Archpoet

Archpoet
Born circa 1130
Died circa 1165
Pen name Archipoeta
Language Latin
Genres Courtly poetry
Literary movement Goliard
Notable work(s) "Confession"

The Archpoet (c. 1130–c. 1165),[1] or Archipoeta (in Latin and German),[2] is the name given to a 12th century anonymous author of ten poems from medieval Latin literature, the most famous being his "Confession" found in the Carmina Burana manuscript (under CB 191). Along with Hugh Primas of Orléans (with whom he has sometimes been confused),[nb 1] he is cited as the best exemplar of Goliardic poetry[3] and one of the stellar poets of the Latin Middle Ages.[4]

Knowledge about him comes from his poems in manuscripts:[5] his noble birth[6] in an unspecified Western Europe region,[7][8] his respectable and classical education,[9][10] his association with Archchancellor Rainald of Dassel's court,[11] and his poetic activity linked to it in content and purpose.[4][12] As such, it has been recently speculated that the bibulous, extravagant personality emanating from the poems could be only serving as a façade despite their apparent autobiographical trend.[13]

Contents

Biography

Identity and nickname

His existence has been elaborated upon the authorial superscription "Archipoeta" appearing with the poems now ascribed to him in a small number of manuscripts[5] as well as the consistencies in usage and style among certain of the otherwise anonymous poems in the Carmina Burana collection. While some recent—and so far inconclusive—attempts have been made to identify the Archpoet as either one of two Rodulfuses from the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa's entourage,[14] his real identity has never been found and is most likely lost for good.

It has been suggested by W. H. T. Jackson[15] and others[16] that his nickname could be a play on his patron Rainald of Dassel's title of Archchancellor (Archicancellarius in Latin), even if its exact origins are ultimately left open to speculation.[17] Moreover, it is not known how he came to earn the nickname or who bestowed it to him: whether as a mark of esteem from the audiences, other poets, Rainald himself; as a satirical jest on his patron's title; or as an ironical mock self-attribution. There has been report of at least two other clerics as bearers of the "Archipoeta" pseudonym or title around that time: one Nicolaus in Bonn around 1219, and Henry of Avranches around 1250,[18] yet both clearly distinct from the "Archipoeta" of Barbarossa's reigning period (1155–1190).

Conjectured life

The Archpoet's living circumstances have been surmised from the indicative content of his poems but mostly from the life of Rainald of Dassel.[11] Because he designates Rainald as Archbishop of Cologne,[nb 2] it shows that he must have been alive and active for at least some time between 1159 (when Rainald became archbishop) and 1167 (when he died); furthermore, all of his datable poems fall within 1162 and 1164.[19] With the passing of his patron in 1167, no more is heard from the Archpoet.[20] Also, in poem X, Peter Dronke writes, "he counts himself among the iuvenes: while technically a iuvinis can be any age between twenty-one and fifty, it would seem plausible to imagine the Archpoet as thirty or thirty-five at the time of this composition, and to set his birth not too far from 1130."[21]

Several indications concur as to establish that the Archpoet came from a place north of the Alps,[nb 3] although no solid claim can be made as to which country,[7] even though Germany has repeatedly and traditionally being taken as his birthplace.[8] He refers to himself as "ortus a militibus",[6] of knightly birth, and, coming from such a high class, was most certainly well-educated in the liberal arts,[9] theology[2] and the classics.[10] In poem IV, he states that he chose the pursuit of poetry (as symbolized by the Roman poet Virgil) over a career in the military (as symbolized by the Trojan warrior Paris) like his birth permitted and disposed him to.[22] It has been deduced from the same poem that he first traveled to Salerno in order to pursue medical studies but that due to ill health, he had to abandon this project.[23]

It was probably then that he began working in the court of Rainald of Dassel, the bishop elector of Cologne and Archchancellor to Frederick Barbarossa, Holy Roman Emperor,[23] about which he wrote, according to Ernst Robert Curtius, "[t]he most brilliant stanzas"[24] among the many written about and/or for him during the 35 years of his reign. His references to Salerno, Vienna, and Cologne in his poems, as well as several details gleaned from the Archchancellor's court displacements, suggest that he did travel around northern Italy, Provence, Burgundy, Austria and Germany during his life.[25] It is known that the Archpoet lived for some time—possibly the last years of his life—at the monastery of St. Martin in Cologne.[26] As is the case with many medieval and/or anonymous authors, very little else can be said with certainty about his life.

