Systematic (IUPAC) name | |
---|---|
3-[(1R,2R)-3-(dimethylamino)-1-ethyl-2- methylpropyl]phenol hydrochloride |
|
Clinical data | |
AHFS/Drugs.com | monograph |
MedlinePlus | a610006 |
Pregnancy cat. | C(AU) C(US) |
Legal status | Schedule II |
Routes | Oral, Other ROA Unknown |
Pharmacokinetic data | |
Bioavailability | 31.9 ± 6.8% (oral)[1] |
Metabolism | Hepatic glucuronidation and sulfate conjugation |
Half-life | 4 hrs |
Excretion | Renal (>95%) and fecal |
Identifiers | |
CAS number | 175591-23-8 |
ATC code | N02AX06 |
PubChem | CID 9838022 |
ChemSpider | 8013742 |
UNII | H8A007M585 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201776 |
Synonyms | BN-200 CG-5503 R-331333 |
Chemical data | |
Formula | C14H23NO |
Mol. mass | 221.339 g/mol |
SMILES | eMolecules & PubChem |
|
|
(verify) |
(what is this?)
Tapentadol (trade name Nucynta, Palexia, In India - ZYNTAP)[2] is a centrally acting analgesic with a dual mode of action as an agonist at the μ-opioid receptor and as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.[3] While its analgesic actions have been compared to tramadol and oxycodone,[4] its general potency is somewhere between tramadol and morphine in effectiveness.[5] Tapentadol is a new molecular entity that is structurally similar to Tramadol (Tramal). It has opioid and nonopioid acitivity in a single compound.
In the US, Tapentadol is FDA approved for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain. Due to the dual mechanism of action as an opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, there is potential for off label use in chronic pain.
Doctors use serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in chronic pain management to increase the effectiveness of opioids and, to a lesser extent, NSAIDs (along with other analgesics) against neuropathic pain and from certain specific contributing causes such as fibromyalgia and diabetic neuropathy. One selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) often used as an adjunct, atypical & potentiator is duloxetine (Cymbalta). Another opioid with selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor effects is levorphanol (Levo-Dromoran).
Its dual mode of action provides analgesia at similar levels of more potent narcotic analgesics such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, and pethidine (meperidine) with a more tolerable side effect profile.
Contents |
Tapentadol was developed by Grünenthal in conjunction with Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development. It is being marketed as immediate release oral tablets of 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg under the brand name Nucynta.
It is the first new drug of the centrally acting analgesic class approved in the United States in more than 25 years.[6] Internationally, tapentadol's status is in various stages of development at this time.
Efficacy of tapentadol compared to placebo was demonstrated in two phase III and one phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled clinical trials submitted to the FDA. The phase III trials evaluated tapentadol multiple dosing post-orthopedic surgery and in late-stage OA. The phase II study evaluated single dosing of tapentadol post dental procedure. All trials utilized a 0-10 point scale for pain intensity (none to worst) and 0-5 point scale for pain relief (none to complete). Patients were assessed at time intervals and the sum of numerical values for these pain scales were the basis of evaluating efficacy. Secondary endpoints of total pain relief from baseline, time to pain relief, time to first rescue medication and the need for rescue medication are important clinically relevant endpoints. These published phase II and phase III studies used active control medications including oxycodone, morphine or NSAIDs.
