In programming languages, name binding is the association of objects (data and/or code) with identifiers.[1] An identifier bound to an object is said to reference that object. Machine languages have no built-in notion of identifiers, but name-object bindings as a service and notation for the programmer is implemented by programming languages. Binding is intimately connected with scoping, as scope determines which names bind to which objects - at which locations in the program code (lexically) and in which one of the possible execution paths (temporally).
Use of an identifier id
in a context that establishes a binding for id
is called a binding (or defining) occurrence. In all other occurrences (e.g., in expressions, assignments, and subprogram calls), an identifier stands for what it is bound to; such occurrences are called applied occurrences.
Contents |
The binding of names before the program is run is called static (also "early"); bindings performed as the program runs are dynamic (also "late" or "virtual").
An example of a static binding is a direct C function call: the function referenced by the identifier cannot change at runtime.
But an example of dynamic binding is dynamic dispatch, as in a C++ virtual method call. Since the specific type of a polymorphic object is not known before runtime (in general), the executed function is dynamically bound. Take, for example, the following Java code:
public void foo(List<String> list) { list.add("bar"); }
Is list
a reference to a LinkedList
, an ArrayList
, or some other subtype of List
? The actual method referenced by add
is not known until runtime. In a language like C, the actual function is known.
Rebinding should not be confused with mutation — "rebinding" is a change to the referencing identifier; "mutation" is a change to the referenced value. Consider the following Java code:
LinkedList<String> list; list = new LinkedList<String>(); list.add("foo"); list = null;
The identifier list
initially references nothing (it is uninitialized); it is then rebound to reference an object (a linked list of strings). The linked list referenced by list
is then mutated, adding a string to the list. Lastly, list
is rebound to null
.
Late static binding is a variant of binding somewhere between static and dynamic binding. Consider the following PHP example:
class A { static $word = "hello"; static function hello() {print self::$word;} } class B extends A { static $word = "bye"; } B::hello();
In this example, the PHP interpreter binds the function hello() to class A, and so the call to B::hello() produces the string "hello". If the semantics of "self::$word" had been based on "late static binding", then the result would have been "bye".
Beginning with PHP version 5.3, late static binding is supported [1]. Specifically, if "self::$word" in the above were changed to "static::$word" as shown in the following block, then the result of the call to B::hello() would be "bye":
class A { static $word = "hello"; static function hello() {print static::$word;} } class B extends A { static $word = "bye"; } B::hello();