Modern critical reassessment

While it is still commonly assumed that the Archpoet was a follower of the Goliard tradition—writing student drinking songs, parodies critical of the Church and satires on the life of itinerant clergy in the Middle Ages—, the noted scholar Peter Dronke proposed a very different portrait in his 1968 book The Medieval Lyric:

“ [H]e was in fact a court poet, perhaps also a civil servant or minor diplomat, in the service of the Imperial Chancellor, and so almost certainly a member of the circle around Frederick Barbarossa himself. I am convinced that his leitmotif of the wayward, wretched vagabond-poet who is compelled to beg from his patron and his audience contains far less autobiography than literary craft... The Archpoet's picture of the vagabond-poet (whatever element of literal truth it may have contained) has been drawn for the sophisticated entertainment of that international set of diplomats and legislators, high-born scholars and prelates who surrounded the Emperor, whose lingua franca was Latin, and among whom the Archpoet probably, by his birth and position, moved as an equal.[13] ”

This view of the Archpoet and his milieu, severely contrasting with that of the previous generations of researchers and writers such as J. A. Symonds and Helen Waddell, created a break in modern High Middle Ages scholarship about the Goliards and, in spite of not creating consensus within the academic community, has since been approved and picked up by many scholars.[27] Summarizing Dronke's view by using English writer Geoffrey Chaucer as an example of differentiation between actual (historical) self and poetic (fictional) persona, Jan Ziolkowski wrote that the Archpoet's shenanigans "may be little more than a stance struck by the poet to entertain his audience; the persona could be as far from the reality as that of Chaucer the character was from Chaucer the poet or man."[28] Dronke further argued that the Archpoet could well have been Hugh Primas's student in Orléans, getting acquainted through him with various rare Classical poets and also with his personal style (themes and techniques).[29]

Works

Overview

The Archpoet is known to us today through ten Latin poems or carmina (plural form of carmen, Latin equivalent of "song" or "chant") found in various manuscripts dating back from the 12th and 13th centuries. Listed here are the poems, identified, as is customary, by their incipit:

  • I: "Lingua balbus, hebes ingenio"
  • II: "Fama tuba dante sonum"
  • III: "Omnia tempus habent"
  • IV: "Archicancellarie, vir discrete mentis"
  • V: "Nocte quadam sabbati somno iam refectus"
  • VI: "En habeo versus te precipiente reversus"
  • VII: "Archicancellarie, viris maior ceteris"
  • VIII: "Presul urbis Agripine"
  • IX: "Salve, mundi domine, Cesar noster, ave!"
  • X: "Estuans intrinsecus ira vehementi"[nb 4] ("Confession")

The works of the Archpoet have been found and preserved in the following manuscripts:

The Carmina Burana thus contains the 25-stanza "Estuans intrinsecus" (X) under the reference number CB 191[nb 5] as well as 4 stanzas from "Archicancellarie, vir discrete mentis" (IV) under CB 220,[nb 6] starting with "Sepe de miseria" in the collection.

Presentation

Despite being quite dissimilar from one another in terms of tone and intent, the ten poems are all "occasional"[12] in the sense that they have been written for a specific purpose under precise circumstances, whether to celebrate an event or respond to a request; in the Archpoet's case, concerning the court of his patron: eight of them are directed to Rainald of Dussel, while the two others are addressed to Frederick Barbarossa himself.[4] For example, the fourth poem, "Archicancellarie, vir discrete mentis", was most probably written as a plaintive answer to what he felt was the unreasonable demand from Rainald that he write within one week an epic recounting the Emperor's campaign in Italy.[32]

The Archpoet's poems are known for appearing "intensely personal":[15] he features in almost all of them, and deals in an outspoken manner with intimate subjects such as his material (e.g. poverty, wandering) and spiritual (e.g. distress, anger, love) condition, his flawed and sinful nature, his wishes and aspirations. Many of his poems, whether panegyric or not, amount to very elaborate pleas to obtain food, drink, clothing, and money from his powerful patron.[2] Yet far from falling into mere lyricism or honest confidence, they are often undermined by subtle sarcasm and disguised mockery, fitting with the persona the Archpoet seems to have created for himself as a free-spirited, vagabond hedonist, unrepentant in his propensity to overindulge and unblushing in the judgment of his self-worth.[33] Aside from their recognized technical merits,[34] the poems are imbued with a strong and pervading sense of humor manifested in the consummate use and manipulation of classical and biblical sources for parodic, sarcastic and ironic purposes.[35]

