Inequalities are very important in the study of information theory. There are a number of different contexts in which these inequalities appear.
Contents |
Consider a finite collection of finitely (or at most countably) supported random variables on the same probability space. For a collection of n random variables, there are 2n − 1 such non-empty subsets for which entropies can be defined. For example, when n = 2, we may consider the entropies and and express the following inequalities (which together characterize the range of the marginal and joint entropies of two random variables):
In fact, these can all be expressed as special cases of a single inequality involving the conditional mutual information, namely
where , , and each denote the joint distribution of some arbitrary (possibly empty) subset of our collection of random variables. Inequalities that can be derived from this are known as Shannon-type inequalities. More formally, (following the notation of Yeung), define to be the set of all constructible points in where a point is said to be constructible if and only if there is a joint, discrete distribution of n random variables such that each coordinate of that point, indexed by a non-empty subset of {1, 2, ..., n}, is equal to the joint entropy of the corresponding subset of the n random variables. The closure of is denoted
The cone in characterized by all Shannon-type inequalities among n random variables is denoted Software has been developed to automate the task of proving such inequalities.[1][2] Given an inequality, such software is able to determine whether the given inequality contains the cone in which case the inequality can be verified, since
Other, less trivial inequalities have been discovered among the entropies and joint entropies of four or more random variables, which cannot be derived from Shannon's basic inequalities.[3][4] These are known as non-Shannon-type inequalities.
It was shown that
where the inclusions are proper for All three of these sets are, in fact, convex cones.
A great many important inequalities in information theory are actually lower bounds for the Kullback–Leibler divergence. Even the Shannon-type inequalities can be considered part of this category, since the bivariate mutual information can be expressed as the Kullback–Leibler divergence of the joint distribution with respect to the product of the marginals, and thus these inequalities can be seen as a special case of Gibbs' inequality.
On the other hand, it seems to be much more difficult to derive useful upper bounds for the Kullback–Leibler divergence. This is because the Kullback–Leibler divergence DKL(P||Q) depends very sensitively on events that are very rare in the reference distribution Q. DKL(P||Q) increases without bound as an event of finite non-zero probability in the distribution P becomes exceedingly rare in the reference distribution Q, and in fact DKL(P||Q) is not even defined if an event of non-zero probability in P has zero probability in Q. (Hence the requirement that P be absolutely continuous with respect to Q.)
This fundamental inequality states that the Kullback–Leibler divergence is non-negative.
Another inequality concerning the Kullback–Leibler divergence is known as Kullback's inequality.[5] If P and Q are probability distributions on the real line with P absolutely continuous with respect to Q, and whose first moments exist, then
where is the large deviations rate function, i.e. the convex conjugate of the cumulant-generating function, of Q, and is the first moment of P.
The Cramér–Rao bound is a corollary of this result.
Pinsker's inequality relates Kullback–Leibler divergence and total variation distance. It states that if P, Q are two probability distributions, then
where
is the Kullback–Leibler divergence in nats and
is the total variation distance.
In 1957,[6] Hirschman showed that for a (reasonably well-behaved) function such that and its Fourier transform the sum of the differential entropies of and is non-negative, i.e.
Hirschman conjectured, and it was later proved,[7] that a sharper bound of which is attained in the case of a Gaussian distribution, could replace the right-hand side of this inequality. This is especially significant since it implies, and is stronger than, Weyl's formulation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
Given discrete random variables , , and , such that takes values only in the interval [−1, 1] and is determined by (so that ), we have[8][9]
relating the conditional expectation to the conditional mutual information. This is a simple consequence of Pinsker's inequality. (Note: the correction factor log 2 inside the radical arises because we are measuring the conditional mutual information in bits rather than nats.)