Autoeroticism

Autoeroticism is the practice of becoming sexually stimulated through internal stimuli. The term was popularized toward the end of the 19th century by British sexologist Havelock Ellis, who defined autoeroticism as "the phenomena of spontaneous sexual emotion generated in the absence of an external stimulus proceeding, directly or indirectly, from another [animate entity]."[1] The most common autoerotic practice is masturbation, and though the two terms are often used synonymously, there is an inequality. Not all autoerotic behaviors are masturbatory behaviors. Nocturnal emissions, erotic daydreams, and sexual arousal to 'sexually-neutral' stimuli (music, scenery, art, risk, spiritual reverie, etc.) are examples of autoeroticism.

Contents

Self stimulation

Many people use dildos, vibrators, anal beads, Sybian machines, and other sex toys while alone. Autofellatio, the act of orally stimulating one's own penis, is thought to occur in less than 1% of the male population.[2] It is rare because performing it requires great physical flexibility. Autoerotic behavior is considered to be a normal part of human development, beginning when children or adolescents are able to stimulate themselves sexually. Among the benefits of the act are availability of a sexual partner (oneself), the ability to learn varying degrees of orgasm control, and the fact that it is usually a safe sex practice.

Criticism and controversies

Some people, for religious or personal reasons, believe autoeroticism to be wrong. For example, masturbation is considered wrong by the Roman Catholic Church[3] because it violates the purpose of the "...total meaning of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love." As such, it is viewed as an offense against chastity.

Teaching adolescents about masturbation remains controversial in some parts of the world. For example, in 1994 Bill Clinton fired Joycelyn Elders who was Surgeon General of the United States in part because she advocated teaching masturbation in schools as a way of preventing teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.[4]

Safety issue

A few autoerotic practices are considered unsafe, sometimes even leading to death.[5] These include autoerotic asphyxiation and self-bondage. The potential for injury or even death that exists while engaging in these practices rather than the partnered versions (erotic asphyxiation and bondage, respectively) becomes drastically increased due to the isolation and lack of assistance in the event of a problem.

Autoeroticism in other animal species

Animal sexual behavior has been observed in many species, both in the wild and in captivity. Individuals of some species have been known to create tools for autoerotic purposes.

Variant meaning

The word autoeroticism is occasionally used to refer to sexual feeling occurring without external stimulation.

References

  1. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=DCpokE8C2WgC&pg=PA45
  2. ^ William Guy, Michael H. P. Finn (1954). "A Review of Autofellatio: A Psychological Study of Two New Cases". Psychoanalytic Review (41): 354–358. 
  3. ^ http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM Vatican website:scroll to 2352
  4. ^ Duffy, Michael (19 December 1994). "Getting Out the Wrecking Ball". Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,982008,00.html. Retrieved 2007-07-22. 
  5. ^ © Knowledge Solutions LLC 1996 - 2002 / AN OBJECTIVE OVERVIEW OF AUTOEROTIC FATALITIES by Brent E. Turvey, MS

External links