"Confession"

Described as "the prototype of the goliardic songs"[36] as well as "the masterpiece of the [Goliardic] school",[16] the best known poem of the Archpoet is his tenth, "Estuans intrinsecus", commonly called the Goliardic "Confession" (sometimes "Confessio", "Confessio Goliae" or "Confession of Golias"),[37] a metrical composition of ironical tone wherein he confesses his love of women, gambling, and drinking. It is purported to have been written in Pavia around the year 1163 for his patron as a confession and defense of his sins after a rival of the Archpoet witnessed and subsequently reported his reprobate behavior.[38] For example, the oft-cited twelfth stanza[nb 7] goes:

Latin original English literal translation English metrical translation

Meum est propositum in taberna mori,
ut sint vina proxima morientis ori.
tunc cantabunt letius angelorum chori:
"Sit Deus propitius huic potatori."[39]

My purpose is to die in a tavern,
and be wine close to my dying mouth.
Then will sing happily an angels' choir:
"May God be merciful toward this drinker."[nb 8]

I am resolved to die in a tavern,
so wine will be close to my dying mouth.
Will sing gaily the angels' choir then:
"May God be merciful to this drunkard."[nb 8]

The parodic and satirical effect is mainly produced by the replacement of peccatori ("sinner") by potatori ("drunkard"), a reference to the Scripture: "Deus propitius esto mihi peccatori."(Luke 18:13) The poem relies heavily on ambiguity for its overall effect: on one hand, the narrator poses as a penitent dissolute, while on the other he is not being apologetic at all.

The "Confession" was very famous in the Archpoet's time: compared to his other poems, which are mostly found in only one manuscript, "Estuans intrinsecus" has been copied in more than thirty,[12] and it almost single-handedly accounts for his enduring appeal as the writer of one of the most popular medieval Latin poem.[40]

Interpretation and appraisal

In her influential study The Wandering Scholars of the Middle Ages, Helen Waddell laudingly writes of the poem, stating that "Confessio Goliae is something more that the arch-type of a generation of vagabond scholars, or the greatest drinking song in the world: it is the first defiance by the artist of that society which it is his thankless business to amuse: the first cry from the House of the Potter, "Why hast thou made me thus?"."[41]

Reading the medieval "Confession" with the perspective of a modern cultural critic, philosopher Herbert Marcuse wrote of the Archpoet's artistic posture and keen sense of his particular situation: "Archipoeta is perhaps the first artist with the artist's genuine awareness of himself, who comprehended and openly emphasized that his vagabond life and his opposition to the surrounding world were an artistic necessity... The splendid strophes of his vagabond's confession resonate with the elevated consciousness of the authentic lifestyle of the freelance artist".[42]

In popular culture

Notes

  1. ^ Various sources (for example, see Lejay 1913: 33) have erroneously taken "Archipoeta" to be an alias or pen name of Hugh of Orléans while in fact there are numerous indications establishing their being two different individuals. Peter Dronke goes even as far as to call the Archpoet Hugh's "brillante discepolo e successore" (Dronke 2007: 137), brilliant disciple and successor.
  2. ^ Keeping in line with the hypothesis that his nickname or pseudonym was inspired by the titles of his patron, it explains why he is sometimes referred to as the "Archpoet of Cologne"; for example, see Whicher 1949: 102-103 and Curtius 1990: 29.
  3. ^ The main evidence being his using the word "transmontanos" (meaning "which lives or comes from beyond the mountains" in Latin) in line 14 of poem III, when it is made clear that he is writing from within Italy and thus south of the Alps.
  4. ^ "Aestuans intrinsecus" is also found as a variant to "Estuans intrinsecus" since medieval manuscripts do not always use the same spelling for the same texts.
  5. ^ While CB 191 is sometimes presented as having 30 stanzas, the last 5 (often put under CB 191a) are believed not to be the Archpoet's own work. See Wolff 1995: 529.
  6. ^ As with the other poem, CB 220a (or sometimes CB 221) is believed to be another anonymous author's work. See Wolff 1995: 533. Both the Bibliotheca Augustana's and David Stampe's (reproducing Bischoff's) versions display these poems of contested origin as 191a and 220a.
  7. ^ There are numerous and significant variants in the different versions of the Latin text depending on the source manuscripts and the editorial choices of scholars, as is often the case with the bulk of medieval literature. The one chosen here is in no way the sole, authoritative form.
  8. ^ a b Note that both English translations have no official, authoritative sources; they are the free work of anonymous editors, and serve only as illustrations of the Latin original.
  9. ^ The song has been published in the German Allgemeines Deutsches Kommersbuch (152nd edition, 1956, p. 381).

