.1126/science.1152595. PMID 18356525. 
  6. ^ a b Seilacher, A. (1992). "Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution" (abstract). Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 607–613. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0607. http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/cgi/content/abstract/149/4/607. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  7. ^ Narbonne, Guy (June 2006). "The Origin and Early Evolution of Animals". Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/recent_pubs1.html. Retrieved 2007-03-10. 
  8. ^ Waggoner, Ben (1998). "Interpreting the Earliest Metazoan Fossils: What Can We Learn?". Integrative and Comparative Biology 38 (6): 975–982. doi:10.1093/icb/38.6.975. ISSN 1540-7063. http://intl-icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/6/975. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  9. ^ Hofmann, H.J.; Narbonne, G.M., Aitken, J.D. (1990). "Ediacaran remains from intertillite beds in northwestern Canada". Geology 18 (12): 1199–1202. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<1199:ERFIBI>2.3.CO;2. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/12/1199. 
  10. ^ a b c d Gehling, James G.; Guy M. Narbonne and Michael M. Anderson (2000). "The First Named Ediacaran Body Fossil, Aspidella terranovica". Palaeontology 43 (3): 429. doi:10.1111/j.0031-0239.2000.00134.x. 
  11. ^ Gürich, G. (1933). "Die Kuibis-Fossilien der Nama-Formation von Südwestafrika" (in German). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 15: 137–155. 
  12. ^ a b Sprigg, R.C. (1947). "Early Cambrian "jellyfishes" of Ediacara, South Australia and Mount John, Kimberly District, Western Australia". Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 73: 72–99. 
  13. ^ "Leicester’s fossil celebrity: Charnia and the evolution of early life". http://www.charnia.org.uk/saturday_school_2007.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  14. ^ Sprigg, R.C. (1991). "Martin F Glaessner: Palaeontologist extraordinaire". Mem. Geol. Soc. India 20: 13–20. 
  15. ^ Glaessner, M.F. (1959). "The oldest fossil faunas of South Australia". International Journal of Earth Sciences (Springer) 47 (2): 522–531. Bibcode 1959GeoRu..47..522G. doi:10.1007/BF01800671. http://www.springerlink.com/content/th8t5154382750kq/. 
  16. ^ Glaessner, Martin F. (1961). "Precambrian Animals". Science. Am. 204 (3): 72–78. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0361-72. 
  17. ^ Misra, S.B. (1969). "Late Precambrian(?) fossils from southeastern Newfoundland" (abstract). Geol. Soc. America Bull. 80 (11): 2133–2140. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[2133:LPFFSN]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0016-7606. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/80/11/2133. 
  18. ^ Badham, Mark (2003-01-30). "The Mistaken Point Fossil Assemblage Newfoundland, Canada". The Miller Museum of Geology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/recent_pubs1.html. Retrieved 2007-03-10. 
  19. ^ Termier, H.; Termier, G. (1960). "L’Ediacarien, premier etage paleontologique" (in French). Rev. Gen. Sci. Et Bull. Assoc. Francaise Avan. Sci. 67 (3–4): 175–192. 
  20. ^ a b Knoll, Andy H.; Walter, M.; Narbonne, G.; Christie-Blick, N. (2006). "The Ediacaran Period: a new addition to the geologic time scale" (PDF). Lethaia 39: 13–30. doi:10.1080/00241160500409223. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/KnollWalterNarbonneChristieBlick_Lethaia_2006.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-14. Reprint, 2004 original available here [1] (PDF).
  21. ^ a b Stanley, S.M. (1973). "An ecological theory for the sudden origin of multicellular life in the Late Precambrian". Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 (5): 1486–1489. Bibcode 1973PNAS...70.1486S. doi:10.1073/pnas.70.5.1486. PMC 433525. PMID 16592084. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=433525. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  22. ^ a b Runnegar, B.N.; Fedonkin, M.A. (1992). "Proterozoic metazoan body fossils". In Schopf, W.J.; Klein, C.. The Proterozoic biosphere. Cambridge University Press. 369–388. ISBN 978-0-521-36615-1. OCLC 26310475 23583672 26310475. 
