Translational frameshift

Translational frameshifting or ribosomal frameshifting refers to an alternate process of protein translation. A protein is translated from one end of the mRNA to the other, from the 5' to the 3' end. Normally a protein is translated from a template mRNA with consecutive blocks of 3 nucleotides being read as single amino acids. However, certain organisms may exhibit a change or shift in the ribosomes frame by one or two nucleotides when translating the genetic code. This is deemed translational or ribosomal frameshifting[1]. The process can be programmed by the nucleotide sequence of the mRNA and is sometimes affected by the secondary or tertiary mRNA structure. It has been described mainly in viruses (especially retroviruses), retrotransposons and bacterial insertion elements, and also in some cellular genes.

Contents

Process overview

Proteins are translated unidirectionally by reading tri-nucleotides on the mRNA strand also known as codons. Therefore, a shift of any number of nucleotides that is not divisible by 3 in the reading frame will result in subsequent codons to be read differently[2]. This effectively changes the ribosomal reading frame. For example, the following sentence when read from the beginning makes sense to a reader:

|Start|THE CAT AND THE MAN ARE FAT ...
|Start|123 123 123 123 123 123 123 ...

However, changing the reading frame by say shifting the first reading up one letter between the T and H on the first word:

T|Start|HEC ATA NDT HEM ANA REF AT...
-|Start|123 123 123 123 123 123 12...

Now the sentence makes absolutely no sense. In the case of a translating ribosome, a frameshift can result in nonsense being created after the frameshift or a completely different protein being created after the frameshift. When referring to translational frameshifting, the latter is always inferred, the former being a usual unfortunate result of a point mutation such as a deletion.

Controlling mechanisms

The main differences between a frameshift as a result of mutation and a frameshift as a result of ribosomal frameshifting is that there are a few mechanisms used to control the latter. All are based on the fact that ribosomes do not translate proteins at a steady rate regardless of the sequence. There are certain codons that take longer to translate because there are not equal amounts of tRNA of that particular codon in the cytosol[3]. Hence there exists sequences known as choke points (small sections of harder to find codons, resulting in a slowed ribosome translation) and slippery sequences (small sections of very easily accessible codons, resulting in a quick ribosome translation) that control the rate of ribosomal frameshifting. Slippery sequences can potentially make the reading ribosome "slip" and skip a number of nucleotides (usually only 1) and read a completely different frame thereafter. Choke points reduce the probability of this happening[4].

Examples

This type of frameshifting may be programmed to occur at particular recoding sites and is important in some viruses (e.g. SARS, HIV[5]) and some cellular genes (e.g. prfB a release factor). Its use is primarily for compacting more genetic information into a shorter amount of genetic material.

Frameshift elements
Type Distribution Ref.
ALIL pseudoknot Bacteria [6]
Antizyme RNA frameshifting stimulation element Invertebrates [7]
Coronavirus frameshifting stimulation element Coronavirus [8]
DnaX ribosomal frameshifting element Eukaryota, Bacteria
HIV Ribosomal frameshift signal Viruses
Insertion sequence IS1222 ribosomal frameshifting element Eukaryota, Bacteria
Ribosomal frameshift Viruses

See also

References

  1. ^ Léger M, Dulude D, Steinberg SV, Brakier-Gingras L. "The three transfer RNAs occupying the A, P and E sites on the ribosome are involved in viral programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift." Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):5581-92. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
  2. ^ Ivanov IP, Atkins JF. "Ribosomal frameshifting in decoding antizyme mRNAs from yeast and protists to humans: close to 300 cases reveal remarkable diversity despite underlying conservation." Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(6):1842-58. Epub 2007 Mar 1. Review.
  3. ^ de Crécy-Lagard V. "Identification of genes encoding tRNA modification enzymes by comparative genomics." Methods Enzymol. 2007;425:153-83. Review.
  4. ^ Green L, Kim CH, Bustamante C, Tinoco I Jr. "Characterization of the Mechanical Unfolding of RNA Pseudoknots." J Mol Biol. 26 May 2007
  5. ^ McNaughton BR, Gareiss PC, Miller BL. "Identification of a selective small-molecule ligand for HIV-1 frameshift-inducing stem-loop RNA from an 11,325 member resin bound dynamic combinatorial library." J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Sep 19;129(37):11306-7. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
  6. ^ Mazauric, H.; Licznar, P.; Prère, F.; Canal, I.; Fayet, O. (Jul 2008). "Apical Loop-Internal Loop RNA Pseudoknots: A NEW TYPE OF STIMULATOR OF-1 TRANSLATIONAL FRAMESHIFTING IN BACTERIA" (Free full text). Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 (29): 20421–20432. doi:10.1074/jbc.M802829200. ISSN 0021-9258. PMID 18474594. http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18474594.  edit
  7. ^ Ivanov IP, Anderson CB, Gesteland RF, Atkins JF (2004). "Identification of a new antizyme mRNA +1 frameshifting stimulatory pseudoknot in a subset of diverse invertebrates and its apparent absence in intermediate species.". J Mol Biol 339 (3): 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.082. PMID 15147837. 
  8. ^ Baranov, PV; Henderson CM, Anderson CB, Gesteland RF, Atkins JF, Howard MT (2005). "Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in decoding the SARS-CoV genome". Virology 332 (2): 498–510. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2004.11.038. PMID 15680415. 

External links