ISO 9000

The ISO 9000 family of standards relates to quality management systems and is designed to help organizations ensure they meet the needs of customers and other stakeholders (Poksinska et al, 2002 [1] ). The standards are published by ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, and available through National standards bodies. ISO 9000 deals with the fundamentals of quality management systems [2] ), including the eight management principles (Beattie and Sohal, 1999;[3] Tsim et al, 2002 [2]) on which the family of standards is based. ISO 9001 deals with the requirements that organizations wishing to meet the standard have to fulfill.

Third party certification bodies provide independent confirmation that organizations meet the requirements of ISO 9001. Over a million organizations worldwide [4] are independently certified, making ISO 9001 one of the most widely used management tools in the world today. Despite widespread use, however, the ISO certification process has been criticized[5][6] as being wasteful and not being useful for all organizations.[7][8][9]

Contents

Reasons for use

The ISO family of standards is the only international standard that addresses systemic change. The global adoption of ISO 9001 may be attributable to a number of factors. A number of major purchasers require their suppliers to hold ISO 9001 certification. In addition to several stakeholders’ benefits, a number of studies have identified significant financial benefits for organizations certified to ISO 9001, with a 2011 survey from the British Assessment Bureau showing 44% of their certified clients had won new business.[10] Corbett et al (2005) [11] showed that certified organizations achieved superior return on assets [12] compared to otherwise similar organizations without certification. Heras et al (2002) [13] found similarly superior performance [14] and demonstrated that this was statistically significant and not a function of organization size. Naveh and Marcus (2007) [15] showed that implementing ISO 9001 led to superior operational performance.[16] Sharma (2005) [17] identified similar improvements in operating performance and linked this to superior financial performance. Chow-Chua et al (2002) [18] showed better overall financial performance was achieved for companies in Denmark. Rajan and Tamimi (2003) [19] showed that ISO 9001 certification resulted in superior stock market performance [20] and suggested that shareholders were richly rewarded [21] for the investment in an ISO 9001 system.

While the connection between superior financial performance and ISO 9001 may be seen from the examples cited, there remains no proof of direct causation, though longitudinal studies, such as those of Corbett et al (2005) [11] may suggest it. Other writers, such as Heras et al (2002), [13] have suggested that while there is some evidence of this, the improvement is partly driven by the fact that there is a tendency for better performing companies to seek ISO 9001 certification.

The mechanism for improving results has also been the subject of much research. Lo et al (2007) [22] identified operational improvements (cycle time reduction, inventory reductions, etc.) as following from certification. Buttle (1997) [23] and Santos (2002) [24] both indicated internal process improvements in organizations leading to externally observable improvements. Hendricks and Singhal (2001) [25] results indicate that firms outperform their control group during the post-implementation period and effective implementation of total quality management principles and philosophies leads to significant wealth creation. The benefit of increased international trade and domestic market share, in addition to the internal benefits such as customer satisfaction, interdepartmental communications, work processes, and customer/supplier partnerships derived, far exceeds any and all initial investment, according to Alcorn.[26]

Background

ISO 9000 was first published in 1987.[27] It was based on the BS 5750 series of standards from BSI[28] that were proposed to ISO in 1979. However, its history can be traced back some twenty years before that, to the publication of the Department of Defense MIL-Q-9858 standard in 1959. MIL-Q-9858 was revised into the NATO AQAP series of standards in 1969, which in turn were revised into the BS 5179 series of guidance standards published in 1974, and finally revised into the BS 5750 series of requirements standards in 1979 before being submitted to ISO.

BSI has been certifying organizations for their quality management systems since 1978. Its first certification [29] (FM 00001) is still extant and held by Tarmac, a successor to the original company which held this certificate. Today BSI claims to certify organizations at nearly 70,000 sites globally.[30] The development of the ISO 9000 series is shown in the diagram to the right.