  23. ^ Burzin, M.B.; Debrenne, F.; Zhuravlev, A.Y. (2001). "Evolution of shallow-water level-bottom communities". In Zhuravlev, A.Y.; Riding, R.. The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 216–237. ISBN 0-231-50516-7. OCLC 51852000. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&docId=100738360. Retrieved 2007-05-06. 
  24. ^ a b c Narbonne, Guy M. (1998). "The Ediacara biota: A terminal Neoproterozoic experiment in the evolution of life" (PDF). GSA 8 (2): 1–6. ISSN 1052-5173. ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/GSAToday/gt9802.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  25. ^ Bowring, S.A.; Martin, M.W. (2001). "Calibration of the Fossil Record". In Briggs & Crowther. Palæobiology II: A synthesis. Blackwell publishing group. ISBN 978-0-632-05149-6. OCLC 55536116 51481754 55536116. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9780632051496. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  26. ^ Gehling, J.G. (1987). "Earliest known echinoderm — A new Ediacaran fossil from the Pound Subgroup of South Australia". Alcheringa 11 (4): 337–345. doi:10.1080/03115518708619143. 
  27. ^ a b McMenamin, Mark A.S. (2003). "Spriggina is a Trilobitoid Ecdysozoan".  . Seattle Annual Meeting of the GSA. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_62056.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  28. ^ e.g. Butterfield, N.J. (2007). "Macroevolution and microecology through deep time". Palaeontology 50 (1): 41–55. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x. 
  29. ^ Chen, J-Y; Bottjer, DJ; Oliveri, P; Dornbos, SQ; Gao, F; Ruffins, S; Chi, H; Li, CW et al. (Jul 2004). "Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian". Science 305 (5681): 218–222. Bibcode 2004Sci...305..218C. doi:10.1126/science.1099213. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 15178752. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/1099213v1?ijkey=TmRu98UQkv06Y&keytype=ref&siteid=sci. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  30. ^ For example, "Fossil may be ancestor of most animals". msnbc. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5112628/. Retrieved 2007-06-22. , Leslie Mullen. "Earliest Bilateral Fossil Discovered". Astrobiology Magazine. http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1005.html. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  31. ^ a b Bengtson, S.; Budd, G (19 November 2004). "Comment on "Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian"". Science 306 (5700): 1291. doi:10.1126/science.1101338. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 15550644. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5700/1291a. 
  32. ^ e.g. Bailey, J.V.; Joye, S.B., Kalanetra, K.M., Flood, B.E., Corsetti, F.A. (Jan 2007). "Evidence of giant sulphur bacteria in Neoproterozoic phosphorites" (abstract). Nature 445 (7124): 198–201. Bibcode 2007Natur.445..198B. doi:10.1038/nature05457. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17183268. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7124/abs/nature05457.html. Retrieved 2007-04-28. , summarised by Donoghue, P.C.J. (Jan 2007). "Embryonic identity crisis". Nature 445 (7124): 155–156. Bibcode 2007Natur.445..155D. doi:10.1038/nature05520. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17183264. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7124/full/nature05520.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  33. ^ Xiao et al..'s response to Bailey et al..'s original paper : Xiao, S.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, X. (Apr 2007). "Palaeontology: undressing and redressing Ediacaran embryos" (abstract). Nature 446 (7136): E9–E10. Bibcode 2007Natur.446....9X. doi:10.1038/nature05753. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17410133. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/abs/nature05753.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21.  And Bailey et al..'s reply: Bailey, J.V.; Joye, S.B.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Flood, B.E.; Corsetti, F.A. (2007). "Palaeontology: Undressing and redressing Ediacaran embryos (Reply)". Nature 446 (7136): E10–E11. Bibcode 2007Natur.446...10B. doi:10.1038/nature05754. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/full/nature05754.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  34. ^ Knoll, AH; Javaux, EJ, Hewitt, D., Cohen, P. (Jun 2006). "Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361 (1470): 1023–1038. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1843. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 1578724. PMID 16754612. http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/r33709390117w941/. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  35. ^ Leiming, Y.; Zhu, M; Knoll, A; Yuan, X; Zhang, J; Hu, J (2007-04-05). "Doushantuo embryos preserved inside diapause egg cysts" (abstract). Nature 446 (7136): 661–663. Bibcode 2007Natur.446..661Y. doi:10.1038/nature05682. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17410174. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/abs/nature05682.html. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  36. ^ Newman, S.A.; Forgacs, G.; Müller, G.B. (2006). "Before programs: The physical origination of multicellular forms". Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50 (2–3): 289–299. doi:10.1387/ijdb.052049sn. ISSN 0214-6282. PMID 16479496. http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/contents.php?vol=50&issue=2–3. Retrieved 2007-11-02. 