Tapentadol demonstrated efficacy compared to placebo in a phase III, 3 day, multiple dosing assessment of post-surgical (bunionectomy) pain. The mean age of this patient population was 60–62 years. Participants had a post-operative baseline pain score of >4 on an 11 point scale and were randomized to placebo, tapentadol 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg or oxycodone IR 15 mg. All study medications including oxycodone were compared to placebo and given q4-6h. The sum of pain intensity (SPID) over the first 48 hours of study medication improved with all tapentadol strengths as well as oxycodone compared to placebo (p=<0.001). The percent of patients requiring rescue medication was less for tapentadol and oxycodone compared to placebo (tapentadol 100 mg=10%, oxycodone 15 mg =9%, placebo=49%). The time to the first dose of rescue medication required was reduced with all strengths of tapentadol as well as oxycodone when compared to placebo (p=<0.001, no data given). Overall, more patients experienced at least a 50% improvement in pain from baseline with tapentadol and oxycodone compared to placebo (tapentadol 50, 75, 100 mg=58%, 56.7%, 70.3%, oxycodone =72.8%, placebo = 30%, p=<0.001). Absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 40.3% for Tapentadol 100 mg and 42.8% for oxycodone. The number needed to treat (NNT) for 50% pain improvement at 48 hours was 3.6, 3.8 and 2.5 for tapentadol and 2.5 for oxycodone. Tapentadol was non-inferior to oxycodone IR 15 mg. Withdrawal due to adverse events was less with Tapentadol than oxycodone (NNH; Tapentadol 50, 75, 100 mg = 39, 23.8, n/a, oxycodone = 100).[10]
Tapentadol was effective in a phase III, 10 day, multiple dosing assessments of patients awaiting knee replacement surgery from late stage OA. All patients were currently at a level of pain with an indication for opioid analgesics. Tapentadol 50 mg, 75 mg and oxycodone IR 10 mg was compared to placebo. The sum pain intensity difference (SPID) at 48 hours and 5 days improved with tapentadol 50 mg and 75 mg and oxycodone 10 mg as compared to placebo (p=<0.001). More patients experienced at least a 50% improvement in pain from baseline with tapentadol and oxycodone compared to placebo (tapentadol = 27, 26, oxycodone=25%, placebo=13%, p=<0.01). The NNT to achieve 50% pain relief was 7.1, 7.7 and 8.3 for tapentadol 50 and 75 mg doses and oxycodone. Tapentadol was non-inferior to oxycodone IR 15 mg. In this 10 days study, tapentadol had a lower incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events than oxycodone (NNH tapentadol 50,75 mg = 11.2, 6.9, oxycodone=3.6). The authors also state lower incidence of selected GI adverse events with tapentadol (p=<0.001).[11]
A phase II single dose trial of tapentadol 25 mg-200 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg and morphine IR 60 mg was evaluated in post-surgery dental pain. This patient population was younger than in the previous 2 studies (18–45 years old, mean=23). The sum of total pain relief (SPID) at 4 and 8 hours and improved from baseline compared to placebo with doses of tapentadol that were >75 mg (p=<0.05). The time to perceptible (any noticeable relief) and clinically meaningful pain relief reported by patients was shorter for tapentadol 200 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg compared to morphine 60 mg IR (time to perceptible, meaningful pain relief: tapentadol 200 mg = 0.7 hours, 1.5 hours, morphine 60 mg = 0.8 hours, 2.6 hours, ibuprofen 400 mg = 0.8 hours, 1.5 hours). A minimum dose of 50 mg tapentadol was necessary to achieve statistical significance for a 50% reduction in pain from baseline. More patients reported a 50% improvement in pain from baseline with each increasing dose of tapentadol. The NNT for tapentadol 50, 75, 100, 200 mg was 13, 5, 2, and 3. NNT for morphine 60 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg was 3 and 2. Ibuprofen appeared to work well compared to other medications in this model.[12]
Additional non-published have evaluated tapentadol with oxycodone and placebo in hip replacement surgery (terminated due to high discontinuation rates) and tapentadol with morphine and placebo in chronic tumor related pain (terminated due to recall of a rescue medication impacting timeline). Results of these studies are not available. Studies currently recruiting subjects include tapentadol, morphine and placebo in chronic tumor related pain, and tapentadol, oxycodone and placebo in post-op shoulder surgery and vertebral compression fracture. There are no listed clinical trials involving tramadol or NSAIDs.
The abuse potential of tapentadol has not been fully elucidated due to limited clinical experience with this new drug. The preliminary information available from clinical use as well as close pharmacodynamic similarities with the class prototype drug tramadol indicate that tapentadol has a relatively limited potential for abuse, dependency and addiction compared to other strong opioid medications. The decision of the US DEA to place tapentadol into Schedule II,[13] the same category as the most powerful and frequently abused narcotics, such as morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl, could therefore be seen as overly cautious. While Tapentadol is less abused than Oxycodone, the drug will remain in Schedule II since it is considered to have an abuse profile similar to hydromorphone.
Nausea, dizziness, constipation, and CNS sedation are common side effects of opioid pain medications. In phase II trials, tapentadol has been shown to provide equianalgesic effect with a lower incidence of side effects compared to oxycodone and morphine. One trial, sponsored by Grünenthal, comparing tapentadol to morphine and ibuprofen for relief of postoperative pain found tapentadol to cause less nausea and dizziness than morphine, with no significant difference in the incidence of vomiting or drowsiness.[14]
Clinical studies cite there is less incidence of select adverse gastrointestinal effects tapentadol compared to oxycodone.
May cause hallucinations and short term memory loss to patients on anti-depressants.
|