Sievert

The sievert (symbol: Sv) is the International System of Units (SI) SI derived unit of dose equivalent radiation. It attempts to quantitatively evaluate the biological effects of ionizing radiation as opposed to just the absorbed dose of radiation energy, which is measured in gray. It is named after Rolf Maximilian Sievert, a Swedish medical physicist renowned for work on radiation dosage measurement and research into the biological effects of radiation.

Contents

Definition

The unit gray measures the absorbed dose of radiation (D), absorbed by any material. The unit sievert measures the equivalent dose of radiation (H), having the same damaging effect as an equal dose of gamma rays.

Both the gray, with symbol Gy and the sievert, with symbol Sv are SI derived units, defined as a unit of energy (joule) per unit of mass (kilogram):

1 Gy = 1 Sv = 1 J / kg

This SI unit is named after Rolf Maximilian Sievert. As with every SI unit whose name is derived from the proper name of a person, the first letter of its symbol is upper case (Sv). When an SI unit is spelled out in English, it should always begin with a lower case letter (sievert), except where any word would be capitalized, such as at the beginning of a sentence or in capitalized material such as a title. Note that "degree Celsius" conforms to this rule because the "d" is lowercase. —Based on The International System of Units, section 5.2.

Dose equivalent

The equivalent dose to a tissue is found by multiplying the absorbed dose, in gray, by a weighting factor (WR). The relation between absorbed dose D and equivalent dose H is thus:

H = W_R \cdot D.

The weighting factor (sometimes referred to as a quality factor) is determined by the radiation type and energy range.[1]

H_T = \sum_R W_R \cdot D_{T,R}\ ,

where

HT is the equivalent dose absorbed by tissue T
DT,R is the absorbed dose in tissue T by radiation type R
WR is the weighting factor defined by the following table
Radiation type and energy WR
electrons, muons, photons (all energies)
1
protons and charged pions
2
alpha particles, fission fragments, heavy ions
20
neutrons
(function of linear energy transfer L in keV/μm)
L < 10
1
10 ≤ L ≤ 100 0.32·L − 2.2
L > 100 300 / sqrt(L)

Thus for example, an absorbed dose of 1 Gy by alpha particles will lead to an equivalent dose of 20 Sv. The maximum weight of 30 is obtained for neutrons with L = 100 keV/μm.

Effective dose

The effective dose of radiation (E), absorbed by a person is obtained by averaging over all irradiated tissues with weighting factors adding up to 1:[1][2]

E = \sum_T W_T \cdot H_T = \sum_T W_T \sum_R W_R \cdot D_{T,R}.
Tissue type WT
(each)
WT
(group)
Bone marrow, colon, lung, stomach, breast, remaining tissues
0.12
0.72
Gonads
0.08
0.08
Bladder, oesophagus, liver, thyroid
0.04
0.16
Bone surface, brain, salivary glands, skin
0.01
0.04
total
1.00

For other organisms, weighting factors have been defined, relative to the effect on humans:

Organism relative weight
Viruses, bacteria, protozoans 0.03 – 0.0003
Insects 0.1 – 0.002
Molluscs 0.06 – 0.006
Plants 2 – 0.02
Fish 0.75 – 0.03
Amphibians 0.4 – 0.14
Reptiles 1 – 0.075
Birds 0.6 – 0.15

SI multiples and conversions

Frequently used SI multiples are the millisievert (1 mSv = 0.001 Sv) and microsievert (1 μSv = 0.000001 Sv).

An older unit for the equivalent dose, is the rem,[3] still often used in the United States. One sievert is equal to 100 rem:

The conventional units for its time derivative is mSv/h.

Symptom benchmarks

See also Radiation poisoning.