  37. ^ a b c McMenamin M. (1998). The Garden of Ediacara. New York: Columbia Univ Press. ISBN 978-0-231-10559-0. OCLC 228271905. 
  38. ^ a b Grazhdankin, D (2001). "Microbial origin of some of the Ediacaran fossils".  . GSA Annual Meeting, November 5–8, 2001. pp. 177. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2001AM/finalprogram/abstract_21602.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  39. ^ Grazhdankin, D.; Gerdes, G. (2007). "Ediacaran microbial colonies". Lethaia 40 (3): 201–210. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2007.00025.x. 
  40. ^ Jensen, S.; Gehling, J.G.; Droser, M.L.; Grant, S.W.F. (2002). "A scratch circle origin for the medusoid fossil Kullingia". Lethaia 35 (4): 291–299. doi:10.1080/002411602320790616. http://earthsciences.ucr.edu/docs/Soren_scratch_2002.pdf. 
  41. ^ a b (a) The only current description, far from universal acceptance, appears as: Grazhdankin, D.; Seilacher, A. (2002). "Underground Vendobionta From Namibia" (abstract). Palaeontology 45 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00227. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/1475-4983.00227/abs/. 
  42. ^ McMenamin, M. A. S. (2009). Paleotorus: The Laws of Morphogenetic Evolution. Meanma Press. ISBN 978-1-893882-18-8. 
  43. ^ Narbonne, G.M.; Saylor, B.Z. & Grotzinger, J.P. (1997). "The Youngest Ediacaran Fossils from Southern Africa". Journal of Paleontology 71 (6): 953–967. ISSN 0022–3360. PMID 11541433. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022–3360%28199711%2971%3A6%3C953%3ATYEFFS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  44. ^ Xiao, S.; Laflamme, M. (January 2009). "On the eve of animal radiation: phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota". Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.015. PMID 18952316.  edit
  45. ^ McMenamin, M. (1993). "Osmotrophy in fossil protoctists and early animals". Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 22 (1-3): 301–304. 
  46. ^ Laflamme, M.; Xiao, S.; Kowalewski, M. (2009). "Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (34): 14438. Bibcode 2009PNAS..10614438L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904836106.  edit
  47. ^ Chen, J.-Y.; Budd, G (19 November 2004). "Response to Comment on "Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian"". Science 306 (5700): 1291. doi:10.1126/science.1102328. PMID 15550644. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;306/5700/1291b. 
  48. ^ a b Fedonkin, M.A.; Waggoner, B.M. (Nov 1997). "The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism". Nature 388 (6645): 868–871. Bibcode 1997Natur.388..868F. doi:10.1038/42242. ISSN 0372-9311. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v388/n6645/full/388868a0.html. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  49. ^ Glaessner, M.F. (1980). "Parvancorina — an arthropod from the late Precambrian of South Australia". Ann. Nat. Hist. Mus. Wien. 83: 83–90. 
  50. ^ For a reinterpretation, see Ivantsov, A.Y.; Malakhovskaya, Y.E., Serezhnikova, E.A. (2004). Abstract [2] "Some Problematic Fossils from the Vendian of the Southeastern White Sea Region"] (in Russian; English translation available) (abstract). Paleontological Journal 38 (1): 1–9. ISSN 0031–0301. http://www.maik.rssi.ru/abstract/paleng/4/paleng1_4p1abs.htm Abstract] [3]. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  51. ^ Germs, G.J.B. (October 1972). "New shelly fossils from Nama Group, South West Africa". American Journal of Science 272 (8): 752–761. ISSN 0002–9599. http://www.ajsonline.org/cgi/reprint/272/8/752. 