Global adoption

The growth in ISO 9001 certification is shown in the table below. The worldwide total of ISO 9001 certificates can be found in the ISO Survey of 9001 in 2003, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Worldwide total of ISO 9001:2000/2008 certificates
Dec 2000 Dec 2001 Dec 2002 Dec 2003 Dec 2004 Dec 2005 Dec 2006 Dec 2007 Dec 2008 Dec 2009
457,834 510,349 561,767 497,919 660,132 773,867 896,929 951,486 982,832 1,064,785

Source: ISO Survey 2009

In recent years there has been a rapid growth in China, which now accounts for approximately a quarter of the global certifications.

Top 10 countries for ISO 9001 certificates - 2009
Rank Country No. of certificates
1 China 257,076
2 Italy 130,066
3 Japan 68,484
4 Spain 59,576
5 Russian Federation 53,152
6 Germany 47,156
7 United Kingdom 41,193
8 India 37,493
9 USA 28,935
10 Korea, Republic of 23,400

Source: ISO Survey 2009

Contents of ISO 9001

ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems — Requirements is a document of approximately 30 pages which is available from the national standards organization in each country. It is supplemented by two other standards, ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary and ISO 9004:2009 Managing for the sustained success of an organization — A quality management approach, which do not contain specific requirements and are not used directly in certification. Outline contents for ISO 9001 are as follows:

In effect, users need to address all sections 1 to 8, but only 4 to 8 need implementing within a QMS.

The standard specifies six compulsory documents:

In addition to these, ISO 9001:2008 requires a quality policy and Quality Manual (which may or may not include the above documents).

Summary of ISO 9001:2008 in informal language

Certification

ISO does not itself certify organizations. Many countries have formed accreditation bodies to authorize certification bodies, which audit organizations applying for ISO 9001 compliance certification. Although commonly referred to as ISO 9000:2000 certification, the actual standard to which an organization's quality management can be certified is ISO 9001:2008. Both the accreditation bodies and the certification bodies charge fees for their services. The various accreditation bodies have mutual agreements with each other to ensure that certificates issued by one of the Accredited Certification Bodies (CB) are accepted worldwide.

The applying organization is assessed based on an extensive sample of its sites, functions, products, services, and processes. A list of problems ("action requests" or "non-compliance") is first made known to management. If there are no major problems on this list, or after it receives a satisfactory improvement plan from the management showing how any problems will be resolved, the certification body will issue an ISO 9001 certificate. The certificate is limited by a certain scope (e.g. production of golf balls) and names the locations covered.

An ISO certificate is not a once-and-for-all award, but must be renewed at regular intervals recommended by the certification body, usually around three years. There are no grades of competence within ISO 9001: either a company is certified (meaning that it is committed to the method and model of quality management described in the standard) or it is not. In this respect, ISO certification contrasts with measurement-based quality systems such as the Capability Maturity Model.

Evolution of ISO 9000 standards

1987 version

ISO 9000:1987 had the same structure as the UK Standard BS 5750, with three 'models' for quality management systems, the selection of which was based on the scope of activities of the organization:

ISO 9000:1987 was also influenced by existing U.S. and other Defense Standards ("MIL SPECS"), and so was well-suited to manufacturing. The emphasis tended to be placed on conformance with procedures rather than the overall process of management, which was likely the actual intent.

1994 version

ISO 9000:1994 emphasized quality assurance via preventive actions, instead of just checking final product, and continued to require evidence of compliance with documented procedures. As with the first edition, the down-side was that companies tended to implement its requirements by creating shelf-loads of procedure manuals, and becoming burdened with an ISO bureaucracy. In some companies, adapting and improving processes could actually be impeded by the quality system.

2000 version

ISO 9001:2000 combined the three standards—9001, 9002, and 9003—into one, called 9001. Design and development procedures were required only if a company does in fact engage in the creation of new products. The 2000 version sought to make a radical change in thinking by actually placing the concept of process management front and center ("Process management" was the monitoring and optimisation of a company's tasks and activities, instead of just inspection of the final product). The 2000 version also demanded involvement by upper executives in order to integrate quality into the business system and avoid delegation of quality functions to junior administrators. Another goal was to improve effectiveness via process performance metrics: numerical measurement of the effectiveness of tasks and activities. Expectations of continual process improvement and tracking customer satisfaction were made explicit.

