Observation data Epoch J2000.0 Equinox J2000.0 |
|
---|---|
Constellation | Gemini |
Right ascension | 07h 23m 43.592s |
Declination | +20° 24′ 58.66″ |
Apparent magnitude (V) | 9.93 |
Characteristics | |
Spectral type | K5Ve[1] |
Apparent magnitude (B) | 11.08 |
Apparent magnitude (R) | 9.43 |
Apparent magnitude (I) | 8.9 |
Apparent magnitude (J) | 7.643 |
Apparent magnitude (H) | 7.032 |
Apparent magnitude (K) | 6.879 |
B−V color index | 1.15 |
V−R color index | 0.50 |
R−I color index | 0.5 |
Astrometry | |
Radial velocity (Rv) | +9.3 km/s |
Proper motion (μ) | RA: −65.8 mas/yr Dec.: −228.1 mas/yr |
Distance | 84.76 ly (26[1] pc) |
Absolute magnitude (MV) | 7.86 |
Details | |
Mass | 0.63[2] M☉ |
Radius | 0.71[2] R☉ |
Surface gravity (log g) | 4.53[2] |
Luminosity | 0.17[2] L☉ |
Temperature | 4410[2] K |
Metallicity | 0.30[2] |
Rotation | 3.59 days |
Rotational velocity (v sin i) | 10.03[2] km/s |
Age | 35-80[2][3]million years |
Other designations | |
TYC 1355-214-1, G 88-24, RE J0723+20, UCAC2 38962530, ASCC 766517, LSPM J0723+2024, RE J072339+202438, USNO-B1.0 1104-00142035, BD+20 1790, LTT 12010, 1RXS J072343.6+202500, EUVE J0723+20.4, 2MASS J07234358+2024588, 1SWASP J072343.59+202458.6, GEN# +0.02001790, NLTT 17795, UBV M 998
|
|
Database references | |
SIMBAD | data |
NStED | data |
Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia |
data |
BD+20°1790 is a young late orange dwarf star in the constellation Gemini, located nearly 85 light years away from Sun. The star is young and very active and is a member of the AB Doradus Moving Group.[4] The star has also been studied and monitored by SuperWASP group and found to coincide with the ROSAT source 1RXS J072343.6+202500.[5] The planet candidate was announced in December 2009.[2]
The Keplerian fit of the RV data suggested an orbital solution for a close-in massive planet with an orbital period of 7.7834 days. Moreover the presence of a close-in massive jovian planet could explain the high level of stellar activity detected.[2] However, further study suggests that this planet may not exist because the radial velocity variations are strongly correlated to stellar activity, suggesting this activity is the cause of the variations.[6] This echoes the similar case of the disproven planet detection around TW Hydrae, which was also found to be due to stellar activity rather than orbital motion.[7]