  52. ^ Ivantsov A. Yu. (2006). "New find of Cambrian type arthropoda from the Vendian of the White Sea, Russia.". The Second International Palaeontological Congress, Beijing, China. July 17–21, 2006.. http://www.igcp512.org/documents/IPC-T2-Abstracts.pdf. 
  53. ^ a b Fedonkin, M.A. (1992). "Vendian faunas and the early evolution of Metazoa". Origin and early evolution of the. New: Plenum. pp. 87–. ISBN 978-0-306-44067-0. http://books.google.com/?id=gUQMKiJOj64C&pg=PP1. Retrieved 2007-03-. 
  54. ^ Fedonkin, M. A. (1985). "Paleoichnology of Vendian Metazoa". In Sokolov, B. S.; Iwanowski, A. B. (in Russian). Vendian System: Historical–Geological and Paleontological Foundation, Vol. 1: Paleontology. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 112–116. 
  55. ^ Matz, V.; Frank, M.; Marshall, J.; Widder, A.; Johnsen, S. (Dec 2008). "Giant Deep-Sea Protist Produces Bilaterian-like Traces". Current Biology 18 (23): 1849–1854. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.028. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 19026540.  edit
  56. ^ Seilacher, A.; Bose, P.K.; Pflüger, F. (1998-10-02). "Triploblastic Animals More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Evidence from India" (abstract). Science 282 (5386): 80–83. Bibcode 1998Sci...282...80S. doi:10.1126/science.282.5386.80. PMID 9756480. 
  57. ^ Budd, G.E.; Jensen, S. (2000). "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla" (abstract). Biological Reviews 75 (02): 253–295. doi:10.1017/S000632310000548X. PMID 10881389. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S000632310000548X. Retrieved 2007-06-27. 
  58. ^ Jensen, S. (2008). "PALEONTOLOGY: Reading Behavior from the Rocks". Science 322 (5904): 1051. doi:10.1126/science.1166220. 
  59. ^ Ivantsov, A.Y.; Malakhovskaya, Y.E. (2002). "Giant Traces of Vendian Animals" (in Russian; English translation available) (PDF). Doklady Earth Sciences (Doklady Akademii Nauk) 385 (6): 618–622. ISSN 1028–334X. http://vend.paleo.ru/pub/Ivantsov_et_Malakhovskaya_2002-e.pdf. Retrieved 2007-05-10. 
  60. ^ A. Yu. Ivantsov. (2008). "Feeding traces of the Ediacaran animals". HPF-17 Trace fossils : ichnological concepts and methods. International Geological Congress - Oslo 2008.
  61. ^ According to New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications (2007), "Fedonkin, M.A.; Simonetta, A; Ivantsov, A.Y.", in Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Komarower, Patricia, The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota, Special publications, 286, London: Geological Society, pp. 157–179, doi:10.1144/SP286.12, ISBN 9781862392335, OCLC 191881597 156823511 191881597 
    For a more cynical perspective see Butterfield, N. J. (Dec 2006). "Hooking some stem-group "worms": fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". BioEssays 28 (12): 1161–1166. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. ISSN 0265-9247. PMID 17120226.  edit
  62. ^ "Discovery Of Giant Roaming Deep Sea Protist Provides New Perspective On Animal Evolution". ScienceDaily. November 20, 2008. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081120130531.htm. 
  63. ^ Donovan, Stephen K., Lewis, David N. (2001). "Fossils explained 35. The Ediacaran biota" (abstract). Geology Today 17 (3): 115–120. doi:10.1046/j.0266-6979.2001.00285.x. 
  64. ^ Ford, T. D. (1958). "The Pre-cambrian fossils of Charnwood Forest". Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 31 (3): 211–217. doi:10.1144/​pygs.31.3.211. 
  65. ^ Discussed at length in Laflamme, M.; Narbonne, G. M.; Anderson, M. M. (2004). "Morphometric analysis of the Ediacaran frond Charniodiscus from the Mistaken Point Formation, Newfoundland". Journal of Paleontology 78 (5): 827–837. doi:10.1666/​0022-3360(2004)​078<0827:MAOTEF>​2.0.CO;2. 
