Clifford Geertz

Clifford Geertz
Born August 23, 1926(1926-08-23)
San Francisco
Died October 30, 2006(2006-10-30) (aged 80)
Philadelphia
Nationality American
Fields Anthropology
Institutions Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey
Doctoral students James Siegel, James Boon, Lawrence Rosen, Abdellah Hammoudi

Clifford James Geertz (August 23, 1926, San Francisco – October 30, 2006, Philadelphia) was an American anthropologist who is remembered mostly for his strong support for and influence on the practice of symbolic anthropology, and who was considered "for three decades...the single most influential cultural anthropologist in the United States."[1] He served until his death as professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.

Contents

Life

Clifford James Geertz was born in San Francisco, California on August 23, 1926. After service in the U.S. Navy in World War II (1943–45), Geertz received his B.A. in philosophy from Antioch College in 1950, and his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1956, where he studied social anthropology in the Department of Social Relations. He taught or held fellowships at a number of schools before joining the anthropology staff of the University of Chicago (1960–70). He then became professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton from 1970 to 2000, then emeritus professor. Geertz received Honorary Doctorate Degrees from some fifteen colleges and universities, including Harvard University, the University of Chicago and the University of Cambridge. He was married first to the anthropologist Hildred Geertz. After their divorce he married Karen Blu, also an anthropologist. Clifford Geertz died of complications following heart surgery on October 30, 2006.[2]

Geertzian theory

At the University of Chicago, Geertz became a champion of symbolic anthropology, a framework which gives prime attention to the role of symbols in constructing public meaning. In his seminal work The Interpretation of Cultures (1973), Geertz outlined culture as "a system of inherited conceptions expressed in symbolic forms by means of which men communicate, perpetuate, and develop their knowledge about and attitudes toward life" (1973:89).

Geertz believed the role of anthropologists was to try to interpret the guiding symbols of each culture. He was considered quite innovative in this regard, as he was one of the earliest scholars to see that the insights provided by common language, philosophy and literary analysis could have major explanatory force in the social sciences.

His oft-cited essay "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight" is the classic example of thick description. Thick description is anthropological practice of explaining with as much detail as possible the reason behind human actions. For example one could say a man winked. However, this would not explain why he winked: was he flirting, did he have something in his eye, was he trying to communicate irony in what he had just said...these are the questions an anthropologist must answer.[3]

During Geertz's long career, he worked through a variety of theoretical phases and schools of thought. In 1957, Geertz wrote that "The drive to make sense out of experience, to give it form and order, is evidently as real and pressing as the more familiar biological needs...", a statement which reflects an early leaning toward functionalism. Accordingly, in his early career Geertz considered anthropology a kind of science. This is in contrast to Geertz's later enthusiasm for an interpretive approach. In his later work, Geertz spoke particularly of the difficulties that ethnographic research has in getting at an adequate description of objective reality. Geertz attributed this to the fact that people tell ethnographers what they believe to be their own motivations, but those people's actions then often seem to contradict their statements to the researcher. Geertz believed this effect occurred partly due to the problems that people have in verbalizing aspects of their life that they usually take for granted, partly due to how ethnographers structure their research approaches and frameworks, and partly due to the inherent complexity of the social order.

Family resemblances and consociates

Geertz imported the concept of '"family resemblances"...into anthropology from the post-analytic philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, just as he also introduced Alfred Schutz's...distinctions among predecessors, consociates, contemporaries and successors, distinctions that have become commonplace in anthropology'[4] in his wake. Geertz stressed how the links between 'consociate-contemporary-predecessor-successor...[derive from] the umwelt-mitwelt-vorwelt-vogelwelt formulation'[5] of Schutz's phenomenology.

Fieldwork

Geertz conducted extensive ethnographical research in Southeast Asia and North Africa. He also contributed to social and cultural theory and is still very influential in turning anthropology toward a concern with the frames of meaning within which various peoples live out their lives. He worked on religion, most particularly Islam, on bazaar trade, on economic development, on traditional political structures, and on village and family life. At the time of his death he was working on the general question of ethnic diversity and its implications in the modern world.

Legacy

Geertz's ideas had a strong influence on 20th century academia. Aside from his influence on anthropology, Geertz' landmark contributions to social and cultural theory were also influential for geographers, ecologists, political scientists, humanists, and historians.[6] University of Miami Professor Daniel Pals wrote of Geertz in 1996, "His critics are few; his admirers legion."[7]

Interlocutors

Major publications

Chronologial list of works by Clifford Geertz

The four studies included in the book are:

  • "The World in a Text: How to Read Tristes Tropiques" (pp. 25–48).
  • "Slide Show: Evans-Pritchard's African Transparencies" (pp. 49–72).
  • "I-Witnessing: Malinowski's Children" (pp. 73–101).
  • "Us/not-Us: Benedict's Travels" (pp. 102–128).

Honors

See also

Notes

  1. ^ C. Geertz, R. A. Shweder, and B. Good, Clifford Geertz by his Colleagues (Chicago 2005) p. 1
  2. ^ http://www.indiana.edu/~wanthro/theory_pages/Geertz.htm
  3. ^ Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. pp. 6. 
  4. ^ Geertz, Shweder, Good, (2005) p. 68
  5. ^ Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Culture (London 1993) p. 367n
  6. ^ "Clifford Geertz 1926 - 2006". Princeton, New Jersey: Institute for Advanced Study Press. 2006. http://www.ias.edu/news/press-releases/geertz-1926-2006. 
  7. ^ Frankenberry, Nancy K.; Hans H. Penner (1999). Clifford Geertz's Long-Lasting Moods, Motivations, and Metaphysical Conceptions. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-13-158591-6. JSTOR 1206117. 
  8. ^ Association for Asian Studies (AAS), 1987 Award for Distinguished Contributions to Asian Studies; retrieved 2011-05-31

References

External links