In measure theory, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem provides sufficient conditions under which two limit processes commute, namely Lebesgue integration and almost everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions. The dominated convergence theorem does not hold for the Riemann integral because the limit of a sequence of Riemann-integrable functions is in many cases not Riemann-integrable. Its power and utility are two of the primary theoretical advantages of Lebesgue integration over Riemann integration.
It is widely used in probability theory, since it gives a sufficient condition for the convergence of expected values of random variables.
Contents |
Let {ƒn} denote a sequence of real-valued measurable functions on a measure space (S, Σ, μ). Assume that the sequence converges pointwise to a function ƒ and is dominated by some integrable function g in the sense that
for all numbers n in the index set of the sequence and all points x in S. Then the limiting function ƒ is integrable and
(By integrable we mean
Remarks:
Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem is a special case of the Fatou–Lebesgue theorem. Below is a direct proof, using Fatou’s lemma as the essential tool.
As the pointwise limit of the sequence, ƒ is also measurable and dominated by g, hence integrable. Furthermore,
for all n and
By the reverse Fatou lemma,
Using linearity and monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral,
and the theorem follows.
If the assumptions hold only μ-almost everywhere, then there exists a μ-null set N ∈ Σ such that the functions ƒn1N satisfy the assumptions everywhere on S. Then ƒ(x) is the pointwise limit of ƒn(x) for x ∈ S \ N and ƒ(x) = 0 for x ∈ N, hence ƒ is measurable. The values of the integrals are not influenced by this μ-null set N.
The assumption that the sequence is dominated by some integrable g can not be dispensed with. This may be seen as follows: define ƒn(x) = n for x in the interval (0, 1/n] and ƒn(x) = 0 otherwise. Any g which dominates the sequence must also dominate the pointwise supremum h = supn ƒn. Observe that
by the divergence of the harmonic series. Hence, the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral tells us that there exists no integrable function which dominates the sequence on [0,1]. A direct calculation shows that integration and pointwise limit do not commute for this sequence:
because the pointwise limit of the sequence is the zero function. Note that the sequence {ƒn} is not even uniformly integrable, hence also the Vitali convergence theorem is not applicable.
One corollary to the dominated convergence theorem is the bounded convergence theorem, which states that if ƒ1, ƒ2, ƒ3, … is a sequence of uniformly bounded real-valued measurable functions which converges pointwise on a bounded measure space (S, Σ, μ) (i.e. one in which μ(S) is finite) to a function ƒ, then the limit ƒ is an integrable function and
Remark: The pointwise convergence and uniform boundedness of the sequence can be relaxed to hold only μ-almost everywhere, provided the measure space (S, Σ, μ) is complete or ƒ is chosen as a measurable function which agrees μ-almost everywhere with the μ-almost everywhere existing pointwise limit.
Since the sequence is uniformly bounded, there is a real number M such that |ƒn(x)| ≤ M for all x ∈ S and for all n. Define g(x) = M for all x ∈ S. Then the sequence is dominated by g. Furthermore, g is integrable since it is a constant function on a set of finite measure. Therefore the result follows from the dominated convergence theorem.
If the assumptions hold only μ-almost everywhere, then there exists a μ-null set N ∈ Σ such that the functions ƒn1N satisfy the assumptions everywhere on S.
The dominated convergence theorem applies also to measurable functions with values in a Banach space, with the dominating function still being non-negative and integrable as above.