Dose examples

Single dose examples

Hourly dose examples

Yearly dose examples

Dose limit examples

History

Historically, the weighting factors for radiation type and tissue type were separated out as Q and N respectively. In 2002, the CIPM decided that the distinction between Q and N caused too much confusion and therefore deleted the factor N from the definition of absorbed dose in the SI brochure.[24]

The older version of the definitions contained Q and N factors, corresponding to the current WR and WT, with values:

Radiation type and energy Q
electrons, positrons, muons, or photons (gamma, X-ray)
1
neutrons <10 keV
5
neutrons 10–100 keV
10
neutrons 100 keV – 2 MeV
20
neutrons 2 MeV – 20 MeV
10
neutrons >20 MeV
5
protons other than recoil protons and energy >2 MeV
2
alpha particles, fission fragments, nonrelativistic heavy nuclei
20
Tissue type N
(each)
N
(group)
bone surface, skin
0.01
0.02
bladder, breast, liver, esophagus, thyroid, other
0.05
0.30
bone marrow, colon, lung, stomach
0.12
0.48
gonads
0.20
0.20
total
1.00

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b "The 2007 Recommendations". International Commission on Radiological Protection. http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP_Publication_103-Annals_of_the_ICRP_37(2-4)-Free_extract.pdf. Retrieved 2011-04-15. 
  2. ^ A D Wrixon. "New ICRP recommendations". Journal on Radiological Protection. http://iopscience.iop.org/0952-4746/28/2/R02/pdf/0952-4746_28_2_R02.pdf. Retrieved 2011-04-15. 
  3. ^ Office of Air and Radiation; Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (May 2007). "Radiation: Risks and Realities" (PDF). Radiation: Risks and Realities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. p. 2. http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/docs/402-k-07-006.pdf. Retrieved 19 March 2011. 
  4. ^ Brenner, David J.; Hall, Eric J. (2007). "Computed Tomography — an Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure". New England Journal of Medicine 357 (22): 2277–84. doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149. PMID 18046031. 
  5. ^ a b c "What Happened and What Didn't in the TMI-2 Accident". American Nuclear Society. http://www.ans.org/pi/resources/sptopics/tmi/whathappened.html. Retrieved 2011-03-16. 
  6. ^ a b "Radiation Benefit of Digital Mammogram Not Clear". Breastcancer.org. http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/testing/new_research/20100121b.jsp. 
  7. ^ a b Van Unnik, JG; Broerse, JJ; Geleijns, J; Jansen, JT; Zoetelief, J; Zweers, D (1997). "Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals". The British journal of radiology 70 (832): 367–71. PMID 9166072. 
  8. ^ a b c d e f "Radiation Risks and Realities". EPA. http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/docs/402-k-07-006.pdf. 
  9. ^ a b International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection - ICRP Publication 60. p. 52. 
  10. ^ a b c d e "Everyday exposures to radiation". PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/interact/facts.html. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f "Radiation fears after Japan blast". BBC. 18 April 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12722435. 
  12. ^ http://microsievert.net/
  13. ^ State of the reactor, Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, Mar 15, 2011 (Tuesday) - 03 July 2011 (Sun), atmc.jp/plant.
  14. ^ http://www.stuk.fi/sateilyvaara/en_GB/esim_annos/
  15. ^ http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-02/radiation-levels-spike-at-fukushima-nuclear-power/2820930?section=world
  16. ^ http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/record-high-radiation-at-japan-nuke-plant/story-e6frf7jx-1226106280508
  17. ^ "Radiation and Safety". International Atomic Energy Agency. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Radiation/radsafe.html. Retrieved 2011-03-27. 
  18. ^ a b Radiation at FUSRAP Sites
  19. ^ "Radiation Exposure: The Facts vs. Fiction". University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics. http://www.uihealthcare.org/adamXml.aspx?product=HIE%20Multimedia&type=1&content=000026. 
  20. ^ "Fact Sheet on Biological Effects of Radiation". United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/bio-effects-radiation.html. 
  21. ^ http://www.ors.od.nih.gov/sr/drs/training/GRS/Pages/sectionf.aspx
  22. ^ a b Nuclear Radiation and Health Effects, June 2010, World nuclear Association.
  23. ^ Bradsher, Keith; Tabuchi, Hiroko (15 March 2011). "Last Defense at Troubled Reactors: 50 Japanese Workers". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/asia/16workers.html. 
  24. ^ CIPM, 2002: Recommendation 2 : Dose Equivalent, Bureau Internatioual de Poids et Measures (MIPM).

References