The ISO 9000 standard is continually being revised by standing technical committees and advisory groups, who receive feedback from those professionals who are implementing the standard.[1]

ISO 9001:2008 only introduced clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 and some changes intended to improve consistency with ISO 14001:2004. There were no new requirements. For example, in ISO 9001:2008, a quality management system being upgraded just needs to be checked to see if it is following the clarifications introduced in the amended version.

Auditing

Two types of auditing are required to become registered to the standard: auditing by an external certification body (external audit) and audits by internal staff trained for this process (internal audits). The aim is a continual process of review and assessment to verify that the system is working as it is supposed to; to find out where it can improve; and to correct or prevent problems identified. It is considered healthier for internal auditors to audit outside their usual management line, so as to bring a degree of independence to their judgments.

Under the 1994 standard, the auditing process could be adequately addressed by performing "compliance auditing":

The 2000 standard uses a different approach. Auditors are expected to go beyond mere auditing for rote compliance by focusing on risk, status, and importance. This means they are expected to make more judgments on what is effective, rather than merely adhering to what is formally prescribed. The difference from the previous standard can be explained thus:

Under the 1994 version, the question was broad: "Are you doing what the manual says you should be doing?", whereas under the 2000 version, the questions are more specific: "Will this process help you achieve your stated objectives? Is it a good process or is there a way to do it better?"

Industry-specific interpretations

The ISO 9001 standard is generalized and abstract; its parts must be carefully interpreted to make sense within a particular organization. Developing software is not like making cheese or offering counseling services, yet the ISO 9001 guidelines, because they are business management guidelines, can be applied to each of these. Diverse organizations—police departments (US), professional soccer teams (Mexico) and city councils (UK)—have successfully implemented ISO 9001:2000 systems.

Over time, various industry sectors have wanted to standardize their interpretations of the guidelines within their own marketplace. This is partly to ensure that their versions of ISO 9000 have their specific requirements, but also to try and ensure that more appropriately trained and experienced auditors are sent to assess them.

Effectiveness

The debate on the effectiveness of ISO 9000 commonly centers on the following questions:

  1. Are the quality principles in ISO 9001:2000 of value? (Note that the version date is important; in the 2000 version ISO attempted to address many concerns and criticisms of ISO 9000:1994).
  2. Does it help to implement an ISO 9001:2000-compliant quality management system?
  3. Does it help to obtain ISO 9001:2000 certification?

Effectiveness of the ISO system being implemented depends on a number of factors, the most significant of which are:

  1. Commitment of senior management to monitor, control, and improve quality. Organizations that implement an ISO system without this desire and commitment often take the cheapest road to get a certificate on the wall and ignore problem areas uncovered in the audits.
  2. How well the ISO system integrates into current business practices. Many organizations that implement ISO try to make their system fit into a cookie-cutter quality manual instead of creating a manual that documents existing practices and only adds new processes to meet the ISO standard when necessary.
  3. How well the ISO system focuses on improving the customer experience. The broadest definition of quality is "Whatever the customer perceives good quality to be." This means that a company doesn't necessarily have to make a product that never fails; some customers will have a higher tolerance for product failures if they always receive shipments on-time or have a positive experience in some other dimension of customer service. An ISO system should take into account all areas of the customer experience and the industry expectations, and seek to improve them on a continual basis. This means taking into account all processes that deal with the three stakeholders (customers, suppliers, and organization); only then will a company be able to sustain improvements in the customer's experience.
  4. How well the auditor finds and communicates areas of improvement. While ISO auditors may not provide consulting to the clients they audit, there is the potential for auditors to point out areas of improvement. Many auditors simply rely on submitting reports that indicate compliance or non-compliance with the appropriate section of the standard; however, to most executives, this is like speaking a foreign language. Auditors that can clearly identify and communicate areas of improvement in language and terms executive management understands facilitate action on improvement initiatives by the companies they audit. When management doesn't understand why they were non-compliant and the business implications associated with non-compliance, they simply ignore the reports and focus on what they do understand.

