Mosasaur

Mosasaurs
Temporal range: Late Cretaceous
Mosasaurus hoffmannii skeleton, Natural History Museum of Maastricht, The Netherlands
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Superfamily: Mosasauroidea
Family: Mosasauridae
Gervais, 1853
Subfamilies

Mosasaurs (from Latin Mosa meaning the 'Meuse river', and Greek sauros meaning 'lizard') are large extinct marine lizards. The first fossil remains were discovered in a limestone quarry at Maastricht on the Meuse in 1764. Mosasaurs are now considered to be the closest relatives of snakes, due to cladistic analyses that have taken into account similarities in jaw and skull anatomies.[1] Mosasaurs were varanoids closely related to terrestrial monitor lizards. They probably evolved from semi-aquatic squamates[2] known as aigialosaurs, which were more similar in appearance to modern-day monitor lizards, in the Early Cretaceous. During the last 20 million years of the Cretaceous Period (Turonian-Maastrichtian), with the extinction of the ichthyosaurs and pliosaurs, mosasaurs became the dominant marine predators.

Contents

Description

Mosasaurs breathed air, were powerful swimmers, and were well-adapted to living in the warm, shallow epicontinental seas prevalent during the Late Cretaceous Period. Mosasaurs were so well adapted to this environment that they gave birth to live young, rather than return to the shore to lay eggs, as sea turtles do.

The smallest-known mosasaur was Carinodens belgicus, which was about 3.0 metres (9.8 ft) to 3.5 metres (11 ft) long and probably lived in shallow waters near shore, cracking mollusks and sea urchins with its bulbous teeth. Larger mosasaurs were more typical: mosasaurs ranged in size up to 17 metres (56 ft). Hainosaurus holds the record for longest mosasaur, at 17.5 metres (57 ft).

Mosasaurs had a body shape similar to that of modern-day monitor lizards (varanids), but were more elongated and streamlined for swimming. Their limb bones were reduced in length and their paddles were formed by webbing between their elongated digit-bones. Their tails were broad, and supplied the locomotive power. This method of locomotion may have been similar to that used by the conger eel or sea snakes today. However, more recent evidence suggests that many advanced mosasaurs had large crescent-shaped flukes on the ends of their tails similar to those of sharks and ichthyosaurs. Rather than snake-like undulatory movement, the body probably remained stiff in these mosasaurs to improve hydrodynamic efficiency through the water while the end of the tail provided strong propulsion.[5] The animal may have lurked and pounced rapidly and powerfully on passing prey, rather than hunting for it.

Mosasaurs had a double-hinged jaw and flexible skull (much like that of a snake), which enabled them to gulp down their prey almost whole, a snakelike habit which helped identify the unmasticated gut contents fossilized within mosasaur skeletons. A skeleton of Tylosaurus proriger from South Dakota included remains of the diving seabird Hesperornis, a marine bony fish, a possible shark and another, smaller mosasaur (Clidastes). Mosasaur bones have also been found with shark teeth embedded in them.

Based on features such as the double row of pterygoid ("flanged") teeth on the palate, the double-hinged jaw, modified/reduced limbs and probable methods of locomotion, many researchers believe that snakes and mosasaurs may have had a common ancestor. This theory was first suggested in 1869, by Edward Drinker Cope, who coined the term "Pythonomorpha" to include them. The idea lay dormant for more than a century, before being revived in the 1990s.[6][7]

Soft tissue

Despite the relatively high number of mosasaur remains collected worldwide, knowledge of the nature of their skin coverings remains in its early stages. An incredibly small amount of mosasaurid specimens collected from around the world retain fossilized scale imprints; this lack of knowledge is possibly due to the delicate nature of the scales, which nearly eliminates possibility of preservation, in addition to the preservation sediments types and the marine conditions under which the preservation occurred. Until the discovery of several mosasaur specimens along with their remarkably well preserved scale imprints from late Maastrichtian deposits of the Muwaqqar Chalk Marl Formation of Harrana[8] in Jordan, knowledge of the nature of mosasaur integument was mainly based on very few accounts describing early mosasaur fossils dating back to the upper Santonian-lower Campanian such as the famous Tylosaurus specimen (KUVP-1075) from Cove County, Kansas.[9] Material from Jordan has shown that the body of mosasaurs, as well as the membrane between the fingers and toes, was covered with small overlapping diamond-shaped scales resembling those of snakes. Much like modern reptiles, there existed regional variations in the type and size of the scales that covered the mosasaurs. In Harrana specimens, two types of scales were observed on a single specimen,[8] keeled scales covering the upper regions of the body as well as smooth scales covering the lower regions. As ambush predators, lurking and quickly capturing prey using stealth tactics,[10] it is suggested mosasaurs benefited greatly from the non-reflective keeled scales.[8]

