| God: The Failed Hypothesis | |
|---|---|
| Author(s) | Victor J. Stenger |
| Cover artist | PhotoDisc, Inc. |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Genre(s) | Science |
| Publisher | Prometheus Books |
| Publication date | 2007 |
| Media type | Print (Hardcover) |
| Pages | 294 pp |
| ISBN | 1591024811 |
| OCLC Number | 72988016 |
| Dewey Decimal | 212/.1 22 |
| LC Classification | BL240.3 .S738 2007 |
| Preceded by | The Comprehensible Cosmos: Where Do The Laws Of Physics Come From? |
God: The Failed Hypothesis is a 2007 New York Times bestseller by scientist Victor J. Stenger who argues that there is no evidence for the existence of a deity and that God's existence, while not impossible, is improbable.
David Ludden of Skeptic magazine wrote that "Stenger lays out the evidence from cosmology, particle physics and quantum mechanics showing that the universe appears exactly as it should if there is no creator."[1] Ludden concluded "All freethinkers should have both volumes [The God Delusion], side by side, on their bookshelves."
Damien Broderick wrote in The Australian, "Stenger offers an answer to that deep question in his two new books, arguing a materialist, God-free account of the cosmos, equally antagonistic to superstition, the paranormal and religions archetypal and newfangled alike. He refuses to accept the polite accommodation urged by agnostic Stephen Jay Gould that science and religion can never be in conflict as they are non-overlapping 'magisteria'."[2]
Stenger says that, when Gould said religion was outside the reach of science, he was reducing religion to moral philosophy. In contrast, Stenger believes that religion often makes claims that are very much within the abilities of science to investigate. In that vein, he says that science practices methodological naturalism, although it does not rule out the supernatural (i.e. metaphysical naturalism or physicalism), science does restrict itself to testing that which can actually be tested - namely effects in the natural world (be their cause natural or supernatural).[3]
Stenger believes we have more than enough evidence of absence of the Judeo-Christan God. He adds that many arguments for God that were once compelling are now weak or irrelevant in light of modern scientific understanding. Stenger does not think we should be dogmatic about disbelief in God, but says the evidence is overwhelmingly against the belief. He is also critical of Fine tuning arguments, and says they misunderstand the more reasonable weak anthropic principle.[3]