The orbital eccentricity of an astronomical body is the amount by which its orbit deviates from a perfect circle, where 0 is perfectly circular, and 1.0 is a parabola, and no longer a closed orbit. It derives its name from the parameters of conic sections, as every Kepler orbit is a conic section.
Contents |
In a two-body problem with inverse-square-law force, every orbit is a Kepler orbit. The eccentricity of this Kepler orbit is a positive number that defines its shape.
The eccentricity may take the following values:
The eccentricity is given by
where E is the total orbital energy, is the angular momentum, is the reduced mass. and the coefficient of the inverse-square law central force such as gravity or electrostatics in classical physics:
( is negative for an attractive force, positive for a repulsive one) (see also Kepler problem).
or in the case of a gravitational force:
where is the specific orbital energy (total energy divided by the reduced mass), the standard gravitational parameter based on the total mass, and the specific relative angular momentum (angular momentum divided by the reduced mass).
For values of e from 0 to 1 the orbit's shape is an increasingly elongated (or flatter) ellipse; for values of e from 1 to infinity the orbit is a hyperbola branch making a total turn of 2 arccsc e, decreasing from 180 to 0 degrees. The limit case between an ellipse and a hyperbola is for e precisely 1 which is parabola.
Radial trajectories are classified as elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic based on the energy of the orbit, not the eccentricity. Radial orbits have zero angular momentum and hence eccentricity equal to one. Keeping the energy constant and reducing the angular momentum, elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic orbits each tend to the corresponding type of radial trajectory while e tends to 1 (or in the parabolic case: remains 1).
For a repulsive force only the hyperbolic trajectory, including the radial version, is applicable.
For elliptical orbits, a simple proof shows that arcsin() yields the projection angle of a perfect circle to an ellipse of eccentricity . For example, to view the eccentricity of the planet Mercury (=0.2056), one must simply calculate the inverse sine to find the projection angle of 11.86 degrees. Next, tilt any circular object (such as a coffee mug viewed from the top) by that angle and the apparent ellipse projected to your eye will be of that same eccentricity.
From Medieval Latin eccentricus, derived from Greek ekkentros "out of the center", from ek-, ex- "out of" + kentron "center". Eccentric first appeared in English in 1551, with the definition "a circle in which the earth, sun. etc. deviates from its center." Five years later, in 1556, an adjective form of the word was added.
Eccentricity of an orbit can be calculated from orbital state vectors as a magnitude of eccentricity vector:
where:
For elliptical orbits it can also be calculated from distance at apoapsis and periapsis:
where:
The eccentricity of an elliptical orbit can also be used to obtain the ratio of the periapsis to the apoapsis:
The eccentricity of the Earth's orbit is currently about 0.0167; the Earth's orbit is nearly circular. Over hundreds of thousands of years, the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit varies from nearly 0.0034 to almost 0.058 as a result of gravitational attractions among the planets (see graph).[1]
In other values, Mercury (with an eccentricity of 0.2056) holds the title as the largest value among the planets of the Solar System. Prior to the redefinition of its planetary status, Pluto held this title with an eccentricity of about 0.248. The Moon's value is 0.0549. For the values for all planets in one table, see List of gravitationally rounded objects of the Solar System.
Most of the solar system's asteroids have eccentricities between 0 and 0.35 with an average value of 0.17.[2] Their comparatively high eccentricities are probably due to the influence of Jupiter and to past collisions.
The eccentricity of comets is most often close to 1. Periodic comets have highly eccentric elliptical orbits, with eccentricities just below 1; Halley's Comet's elliptical orbit, for example, has a value of 0.967. Non-periodic comets follow near-parabolic orbits and thus have eccentricities very close to 1. Examples include Comet Hale-Bopp with a value of 0.995[3] and comet C/2006 P1 (McNaught) with a value of 1.000019.[4] As Hale-Bopp's value is less than 1, its orbit is elliptical and so the comet will in fact return.[3] Comet McNaught has a hyperbolic orbit while within the influence of the planets, but is still bound to the Sun with an orbital period of about 10^5 years.[5] As of a 2010 Epoch, Comet C/1980 E1 has the largest eccentricity of any known hyperbolic comet with an eccentricity of 1.057,[6] and will leave the solar system indefinitely.
Neptune's largest moon Triton has an eccentricity of 1.6 × 10^-5 [7] which is the smallest eccentricity of any known body in the solar system; its orbit is as close to a perfect circle as can be currently measured.
The mean eccentricity of an object is the average eccentricity as a result of perturbations over a given time period. Neptune currently has an instant (current Epoch) eccentricity of 0.0113,[8] but from 1800 A.D. to 2050 A.D. has a mean eccentricity of 0.00859.[9]
Orbital mechanics require that the duration of the seasons be proportional to the area of the Earth's orbit swept between the solstices and equinoxes, so when the orbital eccentricity is extreme, the seasons that occur on the far side of the orbit (aphelion) can be substantially longer in duration. Today, northern hemisphere fall and winter occur at closest approach (perihelion), when the earth is moving at its maximum velocity. As a result, in the northern hemisphere, fall and winter are slightly shorter than spring and summer. In 2006, summer was 4.66 days longer than winter and spring was 2.9 days longer than fall.[10] Axial precession slowly changes the place in the Earth's orbit where the solstices and equinoxes occur. Over the next 10,000 years, northern hemisphere winters will become gradually longer and summers will become shorter. Any cooling effect, however, will be counteracted by the fact that the eccentricity of Earth's orbit will be almost halved, reducing the mean orbital radius and raising temperatures in both hemispheres closer to the mid-interglacial peak.
Prussing, John E., and Bruce A. Conway. Orbital Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.