More recently, a well preserved fossil of Platecarpus tympaniticus has been found that preserves not only skin impressions, but also internal organs. There are several reddish areas in the fossil that may represent the heart, lungs, and kidneys. The trachea is also preserved along with part of what may be the retina in the eye. The placement of the kidneys is farther forward in the abdomen than it is in monitor lizards, and is more similar to that of cetaceans. As in cetaceans, the bronchi leading to the lungs run parallel to each other instead of splitting apart from one another as in monitors and other terrestrial reptiles. In mosasaurs, these features may be internal adaptations to a fully marine lifestyle.[5]

In 2011, collagen protein was recovered from a Prognathodon humerus dated to the Cretaceous.[11]

Environment

Sea levels were high during the Cretaceous Period, causing marine transgressions in many parts of the world and a great inland seaway in what is now North America. Mosasaur fossils have been found in the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Portugal, Sweden, the United Kingdom,[12] Angola, Morocco, Australia, New Zealand, and on Vega Island off the coast of Antarctica. Mosasaurs have been found in Canada in Manitoba and Saskatchewan[13] and in much of the contiguous United States. Complete or partial specimens have been found in Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia -- as well as in states covered by the Cretaceous seaway: Texas, southwest Arkansas, New Mexico, Kansas,[14] Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, Montana, and the Pierre Shale/Fox Hills formations of North Dakota.[15] Lastly, mosasaur bones and teeth are also known from California, Mexico, and Peru.

Many of the so-called 'dinosaur' remains found on New Zealand are actually mosasaurs and plesiosaurs, both being Mesozoic predatory marine reptiles.

Discovery

The first publicized discovery of a partial fossil mosasaur skull in 1764 by quarry-workers in a subterranean gallery of a limestone quarry in Mount Saint Peter, near the Dutch city of Maastricht, preceded any major dinosaur fossil discoveries but remained little known. However, a second find of a partial skull drew the Age of Enlightenment's attention to the existence of fossilized animals that were different from any known living creatures. When the specimen was discovered between 1770 and 1774, Johann Leonard Hoffmann, a surgeon and fossil-collector, corresponded about it with the most influential scientists of his day, making the fossil famous. The original owner though was Godding, a canon of Maastricht cathedral.

When the French Revolutionary forces occupied Maastricht in 1794, the carefully hidden fossil was uncovered, after a reward, it is said, of six hundred bottles of wine, and transported to Paris. After it had been earlier interpreted as a fish, a crocodile and a sperm whale, the first to understand its lizard affinities was the Dutch scientist Adriaan Gilles Camper in 1799. In 1808 Georges Cuvier confirmed this conclusion, although le Grand Animal fossile de Maëstricht was not actually named Mosasaurus ('Meuse reptile') until 1822 and not given its full species name, Mosasaurus hoffmannii, until 1829. Several sets of mosasaur remains, that had been discovered earlier at Maastricht but were not identified as mosasaurs until the nineteenth century, have been on display in the Teylers Museum, Haarlem, procured from 1790.

The Maastricht limestone beds were rendered so famous by the Mosasaur discovery that they have given their name to the final six-million-year epoch of the Cretaceous, the Maastrichtian.

Taxonomy

Classification

Incertae sedis

Phylogeny

Cladogram of mosasaurs and related taxa modified from Bell and Polcyn, 2005:[16]

Mosasauroidea 
 Aigialosauridae 

Aigialosaurus dalmaticus



 Mosasauridae 
 Mosasaurinae

Dallasaurus turneri





Clidastes KU-liodontus



Clidastes YP-liodontus





Clidastes moorevillensis




Clidastes novum sp.




Clidastes propython






Globidens alabamaensis



Globidens dakotensis





Prognathodon overtoni




Plesiotylosaurus crassidens



Prognathodon rapax







Mosasaurus conodon




Mosasaurus missouriensis





Mosasaurus indet.