Advantages

It is widely acknowledged that proper quality management improves business, often having a positive effect on investment, market share, sales growth, sales margins, competitive advantage, and avoidance of litigation. The quality principles in ISO 9000:2000 are also sound, according to Wade and also to Barnes, who says that "ISO 9000 guidelines provide a comprehensive model for quality management systems that can make any company competitive." Implementing ISO often gives the following advantages:

  1. Creates a more efficient, effective operation
  2. Increases customer satisfaction and retention
  3. Reduces audits
  4. Enhances marketing
  5. Improves employee motivation, awareness, and morale
  6. Promotes international trade
  7. Increases profit
  8. Reduces waste and increases productivity.
  9. common tool for standardization.

Problems

A common criticism of ISO 9001 is the amount of money, time, and paperwork required for registration.[5] According to Barnes, "Opponents claim that it is only for documentation. Proponents believe that if a company has documented its quality systems, then most of the paperwork has already been completed."[31] Wilson suggests that ISO standards "... elevate inspection of the correct procedures over broader aspects of quality," and therefore, "the workplace becomes oppressive and quality is not improved."[6]

According to Seddon, ISO 9001 promotes specification, control, and procedures rather than understanding and improvement.[7] Wade argues that ISO 9000 is effective as a guideline, but that promoting it as a standard "helps to mislead companies into thinking that certification means better quality, ... [undermining] the need for an organization to set its own quality standards." [32] Paraphrased, Wade's argument is that reliance on the specifications of ISO 9001 does not guarantee a successful quality system.

While internationally recognized, most consumers are not aware of ISO 9000 and it holds no relevance to them. The added cost to certify and then maintain certification may not be justified if product end users do not require ISO 9000. The cost can actually put a company at a competitive disadvantage when competing against a non-ISO 9000-certified company.

The standard is seen as especially prone to failure when a company is interested in certification before quality.[7] Certifications are in fact often based on customer contractual requirements rather than a desire to actually improve quality.[31][33] "If you just want the certificate on the wall, chances are you will create a paper system that doesn't have much to do with the way you actually run your business," said ISO's Roger Frost.[33] Certification by an independent auditor is often seen as the problem area, and according to Barnes, "has become a vehicle to increase consulting services." [31] In fact, ISO itself advises that ISO 9001 can be implemented without certification, simply for the quality benefits that can be achieved.[34]

Another problem reported is the competition among the numerous certifying bodies, leading to a softer approach to the defects noticed in the operation of the Quality System of a firm.

Abrahamson[35] argues that fashionable management discourse such as Quality Circles tends to follow a lifecycle in the form of a bell curve, possibly indicating a management fad.

