Fabry–Pérot interferometer

In optics, a Fabry–Pérot interferometer or etalon is typically made of a transparent plate with two reflecting surfaces, or two parallel highly reflecting mirrors. (Technically the former is an etalon and the latter is an interferometer, but the terminology is often used inconsistently.) Its transmission spectrum as a function of wavelength exhibits peaks of large transmission corresponding to resonances of the etalon. It is named after Charles Fabry and Alfred Perot.[1] "Etalon" is from the French étalon, meaning "measuring gauge" or "standard".[2]

The resonance effect of the Fabry–Pérot interferometer is identical to that used in a dichroic filter. That is, dichroic filters are very thin sequential arrays of Fabry–Pérot interferometers, and are therefore characterised and designed using the same mathematics.

Etalons are widely used in telecommunications, lasers and spectroscopy to control and measure the wavelengths of light. Recent advances in fabrication technique allow the creation of very precise tunable Fabry–Pérot interferometers.

Contents

Theory

The varying transmission function of an etalon is caused by interference between the multiple reflections of light between the two reflecting surfaces. Constructive interference occurs if the transmitted beams are in phase, and this corresponds to a high-transmission peak of the etalon. If the transmitted beams are out-of-phase, destructive interference occurs and this corresponds to a transmission minimum. Whether the multiply reflected beams are in phase or not depends on the wavelength (λ) of the light (in vacuum), the angle the light travels through the etalon (θ), the thickness of the etalon () and the refractive index of the material between the reflecting surfaces (n).

The phase difference between each succeeding reflection is given by δ:[3]

\delta = \left( \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda} \right) 2 n \ell \cos\theta.

If both surfaces have a reflectance R, the transmittance function of the etalon is given by

T_e = \frac{(1-R)^2}{1%2BR^2-2R\cos\delta}=\frac{1}{1%2BF\sin^2(\delta/2)},

where

 F = \frac{4R}{{(1-R)^2}}

is the coefficient of finesse.

Maximum transmission (T_e=1) occurs when the optical path length difference (2 n l \cos\theta) between each transmitted beam is an integer multiple of the wavelength. In the absence of absorption, the reflectance of the etalon Re is the complement of the transmittance, such that T_e%2BR_e=1. The maximum reflectivity is given by:

R_\max = 1-\frac{1}{1%2BF}= \frac {4R}{(1%2BR)^2}

and this occurs when the path-length difference is equal to half an odd multiple of the wavelength.

The wavelength separation between adjacent transmission peaks is called the free spectral range (FSR) of the etalon, Δλ, and is given by:

\Delta\lambda = \frac{ \lambda_0^2}{2n\ell \cos\theta %2B \lambda_0 } \approx \frac{ \lambda_0^2}{2n\ell \cos\theta }

where λ0 is the central wavelength of the nearest transmission peak. The FSR is related to the full-width half-maximum, δλ, of any one transmission band by a quantity known as the finesse:

 \mathcal{F} = \frac{\Delta\lambda}{\delta\lambda}=\frac{\pi}{2 \arcsin(1/\sqrt F)}.

This is commonly approximated (for R > 0.5) by

 \mathcal{F} \approx \frac{\pi \sqrt{F}}{2}=\frac{\pi R^{1/2} }{1-R}

Etalons with high finesse show sharper transmission peaks with lower minimum transmission coefficients. In the oblique incidence case, the finesse will depend on the polarization state of the beam, since the value of "R", given by the Fresnel equations, is generally different for p and s polarizations.

A Fabry–Pérot interferometer differs from a Fabry–Pérot etalon in the fact that the distance between the plates can be tuned in order to change the wavelengths at which transmission peaks occur in the interferometer. Due to the angle dependence of the transmission, the peaks can also be shifted by rotating the etalon with respect to the beam.

Fabry–Pérot interferometers or etalons are used in optical modems, spectroscopy, lasers, and astronomy.

A related device is the Gires–Tournois etalon.

Detailed analysis

Two beams are shown in the diagram at the right, one of which (T0) is transmitted through the etalon, and the other of which (T1) is reflected twice before being transmitted. At each reflection, the amplitude is reduced by \sqrt R and the phase is shifted by \pi, while at each transmission through an interface the amplitude is reduced by \sqrt T. Assuming no absorption, conservation of energy requires T + R = 1. In the derivation below, n is the index of refraction inside the etalon, and n0 is that outside the etalon. The incident amplitude at point a is taken to be one, and phasors are used to represent the amplitude of the radiation. The transmitted amplitude at point b will then be

t_0 = T\,e^{ik\ell/\cos\theta},

where k=2\pi n/\lambda is the wavenumber inside the etalon and λ is the vacuum wavelength. At point c the transmitted amplitude will be

TR\,e^{2\pi i %2B 3ik\ell/\cos\theta}.

The total amplitude of both beams will be the sum of the amplitudes of the two beams measured along a line perpendicular to the direction of the beam. The amplitude at point b can therefore be added to an amplitude t1 equal in magnitude to the amplitude at point c, but retarded in phase by an amount k0 ℓ0 where k_0=2\pi n_0/\lambda is the wavenumber outside of the etalon. Thus

t_1 = RT\,e^{2\pi i%2B3ik\ell/\cos\theta-ik_0 \ell_0},

where ℓ0 is

\ell_0=2\ell\tan\theta\sin\theta_0\,.

Neglecting the 2\pi phase change due to the two reflections, the phase difference between the two beams is

\delta={2k\ell\over\cos\theta} - k_0 \ell_0\,.

The relationship between θ and θ0 is given by Snell's law:

n\sin\theta=n_0\sin\theta_0\,,

so that the phase difference may be written:

\delta=2k\ell\,\cos\theta\,.

To within a constant multiplicative phase factor, the amplitude of the mth transmitted beam can be written as:

t_m=TR^m e^{im\delta}\,.

The total transmitted amplitude is the sum of all individual beams' amplitudes:

t=\sum_{m=0}^\infty t_m=T\sum_{m=0}^\infty R^m\,e^{im\delta}

The series is a geometric series whose sum can be expressed analytically. The amplitude can be rewritten as

t=\frac{T}{1-Re^{i\delta}}.

The intensity of the beam will be just t times its complex conjugate. Since the incident beam was assumed to have an intensity of one, this will also give the transmission function:

T_e=tt^*=\frac{T^2}{1%2BR^2-2R\cos\delta}

Another expression for the transmission function

Defining \gamma=\ln(1/R) the above expression may be written as:

T_e=\frac{T^2}{1-R^2}\left(\frac{\sinh\gamma}{\cosh\gamma-\cos\delta}\right)

The second term is proportional to a wrapped Lorentzian distribution so that the transmission function may be written as a series of Lorentzian functions:

T_e=\frac{2\pi\,T^2}{1-R^2}\,\sum_{\ell=-\infty}^\infty L(\delta-2\pi\ell;\gamma)

where

L(x;\gamma) = \frac{\gamma}{\pi(x^2%2B\gamma^2)}

Applications

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Perot frequently spelled his name with an accent—Pérot—in scientific publications, and so the name of the interferometer is commonly written with the accent. Métivier, Françoise (September–October 2006). "Jean-Baptiste Alfred Perot" (in French) (pdf). Photoniques (no. 25). http://www.sabix.org/documents/perot.pdf. Retrieved 2007-10-02.  Page 2: "Pérot ou Perot?"
  2. ^ Oxford English Dictionary
  3. ^ Lipson, S.G.; Lipson, H.; Tannhauser, D.S. (1995). Optical Physics (3rd ed.). London: Cambridge U.P.. pp. 248. ISBN 0521069262. 

External links