  66. ^ Williams, G.C. 1997. Preliminary assessment of the phylogenetics of pennatulacean octocorals, with a reevaluation of Ediacaran frond-like fossils, and a synthesis of the history of evolutionary thought regarding the sea pens. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Coelenterate Biology: 497-509.
  67. ^ Antcliffe, J.B.; Brasier, M.D. (2007). "Charnia and sea pens are poles apart". Journal of the Geological Society 164 (1): 49–51. doi:10.1144/0016-76492006-080. http://jgs.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/164/1/49. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  68. ^ Antcliffe, J.B.; Brasier, M.D. (2007). "Charnia At 50: Developmental Models For Ediacaran Fronds". Palaeontology 51 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00738.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00738.x. 
  69. ^ Glaessner, M.F. (1984). The Dawn of Animal Life: A Biohistorical Study. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-31216-7. OCLC 9394425. 
  70. ^ Seilacher, A.; Grazhdankin, D., Legouta, A. (2003). "Ediacaran biota: The dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists". Paleontological research 7 (1): 43–54. doi:10.2517/prpsj.7.43. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110002695304/. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  71. ^ Seilacher, A. (1984). "Late Precambrian and Early Cambrian Metazoa: preservational or real extinctions?". In Holland, H.D.; Trendall, A.F.. Patterns of Change in Earth Evolution. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 159–168. ISBN 0-387-12749-6. OCLC 11202424. 
  72. ^ Seilacher, A. (1989). "Vendozoa: organismic construction in the Proterozoic biosphere". Lethaia 17 (3): 229–239. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1989.tb01332.x. 
  73. ^ Buss, L.W. and Seilacher, A. (1994). "The Phylum Vendobionta: A Sister Group of the Eumetazoa?". Paleobiology (Paleobiology, Vol. 20, No. 1) 20 (1): 1–4. ISSN 0094-8373. JSTOR 2401145. 
  74. ^ McMenamin, M. A. S. (1986). "The Garden of Ediacara". Palaios 1 (2): 178–182. 
  75. ^ Retallack, G.J. (1994). "Were the Ediacaran fossils lichens?". Paleobiology 20 (4): 523–544. ISSN 0094-8373. http://www.uoregon.edu/~gregr/Papers/fossil%20lichens.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  76. ^ Waggoner, B.M. (1995). "Ediacaran Lichens: A Critique". Paleobiology (Paleobiology, Vol. 21, No. 3) 21 (3): 393–397. ISSN 0094-8373. JSTOR 2401174. 
  77. ^ Waggoner, B.; Collins, A.G. (2004). "Reductio Ad Absurdum: Testing The Evolutionary Relationships Of Ediacaran And Paleozoic Problematic Fossils Using Molecular Divergence Dates". Journal of Paleontology 78 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078<0051:RAATTE>2.0.CO;2. 
  78. ^ Waggoner, Ben (1998). "Interpreting the Earliest Metazoan Fossils: What Can We Learn?" (abstract). Integrative and Comparative Biology 38 (6): 975–982. doi:10.1093/icb/38.6.975. http://intl-icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/6/975. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 
  79. ^ Ford, T.D. (1958). "Pre-Cambrian fossils from Charnwood Forest". Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 31 (6): 211–217. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2451.1999.00007.x. 
  80. ^ Zhuralev (1992). "Were Vend-Ediacaran multicellulars metazoa?".  . 2. International Geological Congress, Kyoto, Japan. pp. 339. http://www.jstor.org/view/00948373/di995962/99p0929r/0. Retrieved 2007-06-21. 
  81. ^ Peterson, K.J. and Waggoner, B. and Hagadorn, J.W. (2003). "A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?". Integrative and Comparative Biology 43 (1): 127–136. doi:10.1668/1540-7063(2003)043[0127:AFAFNE]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1540-7063. 
  82. ^ Pflug (1973). "Zur fauna der Nama-Schichten in Südwest-Afrika. IV. Mikroscopische anatomie der petalo-organisme" (in German). Paleontographica (B144): 166–202. ISSN 0375-0299. 
