Fee (feudal tenure)

For other uses see Fee (disambiguation)

A fee (alternatively and rarely: fief, fiefdom,[1] Latinised to feudum) was the central element of feudalism and consisted of heritable lands (or revenue-producing property) granted under one of several varieties of feudal tenure by an overlord to a vassal who held it in fealty (or "in fee") in return for a form of feudal allegiance and service, usually given by the personal ceremonies of homage and fealty. A list of several hundred such fees held in chief between 1198 and 1292, their holders' names and form of tenure was published in 3 volumes between 1920-31, known as "The Book of Fees", and is a re-edition of a mediaeval precursor known as the Testa de Nevill, produced in 1302. Not only land but anything of value could be held in fee, such as an office, a right of exploitation (e.g., hunting, fishing) or any other type of right to receive revenue such as a fee farm, rather than the land it comes from.

In the 10th and 11th centuries the term "fee" (feudum) could be used either to describe dependent tenure held by a man from his lord, as the term is used now by historians, or it could mean simply "property". It lacked a precise meaning until the middle of the 12th century, when it received formal definition from land lawyers.

Historically the fees of the 11th and the 12th century derived from two separate sources. The first was land carved out of the estates of the upper nobility. The second source was allodial land transformed into dependent tenures. During the 10th century in northern France and the 11th century in France south of the Loire, local magnates either recruited or forced the owners of allodial holdings into dependent relationships and they were turned into fiefs. The process occurred later in Germany, and was still going on in the 13th century.

In 13th-century England, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy the term "feodum" was used to describe a dependent tenure held from a lord by a vassal in return for a specified amount of knight service and occasional financial payments (feudal incidents).

However, knight service in war was far less common than:

A lord in late 12th-century England and France could also claim the right of:

Originally, vassalage did not imply the giving or receiving of landholdings (which were granted only as a reward for loyalty), but by the eighth century the giving of a landholding was becoming standard. The granting of a landholding to a vassal did not relinquish the lord's property rights, but only the use of the lands and their income; the granting lord retained ultimate ownership of the fee and could, technically, recover the lands in case of disloyalty or death.[3]

By the middle of the 10th century, fee had largely become hereditary.[4] The eldest son of a deceased vassal would inherit, but first he had to do homage and fealty to the lord and pay a "relief" for the land (a monetary recognition of the lord's continuing proprietary rights over the property). Henry II transformed them into important sources of royal income and patronage. The discontent of barons with royal claims to arbitrarily assessed "reliefs" and other feudal payments under Henry's son King John resulted in Magna Carta of 1215.

Eventually, great feudal lords sought also to seize governmental and legal authority (the collection of taxes, the right of high justice, etc.) in their lands, and some passed these rights to their own vassals.[4]

In northern France in the 12th and 13th centuries military service for fiefs was limited for offensive campaigns to 40 days for a knight. By the 12th century English and French kings and barons began to commute military service for cash payments (scutages), with which they could purchase the service of mercenaries.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The term "fee" is that invariably used in modern & victorian academic literature on the history of the feudal era, i.e. "Book of Fees" etc.; "fief", whilst etymologically correct and useful for demonstrating the etymology, is largely restricted in use to popular and often uninformed speech
  2. ^ Richard Abels "Feudalism"
  3. ^ Cantor, 198-9.
  4. ^ a b Cantor, 200.
  5. ^ Richard Abels "Feudalism"

References