Total maximum daily load

1 State Inventories
2 TMDL Planning Process
3 Implementation of TMDLs
4 See also
5 References
6 External links

A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a regulatory term in the U.S. Clean Water Act, describing a value of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a body of water can receive while still meeting water quality standards.^[1] Alternatively, TMDL is an allocation of that water pollutant deemed acceptable to the subject receiving waters.

TMDLs have been used extensively by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state environmental agencies in implementing the Clean Water Act by establishing maximum pollution limits for industrial wastewater dischargers. EPA published regulations in 1992 establishing TMDL procedures.^[2] Application of TMDL has broadened significantly in the last decade to include many watershed-scale efforts. This process incorporates both point source and nonpoint source pollutants within a watershed.

State Inventories

The Clean Water Act requires states to compile lists of water bodies that do not fully support beneficial uses such as aquatic life, fisheries, drinking water, recreation, industry, or agriculture. These inventories are known as 303(d) Lists and characterize waters as fully supporting, impaired, or in some cases threatened for beneficial uses.

TMDL Planning Process

Beneficial use determinations must have sufficient credible water quality data for TMDL planning.

Throughout the U.S., data are often lacking adequate spatial or temporal coverage to reliably establish the sources and magnitude of water quality degradation.

TMDL planning in large watersheds is a process that typically involves the following steps:

Watershed Characterization—understanding the basic physical, environmental, and human elements of the watershed.
Impairment Status—analyzing existing data to determine if waters fully support beneficial uses
Data Gaps and Monitoring Report—identification of any additional data needs and monitoring recommendations
Source Assessment—identification of sources of pollutants, and magnitude of sources.
Load Allocation—determination of natural pollutant load, and load from human activities (i.e. diffuse nonpoint sources and point discharges).
Set Targets—establishment of water quality targets intended to restore or maintain beneficial uses.
TMDL Implementation Plan—a watershed management strategy to attain established targets.

Water Quality Targets

The purpose of water quality targets is to protect or restore beneficial uses and protect human health. These targets may include state/federal numerical water quality standards or narrative standards, i.e. within the range of "natural" conditions. Establishing targets to restore beneficial uses is challenging and sometimes controversial. For example, the restoration of a fishery may require reducing temperatures, nutrients, sediments, and improving habitat.

Necessary values for each pollutant target to restore fisheries can be uncertain. The potential for a water body to support a fishery even in a pristine state can be uncertain.

Background

Calculating the TMDL for any given body of water involves the combination of factors that contribute to the problem of nutrient concentrated runoff. Bodies of water are tested for contaminants based on their intended use. Each body of water is tested similarly but designated with a different TMDL. Drinking water reservoirs are designated differently than areas for public swimming and water bodies intended for fishing are designated differently than water located in wildlife conservation areas. The size of the water body also is taken into consideration when TMDL calculating is undertaken. The larger the body of water, the greater the amounts of contaminants can be present and still maintain a Margin of Safety. The Margin of Safety (MOS) is the nutrients allowed to be present in a body of water and have it still meet state water quality requirements for its intended use. TMDL is the end product of all point and non-point source pollutants of a single contaminant. Pollutants that originate from a point source are given allowable levels of contaminants to be discharged; this is the Waste Load Allocation (WLA). Nonpoint source pollutants are also calculated into the TMDL equation with Load Allocation (LA).

Calculation

The calculation of a TMDL is as follows:

$TMDL = WLA %2B LA %2B MOS$

Load Allocations

Load allocations are equally challenging as setting targets. Load allocations provide a framework for determining the relative share of natural sources and human sources of pollution.

The natural background load for a pollutant may be imprecisely understood. Industrial dischargers, farmers, land developers, municipalities, natural resource agencies, and other watershed stakeholders each have a vested interest in the outcome.

Implementation of TMDLs

To enforce TMDLs with point sources, water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs) must be developed and incorporated into discharge permits for these sources.^[3] The permits are issued by EPA and state agencies under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Nonpoint source discharges (e.g. agriculture) are generally in a voluntary compliance scenario. The TMDL implementation plan is intended to help bridge this divide and insure that watershed beneficial uses are restored and maintained. Local watershed groups play a critical role in educating stakeholders, generating funding, and implementing projects to reduce nonpoint sources of pollution.

References

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Washington, D.C. "Guidance for Water Quality-Based Decisions: The TMDL Process." Doc. No. EPA 440/4-91-001. April 1991.

^ Clean Water Act sec. 303(d), 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d).
^ EPA. "Water Quality Planning and Management." Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 130.7.
^ EPA. "NPDES Permit Writers' Manual." Chapter 6. December 1996. Document No. EPA-833-B-96-003.

External links

United States environmental law

Supreme Court decisions	Sierra Club v. Morton (1972) · United States v. SCRAP (1973) · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill (1978) · Vermont Yankee v. NRDC (1978) · Hughes v. Oklahoma (1979) · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992) · United States v. Bestfoods (1998) · Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (2000) · SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers (2001) · Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen (2004) · Rapanos v. United States (2006) · Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) · National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife (2007) · Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (2009)

Major federal legislation and treaties	Lacey Act (1900) · Weeks Act (1911) · North Pacific Fur Seal Convention of 1911 (1911) · Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) · Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (1934) · Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (1954) · Clean Air Act (1970) · National Environmental Policy Act (1970) · Clean Water Act (1972) · Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (1972) · Endangered Species Act (1973) · Safe Drinking Water Act (1974) · Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1976) · Toxic Substances Control Act (1976) · Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (1977) · CERCLA (Superfund) (1980) · Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (1986)

Federal agencies	United States Environmental Protection Agency · Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · Council on Environmental Quality · Office of Surface Mining · U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Regulations and concepts	Citizen suit · Discharge Monitoring Report · Environmental crime · Environmental impact statement · Environmental justice · National Ambient Air Quality Standards · National Priorities List · New Source Performance Standard · Not-To-Exceed (NTE) · Right to know · Total maximum daily load · Toxicity category rating