The Malay Dilemma | |
---|---|
Author(s) | Mahathir bin Mohamad |
Subject(s) | Non-fiction |
Publisher | Asia Pacific Press |
Publication date | 1970 |
Pages | 188 |
ISBN | 9812043551 9789812043559 |
OCLC Number | 246739691 |
The Malay Dilemma is a controversial book written by Mahathir bin Mohamad in 1970, 11 years before he became Malaysia's 4th Prime Minister.
At the time of publication, Mahathir had just lost his parliamentary seat, been expelled from the ruling party UMNO and Malaysia had recently been rocked by the racial riots later known as the May 13th Incident. The book analyses Malaysian history and politics in terms of race, and posits the following basic positions:
The dilemma thus, was whether Malays should accept this governmental aid — and Mahathir's position was that they should.
Prone to sweeping statements about other races, such as describing Jews as hook-nosed,[1] the book entrenched Mahathir's image as a Malay ultra. However, Mahathir also dissects the multiple failings of his own race, and the book was intended as a solution leading away from violence towards a harmonious, integrated Malaysia (albeit one where political and economic power is firmly concentrated in the hands of the Malays).
Mahathir was readmitted to UMNO in 1972 and became Prime Minister of Malaysia in 1981, and in time most of the policies suggested in the book were indeed adopted by the Malaysian government, most notably in the Malaysian New Economic Policy. The dilemma was revisited in 2000-2002 by Mahathir and his successor Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who now argued that Malays were well on the way to catching up, and that they should now be weaned away from the crutches that had allowed them to compete.
In the preface of the book's 1st edition, its British publisher casts doubt on the accuracy of Mahathir's assumptions and facts.[2] Mahathir has been rightly criticised for the lack of documentary evidence to butress his many arguments and conclusions. His assertions and assumptions were based on his personal observations and experiences, with no empirical data to support them.[2]