Multilinear map

In linear algebra, a multilinear map is a function of several variables that is linear separately in each variable. More precisely, a multilinear map is a function

$f\colon V_1 \times \cdots \times V_n \to W\text{,}$

where $V_1,\ldots,V_n$ and $W\!$ are vector spaces (or modules), with the following property: for each $i\!$ , if all of the variables but $v_i\!$ are held constant, then $f(v_1,\ldots,v_n)$ is a linear function of $v_i\!$ .^[1]

A multilinear map of two variables is a bilinear map. More generally, a multilinear map of k variables is called a k-linear map. If the codomain of a multilinear map is the field of scalars, it is called a multilinear form. Multilinear maps and multilinear forms are fundamental objects of study in multilinear algebra.

If all variables belong to the same space, one can consider symmetric, antisymmetric and alternating k-linear maps. The latter coincide if the underlying ring (or field) has a characteristic different from two, else the former two coincide.

1 Examples
2 Coordinate representation
3 Relation to tensor products
4 Multilinear functions on n×n matrices
5 Example
6 Properties
7 See also
8 References

Examples

Any bilinear map is a multilinear map. For example, any inner product on a vector space is a multilinear map, as is the cross product of vectors in $\mathbb{R}^3$ .
The determinant of a matrix is an antisymmetric multilinear function of the columns (or rows) of a square matrix.
If $F\colon \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$ is a C^k function, then the $k\!$ th derivative of $F\!$ at each point $p\!$ in its domain can be viewed as a symmetric $k\!$ -linear function $D^k\!f(p)\colon \mathbb{R}^m\times\cdots\times\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$ .
The tensor-to-vector projection in multilinear subspace learning is a multilinear map as well.

Coordinate representation

Let

$f\colon V_1 \times \cdots \times V_n \to W\text{,}$

be a multilinear map between finite-dimensional vector spaces, where $V_i\!$ has dimension $d_i\!$ , and $W\!$ has dimension $d\!$ . If we choose a basis $\{\textbf{e}_{i1},\ldots,\textbf{e}_{id_i}\}$ for each $V_i\!$ and a basis $\{\textbf{b}_1,\ldots,\textbf{b}_d\}$ for $W\!$ (using bold for vectors), then we can define a collection of scalars $A_{j_1\cdots j_n}^k$ by

$f(\textbf{e}_{1j_1},\ldots,\textbf{e}_{nj_n}) = A_{j_1\cdots j_n}^1\,\textbf{b}_1 %2B \cdots %2B A_{j_1\cdots j_n}^d\,\textbf{b}_d.$

Then the scalars $\{A_{j_1\cdots j_n}^k \mid 1\leq j_i\leq d_i, 1 \leq k \leq d\}$ completely determine the multilinear function $f\!$ . In particular, if

$\textbf{v}_i = \sum_{j=1}^{d_i} v_{ij} \textbf{e}_{ij}\!$

for $1 \leq i \leq n\!$ , then

$f(\textbf{v}_1,\ldots,\textbf{v}_n) = \sum_{j_1=1}^{d_1} \cdots \sum_{j_n=1}^{d_n} \sum_{k=1}^{d} A_{j_1\cdots j_n}^k v_{1j_1}\cdots v_{nj_n} \textbf{b}_k.$

Relation to tensor products

There is a natural one-to-one correspondence between multilinear maps

$f\colon V_1 \times \cdots \times V_n \to W\text{,}$

and linear maps

$F\colon V_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes V_n \to W\text{,}$

where $V_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes V_n\!$ denotes the tensor product of $V_1,\ldots,V_n$ . The relation between the functions $f\!$ and $F\!$ is given by the formula

$F(v_1\otimes \cdots \otimes v_n) = f(v_1,\ldots,v_n).$

Multilinear functions on n×n matrices

One can consider multilinear functions, on an n×n matrix over a commutative ring K with identity, as a function of the rows (or equivalently the columns) of the matrix. Let A be such a matrix and $a_i$ , 1 ≤ i ≤ n be the rows of A. Then the multilinear function D can be written as

$D(A) = D(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n}) \,$

satisfying

$D(a_{1},\ldots,c a_{i} %2B a_{i}',\ldots,a_{n}) = c D(a_{1},\ldots,a_{i},\ldots,a_{n}) %2B D(a_{1},\ldots,a_{i}',\ldots,a_{n}) \,$

If we let $\hat{e}_j$ represent the jth row of the identity matrix we can express each row $a_{i}$ as the sum

$a_{i} = \sum_{j=1}^n A(i,j)\hat{e}_{j}$

Using the multilinearity of D we rewrite D(A) as

$D(A) = D\left(\sum_{j=1}^n A(i,j)\hat{e}_{j}, a_2, \ldots, a_n\right) = \sum_{j=1}^n A(i,j) D(\hat{e}_{j},a_2,\ldots,a_n)$

Continuing this substitution for each $a_i$ we get, for 1 ≤ i ≤ n

$D(A) = \sum_{1\le k_i\le n} A(1,k_{1})A(2,k_{2})\dots A(n,k_{n}) D(\hat{e}_{k_{1}},\dots,\hat{e}_{k_{n}})$

where, since in our case $1 \le i \le n$

$\sum_{1\le k_i \le n} = \sum_{1\le k_1 \le n} \ldots \sum_{1\le k_i \le n} \ldots \sum_{1\le k_n \le n} \,$

as a series of nested summations.

Therefore, D(A) is uniquely determined by how $D$ operates on $\hat{e}_{k_{1}},\dots,\hat{e}_{k_{n}}$ .

Example

In the case of 2×2 matrices we get

$D(A) = A_{1,1}A_{2,1}D(\hat{e}_1,\hat{e}_1) %2B A_{1,1}A_{2,2}D(\hat{e}_1,\hat{e}_2) %2B A_{1,2}A_{2,1}D(\hat{e}_2,\hat{e}_1) %2B A_{1,2}A_{2,2}D(\hat{e}_2,\hat{e}_2) \,$

Where $\hat{e}_1 = [1,0]$ and $\hat{e}_2 = [0,1]$ . If we restrict D to be an alternating function then $D(\hat{e}_1,\hat{e}_1) = D(\hat{e}_2,\hat{e}_2) = 0$ and $D(\hat{e}_2,\hat{e}_1) = -D(\hat{e}_1,\hat{e}_2) = -D(I)$ . Letting $D(I) = 1$ we get the determinant function on 2×2 matrices: