UNIT dating controversy

The UNIT dating controversy is an ongoing debate in Doctor Who fandom, concerning exactly when the stories featuring the fictional military organisation known as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce, or more recently as the Unified Intelligence Taskforce, take place in the timeline of the television series.[1]

The years during which UNIT operated in the original series run (it appeared in stories from 1968–1989) were not made clear and there has been much confusion and debate on the subject. Although there is strong evidence that at least some of the production team intended the UNIT stories to take place in the "near future", this policy was not consistently applied. Whether the stories take place contemporaneously with the broadcast dates, a few years in the future, or even a few years into the past is therefore arguable.

No television story from the original series which directly and literally features UNIT gives a clear date on screen. Dates are offered in several other stories but they have a habit of appearing at face value to contradict one another, whilst a host of unused dialogue and scenes, internal production memos, books by the contemporary creative team and other media have combined to confuse the matter further. It is not even clear when the contemporary production team intended the stories to be set, as different contributions on different occasions and people contradict each other.

Contents

Established dates

The following precise, or near precise, dates are provided in dialogue:

Contradictory clues

In addition, there are many other contradictory details that confuse the picture.

Off-screen evidence

Published books, contemporary interviews, publicity material and behind the scenes documents all point to a degree of uncertainty amongst the production team as well. For example:

Spin-offs

Spin-off stories in other media have also offered dates for the UNIT stories but have had little success in producing a clear answer:

Footnotes

  1. ^ "When are the UNIT Stories set?" essay in Miles and Wood (2004), pp. 7–9 ("In the whole of Doctor Who fandom, there's no single question as controversial as this."); see also "What's the UNIT Timeline?", ibid pp. 59–63.
    "The Unit Era", essay in Parkin (2006), pp. 98–101 ("Establishing when the UNIT stories take place is probably the most contentious Doctor Who continuity issue").
    "UNIT adventures, problematic timescale of", entry in Howarth and Lyons (1996), pp. 183–184.
    Listed among "extreme examples" of Doctor Who continuity contradictions in Richards and Martin (1997), p. 124.
    Also addressed in Lofficier (1991), pp. 22–24.
    Howe, David J.; and Stephen James Walker (1998, 2003). "Doctor Who Classic Episode Guide — Mawdryn Undead — Details". Doctor Who: The Television Companion. BBC Doctor Who website. http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/mawdrynundead/detail.shtml. Retrieved 2007-03-05. "...perhaps the most hotly debated and criticised aspect of [Mawdryn Undead is] that the dates specified in it are completely at odds with the fairly well established time frame in which the UNIT adventures of the second, third and fourth Doctors' eras took place." 
    Cornell, Paul; Martin Day and Keith Topping (1995). "Dating the UNIT stories". The Discontinuity Guide. BBC Doctor Who website. http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/datingunit.shtml. Retrieved 2007-03-05. 
  2. ^ Robot part 1, at 20:55
  3. ^ "The Sontaran Stratagem: Fact File". Doctor Who. BBC. 2008-04-26. http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/s4/episodes/?episode=s4_04&action=factfile. Retrieved 2008-04-26. 
  4. ^ "End of time for Dr. Who". Unknown newspaper; clipping at The Doctor Who Cuttings Archive. 1969. http://www.cuttingsarchive.org.uk/news_mag/1960s/cuttings/endoftim.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-10. 
  5. ^ Production subtitles from DVD release of "The Time Warrior", BBC Video, 2008

References