  83. ^ Schopf, J.W.; Packer, B.M. (1987-07-03). "Early Archean (3.3-billion to 3.5-billion-year-old) microfossils from Warrawoona Group, Australia" (abstract). Science 237 (4810): 70. Bibcode 1987Sci...237...70S. doi:10.1126/science.11539686. PMID 11539686. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/4810/70. Retrieved 2007-05-21. 
  84. ^ Hofmann, H.J.; Grey, K.; Hickman, A.H.; Thorpe, R.I. (1999-08-01). "Origin of 3.45 Ga coniform stromatolites in Warrawoona Group, Western Australia" (abstract). Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 111 (8): 1256–1262. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1256:OOGCSI>2.3.CO;2. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/8/1256. Retrieved 2007-05-21. 
  85. ^ Archer, C.; Vance, D. (2006-03-01). "Coupled Fe and S isotope evidence for Archean microbial Fe (III) and sulfate reduction" (abstract). Geology 34 (3): 153–156. Bibcode 2006Geo....34..153A. doi:10.1130/G22067.1. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/3/153. Retrieved 2007-05-24. 
  86. ^ Butterfield, Nicholas J. (2000). "Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes". Paleobiology 26 (3): 386. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0386:BPNGNS>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. 
  87. ^ Fedonkin, M.A. (1980). "New representatives of the Precambrian coelenterates in the northern Russian platform" (in Russian). Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal: 7–15. ISSN 0031-031X. 
  88. ^ Meert, J. G.; Gibsher, A. S.; Levashova, N. M.; Grice, W. C.; Kamenov, G. D.; Rybanin, A. (2010). "Glaciation and ~770 Ma Ediacara (?) Fossils from the Lesser Karatau Microcontinent, Kazakhstan". Gondwana Research 19 (4): 867–880. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2010.11.008.  edit
  89. ^ Canfield, D.E.; Teske, A. (Jul 1996). "Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies" (abstract). Nature 382 (6587): 127–132. Bibcode 1996Natur.382..127C. doi:10.1038/382127a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11536736. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v382/n6587/abs/382127a0.html. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  90. ^ Canfield, D.E.; Poulton, S.W.; Narbonne, G.M. (2007-01-05). "Late-Neoproterozoic Deep-Ocean Oxygenation and the Rise of Animal Life" (abstract). Science 315 (5808): 92–5. Bibcode 2007Sci...315...92C. doi:10.1126/science.1135013. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17158290. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/315/5808/92. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  91. ^ Fike, DA; Grotzinger, JP, Pratt, LM, Summons, RE (Dec 2006). "Oxidation of the Ediacaran ocean" (abstract). Nature 444 (7120): 744–7. Bibcode 2006Natur.444..744F. doi:10.1038/nature05345. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17151665. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7120/abs/nature05345.html. Retrieved 2007-04-28. 
  92. ^ Butterfield, N. J. (Jan 2009). "Oxygen, animals and oceanic ventilation: an alternative view". Geobiology 7 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00188.x. ISSN 1472-4677. PMID 19200141.  edit
  93. ^ Narbonne, Guy M. (September 2003). "Life after Snowball: The Mistaken Point biota and the origin of animal ecosystems". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 35. Seattle Annual Meeting of the GSA. pp. 516. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_57850.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  94. ^ Science (January 2008). "The Avalon Explosion: Evolution of Ediacara Morphospace" (abstract). Science 319 (5859): 81–84. Bibcode 2008Sci...319...81S. doi:10.1126/science.1150279. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 18174439. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5859/81. 
  95. ^ Jensen, S. R.; Gehling, J. G.; Droser, M. L. (1998). Nature 393 (6685): 567. Bibcode 1998Natur.393..567J. doi:10.1038/31215.  edit
  96. ^ Shu, D.-G; Morris, S. Conway; Han, J; Li, Y; Zhang, X.-L; Hua, H; Zhang, Z.-F; Liu, J.-N et al. (2006-05-05). "Lower Cambrian Vendobionts from China and Early Diploblast Evolution" (abstract). Science 312 (5774): 731–4. Bibcode 2006Sci...312..731S. doi:10.1126/science.1124565. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16675697. http://science-mag.aaas.org/cgi/content/abstract/312/5774/731. Retrieved 2007-04-28. 