Mosasaurus maximus





Plotosaurus bensoni



Plotosaurus tuckeri














Haasiasaurus gittelmani



 Halisauromorpha 

Trieste aigialosaur





Halisaurus novum sp.



Halisaurus platyspondylus





Halisaurus sternbergi



Halosaurus cf. sternbergi





 Russellosaurina 




Ectenosaurus clidastoides



Ectenosaurus YPcomposit





Platecarpus planifrons




Angolasaurus bocagei




Platecarpus 600tympaniticus




Platecarpus 8769tympaniticus




Plioplatecarpus AMNH sp.



Plioplatecarpus RMM sp.










Tylosaurus novum sp.




Tylosaurus nepaeolicus



Tylosaurus proriger







Tethysaurus nopcsai




Yaguarasaurus columbianus



Russellosaurus coheni









Evolutionary antecedents

Based on features such as the loosely-hinged jaw, modified/reduced limbs and probable locomotion, many researchers believe that snakes share a common marine ancestry with mosasaurs, a suggestion advanced in 1869, by Edward Drinker Cope, who coined the term "Pythonomorpha" to unite them. The idea lay dormant for more than a century, to be revived in the 1990s.[6] Recently, the discovery of Najash rionegrina, a fossorial snake from South America cast doubt on the marine origin hypothesis.

On 2005-11-16, research reported in Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, confirmed that the recently uncovered Dallasaurus turneri is an early link between land-based monitor lizards (such as the Komodo dragon) and the aquatic mosasaurs.[17]

Distribution

The following is a list of geologic formations that have produced mosasaur fossils.

Name Age Location Notes

Fox Hills Formation

Cretaceous North Dakota Estuarine deposits

Moreno Formation

Niobrara Formation

Pierre Shale Formation

Cretaceous North Dakota Oceanic deposits

In popular culture

References

  1. ^ Lee MSY (1997-01-29). "The phylogeny of varanoid lizards and the affinities of snakes". Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 352 (1349): 53–91. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0005. PMC 1691912. PMID 0. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1691912. 
  2. ^ Squamates consist of the living varanoid lizards, snakes and their fossil relatives the mosasaurs.
  3. ^ http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Osborn1899.html
  4. ^ http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Williston98.html
  5. ^ a b Lindgren, J.; Caldwell, M.W.; Konishi, T.; and Chiappe, L.M. (2010). Farke, Andrew Allen. ed. "Convergent Evolution in Aquatic Tetrapods: Insights from an Exceptional Fossil Mosasaur". PLoS ONE 5 (8): e11998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011998. PMC 2918493. PMID 20711249. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2918493. 
  6. ^ a b Palaeos Vertebrates 260.100 Pythonomorpha: Pythonomorpha
  7. ^ Mosasaurs: Last of the Great Marine Reptiles
  8. ^ a b c Kaddumi, H.F. (2009). "On the latest scale coverings of mosasaurs (Squamata: Mosasauridae) from the Harrana Fauna in addition to the description of s new species of Mosasaurus". Fossils of the Harrana Fauna and the Adjacent Areas. Amman: Eternal River Museum of Natural History. pp. 80–94. 
  9. ^ Snow, F. H. (1878). "On the dermal covering of a mosasauroid reptile". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 6: 54–58. 
  10. ^ Massare, J. A. (1987). "Tooth morphology and prey preference of Mesozoic marine reptiles". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 7 (2): 121–137. doi:10.1080/02724634.1987.10011647. 
  11. ^ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0019445
  12. ^ www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/2000158.pdf
  13. ^ http://www.discoverfossils.com
  14. ^ Michael J. Everhart (2005). "Chapter 9: Enter the Mosasaurs". Oceans of Kansas: a natural history of the western interior sea. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-34547-2. 
  15. ^ Getman, Myron RC (1994). Occurrences of Mosasaur and other reptilian fossil remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: late Cretaceous) of North Dakota. St. Lawrence University Dept. of Geology theses. 
  16. ^ Bell, G. L. Jr.; and Polcyn, M. J.. "Dallasaurus turneri, a new primitive mosasauroid from the Middle Turonian of Texas and comments on the phylogeny of Mosasauridae (Squamata)". Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw 84 (3): 177–194. 
  17. ^ Dallasaurus / Ancient Mosasaur - Dallasaurus - SMU

External links