References

  1. ^ Adcock 1994: xix; Waddell 2000: 295.
  2. ^ a b c Jeep 2001: 21.
  3. ^ Whicher 1949: 102; Haskins 1971: 179-181; Adcock 1994: ix; Harrington and Pucci 1997: 566.
  4. ^ a b c Sidwell 2002: 347.
  5. ^ a b Adcock 1994: xxii; Jeep 2001: 21.
  6. ^ a b See poem IV, line 70 (CB 220, line 10).
  7. ^ a b Adcock 1994: xxi-xxii.
  8. ^ a b Harrington and Pucci 1997: 567.
  9. ^ a b Haskins 1971: 181; Harrington and Pucci 1997: 567; Adcock 1994: xix; Emmerson 2006: 44.
  10. ^ a b Adcock 1994: xii.
  11. ^ a b Adcock 1994: xii, xvii.
  12. ^ a b c Jeep 2001: 21; Emmerson 2006: 44.
  13. ^ a b Dronke 1968: 21-22.
  14. ^ Adcock 1994: xx.
  15. ^ a b Jackson 1976: 320.
  16. ^ a b Whicher 1949: 102.
  17. ^ Adcock 1994: xii.
  18. ^ Henshaw 1937: 195.
  19. ^ Adcock 1994: xix.
  20. ^ Jeep 2001: 22.
  21. ^ Adcock 1994: xix. See poem X (CB 191), line 27.
  22. ^ Jeep 2001: 21. See poem IV, lines 69-72 (CB 220, lines 9-12).
  23. ^ a b Haskins 1971: 181; Adcock 1994: xix.
  24. ^ Curtius 1990: 29.
  25. ^ Haskins 1971: 53, 181; Adcock 1994: xix; Jeep 2001: 21; Emmerson 2006: 44.
  26. ^ Waddell 2000: 172; Harrington and Pucci 1997: 567.
  27. ^ See Jackson 1980: 2-3; Adcock 1994: xx; Godwin 2000: 191-192.
  28. ^ Jeep 2001: 21-22.
  29. ^ Adcock 1994: xxi-xxii; Dronke 2007: 137.
  30. ^ Adcock 1994: xxii, 129.
  31. ^ Dronke 1984: 249.
  32. ^ Waddell 2000: 167; Sidwell 2002: 347.
  33. ^ Adcock 1994: xiii-xv.
  34. ^ Dronke 1980: 22, 39-40; Adcock 1994: xiii, xv.
  35. ^ Adcock 1994: xiv; Jeep 2001: 21.
  36. ^ Scheid 1913: 29.
  37. ^ Harrington and Pucci 1997: 567; both Symonds and Whicher used this last title in their respective books.
  38. ^ Fuhrmann 2000: 155.
  39. ^ Harrington and Pucci 1997: 570.
  40. ^ "His 'confession', with its eloquent plea that the poet's inspiration is bound up with his freedom to live freely, to live dangerously, is perhaps the best-known poem in Medieval Latin." (Dronke 1968: 21) See also Morris 2004: 131.
  41. ^ Waddell 2000: 169.
  42. ^ Marcuse 2007: 75.
  43. ^ Artist page on MusicBrainz.org.

Bibliography

Primary sources

Secondary sources

External links

Middle Ages portal
Literature portal
Poetry portal
Early Middle Ages
High Middle Ages
Late Middle Ages
Culture
See also