  97. ^ Gould, S.J.; Calloway, C.B. (1980). "Clams and Brachiopods-Ships that Pass in the Night". Paleobiology 6 (4): 383–396. doi:10.2307/2400538. ISSN 0094-8373. 
  98. ^ McKerrow, W.S.; Scotese, C.R., Brasier, M.D. (1992). "Early Cambrian continental reconstructions". Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 599–606. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0599. 
  99. ^ Hallam, A. (1984). "Pre-Quaternary sea-level changes". Annual Reviews 12: 205–243. Bibcode 1984AREPS..12..205H. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.12.050184.001225. 
  100. ^ Brasier, M.D. (1992). "Background to the Cambrian explosion". Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 585–587. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0585. 
  101. ^ Brasier, M.D. (1992). "Global ocean-atmosphere change across the Precambrian-Cambrian transition". Geological Magazine 129 (2): 161–168. doi:10.1017/S0016756800008256. ISSN 0016-7568. 
  102. ^ Lowenstein, T.K.; Timofeeff, M.N.; Brennan, S.T.; Hardie, L.A.; Demicco, R.V. (2001). "Oscillations in Phanerozoic Seawater Chemistry: Evidence from Fluid Inclusions". Science 294 (5544): 1086–1089. Bibcode 2001Sci...294.1086L. doi:10.1126/science.1064280. PMID 11691988. 
  103. ^ Bartley, J.K.; Pope, M., Knoll, A.H., Semikhatov, M.A., Petrov, P.Y.U. (1998). "A Vendian-Cambrian boundary succession from the northwestern margin of the Siberian Platform: stratigraphy, palaeontology, chemostratigraphy and correlation". Geological Magazine 135 (4): 473–494. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.155.6.0957. PMID 11542817. 
  104. ^ a b c Erwin, Douglas H (May 2008). "Wonderful Ediacarans, Wonderful Cnidarians?". Evolution & Development 10 (3): 263–264. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00234.x. ISSN 1520-541X. PMID 18460087. 
  105. ^ Benus (1988). "Trace fossils, small shelly fossils and the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary". New York State Museum Bulletin. 463. University of the State of New York (May 1988). pp. 81. ISBN 978-1555571788. 
  106. ^ Clapham, Matthew E.; Narbonne, Guy M., Gehling, James G. (2003). [= http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/4/527 "Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland"] (abstract). Paleobiology 29 (4): 527–544. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0527:POTOKA>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. = http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/4/527. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  107. ^ Clapham, M.E.; Narbonne, G.M. (2002). "Ediacaran epifaunal tiering" (abstract). Geology 30 (7): 627–630. Bibcode 2002Geo....30..627C. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0627:EET>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0091-7613. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/7/627. 
  108. ^ a b c d e f Grazhdankin, Dima (2004). "Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution" (PDF). Palæobiology 30 (2): 203–221. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0203:PODITE>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/30/2/203.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08.  (Source of data for Timeline synthesis, p218. Further citations available in caption to Fig. 8.)
  109. ^ Narbonne, Guy M. (2005). "The Ediacara Biota: Neoproterozoic Origin of Animals and Their Ecosystems". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 421–442. Bibcode 2005AREPS..33..421N. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122519. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/NarbonneAREPS2005Final.pdf. Retrieved 200-901-03. 
  110. ^ Waggoner, B. (1999). "Biogeographic Analyses of the Ediacara Biota: A Conflict with Paleotectonic Reconstructions" (abstract). Paleobiology 25 (4): 440–458. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(1999)025<0440:BAOTEB>2.3.CO;2. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/440. Retrieved 2007-06-22. 
  111. ^ Bambach, R.K.; Bush, A.M., Erwin, D.H. (2007). "Autecology and the filling of Ecospace: Key metazoan radiations". Palæontology 50 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00611.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00611.x. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

Further reading

External links