Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage

Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is a greenhouse gas mitigation technology which produces negative carbon emissions by combining biomass use with geologic carbon capture and storage.[1] BECCS extracts CO2 from the atmosphere and store it into trees and crops as they grow. CO2 is then released when they are combusted or decompose. Therefore, biogenic CO2 does not contribute to the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.[2] It was pointed out in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as a key technology for reaching low carbon dioxide atmospheric concentration targets.[3] The negative emissions that can be produced by BECCS has been estimated by the Royal Society to be equivalent to a 50 to 150 ppm decrease in global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations[4] and according to the International Energy Agency, the BLUE map climate change mitigation scenario calls for more than 2 gigatonnes of negative CO2 emissions per year with BECCS in 2050.[5]

The concept of BECCS is drawn from the integration of biomass processing industries or biomass fuelled power plants with carbon capture and storage. BECCS is a form of carbon dioxide removal, along with technologies such as biochar, carbon dioxide air capture and biomass burial.[6]

Contents

Negative emission

The main appeal of BECCS is in its ability to result in negative emissions of CO2. The capture of carbon dioxide from bioenergy sources effectively removes CO2 from the atmosphere.[7]

Bio-energy is derived from biomass which is a renewable energy source and serves as a carbon sink during its growth. During industrial processes, the biomass combusted or processed re-releases the CO2 into the atmosphere. The process thus results in a net zero emission of CO2, though this may be positively or negatively altered depending on the carbon emissions associated with biomass growth, transport and processing , see below under environmental considerations.[8] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology serves to intercept the release of CO2 into the atmosphere and redirect it into geological storage locations.[9] CO2 with a biomass origin is not only released from biomass fuelled power plants, but also during the production of pulp used to make paper and in the production of biofuels such as biogas and bioethanol. The BECCS technology can also be employed on such industrial processes.[10]

It is argued that through the BECCS technology, carbon dioxide is trapped in geologic formations for very long periods of time, whereas for example a tree only stores its carbon during its lifetime. In its report on the CCS technology, IPCC projects that more than 99% of carbon dioxide which is stored through geologic sequestration is likely to stay in place for more than 1000 years. While other types of carbon sinks such as the ocean, trees and soil may involve the risk of negative feedback loops at increased temperatures, BECCS technology is likely to provide a better permanence by storing CO2 in geological formations.[2][11]

The amount of CO2 that has been released to date is believed to be too much to be able to be absorbed by conventional sinks such as trees and soil in order to reach low emission targets.[12] In addition to the presently accumulated emissions, there will be significant additional emissions during this century, even in the most ambitious low-emission scenarios. BECCS has therefore been suggested as a technology to reverse the emission trend and create a global system of net negative emissions.[1][3][12][13][14] This implies that the emissions would not only be zero, but negative, so that not only the emissions, but the absolute amount of CO2 in the atmosphere would be reduced.

Application

Source CO2 Source Sector
Electrical power plants Combustion of biomass or biofuel in steam or gas powered generators releases CO2 as a by-product Energy
Heat power plants Combustion of biofuel for heat generation releases CO2 as a by-product. Usually used for district heating Energy
Pulp and paper mills Industry
Ethanol production Fermentation of biomass such as sugarcane, wheat or corn releases CO2 as a by-product Industry
Biogas production In the biogas upgrading process, CO2 is separated from the methane to produce a higher quality gas Industry

Technology

The main technology for CO2 capture from biotic sources generally employs the same technology as carbon dioxide capture from conventional fossil fuel sources. Broadly, three different types of technologies exist: post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion.[16]

Policy

Based on the current Kyoto Protocol agreement, carbon capture and storage projects are not applicable as an emission reduction tool to be used for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) or for Joint Implementation (JI) projects.[17] Recognising CCS technologies as an emission reduction tool is vital for the implementation of such plants as there is no other financial motivation for the implementation of such systems. There has been growing support to have fossil CCS and BECCS included in the protocol. Accounting studies on how this can be implemented, including BECCS, have also been done.[18]

Environmental considerations

Some of the environmental considerations and other concerns about the widespread implementation of BECCS are similar to those of CCS. However, much of the critique towards CCS is that it may strengthen the dependency on depletable fossil fuels and environmentally invasive coal mining. This is not the case with BECCS, as it relies on renewable biomass. There are however other considerations which involve BECCS and these concerns are related to the possible increased use of biofuels.

Biomass production is subject to a range of sustainability constraints, such as: scarcity of arable land and fresh water, loss of biodiversity, competition with food production, deforestation and scarcity of phosphorus.[19] It is important to make sure that biomass is used in a way that maximizes both energy and climate benefits. There has been criticism to some suggested BECCS deployment scenarios, where there would be a very heavy reliance on increased biomass input.[20]

These systems may have other negative side effects. There is however presently no need to expand the use of biofuels in energy or industry applications to allow for BECCS deployment. There is already today considerable emissions from point sources of biomass derived CO2, which could be utilized for BECCS. Though, in possible future bio-energy system upscaling scenarios, this may be an important consideration.

