Sirdar v The Army Board
Sirdar v The Army Board |
Court |
Court of Appeal |
Full case name |
Sirdar v The Army Board & Secretary of State for Defence |
Citation(s) |
(1999) C-273/97, [1999] ECR I-7403 |
Keywords |
Discrimination |
Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97 is a UK labour law case concerning genuine occupational requirements for a job.
Facts
Ms Sirdar was refused a position in the marines, and made redundant from position as chef. In the marines there had to be interoperability, so all marine members had to be capable of combat. There was a ban on combat for women.
Judgment
The ECJ held Member States ‘depending on the circumstances, national authorities have a certain degree of discretion when adopting measures which they consider to be necessary in order to guarantee public security in a Member State’. Because marines were the ‘point of the arrow head’ the competent authorities were justified in having it be exclusively male.
See also
Direct discrimination cases
|
|
|
|
Horsey v Dyfed County Council [1982] ICR 755
|
|
R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council [1989] AC 1155
|
|
James v Eastleigh BC [1990] UKHL 6
|
|
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2) [1995] UKHL 13
|
|
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd [1998] ICR 449 (C-249/96)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
References