See also

References

  1. ^ Poksinska, B.; Dahlgaard, J.J.; Antoni, M. (2002), "The state of ISO 9000 certification: A study of Swedish organisations", The TQM Magazine 14 (5), http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=842040&show=abstract, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  2. ^ a b Tsim, Y.C.; Yeung, V. W. S.; Leung, E. T. C. (2002), "An adaptation to ISO 9001: 2000 for certified organisations", Managerial Auditing Journal 17 (5), http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=868561&show=abstract, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  3. ^ Beattie, K.R.; Sohal, A.S. (1999), "Implementing ISO 9000: A study of its benefits among Australian organizations", Total Quality Management 10 (1): 95–106, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a713600335, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  4. ^ ISO Press Release, 25 October 2010.
  5. ^ a b "So many standards to follow, so little payoff". Stephanie Clifford. Inc Magazine, May 2005.
  6. ^ a b Ian Wilson, Is ISO the way to go? Some say, Not So, June 04, 2010, (accessed 30 Sept 2011)
  7. ^ a b c "The 'quality' you can't feel", John Seddon, The Observer, Sunday November 19, 2000.
  8. ^ "A Brief History of ISO 9000: Where did we go wrong?" (accessed 30 Sept 2011). John Seddon. Chapter one of "The Case Against ISO 9000", 2nd ed., Oak Tree Press. November 2000. ISBN 1-86076-173-9.
  9. ^ Patrick D. T. O'Connor, ISO 9000: Help or Hoax (accessed Sept. 30, 2011)
  10. ^ ISO 9001 proven to help win new business.
  11. ^ a b Corbett, C.J.; Montes-sancho, M.J.; Kirsch, D.A. (2005), "The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis", Management Science 51 (7): 1046–1059, http://personal.anderson.ucla.edu/charles.corbett/papers/does_iso_9000_pay.pdf, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  12. ^ Interstate ISO 9000 Case Study.
  13. ^ a b Heras, I.; Dick, G.P. M.; Casadesus, M. (2002), "ISO 9000 registration's impact on sales and profitability - A longitudinal analysis of performance before and after accreditation", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19 (6): 774–791, http://eps.udg.es/oe/webmarti/p774.pdf, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  14. ^ Hardies ISO 9000 Case Study
  15. ^ Naveh, E.; Marcus, A. (2007), "Financial performance, ISO 9000 standard and safe driving practices effects on accident rate in the U.S. motor carrier industry", Accident Analysis & Prevention 39 (4): 731–742, PMID 17166474 
  16. ^ DFDS Transport ISO 9000 Case Study
  17. ^ Sharma, D.S. (2005), "The association between ISO 9000 certification and financial performance", The international Journal of Accounting 40: 151–172, http://masp.bus.ku.ac.th/files/ISO%209000%20and%20performamce.pdf, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  18. ^ Chow-chua, C.; Goh, M.; Wan, T.B. (2002), "Does ISO 9000 certification improve business performance?", The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 (8): 936–953, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=840633&show=abstract, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  19. ^ Rajan, M.; Tamimi, N. (2003), "Payoff to ISO 9000 registration", Journal of Investing 12 (1), http://www.iijournals.com/doi/abs/10.3905/joi.2003.319536, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  20. ^ Accenture ISO 9000 Case Study
  21. ^ British Gas ISO 9000 Case Study
  22. ^ Lo, Chris K.Y.; Yeung, Andy C.L.; Cheng, T.C. Edwin (2007), "Impact of ISO 9000 on time-based performance: An event study", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 30 (7): 35–40, http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v30/v30-7.pdf, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  23. ^ Buttle, F. (1997), "ISO 9000: marketing motivations and benefits", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 14 (9): 936–947, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1502750&show=abstract, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  24. ^ Santos, L. (2002), "Benefits of the ISO 9000:1994 system: Some consideration to reinforce competitive advantage", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 19 (3): 321–344, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=840553&show=abstract, retrieved 2010-11-22 
  25. ^ Hendreicks, K.B.; Singhal, V.R. (2001), "The long-run stock price performance of firms with effective TQM programs", Management Science 47 (3): 359–368, JSTOR 2661504 
  26. ^ Alcorn, J. E. (1995), "Benefits of ISO 9000 Certification", Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings 16 (2): 15–18, http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=WCA103967WC&q=Benefits+of+ISO+9000+Certification&uid=788436682&setcookie=yes, retrieved 2010-11-18 
  27. ^ History of the BSI Group
  28. ^ Fast Facts About BSI Group
  29. ^ Tarmac Certificate of Registration
  30. ^ More About BSI Group.
  31. ^ a b c "Good Business Sense Is the Key to Confronting ISO 9000" Frank Barnes in Review of Business, Spring 2000.
  32. ^ "Is ISO 9000 really a standard?" Jim Wade, ISO Management Systems – May–June 2002.
  33. ^ a b "ISO a GO-Go." Mark Henricks. Entrepreneur Magazine Dec 2001.
  34. ^ The ISO Survey – 2005 (abridged version, PDF, 3 MB), ISO, 2005.
  35. ^ Abrahamson, E. (1996). "Managerial fashion." Academy of Management Review. 21(1):254-285.

Further reading

See also

International Organization for Standardization

External links