The BECCS process allows CO2 to be collected and stored directly from the atmosphere, rather than from a fossil source. This implies that any eventual emissions from storage may be recollected and restored simply by reiterating the BECCS-process. This is not possible with CCS alone, as CO2 emitted to the atmosphere cannot be restored by burning more fossil fuel with CCS.

See also

Energy portal
Sustainable development portal

References

  1. ^ a b Obersteiner, M., Azar, C., Kauppi, P., Möllersten, K., Moreira, J., Nilsson, S., Read, P., Riahi, K., Schlamadinger, B., Yamagata, Y., Yan, J., and van Ypersele, J. P.: (2001)“Managing climate risk”, Science, 294(5543), 786–787.
  2. ^ a b "Global Status of BECCS Projects 2010". Biorecro AB, Global CCS Institute. 2010. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/global-status-beccs-projects-2010/online/27026. Retrieved 2011-12-09. 
  3. ^ a b Fischer, B.S., N. Nakicenovic, K. Alfsen, J. Corfee Morlot, F. de la Chesnaye, J.-Ch. Hourcade, K. Jiang, M. Kainuma, E. La Rovere, A. Matysek, A. Rana, K. Riahi, R. Richels, S. Rose, D. van Vuuren, R. Warren, (2007)“Issues related to mitigation in the long term context”, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. ^ "Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty". The Royal Society. 2009. http://royalsociety.org/Geoengineering-the-climate/. Retrieved 2010-08-22. 
  5. ^ "IEA Technology Roadmap Carbon Capture and Storage 2009". OECD/IEA. 2009. https://www.iea.org/papers/2009/CCS_Roadmap.pdf. Retrieved 2010-10-22. 
  6. ^ Rhodes, S. (2008) (PDF). Biomass with Capture: Negative Emissions Within social and Environmental Constraints. Climatic Change. pp. 321–328. http://people.ucalgary.ca/~keith/papers/95.Rhodes.BiomassWithCaptureEd.e.pdf. Retrieved 2009-09-05. 
  7. ^ Read, Peter; Lermit, Jonathan (2005)."Bio-Energy with Carbon Storage (BECS): a Sequential Decision Approach to the threat of Abrupt Climate Change". Energy (International Energy Workshop) 30 (14): 2654-2671. Retrieved 2009-09-05
  8. ^ Cassman, Kenneth G. (2007)."Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish?" Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 1. Pp 18-23 doi:10.1002/bbb.3
  9. ^ Möllersten, K., Yan, J. and Moreira, J. R.: (2003)“Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage: Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emission.” Biomass and Bionenergy, 25, pp 273-285
  10. ^ Möllersten K., Zuzana, C. and Obersteiner, M.: (2003)“Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills”, Energy, 28, pp 691- 710. doi:10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00002-1
  11. ^ IPCC, (2005)“Chapter 5: Underground geological storage” IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H. C. De Coninck, M. Loos, and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp195-276.
  12. ^ a b Hare, B., and Meinshausen, M.: (2006)“How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided?” Climatic Change, 75, pp 111-149.
  13. ^ a b Azar, C., Lindgren, K., Larson, E.D. and Möllersten, K.: (2006)“Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass – Costs and potential role in stabilising the atmosphere”, Climatic Change, 74, 47-79.
  14. ^ Knopf, Brigitte, et al. D-M2.6:Report on first assessment of low stabilisation scenarios. Project deliverable: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies: Supporting European Climate Policy, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), 2008.
  15. ^ National Research Council (U.S.). Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee (1983) Changing climate: report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee, National Academy Press, pp 186-188
  16. ^ IPCC, (2005)“Chaper 3: Capture of CO2” IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz, B., O. Davidson, H. C. De Coninck, M. Loos, and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 105-178.
  17. ^ Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) from ec.europa.eu
  18. ^ Grönkvist, S., Möllersten, K. and Pingoud, K.: (2006)“Equal opportunity for Biomass in Greenhouse gas accounting for CO2 capture and storage: A step towards more cost-effective climate change mitigation regimes,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 1083-1096.
  19. ^ Ignacy, S.: (2007) “The Biofuels Controversy”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 12
  20. ^ Mongabay: (Nov 2007), “Carbon-negative bioenergy to cut global warming could driver deforestation: An interview on BECS with Biopact’s Laurens Rademakers”, http://news.mongabay.com/2007/1106-carbon-negative_becs.html, Retrieved 2009-09-07.

External links