Fraud

In criminal law, a fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and also a civil law violation. Defrauding people or entities of money or valuables is a common purpose of fraud, but there have also been fraudulent "discoveries", e.g., in science, to gain prestige rather than immediate monetary gain.

A hoax also involves deception, but without the intention of gain or of damaging or depriving the victim.

Contents

Cost of fraud

The typical organization loses five percent of its annual revenue to fraud, with a median loss of $160,000. Frauds committed by owners and executives were more than nine times as costly as employee fraud. The industries most commonly affected are banking, manufacturing, and government.[1]

Types of fraudulent acts

Fraud can be committed through many media, including mail, wire, phone, and the Internet (computer crime and Internet fraud). The international dimensions of the web and ease with which users can hide their location, the difficulty of checking identity and legitimacy online, and the simplicity with which hackers can divert browsers to dishonest sites and steal credit card details have all contributed to the very rapid growth of Internet fraud.

Types of criminal fraud include:

United Kingdom

England and Wales and Northern Ireland

The offence of fraud is created by the Fraud Act 2006.

The government's 2006 Fraud Review concluded that fraud is a significantly under-reported crime, and while various agencies and organisations were attempting to tackle the issue, greater co-operation was needed to achieve a real impact in the public sector. The scale of the problem pointed to the need for a small but high-powered body to bring together the numerous counter-fraud initiatives that existed. The National Fraud Authority was established as a result of this recommendation.

Serious Fraud Office

See Serious Fraud Office (United Kingdom) is an arm of the Government of the United Kingdom, accountable to the Attorney-General.

National Fraud Authority

The National Fraud Authority (NFA) is the government agency co-ordinating the counter-fraud response in the UK.

CIFAS - The UK's Fraud Prevention Service

CIFAS - The UK's Fraud Prevention Service, is a not-for-profit membership association representing the private and public sectors. CIFAS is dedicated to the prevention of fraud, including staff fraud, and the identification of financial and related crime.

United States

Common law fraud has nine elements:[3][4]

  1. a representation of an existing fact;
  2. its materiality;
  3. its falsity;
  4. the speaker's knowledge of its falsity;
  5. the speaker's intent that it shall be acted upon by the plaintiff;
  6. plaintiff's ignorance of its falsity;
  7. plaintiff's reliance on the truth of the representation;
  8. plaintiff's right to rely upon it; and
  9. consequent damages suffered by plaintiff.

Most jurisdictions in the United States require that each element be pled with particularity and be proved with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence (very probable evidence) to establish a claim of fraud. The measure of damages in fraud cases is to be computed by the "benefit of bargain" rule, which is the difference between the value of the property had it been as represented, and its actual value. Special damages may be allowed if shown proximately caused by defendant's fraud and the damage amounts are proved with specificity.

Notable fraudsters

Related

Apart from fraud, there are several related categories of intentional deceptions that may or may not include the elements of personal gain or damage to another individual:

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 2010. p. 4. http://www.acfe.com/rttn/2010-highlights.asp. 
  2. ^ Tax Fraud and the Problem of a Constitutionality Acceptable Definition of Religion. BJ Casino – American Criminal Law. Rev., 1987
  3. ^ Morlan v. Kelly, No. 2009-UP-002, SC Supreme Court, 2009
  4. ^ Schnellmann v. Roettger, 373 S.C. 379, 382, 645 S.E.2d 239, 241 (2007)
  5. ^ "Largest Health Care Fraud Case in U.S. History Settled; HCA Investigation Nets Record Total of $1.7 Billion" (Press release), U.S. Department of Justice, June 26, 2003, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm, retrieved April 11, 2011 
  6. ^ Farberfinancial.com
  7. ^ Kokenes, Chris (March 19, 2009), "N.Y. lawyer arraigned in alleged $700M fraud", CNNMoney.com, retrieved April 10, 2011
  8. ^ Lugli, Massimo (March 15, 2002), "'Dominio di Melchizedek' Stato Fantasma Sull" ("'Dominion of Melchizedek' Ghost State"), La Republica, Rome Section: p. 5, "una trappola di lusso per le vittime di una delle piu diaboliche truffe internazionali mai escogitate negli ultimo anni" ("a trap of luxury for the victims of one of the most diabolical international scams ever devised in recent years")
  9. ^ Knight, James (February 17, 2000), "Cyber Nations with Real Repercussions", Asia Times Online
  10. ^ Lozano, Juan A. (17 October 2006). "Judge vacates conviction of Ken Lay". CBS News. Associated Press. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/17/ap/business/mainD8KQMS5O0.shtml. 
  11. ^ Nicole Muehlhausen, BIO: Tom Petters, KSTP.com, September 24, 2008. Retrieved October 8, 2008.
  12. ^ Tom Petters Resigns As Petters Group CEO, WCCO.com, September 29, 2008. Retrieved October 8, 2008.
  13. ^ Hughes, Art (December 2, 2009). "UPDATE 2-Tom Petters found guilty of Ponzi scheme fraud". Reuters (Thomson Reuters). http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN024978920091202. Retrieved December 10, 2009. 
  14. ^ CBC.ca
  15. ^ Wikidfranchise.org

References

External links